I have the same problem with mod_webapp!
I have Apache 1.3.22 on Win2k and I do not manage to compile with the -DEAPI
option...
Diego
-Message d'origine-
De : Lauer, Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 décembre 2001 13:36
À : Tomcat Users List (E-Mail)
Objet : mod_jk f
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 11:39 PM
> Subject: Re: mod_jk solaris
>
> > Hi,
> > First off I am no tomcat expert, but I recognise the dynamic link error.
> > If you use the n
m/SUNW,Ultra-5_10/lib/libc_psr.so.1
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Hitchman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk solaris
> Hi,
> First off I am no tomcat expert
Hi,
First off I am no tomcat expert, but I recognise the dynamic link error.
If you use the nm uitlity to dump the contents of the mod_jk.so, you will
see that ap_table_get is an
undefined reference, this means that it has to exist in another library,
either linked in statically or
as in this case
eve input
chunking allows input data to be recieved in multiple
pieces instead of in one piece.
Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Héritier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:59 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: m
De: Larry Isaacs [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Date: mardi 27 novembre 2001 14:34
> À:'Tomcat Users List'
> Objet:RE: mod_jk and Apache
>
> FYI: The v3.2.x and v3.3 mod_jk are not the same.
> The v3.3 mod_jk supports input chunking and should work
> wit
-
> From: Arnaud Héritier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:40 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: mod_jk and Apache
>
>
> You can download the mod_jk module (mod_jk.dll) for Apache on
> WinNT from :
>
> http://jakar
Thanks. I got the files and it is running very well. Fullt integrated with
win2k IIS.
I will have some questions when I go to deploy a jsp page with some
database code soon.
Thanks all for the help.
At 10:40 AM 11/27/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>You can download the mod_jk module (mod_jk.dll) for A
You can download the mod_jk module (mod_jk.dll) for Apache on WinNT from :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/bin/win32/i386/
or
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.4/bin/win32/i386/
If I don't make a mistake you can use either of them with
When source gets branched or moved around (i.e. checked in
at a new location) version numbers can disconnect. I'm not
aware of anything "missing" from Tomcat 3.3 that is present
in Tomcat 3.2.x.
Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: David Morsberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thurs
use mod_webapps
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Sales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 01:45
Subject: mod_jk & Tomcat 4.0.1
> Hello,
> I'm trying to integrate mod_jk with Tomcat 4.0.1/Apache1.3.22/RH7.2.
> I've poured ove
>Which connector is the preferred or suggested connector for tomcat 4?
>I've seen some people saying they switched back to mod_jk. Is
>mod_jk more
>desireable until mod_webapp is more advanced?
As a mod_jk developper, I will say use mod_jk with TC 4.0.1
since it support more WebServer and is s
on NT plateform for the
moment.
thanks for help
arno
> -Message d'origine-
> De: Larry Isaacs [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Date: jeudi 15 novembre 2001 19:04
> À:'Tomcat Users List'
> Objet:RE: mod_jk
>
> A bug in mod_jk for Tomcat 3.2.x ca
David,
We are using Tomcat 3.2.3 with mod_jk but it should be similar in 4.0. We
set it up like this to utilize multiple processors and machines efficiently
for better scalability. Here's what we did:
We setup Apache to start 4 Ajp13 workers all communicating on a different
port number.
Then w
(terse response)
for each tomcat create a different worker (listening on different ports or
from different servers). Map the urls to workers as appropriate.
remember to modify server.xml to listen on the correct ports.
HTH
> -Original Message-
> From: David Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
A bug in mod_jk for Tomcat 3.2.x causes this to always print,
error or not. Since you are not like to be getting errors,
it may be ignored. This is fixed in Tomcat 3.3's version of
mod_jk. I believe you can use Tomcat 3.3's mod_jk with
Tomcat 3.2.x, though I haven't tried it. Note that the
rev
>We are currently experiencing heavy load using ajpv13.
Good a system which could reproduce the problem.
