--- Ingrid Morterud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> You might be right in us not understanding the java
> heap. Still - then
> we are even more at a loss on how to fix the problem
> than if we really
> had understood how it works.
>
> We are running on a test
. :-)
Ingrid and Tommy
-Original Message-
From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12. september 2005 22:36
To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Memory leak in Tomcat
Hi,
Can you share how much memory do you have and how much used by tomcat
and what JAVA_OPTs do you have
rom my own experience.
>
> I saw unstable performance myself in a very similar deployment of
> Struts
> applications similar to yours. I too thought there was a memory
> leak and
> there may be, but I don't think it is in the applications
> themselves. The
> behavi
Ingrid,
I am not on the tomcat developer committer list so my reply is just an FYI
from my own experience.
I saw unstable performance myself in a very similar deployment of Struts
applications similar to yours. I too thought there was a memory leak and
there may be, but I don't think it
--- Ingrid Morterud Rosvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We are running an application on Tomcat 4.1.30, and
> java 1.4.2.
>
> Our application is using the struts framework with
> jsp's, and cocoon to
> render the xml's.
>
> There seem
Hello.
We are running an application on Tomcat 4.1.30, and java 1.4.2.
Our application is using the struts framework with jsp's, and cocoon to
render the xml's.
There seems to be a major memory leak at startup - the application seems
to constantly be using between 40 - 45 mb of the
There are some memory leaks in the AJP/1.3 Connector (e.g.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32141), but the CVS logs
say that these were introduced after 4.1.27.
"Jochen Wiedmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
we have an elder application runn
Hi,
we have an elder application running on Tomcat 4.1.27 with Java
1.4.2_08 on Sparc Solaris 8. Recently we moved the application to a
new machine running on Sparc Solaris 9. Since then we have a serious
memory problem and need to restart the same application twice a day.
One minor change: We are
I'm deploying and then undeploying a very simple spring-based test app
to my tomcat container. However, my WebappClassLoader never gets
garbage collected, because tomcat objects (loaded by the
StandardClassLoader) have hard references to the classes of my app.
I've figured out / fixed a couple of
Hello,
May be it's some kind of stupid question, but where in tomcat
environment may be memory leak?
I can imagine three subjects:
- objects stored in application scope
- objects stored in session scope
- objects handled by static properties
Is there any other place where objects c
a wrote:
I have experienced similar kind of memory leak, but that was while
reloading the context. There was a steady increase in the memory usage
after each autoReload of my struts 1.2.7-hibernate 2.1.8 powered
webApp in Tomcat 5.5.7/JDK 1.5/Fedora Core 2.
At the beginning: the process memory used by tomc
em. The GC collector doesn't seem to clear it automatically. If I use
the profiler's "run GC" the objects are released,
the heap is returned to full size, and then the objectes start piling up
again.
What you describe is not a memory leak, just normal operation of the
JVM. Tomcat
I have experienced similar kind of memory leak, but that was while
reloading the context. There was a steady increase in the memory usage
after each autoReload of my struts 1.2.7-hibernate 2.1.8 powered
webApp in Tomcat 5.5.7/JDK 1.5/Fedora Core 2.
At the beginning: the process memory used by
part...
I'm running Tomcat 5.5.9; isapi redirector 1.2.13; J2SE 1.5.0.03; JDBC
3.1.8a; to support 2 very low volume websites. I have some kind of memory
leak which triples tomcat's memory usage over about 4-5 days.
I downloaded and installed AppPerfect profiler, and it shows a ste
nd of memory
leak which triples tomcat's memory usage over about 4-5 days.
I downloaded and installed AppPerfect profiler, and it shows a steady,
consistent increase in objects and a corresponding decrease in the heap
size. Even with my webserver shutdown and no Tomcat usage, this leak is
persi
There still might be other references keeping the class alive (Like a logging
package)
Some have gone as far as calling Introspector.flushCaches()
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/beans/Introspector.html#flushCaches()
-Tim
Otgonbayar wrote:
I am using some static fields in my beans, b
I am using some static fields in my beans, but when I am reloading
application the blocks were referenced by static fields still stays in
memory. I detected these using a profiler tool. I wrote a context listener
to free these blocks on destroy. But it doesn't help?
