I've built it many times on 2.7 ;-). On 2.6, I've only ever built version
1.1 (the one that ships with TC 3.3). The PITA part of the process is to
install the GNU tools that it requires. This means 'libtool', 'autoconf',
'automake', and 'GNU make'. Also, at least while you are building, 'GNU
Step-by-step:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto
John
Ravi Pachipala wrote:
Has any one made the apache-tomcat communication work on Wilndows 2000
machines? I have read some HOWTOs and they mostly talk about doing it on
linux machines.
I am planning to use the Coyote connector. I was able to
-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk on windows
Step-by-step:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto
John
Ravi Pachipala wrote:
Has any one made the apache-tomcat communication work on Wilndows 2000
machines
url patterns to Tomcat. For example, if my url
has /ep/, I would like the request to go to Tomcat.
Thanks for your help
Ravi
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:48 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk on windows
Step
problem with ports? I configured tomcat to work in stand-alone
mode on port 7001.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Ravi
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk on windows
Thanks
-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk on windows
Thanks for the kind words.
Try:
JkMount /ep/* ajp13
or better yet:
JkMount /ep/*.jsp ajp13
JkMount /ep/servlet/* ajp13
John
Ravi Pachipala wrote:
Thanks
Where should JkMount be defined? Should it be in Tomcat's server.xml or
Apache's httpd.conf?
Thanks
Ravi
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 2:41 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk on windows
If its defined in Tomcat's
morning Simon.
Thanks for the research.
Norm
- Original Message -
From: Simon Pabst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:58 AM
Subject: Re: Re: mod_jk round robin problem stateless session beans
I did a short test with Apache 2 worker mpm
Thanks for you wisdom guys :-)
I'll try and test if Apache 2 with worker mpm works better,
although i still suspect the stateless session beans are part of the problem.
Since like i said with sticky_session off
or the SessionExample with sticky_session on
the round robin seems to works fine.
I did a short test with Apache 2 worker mpm today and now mod_jk2 seems to
distribute the sessions more evenly,
will post more results tomorrow.
So round robin code is broken with current mod_jk1/2 and prefork Apache
(1.3.27 and default Apache 2 configuration)
Unfortunately you can't use Apache
Good morning Simon.
Thanks for the research.
Norm
- Original Message -
From: Simon Pabst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:58 AM
Subject: Re: Re: mod_jk round robin problem stateless session beans
I did a short test
Good morning Simon.
'RoundRobin' is less likely the more Tomcat's you add I suspect. The
balanced worker program always searches for a new worker by starting
pointers from 1 rather than the last successful worker used, (AFAICT), and
if a worker is free for the task it makes for muddy water indeed
This is a pretty good description of what goes on, and it results in the
highly skewed distributions that you are seeing. I had thought that if you
are using Apache-2 with the 'worker' MPM, that you should get a better
distribution (but haven't tried it myself). With Apache-1.3.x or Apache-2
As far as Tomcat is concerned, 192.168.168.35 is a valid virtual host, so
unless you have a Host container in server.xml for it, or have an Alias
container for it to alias it to an already defined virtual host in
server.xml, Tomcat won't recognize it and will default to the defaultHost
Got it - I just changed ServerName and Host name= to 192.168.169.35 and it
works like a champ. Thanks for all of your help.
Ray Madigan
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk again
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk again
As far as Tomcat is concerned, 192.168.168.35 is a valid virtual host,
so
unless you have a Host container in server.xml for it, or have an Alias
container for it to alias it to an already
Install 2.0.46 from source... :)
-e
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Dumisani Nlebgwa wrote:
Hi guys,
I am using apache 2.0.40 that came with my redhat distribution and I am
trying to make my mod_jk from source. Apparently I have to do
'./configure --with-apxs=path_to_apxs'
However, my problem is that
You have it, its part of the Apache distribution. You just need to find it
and use the appropriate path. It might be an additional RPM, such as
httpd-devel or whatever, in addition to httpd.