>We had set those parameters as Henri specified as 100, 50 and
>20 and still
>she died.
Try to replace it with -1, which will make you have unlimited
number of threads :
>We went back t
We are currently experiencing heavy load using ajpv13.
We had set those parameters as Henri specified as 100, 50 and 20 and still
she died.
We went back to 12 and experienced same problems.
My questions are:
1) Like apache has the built-in monitor (server-status) where you can
watch the state
> -Original Message-
> From: Schulz, Sebastian, fiscus GmbH, Bonn
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:19 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: AW: mod_jk / Ajp13 config fix on heavily loaded system
>
>
> what's about loadbalancing?
>
> say, we have de
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Arnaud_H=E9ritier?=
> Subject: RE: mod_jk & Tomcat 4.0
> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 13:50:56 +0200
>
> I done it as you and it works.
> What's happen ???
It was my fault, I misspelled one of the jars
in worker.inprocess.class_path in workers
There still is no Win32 version of mod_webapp at this site. How much longer
do we have to wait?
-Original Message-
From: menonv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk & Tomcat 4.0
Got it ...
They mod_webapps
I done it as you and it works.
What's happen ???
> -Message d'origine-
> De: Ulrich Knecht [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Date: vendredi 5 octobre 2001 13:42
> À:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet:Re: mod_jk & Tomcat 4.0
>
> Hello,
>
>
Hello,
I'm also trying to put ajp13 to work with tomcat 4.0 and apache 1.3.20
I tried to follow the hints at:
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/
to install an ajp13 connector with tomcat, but it looks like I can't
use my "old" (tomcat 3.2.3) mod_jk.so with it. I seem to need
> That begs the question - is that going to use the mod_webapp stuff as
well?
No.
> Can one use the mod_webapp without the ajp13 connector.
Yes.
Remy
tober 05, 2001 12:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mod_jk & Tomcat 4.0
>
> > Vinay,
> >
> > Sorry to follow this from one list to another, but I found the
> > tomcat4-mod_jk link:
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/
>
> Vinay,
>
> Sorry to follow this from one list to another, but I found the
> tomcat4-mod_jk link:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/
The AJP 1.3 JAR will be distributed with Tomcat 4.0.1. It won't be enabled
by default (since it lacks some real world testing), but there will be a
c
Vinay,
Sorry to follow this from one list to another, but I found the
tomcat4-mod_jk link:
http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/ajp13-tc4.0/
However, you're right - mod_webapp (warp connections) is the preferred
interface to use with catalina, not mod_jk (ajp12/13 connections).
And, hopefully no
veloper List
> Subject: RE: mod_jk & Tomcat 4.0
>
> Hello Again,
> After some digging around the server.xml file I realise that Tomcat
> 4.0 * does * have Apache intergation via the mod_webapp. Surprisingly when
> I
> downloaded and installed the Windows ver
Tony Vinayak wrote:
> Since your browser URI is "/thh/feersum/healthbar/bloomsbury/home.html", you
> don't have a corresponding JkMount in your httpd.conf file. None of your
> current defs:
>
> > JkMount /thh/servlet/* ajp13
> > JkMount /thh/*.jsp ajp13
>
> will cause the browser URI to be redi
Tomcat.
Try with the following:
JkMount /thh/* ajp13
- Tony
-Original Message-
From: minfrin [mailto:minfrin]On Behalf Of Graham Leggett
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 9:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk / tomcat webserver 404 weirdness
Tony Vinayak wrote:
> Doesn'
Tony Vinayak wrote:
> Doesn't look like the request made it to Tomcat at all.
>
> - What does Apache's error/access log indicate regarding the request?
The access log indicates error 404. The error log indicates:
[Fri Sep 14 05:52:44 2001] [error] [client 213.122.48.138] File does not
exist: /
Graham,
Doesn't look like the request made it to Tomcat at all.
- What does Apache's error/access log indicate regarding the request?
