JSP no reload

2002-04-24 Thread Samuel Gabriel
Hi All, Is there is a setting in Jasper to disable Tomcat from checking the timestamp on the page everytime there is a request? It seems important as the more include files are there in the JSP page the more checking that could happen, additionaly due to the nature of Java creating a File object a

RE: [JK2] Some questions

2002-04-24 Thread costinm
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > keep all logs, confs, files in the same place ). > > > > This can work for apache, win32 or *x but for IIS it's really hard, i > much prefer to keep all this things near tomcat, not near the System32 > directory :), anyway having a totally agnos

Re: Replacing WebappClassLoader

2002-04-24 Thread Daniel Rall
"hung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear Tomcat Dev, > Is there a website that have the instruction on how to connection Tomcat 4 > with Apache 2? Please help. Made me running tomcat as module of apache. This sort of question is most appropriate on the Tomcat User list. The documentation f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5903] - version attribute in

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Validator.java

2002-04-24 Thread kinman
kinman 02/04/24 17:36:46 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Validator.java Log: - Fixed 5903: version attribute in jsp:root is mandatory. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +12 -3 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Val

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

2002-04-24 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 07:41, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > [X] Yes > [ ] No > I actually like the Linux style, with odd minor numbers for unstable releases and even for stable ones, but this is not bad too. Bojan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands,

Re: Why is JDK needed to install Apache Tomcat 4.0 on WinNT?

2002-04-24 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 02:37, Duncan McLean wrote: > * Beginning October 17, 2001, it is permissable to redistribute * > * the "javac" compiler with the Java 2 Runtime Environment (JRE).* Which gives permission to JRE packagers like IBM to include javac in the JRE. Most JRE's still d

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 01:44, Remy Maucherat wrote: > I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan. > > The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is > accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1. > > > [ ] +1 I approve this

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5666] - Implicit object _value on jsp pages

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [JK2] Some questions

2002-04-24 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> First - Nacho, my next commit ( probably tommorow, after I check > everything ) will be large, please commit whatever you have changed > and I'll resolve the conflicts. Done, go ahead.. > Is it a NPE or a core dump ? I got it working with Apache + 3.3, 4.0, > 4.1 ( ajp13-socket, unix, jni ),

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5585] - Error page not displayed

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java

2002-04-24 Thread kinman
kinman 02/04/24 16:49:05 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java Log: - Fixed a typo that causes class not to be loaded after compiling the page. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/j

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java

2002-04-24 Thread costin
costin 02/04/24 16:20:38 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java Log: extra 't' Revision ChangesPath 1.16 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server/JkCoyoteHandler.java Index: JkCoyoteHandler.java =

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/include jk_service.h

2002-04-24 Thread nacho
nacho 02/04/24 16:12:50 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriMap.c jk_logger_file.c jk/native2/server/apache2 jk_service_apache2.c jk/native2/include jk_service.h Log: * Cosmetics * win32 tweaks to build Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +2 -2

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2 build.xml

2002-04-24 Thread nacho
nacho 02/04/24 16:11:11 Modified:jk/native2 build.xml Log: * Less libs needed to build mod_jk2 * Changed the name to isapi_redirector2 Revision ChangesPath 1.23 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/build.xml Index: build.xml ===

Re: [JK2] Some questions

2002-04-24 Thread costinm
First - Nacho, my next commit ( probably tommorow, after I check everything ) will be large, please commit whatever you have changed and I'll resolve the conflicts. The biggest change is using JK_OK / JK_ERR consistently for return types and using java style rc=function() if( rc != JK_OK ) ..

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c

2002-04-24 Thread nacho
nacho 02/04/24 16:06:07 Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c Log: Doh, Build then commit ;) Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +9 -9 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/jk_isapi_plugin.c Index: jk_isapi_plugin.c ===

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c jk_iis.h

2002-04-24 Thread nacho
nacho 02/04/24 16:00:14 Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c jk_iis.h Log: * Reading the config file * Removed some debug code * Load and does some logging :) XXX: trying ajp13 worker issues a NPE, needs absolute paths for be able to log. Revision Chan

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

2002-04-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:59:45 -0700 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme > > > Wh

[JK2] Some questions

2002-04-24 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
Hola, isapi_redirector2.dll has started to load and log this night :) and is giving me a beautiful NPE when trying the ajp13 connector from tc33, it's suppoused to work, ? i have some caveats about the way the default logger logs by default ;), the code is trying printf to stderr, what can i do

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

2002-04-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > > > De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41 > > > > Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers? > > Probably every time the release manager feels the code is stable and > bette

RE: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
+0 Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega > -Mensaje original- > De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 17:44 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1 > > > I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.