John
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:34:20 -0400 (EDT), Dumisani Nlebgwa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I
Yes, CoyoteConnector fully supports JK. Its what I use in production. I
would avoid Ajp13Connector, unless you need it.
I would use the actual source for the connectors:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/
If you want ot post your JK problems to the list, we can help.
thanks!
Jamey
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:23 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk and Coyote connector
Yes, CoyoteConnector fully supports JK. Its what I use in production. I
would avoid Ajp13Connector
: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:23 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk and Coyote connector
Yes, CoyoteConnector fully supports JK. Its what I use in production. I
would avoid Ajp13Connector, unless you need it.
I would use the actual source for the connectors:
http://jakarta.apache.org
=lb:balanced
# Status URI mapping (should not be publicly accessible!!!)
[uri:/jkstatus]
group=status:status
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 9:31 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk and Coyote connector
Development
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June
20, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: SPAM: Re: mod_jk quirk?
[Message inserted by SAS Postmaster: ISD is evaluating gateway-level
spam defenses. This message was judged by one of the filters being
Thanks both of you! This answers my question. -Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk quirk?
Larry is correct. The worker is configurable. The Jk docs are a mess
Hi -
AFAIK, Tomcat never reads workers.properties, only mod_jk reads
workers.properties.
If you use the auto-generation, your worker will always be named ajp13. If
you need something else, you need to configure things manually. The
ApacheConfig classes are a convenience, not a requirement,
OK, I appreciate your response. -Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: SPAM: Re: mod_jk quirk?
[Message inserted by SAS Postmaster: ISD is evaluating gateway-level spam defenses
I had the same problem with load balancing using mod_jk2. I found that
changing the lb_factor made a difference. If I set the lb_factor in each of
my connector descriptors, all requests went to the last linux box that was
defined.
I have 3 instances to load balance, this is what I did for now:
AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: SPAM: Re: mod_jk quirk?
[Message inserted by SAS Postmaster: ISD is evaluating
gateway-level spam defenses. This message was judged by one
of the filters being evaluated to be spam. If this message is
in fact spam, ** there is no action you need to take
AFAIK, load balancing only works well with Apache-2 using the 'worker' MPM.
With the 'pre-fork' MPM (which includes Apache-1.3.x on *nix systems), each
child has it's own view of the current lb state, so they still tend to
bunch.
The 'pre-fork' problem probably won't be fixed in mod_jk.
List
Subject: SPAM: Re: mod_jk quirk?
[Message inserted by SAS Postmaster: ISD is evaluating
gateway-level spam defenses. This message was judged by one
of the filters being evaluated to be spam. If this message is
in fact spam, ** there is no action you need to take **.
Should our
Platform?
John
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:47:47 +0900, Wayne Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the mod_jk 1.2.4 was recently released. I was wondering
if
you had a binary of it available for Apache 1.3 and Tomcat 4.1. I would
like to upgrade my mod_jk. On a related note, I was
John,
The platform is Red Hat 9.
Best regards,
Wayne Chang
Pacific Northwest Software
Mobile: (978) 869-3446
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 12:01 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re
Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 12:01 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk questions
Platform?
John
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:47:47 +0900, Wayne Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the mod_jk 1.2.4 was recently released. I was wondering
if
you had
Pacific Northwest Software
Mobile: (978) 869-3446
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 2:08 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk questions
Well, building it is pretty easy, all things
Owens
- Original Message -
From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: Mod_jk, ssl, java, and certificates question
The client only needs to deal with Apache-ssl. Apache with mod_jk
(configured correctly, e.g. the default
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] turner.com cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
06/04/2003 04:57
] turner.com cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
06/04/2003 04:57
PM
Please respond
]
turner.com cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
06/05/2003 09:31
The client only needs to deal with Apache-ssl. Apache with mod_jk
(configured correctly, e.g. the default config) will pass the SSL variables
to Tomcat, but all of the SSL handling (including server-cert) will be done
by Apache.
