Guru
-Original Message-
From: Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 July 2005 13:02
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap
Ask tomcat Because if sometime you change the webserver ( in the
worst
case ) then you
Ask tomcat Because if sometime you change the webserver ( in the worst
case ) then you don't need to change anything :)
Tomcat has good support for OpenLdap ... ( I have been using it for 1 year
)
Guru
-Original Message-
From: Nili Adoram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27
If you use
Form-based authentication (login page) then tomcat needs to do it...
Regards
Guru
-Original Message-
From: Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 July 2005 13:02
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap
Ask tomcat
(login page) then tomcat needs to do it...
Regards
Guru
-Original Message-
From: Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 July 2005 13:02
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap
Ask tomcat Because if sometime you change the webserver
I don t know details about your problem but i can answer that
j_secutiry_check is not a way of integrating tomcat into apache. It is an
authentition scheme defined by J2EE specs.
What you need is the jk_mount apache module, to let your Apache install bypass
the dynamic calls to tomcat, and
Am Montag, 11. Juli 2005 13:34 schrieb Ivan Rodriguez:
I don t know details about your problem but i can answer that
j_secutiry_check is not a way of integrating tomcat into apache. It is an
authentition scheme defined by J2EE specs.
What you need is the jk_mount apache module, to let your
I have the same issue! with debian sarge, and tomcat installed from scratch:
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP
Generated servlet error:
The return type is incompatible with JspSourceDependent.getDependants()
Check the permission in the work directory change it to 777 and try
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 July 2005 15:14
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat and Apache
I have the same issue! with debian sarge, and tomcat installed from
It was my first attempt. I think i have problems with library
dependencies, cause I have copied the install from development to
integration enviroment. Development is a mandriva cooker (urpmi setup),
and integration a debian sarge system(from scratch setup).
Installing and getting running
From: Christian Stalp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat and Apache
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:53:09 +0200
Am Montag, 11. Juli 2005 13:34 schrieb Ivan Rodriguez:
I don t know
in your Apache
PUT
ErrorDocument 400 /errors/404.jsp
ErrorDocument 500 /errors/500.jsp
And move /errors/404.jsp and /errors/404.jsp to the context path .. .not
in WEB-INF as apache wont be able to see the code in WeB-INF ( UNLESS YOU
ALIAS IT WHICH I DONT THINK IS A GOOD IDEA )
Any Doubts ?
Hi Woodchuck,
Am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2005 21:46 schrieb Woodchuck:
another (simple) way to think about the difference is that Apache
serves static web pages, whereas Tomcat *can* do some server-side
processing and serve dynamic web pages.
all else being equal (and with no mods installed on
Hi -
thanks for that, I hadn't realised that the servlet-name default would
still work in my webapp's web.xml. So I can reverse the logic as you
suggest. Works great.
Tim
Parsons Technical Services wrote:
Look here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/default-servlet.html
If you
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache
I think there is not much question that the Apache server is far more
efficient serving static html. Is there really any issue on that? If
so, things sure have changed. I thought the comparison was like 5 to
1. Is that no longer true
this helps,
Fritz
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:39 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache
Apache is not a J2EE container - you are off-roading on this one ;-)
Thanks. That was pretty much what I wanted to find out
(Er, and sorry I just realised I posted __some__ of this as part of a
question on the list last week, but the question I have is now posed
more concretely and wasn't answered then)!
Tim Diggins wrote:
This has been a great and informative thread... I'm wondering now, how
to accomplish what I
See comment in message.
-Message d'origine-
De : Tim Diggins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 19 mai 2005 13:24
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : Re: Tomcat vs Apache
(Er, and sorry I just realised I posted __some__ of this as part of a
question on the list last week
Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache
(Er, and sorry I just realised I posted __some__ of this as part of a
question on the list last week, but the question I have is now posed more
concretely and wasn't answered then)!
Tim Diggins wrote:
This has been a great and informative thread... I'm wondering now
I think I need to ask a question before offering any information.
When you say applet, do you mean a java applet that runs in a client's
browser window? Or, do you have a web application comprised of
servlets/jsps (or some analogous configuration)?
-Anthony
On May 18, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Chris
If all you're doing is serve static pages, both are equivalent.
However, if you ever need dynamic content, either client or server
side, for example a page whose content is extracted from a database,
or a form for which you need to record the values, you need some kind
of intelligence.
Apache is not a J2EE container - you are off-roading on this one ;-)
Michael
- Original Message -
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 7:37 AM
Subject: Tomcat vs Apache
I've been working with Tomcat for a while
I think I need to ask a question before offering any information.
When you say applet, do you mean a java applet that runs in a client's
browser window? Or, do you have a web application comprised of
servlets/jsps (or some analogous configuration)?
We have a large java applet that runs in the
If all you're doing is serve static pages, both are equivalent.
However, if you ever need dynamic content, either client or server
side, for example a page whose content is extracted from a database, or
a form for which you need to record the values, you need some kind of
intelligence.
Apache is not a J2EE container - you are off-roading on this one ;-)
Thanks. That was pretty much what I wanted to find out. BTW, I keep
hearing of people using Apache and Tomcat in conjunction. How does that
work?
Chris
-
Chris:
I guess that the applet is just a static file that is served to the
client's browser window. Therefore, ANY web server would work just
fine. There are no appreciable differences between Tomcat and Apache
for your requirements so far. They act very similarly when serving
static content.
Chris wrote:
Ah, okay. The only reason we were considering switching to Apache was
to possibly improve the performance of our Java applet.