- What's the browser URL that you are using to access your servlet?
- What does the web.xml look like?
cheers,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: minfrin [
Hi Paul,
I assume you are using a version of Tomcat 3.2.x.
If you are willing to give Tomcat 3.3 a try, Tomcat 3.3b2
has support for virtual host aliases. The syntax is:
You do not need to put this in your server.xml. Put it in a
file wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Some of you might have seens mail from me before... I'm still trying to get apache
>and tomcat to work together. Requests are handled by apache, but never reach tomcat,
>the JSP source code is shown instead.
And when you connect to TC directly?
>
> Durin
inger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk Virtual Host Problems
I may be mistaken, but this is an Apache problem, isn't it?
To do name based virtual hosts in Apache, you have to
have a NamedVirtualHost (not sure if that'
I may be mistaken, but this is an Apache problem, isn't it?
To do name based virtual hosts in Apache, you have to
have a NamedVirtualHost (not sure if that's exactly the right
directive) entry that gives the IP where you'll put the hosts.
Then, the VirtualHost entries have to use that same IP
Thanks, folks. My problem was pretty simple. I put mod_jk.dll into
Apache instead of /modules. I read the instructions, but didn't execute
them well.
Nagesh Deshpande wrote:
>
> hi , "One of the library files needed to run this application cannot
be
found" error is due to missing ApacheCo
Try http://www.ccl.net/cca/software/UNIX/apache/index.shtml
You may need to put the same stuff you have under default port 80
inside the block for virtual host 443 in httpd.conf
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Amthauer, Heiner wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I want to use tomcat togehter with apache+mod_ssl. How
>In any documentation about using SSL with
>apache/tomcat I
>allways find configuration examples for mod_jk, but none for mod_jserv
>(which I use). Is mod_jk a must when using apache/tomcat/SSL?
>If not, how
>can it be done with mod_jserv?
Yes, mod_jk will forward to your servlet/JSP
the SSL i
>Hi there!
>
>I want to use tomcat togehter with apache+mod_ssl. However,
>accessing my
>servlets via SSL doesn't work at all, whereas using normal
>http requests it
>all works fine. In any documentation about using SSL with
>apache/tomcat I
>allways find configuration examples for mod_jk, but
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Huang Hai - ES/BJ wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> I got the same problem. Anyone can help?
>
> Apache 1.3.20
> Java 1.2.2
> Tomcat 3.2.3 src
> gcc
>
> Thanks & Best Regards
>
> Huang Hai - Enterprise Services
> Sun Microsystems China Limited
> Tel: +8610-68035588 Ext 28782
> Fax:
I've seen this problem in 3.3.m4...
I just upgraded to 3.3b1 on one box and haven't seen it yet, but haven't tested it as
thoroughly.
I'm really interested in a work around?
In addition to this problem I occasionally get a jsp page that isn't processed
returned.
I've seen this on two seper
I've seen this exact problem in 3.3m3, but I don't have any
recommendations on working through it right now. ajp12
has been better in this respect than ajp13, but the problem
isn't gone. I'm planning to spend some time in August or
September working through the mod_jk code to check on a
num
John Bazeley wrote:
> As a matter of interest, why no -G?
>
> > my $CFG_LD_SHLIB = q(ld);
> > my $CFG_LDFLAGS_SHLIB = q(); # I don't use -G
> > my $CFG_LIBS_SHLIB= q();
Because with -G ld ignores undefined symbols and when I start
Apache, it complains about that same exact symbol, ie :
As a matter of interest, why no -G?
> my $CFG_LD_SHLIB = q(ld);
> my $CFG_LDFLAGS_SHLIB = q(); # I don't use -G
> my $CFG_LIBS_SHLIB= q();
>It appears we are fighting the same battle at the same time.
>I have ripped
>through this for an entire night. Not only isn't there a
>build script for
>solaris in the default tar, the apxs compile directions are wrong!