RE: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

2002-04-24 Thread costinm
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41 > > Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers? Probably every time the release manager feels the code is stable and better than the pr

Re: AJP connector silent when RealPlayer is client.

2002-04-24 Thread Scott G. Miller
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:20:47AM +0200, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >After investigation of virtually every other possibility, it seems that > >mod_jk (AJP 1.3) fails to respond to queries that originate from > >RealPlayer (v8 and RealOne on win32 tested). The platform is RedHat > >Linux, running Ap

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

2002-04-24 Thread Amy Roh
I like the idea. +1 for me. Amy Remy Maucherat wrote: > Costin has suggested to me in a private email that the Tomcat project could > adopt the Apache 2 numbering scheme (starting with Apache Tomcat 4.1). > I think this is a good idea. > > For the uninitiated, the numbering is: > major.minor.b

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

2002-04-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
> Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers? The method in httpd land seems to be once every 1-2 weeks, as long as there are significant changes. Sometimes, one major change (minor security fix or higher priority fix) is enough to cause a build number advance. Remy -- To unsubscribe

RE: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

2002-04-24 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41 Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers? Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

[PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

2002-04-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin has suggested to me in a private email that the Tomcat project could adopt the Apache 2 numbering scheme (starting with Apache Tomcat 4.1). I think this is a good idea. For the uninitiated, the numbering is: major.minor.build build_stability So for example, the first 4.1.x release would p

Tomcat4.0 crashes when servlet forwarding to itself

2002-04-24 Thread Roland
Hello, I just had a bug in one of my servlets. It was forwarding to itself. Not a big problem, but, it caused Tomcat to crash. This is the first time Tomcat crashed with me, so I'm really surprised. Code snippet: //adr is a String with the name of the servlet. RequestDispatcher dispatcher =

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Node.java PageDataImpl.java

2002-04-24 Thread kinman
kinman 02/04/24 14:12:53 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Node.java PageDataImpl.java Log: - Removed the static field in Node.java, because it is not thread safe. Instead rely on traversing the nodes to find the page root. Revis

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread costinm
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > There are a few additional items I would like to see added. > > 1. Port my recent mod_jk/apache1.3 new features to mod_jk/Apache2.0 > and to jk2 as costin requested. This makes those connectors for > use with Apache more consistent. mod_jk2

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java JkMain.java

2002-04-24 Thread costin
costin 02/04/24 12:45:09 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkCoyoteHandler.java JkMain.java Log: Potential fix for 8478. Check if the response has been already commited, and don't recommit. Display a small info notice - COMMIT action shouldn't

Re: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread Amy Roh
> This is not an exclusive decision - we do ship RPM, .zip, .tar.gz, > NullSoft installer. Apache ships MSI, InstallShield. > > If someone contributes the scripts to allow the use of an OSS installer > - we can add it to the list, and even make a note that we 'prefer' it. > > I would be happy to s

Problems with tomcat downloads for OS X (via Webmaster)

2002-04-24 Thread Paulo Gaspar
Via webmaster, please check the "Original Message" that follows. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -Original Message- > From: Gunnar Schomaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: starting problems with tomcat packages on os x >

PGP-keys issue on Tomcat 4.0.3 (via Webmaster)

2002-04-24 Thread Paulo Gaspar
Via webmaster, please check the "Original Message" that follows. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -Original Message- > From: Erik Agsjo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PGP-keys > > > Hi. > > > > I just downloaded the to

RE: Tomcat 4+Slide1.0.16+ISAPI Filter

2002-04-24 Thread Robert Priest
Here is an excerpt of an email I sent Ignacio detailing some of the issues I am finding: Basically, it seems as though the entire issue is centered around authentication through the ISAPI Filter. I am thinking that the filter is also having trouble with: Webfolders - because it first sends a PO

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Amy Roh
+1 Amy Remy Maucherat wrote: > I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan. > > The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is > accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1. > > > [ ] +1 I approve this plan, and will help >