Jeff Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
Any special reason you didn't use Apache 2.0.45?
John
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:53:44 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I am new to using apache and tomcat. I have installed both on a
Windows 2000 pro PC. I installed apache v2.0.42 and tomcat v4.1.18.
I followed John Turners instructions
]To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
turner.com cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
Users List tomcat-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] turner.com cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
06/04/2003 11:47
AM
]
turner.com cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
06/04/2003 12:03
]To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] turner.com cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
06/04/2003 12:03
PM
:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
06/04/2003 12:36
PM
John Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] turner.com cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
06/04/2003 12:36
]To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] turner.com cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
06/04/2003 12:36
PM
Please respond to
Tomcat Users
List
I didn't see the attachments come through on the list.
There's probably an easy answer.
The first things
Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] turner.com cc:
Subject: Re: mod_jk windows 2000 pro
06/04/2003 12:53
Hi John, I have the server name set as ServerName
BostonDev.ad.dstsystems.com:80. As far as I can tell I have no virtual
hosts defined in httpd.conf.
jim
=== begin httpd.conf
#
# Based upon the NCSA server configuration files originally by Rob McCool.
#
# This is the main Apache server
OK, what URL are you trying to access? http://localhost/examples, or
http://BostonDev.ad.dstsystems.com/examples?
John
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 16:26:26 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John, I have the server name set as ServerName
BostonDev.ad.dstsystems.com:80. As far as I can tell I have
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
turner.com cc:
Subject: Re
Graham Smith schrieb:
Context path= docBase=xfly ...
and I have done, but that doesn't really solve the multiple webapps in
one container problem.
As far as I know you should use ROOT and not xfly for the directory name
where your webapp is.
Then use this:
JkMount / worker1
JkMount /*
It looks like you are seeing the same problem as some of the rest of us. It
seems apache, tomcat or mod_jk does not close the connection after serving a
request and the number of threads just keep building up. It seems to be a
problem mainly on Redhat 8.
Have a look at the 'Problems with
Where did you get your mod_jk ?
According to what you say, you should download the following version :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.1/bin/linux/i386/mod_jk-1.3-eapi.so
Also note that you should have mod_so compiled into apache in order to
-
From: Vincent Panel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:54 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk installation
Where did you get your mod_jk ?
According to what you say, you should download the following version :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat
I am trying to configure mod_jk 1.3 to work between Apache 1.3.27 with
mod_ssl and Tomcat 4.1.18 on Linux Version 7.1.
After installing Apache 1.3.27 and Tomcat 4.1.18 when I update
httpsd.conf with following two lines LoadModule jk_module
/libexec/mod_jk.so AddModule mod_jk.c
And then when I
I'm sorry, let me clarify. I'm trying to find the latest mod_jk for
Apache 1.3.27 and Tomcat 3.2.4 for Tru64 Unix 5.1. Can anyone help?
Sincerely,
David Vann
Martha Jefferson Hospital
459 Locust Avenue
Charlottesville, VA 22902
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone (434) 244-5911
Fax (434) 982-7351
You can get Tomcat 3.2.4 from
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.4/bin/.
I, personally, haven't seen a post of somebody that has made the binaries
available for Tru64 Unix. As a result, the best pointer I can give you is
to download the source from
I think you are looking in the wrong area. If mod_jk is working on the intranet it
should work from outside.
Does a page served just by apache work through the internet (not using mod_jk)?
Can you connect directly through to the tomcat service (not using mod_jk and apache,
opening port
tomcat directly, and it worked! I know it's strange,
separetly, both of them work well. But, they don't work together??