So what can I do? Please help m
De: Trond G. Ziarkowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de abril de 2005 11:08
Para: Tomcat Users List
Assunto: Re: Memory Leak Solved
Hi,
don't know if you are using it, but there's also a known issue with
5.0.28 and 'swallowOutput' in the element. After I turne
-
De: Trond G. Ziarkowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de abril de 2005 11:08
Para: Tomcat Users List
Assunto: Re: Memory Leak Solved
Hi,
don't know if you are using it, but there's also a known issue with
5.0.28 and 'swallowOutput' in the ele
Hi,
don't know if you are using it, but there's also a known issue with
5.0.28 and 'swallowOutput' in the element. After I turned it
off, I haven't gotten any out of memory errors...
Trond
sysdba wrote:
We have struggled with a memory leak in 5.0.28/5.0.30 for mon
I'm sorry, ignorance here...
We've been using Tomcat 5.0.28 for more than a few months using
Jetspeed1.5. Our production server probably has gone down once every
week to 2 weeks, and we haven't experienced a memory leak. I thought
that was one of the fixes when using Java
We have struggled with a memory leak in 5.0.28/5.0.30 for months. There have
been many complaints about the necessity to restart Tomcat every couple days
due to Out of Memory errors, but no solutions that cured it. Well, the
suggestion to put the single line:
Introspector.flushCaches
Marx, Mitchell E (Mitch), ALABS wrote:
I see the bugzilla ID:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33368
Anyone know if this is present in Tomcat 4.1.30?
This is now fixed in CVS for TC4.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
Marx, Mitchell E (Mitch), ALABS wrote:
I see the bugzilla ID:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33368
Anyone know if this is present in Tomcat 4.1.30?
Yes.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20758 is also present
but is fixed in 4.1.31
Mark
--
Thank you Robert!!
Just wanna say thanks alot for sharing all your findings with the rest
of us. I start my tomcat 5.0.28 server with -ms252m -mx512m and it was
running for about 3-4 days before i got the OutOfMemoryError. Since i
removed the swallowOutput from my context, my server has'nt been
I see the bugzilla ID:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33368
Anyone know if this is present in Tomcat 4.1.30?
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Wille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: Memor
feel free to open a bug report, so that this issue can be tracked.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Wille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: Memory leak in tomcat 5.0.28
I've figured out my problem. I'm postin
ted (as well as the stack of CaptureLogs).
From: "Robert Wille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List"
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Memory leak in tomcat 5.0.28
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:16:49 -0700
I'm running tomcat 5.0.28 on Linux with
I'm running tomcat 5.0.28 on Linux with JRE 1.4.2_04 and I seem to have a
memory leak. I am not using Apache, but am using the Coyote connector. The
server has been running under heavy load, being accessed by about 150
computers running automated tests. I took heap snapshots about 8 a
Another (simpler) solution is to let someone else write that code. ;-)
I know there are times when you need JDBC directly, but tools like
iBATIS make it darn easy to handle the other 99% of the cases.
Here is a tutorial on using struts with iBATIS that could be helpful
if people are interested.
> Possibly. If you are using a connection pool and do not close the
> connection, it will not be released back to the pool, so subsequent
> calls to the pool will create new connections.
There's a simple procedure to help you avoid this problem, even when errors
occur during your JDBC calls, and
Possibly. If you are using a connection pool and do not close the
connection, it will not be released back to the pool, so subsequent
calls to the pool will create new connections.
In addition, as if that were not bad enough, any resources created
that are referenced by that connection (statements
> From: Rajaneesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Memory leak
>
>Taking the context of nullifying the object in Java, when we do not
> nullify the database connections, statements and result set, does these
> objects just fill the momory or even cause the d
R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:49 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Memory leak
> From: Rolf Zelder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Memory leak
>
> I don't want to believe that this little web app is leaking memory.
> Therefore I mus
> From: Rolf Zelder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Memory leak
>
> I don't want to believe that this little web app is leaking memory.
> Therefore I must do something wrong how I monitor the memory usage.
I suspect the real issue is understanding how the JVM
how are you monitoring tomcat?
peter
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:59:39 +1100, Rolf Zelder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have got a simple web application containing a html page with a link to a
> jsp page, which prints the memory status to the
> console(Runtime.getRuntime().totalMemory()) .
Hi
I have got a simple web application containing a html page with a link to a
jsp page, which prints the memory status to the
console(Runtime.getRuntime().totalMemory()) . Now I let about 50 concurrent
user browsing to those pages and I noticed that the memory usage is
constantly going up. The To
Thanks, all!