Re: Replacing WebappClassLoader

2002-04-24 Thread Christopher K. St. John
"Christopher K. St. John" wrote: > > "Loader" specifies an org.apache.catalina.Loader object, not an > java.lang.ClassLoader. You'd need to do something like this: > Ack. You were talking about the "loaderClass" attribute, not the "className" attribute. I wasn't paying close enough attention,

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Manveen Kaur
- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:44 AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1 > I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan. > > The vote will run until 04/26, and

Re: Replacing WebappClassLoader

2002-04-24 Thread hung
Dear Tomcat Dev, Is there a website that have the instruction on how to connection Tomcat 4 with Apache 2? Please help. Made me running tomcat as module of apache. thanks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > I'd say I hope it won't be needed, as the HEAD branch has recieved all the > bugfixes the main branch had. From the get go, I'd say it should be > reasonably stable. So at least to see where we are in terms of stability, I > really want to cut a Be

Re: [PROPOSAL] jasper2 detection of compile time page include changes

2002-04-24 Thread Kin-Man Chung
+1 on the idea. With minor changes, we can also implement a compiler server that compiles out-of-date pages in the background thread. This would greatly improve the response time for accessing the pages, when recompilations are needed. > Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:52:51 -0500 > From: Glenn Niels

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
> There are a few additional items I would like to see added. > > 1. Port my recent mod_jk/apache1.3 new features to mod_jk/Apache2.0 > and to jk2 as costin requested. This makes those connectors for > use with Apache more consistent. Ok. > 2. Resolve a problem Craig mentioned with Co

Re: Replacing WebappClassLoader

2002-04-24 Thread Christopher K. St. John
Volker Leidl wrote: > > I tried to configure tomcat 4.0.2 to use my own class loader implementation > for web-app class loading. The documentation implies that this can be done > by secifying a "loaderClass" attribute in my Context/Loader element in > server.xml. > "Loader" specifies an org.apa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5735] - HTTP connector running out of processors under heavy load

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8478] New: - Debugging information in HTML output

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Larry Isaacs
[X] +1 I approve this plan, and will help [ ] +0 I approve this plan, but can't help [ ] -0 I am not in favor of this plan [ ] -1 I am against this plan, because: Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread costinm
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > flameproof suite and agree that I would prefer an OSS installer > if at all possible. Nobody disagree with that. This is not an exclusive decision - we do ship RPM, .zip, .tar.gz, NullSoft installer. Apache ships MSI, InstallShield. If s

Re: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread Christopher K. St. John
Kevin Grey wrote: > > So in essence it works on any platform that has a JVM. > Nah, it only works fully on "officially supported" platforms. Which makes sense, because the whole advantage of using a good installer is that it paves over the nasty platform-specific install issues. There's a lis

Re: Why is JDK needed to install Apache Tomcat 4.0 on WinNT?

2002-04-24 Thread Duncan McLean
Here is the text from the readme.txt in the jre directory of an sdk install for java 1.3.1_003: * * Notice of New Redistribution Options * *

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread costinm
+1 Costin On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan. > > The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is > accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1. > > > [ ] +1 I approve

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
> Remy Maucherat wrote: > > The goal of the Apache Tomcat 4.1 final release is to provide a stable > > container that supports 100% of the mandatory requirements of the Servlet > > 2.3 > > and JSP 1.2 specifications, as well as to improve and add many useful > > additional features on top of the

RE: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
> >[X] +1 I approve this plan, and will help Usual rpm packaging, connector stuff for Linux with/without eapi. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread jean-frederic clere
Remy Maucherat wrote: > I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan. > > The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is > accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1. > > > [ ] +1 I approve this plan, and will help > [ ] +0

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7686] - Issue with pathInfo in complex include() scenarios

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread Kevin Grey
InstallAnywhere has both binary and byte-code installers. In fact the binary installers is just a self-estracting executable with byte-code. So in essence it works on any platform that has a JVM. InstallAnywhere is stable, very easy to use both as an end-user and as a build manager. I'm not g

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan. > > The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is > accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1. > > > [X] +1 I approve this plan, a

Re: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread Christopher K. St. John
GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > I don't refuse anything, just expose that I'd rather like > an OSS Java installer. > I've recently been pointedly reminded that I'm "not even a committer", but as the project guidelines encourage developers to comment and cast a nonbinding vote, I'll put on my flameproof