-Mensaje original-
De: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Jueves, 13 de Marzo de 2003 05:10 p.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: mod_jk problem
I think you
I think the problem may have something to do with the IP address
specified inside your VirtualHost. That's a non-routable IP, and even
though you may have done a mapping on your router/firewall/gateway, the
IP address returned to your client will be 192.168.1.28, which I assume
will be blocked
Hi again :) I'm sorry to bother everyone with this - I'm sure its been
covered before but I could not find anything in the archives... And I would
really like to get this resolved.
I'm setting up mod_jk on Apache 1.3.27/Tomcat 4.1.18/WinXP install. I am
following John Turner's HOW-TO - its for
, 2003 10:26 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_jk on WinXP (revisited)
Hi again :) I'm sorry to bother everyone with this - I'm sure its been
covered before but I could not find anything in the archives... And I would
really like to get this resolved.
I'm setting up mod_jk on Apache
All i know is that you don't need to do that for apache 2.0
- Original Message -
From: Denise Mangano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:52 AM
Subject: RE: Mod_jk on WinXP (revisited)
OK... I tried AddModule mod_jk.c
, 2003 10:26 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_jk on WinXP (revisited)
Hi again :) I'm sorry to bother everyone with this - I'm sure its been
covered before but I could not find anything in the archives... And I
would
really like to get this resolved.
I'm setting up mod_jk on Apache
Try deleting the lbfactor line from your workers.properties file. It's
not necessary when you only have one worker defined, and it may be causing
confusion to mod_jk.so.
John
-Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:36 PM
Hmm, tried that but still no luck.
I still get the following
[Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]: Attempting to map
URI '/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp'
[Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (558)]:
jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a suffix match
out correctly in all the places where it needs to be.
John
-Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:24 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk error
Hmm, tried that but still no luck.
I still get the following
, 2003 8:24 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk error
Hmm, tried that but still no luck.
I still get the following
[Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]:
Attempting to map
URI '/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp'
[Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 8:24 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk error
Hmm, tried that but still no luck.
I still get the following
[Mon Mar 03 08:16:00 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]:
Attempting to map
URI '/examples/jsp/dates/date.jsp'
[Mon
, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:25 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk
Yes, .44 is module compatible with .43. For more info, check out my RH
HOWTO for Apache + JK + Tomcat:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto
John
-Original Message-
From
how about a RTFM on this one! :)
http://www.johnturner.com/howto/rh72-howto.html
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Whitlock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 12:14 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk
John,
I went to your page and it's for a Windows
Filip,
You are correct and my impatience has gotten me. Sorry for the
inconvenience, Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:18 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk
how about a RTFM on this one! :)
http
No, there are HOWTOs there for Win2K/XP, Solaris 8, and RH 7.2/7.3. Three
total.
John
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Whitlock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:14 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk
John,
I went to your page and it's
John,
Didn't see the Red Hat ones. I found and they worked. Thanks,
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:27 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk
No, there are HOWTOs there for Win2K/XP, Solaris 8
Yes, .44 is module compatible with .43. For more info, check out my RH
HOWTO for Apache + JK + Tomcat:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto
John
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Whitlock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:11 AM
To: Tomcat
Subject: mod_jk
28, 2003 9:25 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk
Yes, .44 is module compatible with .43. For more info, check out my RH
HOWTO for Apache + JK + Tomcat:
http://www.johnturner.com/howto
John
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Whitlock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
Whitlock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 28, 2003 11:28 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk
John,
Thanks for your help. Do you think that since I didn't install
apache via Red Hat installer that the document might not work for me?
They use an older version of Apache
Phillip,
Just the answer I was looking for. Thanks a lot, Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Phillip Qin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:34 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk
I see many problems when you include apache in your Red hat
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Whitlock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:28 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk
John,
Thanks for your help. Do you think that since I didn't install
apache via Red Hat installer that the document might
RH 8 ships with Apache 2.0.40, and if you've applied RPM updates to your RH
installation, the 2.0.40 is further munged from a standard 2.0.40, as RH
has gone and backported all of the security and other fixes between .40 and
.44 to their .40 instead of just distributing .44.