The build script is obsolete and you should use instead
Makefile.linux
bject: Re: mod_jk for solaris
Hi,
If u2 get this sorted can u send me the mod_jk.so file, build script and
details of environment (tomcat/OS/apache versions)
I'm making a repository at http://users.aber.ac.uk/aff9
Thanks,
Adam.
On Thursday 12 July 2001 15:51, you wrote:
> Yep! and if I
to you. I am recompileng Apache
> woth the mod_so configured in so I hope the apxs stuff will work.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 11:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mod_jk for sol
gt; doesn't like the httpd.conf file.
>
>
> Paul
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nance, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 11:26 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: mod_jk for solaris
>
>
>
> AB,
Hi,
I have a random solaris mod_jk.so at http://users.aber.ac.uk/tomcat/
you can try that.
If u get one built (build instructions also above...somewhere!) then gimme an
e-mail with mod_jk.so and platform details (ie tomcat/apache/solaris ver and
processor)
Thanks,
Adam.
On Thursday 12 July
/include -I/usr/java/include/solaris -lposix4 -c *.c ../jk/*.c
---end script---
-James
-Original Message-
From: Paul Lombardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk for solaris
Yep! and if I find it I'll send it to yo
Well NOW I've done it. I recompiled Apache and now it won't start. It
doesn't like the httpd.conf file.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Nance, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 11:26 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: mod_j
Yep! and if I find it I'll send it to you. I am recompileng Apache
woth the mod_so configured in so I hope the apxs stuff will work.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: m
AB,
I am also in the group...let me know if you find it
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk for solaris
Hi Paul,
It appears we are fighting the same battle at the same
Hi Paul,
It appears we are fighting the same battle at the same time. I have ripped
through this for an entire night. Not only isn't there a build script for
solaris in the default tar, the apxs compile directions are wrong!
I have simply asked some one for a recompiled version. It is easier
is path, file permissions correct ? is it finding the files ?
-Original Message-
From: Anagha Mudigonda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk
hi,
while compiling the source for mod_jk i find a lot of .h files cant be
open
Anagha,
where do u need to compile source for mod_jk?
whats the application of jk_global.h etc .h files?
Rams
+91-040-3000401 x 2162 (O)
+91-040-6313447 (R)
-Original Message-
From: Anagha Mudigonda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
I am using Tomcat 3.2
I'll give 3.3 a try.
Thanks
>-Original Message-
>From: Jason Koeninger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:54 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_jk load-balancing and errors
>
>
>What version are you usin
DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>From: Jason Koeninger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:54 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_jk load-balancing and errors
>
>
>What version are you using? The mod_jk I'm using that
What version are you using? The mod_jk I'm using that was
compiled from the 3.3m3 distribution seems to be handling
dropped connections better, but my system isn't load balanced.
As far as option (a) below, I think ajp12 does that (makes a
new connection each time) which is what makes it sl
mod_jk present in jakarta-tomcat-connectors allow such build
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>
nks,
> * * * John
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 4:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mod_jk and mod_perl
>
>
> I've run both mod_jk and mod_perl as dynamically linked modu
.
>
> If you, or anyone else, has any advice, I'd be stoked.
>
> Thanks,
> * * * John
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 4:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mod_jk and mod_per
ill handle perl requests.
If you, or anyone else, has any advice, I'd be stoked.
Thanks,
* * * John
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kilbride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk and mod_perl
I've run both mod_jk an
I've run both mod_jk and mod_perl as dynamically linked modules in the past,
but not statically. The dynamic modules were very easy to get running.
Any reason it has to be statically compiled?
Thanks,
--jeff
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tu
Change :
JkLogLevel warn
by
JkLogLevel error
Will help reduce log activity
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
MOD_JK present on jakarta.apache.org in RPM
are BUILT AGAINST MOD_SSL (EAPI)
Could you check the mailing list archive before
asking this since it has been allready explained
http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg09075.html
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL
ECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk is garbled? Garbled? I got the binary...