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Mike Anderson
[X] +1 I approve this plan, and will help [ ] +0 I approve this plan, but can't help [ ] -0 I am not in favor of this plan [ ] -1 I am against this plan, because: I will try and get the NetWare plugins for the JK2 stuff built and posted. Mike Anderson -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[VOTE] Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.1

2002-04-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
I'd like to call for a vote on the Apache Tomcat 4.1 Release Plan. The vote will run until 04/26, and will be followed, if the Release Plan is accepted, by a vote for the release of Apache Tomcat 4.1 Beta 1. [ ] +1 I approve this plan, and will help [ ] +0 I approve this plan, but can't help [

More W32Klez.gen@mm Viruses: mnavarro@bdoc.com

2002-04-24 Thread Micael Padraig Og mac Grene
This will be my last post of these viruses, since they seem to be proliferating here. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Continue, select one of the above, and then

2002-04-24 Thread jean-frederic clere
That is probably a virus! issa wrote: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

VIRUS: sent by issa@infotel.opt.mr = W32Klez.gen@mm

2002-04-24 Thread Micael Padraig Og mac Grene
Heads up on this virus. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
> +1 from me. > > Having a cross-platform and consistent installer would be good for tomcat. > > My only concern - I hope the 'one licence' would cover all versions of > tomcat and more than one release manager ( and maybe it can be assigned to > Mr. Gump and automated ). That's brilliant. This w

RE: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread costinm
I believe Apache httpd server is using MSI and InstallShield - and this is neither cross-ASF nor free. I'm not sugesting an exclusive deal with InstallAnywhere - we can try one of the OSS installers in parallel ( if someone has the time to do so ) and if they provide the same features, we'll j

Re: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread costinm
+1 from me. Having a cross-platform and consistent installer would be good for tomcat. My only concern - I hope the 'one licence' would cover all versions of tomcat and more than one release manager ( and maybe it can be assigned to Mr. Gump and automated ). Costin On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Remy

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8470] New: - missing content-length from the header, Apache/Tomcat/AJP12 Connector spins out of control

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8468] - getPathInfo() grows with each self-invocation

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs resources.xml

2002-04-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Thanks Remy ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs resources.xml

2002-04-24 Thread remm
remm02/04/24 07:11:18 Modified:xdocsresources.xml Log: - Add clustering article by Filip Hanik and the Tomcat book project to the list. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +9 -2 jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs/resources.xml Index: resources.xml =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8468] - getPathInfo() grows with each self-invocation

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8468] New: - getPathInfo() grows with each self-invocation

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Possible bugs in jasper Parser/EventListener interaction

2002-04-24 Thread Mikael Andersson
Affected versions: Tomcat 4 version up to 4.0.3 Possible bugs: 1) handleComment is never called on the EventListener handleComment should be called as far as i understand because the parser can't really know if the code-gen backend uses the comments. diff for Parser.java @@ -440,7 +440,10 @@

RE: NoClassDefFoundError

2002-04-24 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> I've already > included the classes12.zip & classes111.zip file under the classpath > (jdk1.3.1). > Any suggestion? 2 suggestions: 1) Use tomcat-user for this kind of messages.. Thanks.. 2) None of Tomcat versions ( 3.x or 4.x ) reads zip files from the jar repositories ( web-inf/lib nor any

Tomcat 4.x cluster

2002-04-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
A must read from Filip ;) http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=Tomcat - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -- To

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8465] New: - classpath.sh overwrites existing java_opts settings

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat build.xml

2002-04-24 Thread keith
keith 02/04/24 05:26:23 Modified:.build.xml Log: Fix build with the http11 connector Revision ChangesPath 1.177 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file: /home

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8024] - Can't include entities in web.xml

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

NoClassDefFoundError

2002-04-24 Thread Paul, Samit (CORP, GEITC)
Hi, I'm using Apache Tomcat 4.0.3 (OS - Win2000). I've encountered the problem of - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/jdbc/driver/OracleDriver I can successfully compile the java file which is basically for DB utility and the way I'm loading the oracle driver is mentioned below - (Line no.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 RELEASE-PLAN-4.1.txt