Jack
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows."
~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunk
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Memory Leak with Javac and Tomcat v. 4.0.28
>
> I was going to update my Tomcat from 4.0.19 because it says there is a
> javac leak in the RELEASE-NOTES. However, I noticed that 4.0.28 says
> the same thing. Is it fixed
Dakota Jack wrote:
I was going to update my Tomcat from 4.0.19 because it says there is a
javac leak in the RELEASE-NOTES. However, I noticed that 4.0.28 says
the same thing. Is it fixed/
Jack
AFAIK this is no Tomcat issue but a JDK/Javac issue which was fixed in
Sun JDK 1.4.
See:
http://www.ap
I was going to update my Tomcat from 4.0.19 because it says there is a
javac leak in the RELEASE-NOTES. However, I noticed that 4.0.28 says
the same thing. Is it fixed/
Jack
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person w
I think this is a jdk bug fixed in java 1.4
-Original Message-
From: T K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 November 2004 22:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: purported javac memory leak?
Hi all,
as most of you know the tomcat 4.1.x jasper HOW-TO
claims
there is a javac memory leak
Hi all,
as most of you know the tomcat 4.1.x jasper HOW-TO
claims
there is a javac memory leak; is there a SUN bug
report
I can look up? A small test case calling
com.sun.tools.Main.compile()
repeatedly does not exhibit the problem with JDK
1.4.2.
Tomcat 5.x uses the JDT Java compiler - what
was
H Solutions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Travis De
Silva'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 6:26 PM
Subject: AW: Windows 2003 Java VM memory leak due to C# garbage collection
alg
gt;; "'Travis De
Silva'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 6:26 PM
Subject: AW: Windows 2003 Java VM memory leak due to C# garbage collection
algorithm
> Hi
>
> > What I want to know is even if our program has a memory leak, it sh
Hi
> What I want to know is even if our program has a memory leak, it should
crash the JVM right?
No, your program (better your webapp) should get OutOfMemoryExceptions and
should continue running. Mostly, it will not do sensful things any more, but
it should NEVER crash the JVM.
> It
memory leak in our application, it
should grow within the java heap and eventually give an out of memory error and crash
the JVM. This is what I have known from the first day I got into Java and have always
thought this to be correct. (until now)
We are running a Tomcat/5.0.27, 3 node cluster (on
Hi,
>Is jmx the Jasper compiler?
>And, to turn it off, is to set false for reloading and development in
>conf/web.xml?
No to all, RTFM or STFA.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
that could be turned off in the connector configuration to
alleviate the memory leak, which is significant.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Sunitha Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 1:49 AM
>To: Tomca
yep, it was adding
request.registerRequests=false
to your CATALINA_HOME/conf/jk2.properties file
Allistair
> -Original Message-
> From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 August 2004 13:43
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: 5.0.19 Memory Leak?
>
could be turned off in the connector configuration to
alleviate the memory leak, which is significant.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Sunitha Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 1:49 AM
>To: Tomcat Users L
Hey folks:
There was a thread which mentioned that there have been memory leaks in
5.0.19. Is this a known issue? If so, is the recommendation to move to
5.0.25?
thanks,
-sunitha
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
ot;, "live" and "reloading" features), but I'm too
lazy to make sure.
Cheers,
Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Roberto Rios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 3:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: S
Everybody is right. The saw teeth is around 3mb. The heap is around 9mb. So
after the GC runs, the available heap falls to 6mb.
As Yoah said this isn't a memory leak, since all the objects that area
created are garbage collected. I called it as a memory leak because even
with nothing ru
To: Tomcat Users List
Cc:
Subject: Re: Strage Behaviour - Tomcat Memory Leak
I've used JProfiler in the past and I found it somewhat unreliable,
since it is pretty heavy weight. I should say it was based on a half
dozen tests usin
> From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Strage Behaviour - Tomcat Memory Leak
>
> I've use OptimizeIt in the past and tomcat without any
> requests shows flat memory usage. in other words constant.