Hi Scott,
I still have problems with my installation but it seems
that you've succeded installing apache-tomcat.
I have some questions for you:
When you finally managed starting Apache after getting
mod_jk.so, could you a
it's
essentially a server setup.
-Original Message-
From: Renato Salazar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk is garbled? Garbled? I got the binary...
Hi Scott,
I still have problems with my installation but it seems
t
3.2.1
Tomcat install fine,
> but was able to build it myself with what you gave
me. I would've never
> gotten that on my own...
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Renato Salazar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:44 PM
>
From: Renato Salazar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk is garbled? Garbled? I got the binary...
I had the same problem and, definetely, you have to
build your own mod_jk.so.
Try downloading another version of Apache (not
insta
I had the same problem and, definetely, you have to
build your own mod_jk.so.
Try downloading another version of Apache (not
installing it)and use it's apxs. I have 1.3.19 and it
works fine, only follow the mod_jk page instructions:
Make sure you have Perl 5 installed. The apxs script
used to
Mod_jk does not work with v2.0.
On Wed, 9 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Having looked through all the docs and CVS, it seems that the include file in
> question was from an older version of Apache.
>
> Is it best to use 1.3.19? Does mod_jk work at all with Apache 2.0? Is it best to
> use
I am also having a problem, although I finally was able to build mod_jk.so.
Apache chokes when I include the tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf file. It gives me
the following...
Begin
Output
[root@domain]# /usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl s
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Mark Crouch wrote:
> I tried updating the apxs perl script with the following:
>
> my $CFG_TARGET= 'q(httpd)';# substituted via
> Makefile.tmpl
> my $CFG_CC= 'q(gcc)';# substituted via
> Makefile.tmpl
> my $CFC_CFLAGS= 'q
I tried updating the apxs perl script with the following:
my $CFG_TARGET= 'q(httpd)';# substituted via
Makefile.tmpl
my $CFG_CC= 'q(gcc)';# substituted via
Makefile.tmpl
my $CFC_CFLAGS= 'q( -DSOLARIS=260 -DMOD_PERL -DUSE_PERL_SSI
-I/usr/loc
I haven't tried it out, but with mod_jk you can define workers. These
workers have properties and one of these properties is called "host",
where you can set the host where tomcat is running on. So it should be
no problem.
You can find the mod_jk documentation here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tom
Can someone at least tell me if it is possible?
Thanks
Laurence
-Original Message-
From: Laurence Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 12:25 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: FW: mod_jk anyone?
-Original Message-
From: Laurence Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL
map_name_at is a function in jk_map.c in
jakarta-tomcat-3.2.1-src/src/native/jk
Obviously you did not compilie/link your mod_jk.so right.
Since you are using nonstandard directories, and you do not tell us
how you compiled the thing, it is hard to help you.
You may try to go to the jakarta-
read!
Thanks again to everyone who helped troubleshoot this! - Sue
-Original Message-
From: Scott Tatum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 6:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk and mod_jserv compiling problems
Sue,
I did some looking in the tomcat-user
like I
> said, I never could get mod_jk working -- and that seems to be the preferred
> way to set this up. So, I would still like informaiton if anyone figures
> out what else I might try. In the mean time, I hope this information is
> helpful to someone else!
>
> - Sue Evans
&
uf
> f.o jk_map.o jk_lb_worker.o jk_jni_worker.o jk_connect.o jk_ajp13_worker.o
> jk_ajp13.o jk_ajp12_worker.
> o mod_jk.o
> apxs:Break: Command failed with rc=255
>
> Any ideas? Again, thanks very much to all who responded! It is a big help.
> I appreciate your time.
> - Sue
&g
me, I hope this information is
helpful to someone else!
- Sue Evans
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Shortt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk and mod_jserv compiling problems
I am getting this EXACT same error on Sol
I am getting this EXACT same error on Solaris 2.7.
It appears that apxs is calling a command with arguments only.