2002-04-24 Thread remm
remm02/04/24 04:59:03 Modified:.RELEASE-PLAN-4.1.txt Log: - Update bug status. Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +1 -6 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-PLAN-4.1.txt Index: RELEASE-PLAN-4.1.txt ===

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7575] - Throwing UnavailableException in JSP's init disables JSP servlet

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java

2002-04-24 Thread remm
remm02/04/24 04:58:00 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources messages.properties jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java Log: - Fix bug 7575. - Jasper now keeps track of the availability status of each

Re: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
> I don't refuse anything, just expose that I'd rather like an OSS > Java installer. (The main advantage is that we wouldn't have to build the script, since they would be contributing one, but I'm repeating myself) > Yes you're right and I was thinking at them will clicking 'send button' > for m

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8459] - Tomcat Crash or stuck without DISPLAY

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8459] New: - Tomcat Crash or stuck without DISPLAY

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> NSIS is OSS so keep. > >Sure, no problem. > >The licensing terms seems ok to me, so I wanted to see if the >community was >ok about it (apparently not). > >So even if this installer is provided in addition to other OSS based >installers, it's not ok ? Since when is this project refusing >cont

Re: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
> Don't want to do the OSS passionaria but we should try > to use only OSS tools on Apache. > > NSIS is OSS so keep. Sure, no problem. The licensing terms seems ok to me, so I wanted to see if the community was ok about it (apparently not). So even if this installer is provided in addition to o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7575] - Throwing UnavailableException in JSP's init disables JSP servlet

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8263] - url-pattern easy to circumvent

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Continue, select one of the above, and then

2002-04-24 Thread Mark Gash
Care - The original text contains a virus Sender of the infected attachment: issa Subject of the message: Continue, select one of the above, and then One or more attachments were quarantined. Attachment Vvyc.exe was Quarantined for the following reasons: Virus W32.Klez.H@mm was found.

RE: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Don't want to do the OSS passionaria but we should try to use only OSS tools on Apache. NSIS is OSS so keep. For Free Java installer we have : IZPack : http://www.izforge.com/izpack/ VAInstall : http://vainstall.sourceforge.net/ FreeInstaller : http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/products

RE: AJP connector silent when RealPlayer is client.

2002-04-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>After investigation of virtually every other possibility, it seems that >mod_jk (AJP 1.3) fails to respond to queries that originate from >RealPlayer (v8 and RealOne on win32 tested). The platform is RedHat >Linux, running Apache 1.3 with mod_jk to Tomcat 4.0.1 (mod_jk from >4.0.3). Any othe

var retrieval from checkbox (with single name)

2002-04-24 Thread Paul Wallace
Hi, I wish to retrieve / store values of multiple checkboxes checked in the previous page. The problem here is I dont know how many boxes (a dynamic amount of them is output), and the checkboxes must have the same name. I wish to do something similar to Hotmail where I check an amount of check

RE: Jk2: scoreboard format and semantics.

2002-04-24 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> >To keep things simple and use existing code, I think we should use >> >the current marshalling/demarshalling code ( ajp13 ) to store/get >> >informations from each slot. >> >> Why not just use native read/write on int/strings ? > >If we treat shm as a byte[] and use java code to process it -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6662] - servlet context fails if webapp name smaller version of another webapp

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core ApplicationContext.java

2002-04-24 Thread remm
remm02/04/24 01:39:53 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core ApplicationContext.java Log: - Fixes bug 6662. - The problem was that, given two context "/foo" and "/foobar", doing ServletContext.getContext("/foobar") in context "/foo" wo

Re: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread Nick Betteridge
Good/free advertising for zerog if installanywhere is used! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5166] - CATALINA_BASE config issues for RUNNING.txt

2002-04-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 RUNNING.txt

2002-04-24 Thread remm
remm02/04/24 01:06:14 Modified:.RUNNING.txt Log: - Document that the configuration needs to be modified to be able to run the admin and manager webapp with CATALINA_BASE. - Fixes bug 5166. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +13 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RUN

Re: Using InstallAnywhere for Tomcat installer

2002-04-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
> on 4/23/02 2:33 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > To get around this, Zero G has > > offered to donate a license of InstallAnywhere to Tomcat, as well as > > installer code. > > I have a strong -1 on this unless the licese is granted to ALL Jakarta > projects. > > It isn't fa

  1   2   >