Memory usage also depends on configuration options such a
if nothing is running under
> tomcat. Something like (the initial increase is due to tomcat startup) this:
>
> /--
> /
> /
>
> My conclusion, is that OR tomcat has a huge memory leak, OR JProfiler isn't
&g
y definition, since the
memory is reclaimed, i.e. nothing maintains references to it ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Roberto Rios [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 12:40 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:
ue to tomcat startup) this:
/--
/
/
My conclusion, is that OR tomcat has a huge memory leak, OR JProfiler isn't
reliable.
Does anyone has an explanation about this behaviour? Is it know? Maybe a
listener, logger, etc?
MatrixOne Tech Support eMail incident submission functionality requires specific
subject line. The following subject lines are recognized.
Request for CustomerLink Access
- This will submit a request for new CustomerLink account
Request for CustomerLink Password Reset
- This will subm
ou got and the number of max clients.
Hope this helps
Thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Carl Olivier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juni 2004 09:38
An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Betreff: mod_jk2 memory leak?
Greetings.
Ok, I posted yesterday about the fork att
Greetings.
Ok, I posted yesterday about the fork attribute - no response yet and stuff.
Now I indicated that the fork setting of true *seemed* to have solved many
of my problems RE the apparent memory leak on my server.
I am now revising that statement in that the server now stayed up for 25
Try this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=107976963131361&w=2
I wasn't able to get it to work myself, but maybe you can.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whatever works, right?
Does this only apply to tomcat 5 or is it applicable to tomcat 4 as well?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 11:00 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
On
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:48:02 -0400, Chad Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This sounds awfully similar to what we are experiencing, although I have
not determined that it is a jk2 related memory leak. Are you using some
sort of profiling tool to determine this? And exactly wha
Michiel Toneman wrote, On 6/2/2004 2:18 AM:
I can confirm that this works with mod_jk too.
I'm a little surprised that fixing this rather horrible memory leak
doesn't appear to be a high priority. We were almost at a point of
abandoning Tomcat altogether since we couldn'
This sounds awfully similar to what we are experiencing, although I have not
determined that it is a jk2 related memory leak. Are you using some sort of profiling
tool to determine this? And exactly what does request.registerRequests=false do?
-Original Message-
From: Michiel Toneman
Message -
From: "Kommuru, Bhaskar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 6:03 AM
Subject: RE: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
> I am just curious in this... Where did you set the
Adrian Barnett wrote:
Ran out of memory last night again
Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows or
something
Frustrating
James
I was having a memory leak using mod_jk2, and it was fixed by adding
request.registerRequests=false
to tomcat
I am just curious in this... Where did you set the 512m? Is your Tomcat's
JVM size?
>> Ran out of memory last night again
>>
>> Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
>> Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows or
>> something
>>
>>
Ran out of memory last night again
Set to 512m and ran out at 284m
Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows or
something
Frustrating
James
I was having a memory leak using mod_jk2, and it was fixed by adding
request.registerRequests=false
to tomcat/conf/jk2.properties.
I
nal Message-
From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I have this in our startup scripts
export CATALINA_OPTS="-Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128m -Xdebug"
Perhaps the debug
A_HOME%/jre/bin/server' to '%JAVA_HOME%/bin' directory
And
use this '-Xms256m -Xms512m'
Changa fer,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Le
01, 2004 4:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I have this in our startup scripts
export CATALINA_OPTS="-Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128m -Xdebug"
Perhaps the debug argument might reveal something. I cant be much help
on windows matters as I
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
300 mb sounds a lot, i've got a hibernate and struts flavored app
running with a 128 limit, and thats being generous.
I haven't measured anything but top looks happy, with 5.0.2
TECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
> 300 mb sounds a lot, i've got a hibernate and struts flavored app
> running with a 128 limit, and thats being generous.
>
> I haven't measured anything but top looks happy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I've just set 5.0.25 up and it will run with mod_jk/1.2.3-dev and
Apache/2.0.47 , I'll see if i get the same thing happening.
When i was having problems i was getting a decoding
doesnt accept -server.
Ill continue to monitor it with the mod_jk bypass in.
James
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory
>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk
May 31, 2004 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
> What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
>
>
>
>
> On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
>
> > As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat
> > 5
What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat
5.0.25
and Apache 2.049
I beleive it may be related to the mod_jk connector and since I am not
actually serving up anything
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat 5.0.25
and Apache 2.049
I beleive it may be related to the mod_jk connector and since I am not
actually serving up anything with apache yet I want to just bypass the
connector for 1 site and hit tomcat directly. I have to use
imilar message, I'll
try this too. But... where do I put this conf, as mod_jk does not have a
jk.properties file. could be it worker.properties? :)
thanks in advance
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
Robert Krüger wrote:
Hi,
we had the same problem (enormous memory leak which frequently made
our produc
Brian Beckham wrote:
Jeff,
Can you tell me more about your sitation? Did 5.0.24 help?