Depending on where
There's a setting... I think it's in workers.properties, called lbfactor,
which allows you to control the balancing factors.
-Jake
Mike Bradford wrote:
Has anyone else had experience with mod_jk (and mod_jk2) not evenly
distributing requests across systems? It seems that the first system
what is it that you are looking for, or what it is that is wrong with 2.0.2.
John
-Original Message-
From: Charles A Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk-2.0.43.so
If this is jakarta-tomcat
that
there will be some loose ends for awhile.
John
-Original Message-
From: Charles A Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk-2.0.43.so
I am seeing the following in the apache2 error_log file:
[Wed Feb
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/
John
-Original Message-
From: Charles A Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk-2.0.43.so
Exactly where do I get the mod_jk-2.0.43.so source?
If this is jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src.tar.gz then I have
already compiled and using this one.
Am I looking at the wrong source?
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/
John
-Original Message-
From: Charles A Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk-2.0.43.so
If this is jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src.tar.gz then I have
already compiled and using this one.
Am I looking at the wrong source?
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/
John
-Original Message
Nope. The communications between Tomcat and Apache, via mod_jk, will be in
the clear (non-SSL). Assuming you can configure your Apache for SSL
correctly, and can configure the JK connection correctly, there's nothing
else you have to do to Tomcat.
John
-Original Message-
From: Adam
For Apache 1.3.x, you need to move 'mod_rewrite' below 'mod_jk' in the
AddModule list. Alternatively, the [PT] option may work (but I haven't
tried it).
Alexander Czernay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi Lajos,
thanks for your help. I read
Solved it myself :-)
I added the JkMount to the VirtualHost directives and now everything
appears to work perfectly.
VirtualHost aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd
ServerName www.domain1.com
ErrorLog logs/error_log
TransferLog logs/access_log
JkMount /* worker1
/VirtualHost
VirtualHost
hi,
* Soefara Redzuan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Wow, this mod_jk2 really is much easier to configure than mod_jk was, though
the advanced configuration looks quite daunting. For simple virtual hosting
of a servlet/JSP site, I shouldn't need more than one worker, should I?
Correct me if am
Hi RK,
I thought my workers.properties file looked very different
from everybody else's using mod_jk2 !
I just checked again and realize I misread the page
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/confighowto.html
I actually put the following in jk2.properties instead of in
-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:18:51 +0800
Hi RK,
I thought my workers.properties file looked very different
from everybody else's using mod_jk2 !
I just checked again
JK has way more documentation and support than JK2.
You're missing a JkMount line.
VirtualHost aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd
ServerName www.domain1.com
DocumentRoot /usr/local/etc/httpd/site1
ErrorLog logs/error_log
TransferLog logs/access_log
JkMount /*.jsp ajp13
JkMount /servlets/* ajp13
/VirtualHost
FYI...you aren't using JK2 at all. You are using JK.
John
-Original Message-
From: Soefara Redzuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.
Solved it myself :-)
I
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.
Hi RK,
I thought my workers.properties file looked very different
from everybody else's using mod_jk2 !
I just checked again and realize I misread
needs configuring (with mod_jk) since it is the
one making the connections?
Thank you and sorry for all the confusion earlier.
Soefara.
From: Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk
-Original Message-
From: Soefara Redzuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.
Thank you John,
You're right on all three counts
(a) I forgot a JkMount line and now it works fine
(b
Hi Alexander -
There are several ways you can do this - see my Cocoon notes at
http://www.galatea.com/flashguides/cocoon-tips-2.xml (or my book ;) ).
Probably the best is simply to make the cocoon webapp your default
context in server.xml:
Context path= docBase=cocoon debug=0/
Regards,
Could you please tell me which linux you use and what version?
I tried to do the same on my redhat 8.0. So it is apache2 and tomecat
4.1. I even cannot compile the native(ant native).
Any suggestion?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Mod_jk2 is much easier to install and configure than
301 - 400 of 1079 matches
Mail list logo