I haven't solved my problem either. Any help would be appreciated.
I will post my solution when I resolve it.
-k
> -Original Message-
> From: Sue Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
-Original Message-
From: Scott Tatum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk and mod_jserv compiling problems
I think you were on the best track with #3, compiling and installing Apache
yourself first. When you compile
Fraid not. What I really want is some kind of meta file in the conf
directory which tomcat uses to create the mod_jk.conf-auto file. I might
suggest it to the development team
sam
- Original Message -
From: "Maring, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Those who compile apache+mod_jk+mod_ssl+tomcat may want to check my
instructions at
http://www.ccl.net/cca/software/UNIX/apache
Jan K. Labanowski|phone: 614-292-9279, FAX: 614-292-7168
Ohio Supercomputer Center|Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1224 Kinnear Rd,
I think you were on the best track with #3, compiling and installing Apache
yourself first. When you compile Apache, make sure that your configure line has
at least the --enable-shared=so option so that you can your your mod_jk DSO. I
usually compile with --enable-shared=max option so that I can r
You can't modify the -auto files. What I did was to copy mod_jk.conf-auto
to mod_jk.conf and edit the application I wanted for ajp13.
At 14:45 4/25/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Is there a way to specify the default protocol that will be used when
>creating mod_jk.conf-auto? It always uses AJP12 and
The first thing I would do is remove apache entirely and remove any remnants
of mod_jk and mod_jserv from your system. Especially the binaries.
Best to start with a fresh installation environment than anything else.
Then download and build a new apache installation, making sure to enable DSO
sup
>2. I can't create new mod_jk.so or mod_jserv.so because apxs reports "No
>such file or directory" when I enter the commands as given in the
From my experience you need to compile mod_jk yourself or you will get the
"file garbled" problem. So, how to get apxs working? How about sending
the
Some pointers:
1) The mod_jk.so version supplied with the Tomcat RPM's
at http://rpmized.free.fr should work just fine with RedHat 6.2 regardless
of whatever messages it may spew out, as long as you stick to the standard
Red Hat 6.2 rpms for Apache (no self-compiled Apache - mod_jk is very sensit
In the doc dir of your apache installation dir. you would have a
README file. That file says where you need to put the
generated mod_jk.so file. So that apache can pick it up when it starts.
Anand
> -Original Message-
> From: Ngu Nguyen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 20
later, I had my own
compiled version of mod_jk.so. I didn't have to enter any apxs commands
manually, the Makefile took care of it for me.
Thanks,
--jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Rui M . Silva Seabra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday,
>
>
>Does anybody have some ideas about what was wrong? Any advice?
>Thanks a lot!
>
>Alice
>
>Xiaobu Alice Lian
>Database Engineer
>Agere Systems
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(484)397-2583
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mike Braden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: Mike Braden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk on hp-ux - need help
Your best bet for success would be to re-build Apache. This
will re-create the apxs script with the proper settings for
your sy
Your best bet for success would be to re-build Apache. This
will re-create the apxs script with the proper settings for
your system and avoid problems like this if you update
or use other apache modules.
You can download the source for apache from the site and use this
for a generic install (ass
My understanding is that nearly any module can be statically linked within
apache rather then used as a DSO. (within the Apache tree vs. mod_jk.so)
This must be done during the build of Apache. The trade off is larger
instances of Apache and losing the ability to upgrade the individual modules
but
age-
>From: Craig O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 3:35 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: mod_jk
>
>
>My understanding is that nearly any module can be statically
>linked within
>apache rather then used as a DSO. (within the Apac
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:25:23AM -0700, Jeff Kilbride wrote:
> Forgive the expression, but bullshit. :)
> The mod_jk compilation *is* trivial and since they don't list on the website
In the web page:
For Linux:
apxs -o mod_jk.so -I../jk -I/usr/local/jdk/include -I/usr/local/jdk/include/linux -
901 - 1000 of 1122 matches
Mail list logo