So far I haven't had any problems with 5.0.24, although I've only been
running it a couple of days. When I had the problem with 5.0.19, I
jumped back to 5.0.16 until a couple of days ago when I went up to 5.0
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:54 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19
Brian Beckham wrote:
> Sorry bout that...got a little flustered :)
I don't have any answers but I'd just like to chime in to say that I've
had nearly identical p
Brian Beckham wrote:
Sorry bout that...got a little flustered :)
I don't have any answers but I'd just like to chime in to say that I've
had nearly identical problems when I was using 5.0.19. I've moved on to
5.0.24 now, but I found some error logs in one of my backups so I'm
attaching them in
emy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:21 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19
Brian Beckham wrote:
Ok, after adding that setting in jk2.properties I have had 2 lockups of
tomcat on my production siteany help!!?!!?
"lockup
occurred.
Brian Beckham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: 770.924.6444 ext. 203
Mobile: 404.406.8355
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:21 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19
Brian Beckham wrote:
> Ok
Brian Beckham wrote:
Ok, after adding that setting in jk2.properties I have had 2 lockups of
tomcat on my production siteany help!!?!!?
"lockup" doesn't mean anything to me. Details please :)
Also, this property cannot possibly cause that (look in the code if in
doubt).
--
xxx
21, 2004 8:53 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19
I added the request.registerRequests=false to jk2.properties yesterday,
but I still do not have a definite confirmation on whether this problem
is fixed. The JVM did grow to over 600MB, which is more that my Tomcat
.924.6444 ext. 203
Mobile: 404.406.8355
-Original Message-
From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19
wsedio wrote:
> On 19-05-2004 23:15, Michiel Toneman wrote:
>
>> We were h
wsedio wrote:
On 20-05-2004 11:58, wsedio wrote:
On 19-05-2004 23:15, Michiel Toneman wrote:
We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19.
Does Tomcat 5.0.24 fix this problem?
I have no idea, haven't tried it out yet. No plans as yet to
test/roll-out 5.0.24, so it will be a while before
On 20-05-2004 11:58, wsedio wrote:
On 19-05-2004 23:15, Michiel Toneman wrote:
We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19.
Does Tomcat 5.0.24 fix this problem?
We added this to the jk2.properties:
request.registerRequests=false
and the memory usage was normal again. Somewhat non-obviou
our webapp actually requires more than 120MB of memory under
your load?
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19
wsedio wr
Hi,
What if your webapp actually requires more than 120MB of memory under
your load?
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:09 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject:
> Someone could answer this question, please? Becouse my available memory
> is going down from 120 to 50 and to 10 megabytes to fast. And I'm not
> finding any leak in my apps...
Sorry if I looked rude, didn't mean that :P
Maybe this leak is solved in tomcat 5.0.24??
Emerson Cargnin wrote:
wsedio
wsedio wrote:
On 19-05-2004 23:15, Michiel Toneman wrote:
We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19.
Does Tomcat 5.0.24 fix this problem?
We added this to the jk2.properties:
request.registerRequests=false
and the memory usage was normal again. Somewhat non-obvious, I agree.
It also
On 19-05-2004 23:15, Michiel Toneman wrote:
We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19.
Does Tomcat 5.0.24 fix this problem?
We added this to the jk2.properties:
request.registerRequests=false
and the memory usage was normal again. Somewhat non-obvious, I agree. It
also gets rid of "Er
We are runnning Tomcat 5.0.19 and experiencing the same
problems. This is what we defined for the memory. Our
tomcat is crawling at this point. We have to restart it
everyday.
CATALINA_OPTS="$CATALINA_OPTS -server -Xms1152M -Xmx1536M -
Xincgc"
Thanks, Tom
-
We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19.
We added this to the jk2.properties:
request.registerRequests=false
and the memory usage was normal again. Somewhat non-obvious, I agree. It
also gets rid of "Error registering request" messages in catalina.out.
We are using mod_jk (1.2) wit
1 - 100 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