The performance of the applet should have nothing to do with the server
that delivers it, unless perhaps the server happens to be downloading
slower than
On 5/18/05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If all you're doing is serve static pages, both are equivalent.
However, if you ever need dynamic content, either client or server
side, for example a page whose content is extracted from a database, or
a form for which you need to record the
of customers. Some need CGI, some need PHP, and
some need J2EE.
I hope this helps,
Fritz
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:39 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache
Apache is not a J2EE container - you are off-roading
The dynamic aspect of Tomcat is used to write HTML dynamically. This
is unrelated to the service of applets. If all you are doing is
serving an applet, you don't need Tomcat, as your HTML is static. I
don't know what some of the other replies mean, but this much is
clear.
On 5/18/05, Anthony
For my own education, what the heck is off-roading?
On 5/18/05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache is not a J2EE container - you are off-roading on this one ;-)
Thanks. That was pretty much what I wanted to find out. BTW, I keep
hearing of people using Apache and Tomcat in conjunction.
I think there is not much question that the Apache server is far more
efficient serving static html. Is there really any issue on that? If
so, things sure have changed. I thought the comparison was like 5 to
1. Is that no longer true?
On 5/18/05, Jason Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
hihi,
another (simple) way to think about the difference is that Apache
serves static web pages, whereas Tomcat *can* do some server-side
processing and serve dynamic web pages.
all else being equal (and with no mods installed on Apache such as
CGI/SSI/PHP), everyone visiting an Apache hosted
Ah, okay. The only reason we were considering switching to Apache was
to possibly improve the performance of our Java applet.
However the Apache Web Server may well have better performance when
serving large files, I don't believe I have seen any benchmarks
dealing with large files only smaller
According to benchmarks posted a few months ago, depending on your
circumstances, that may no longer be true (or it may even be the
reverse). I don't have the url, but I am sure someone else does, or
search for the benchmark site.
On May 18, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Dakota Jack wrote:
I think
-Original Message-
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 2:01 PM
To: Tomcat Users List; Jason Bainbridge
Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache
I think there is not much question that the Apache server is
far more efficient serving static html
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache
I think there is not much question that the Apache server is far more
efficient serving static html. Is there really any issue on that? If
so, things sure have changed. I thought the comparison was like 5 to
1
Apache SOAP is the original apache SOAP implementation. I recommend you
check out apache Axis, its successor. I have Axis 1.2 (formerly ran 1.1)
running in Tomcat 5.5.8, and I had it running in Tomcat 4.x for over a
year. Just make sure that the jar files that Axis needs are in the
common/lib
I also would recommend Axis, but if you put the jar files in common/lib
you will not be able to reload your app. At least that happened to me
with axis 1.1 under 5.0.28... That also breaks the rule that the app
should be as self-contained as possible to make it as portable as possible.
Trond
I agree with Trond. And since I wrote my reply rather quickly I want to
make sure I'm clear. You only need to put in common/lib any jar files
that both Tomcat and Axis need, which certainly does not include
axis.jar and the other jars that come with the Axis distribution. I
thought that maybe
Faine, Mark wrote:
Has anyone succeeded in getting Tomcat 5 to run in-process with Apache 2
using mod_jk? Does anyone know of a howto on this? I've read the docs,
I've searched the web, I have it working using AJP13 but I have had no luck
on getting it to work in-process. I don't even know
Don't think so. Apache takes on the connection and therefore is in
charge of the SSL handshake. So you will have to confiure apache to
support SSL.
They only way to make tomcat handle the handshake is to make it
directly available to the browser. But guess you allready kind of
suspected it :)
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:25:59 +0200, Laurentiu Vasiescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to have the Tomcat with SSL and a front-end Apache, wich
should only serve as a interface between client and tomcat?
I mean tomcat should serve the certificates and do all the ssl, apache only
Actually I believe its the opposite. Apache serves the certificate the
communication between Tomcat and Apache shouldnt be public anyway.
From: Laurentiu Vasiescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: tomcat +
Didier McGillis wrote:
Actually I believe its the opposite. Apache serves the certificate the
communication between Tomcat and Apache shouldnt be public anyway.
Apache makes the SSL handshake and passes any client certificate to
Tomcat. Any servlet sees that like it came directly from Tomcat.
Dwayne Ghant wrote:
Hello All,
I have successfully set up tomcat/ apache /mod_jk
Just one quick question I need all the developers to have access like
http://hostname/~username
And I need tomcat to automatically pick up the developers accounts so
they can write web-applications.
I got everything
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/host.html
section User Web Applications may help.
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Ghant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2004 17:31
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0.27/Apache 2.0.40 with mutible
How about http://www.oracle.com/support/index.html ?
-Tim
Daxin Zuo wrote:
After install Oracle9.2.0.1, Apache and Tomcat are installed. What are the
versions of the TOMCAT and the apache in this version of Oracle? Do you know
the location of the document where oracle describe its http server?
Can anybody forward more specific information?
This Oracle site definitely has the information. But the doc sea is too
wide.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:14 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat and apache
Will this help?
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg136432.html
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Glen Ezkovich wrote:
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 16:55:10 -0500
From: Glen Ezkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Thanks Alex,
Its a good resource but, we were hoping to be able to define the
context some where besides the server.xml, such as in the appBase. I've
run across mentions of using xml fragments for this, but as yet haven't
been able to find out much.
If anyone knows about how this can be
Sep 2004 08:19:53 -0400
From: Brantley Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality?
I second this.
I've had nothing but trouble out of JK2, configuration difficulties
Try turning off ip to name resolution, this can sometimes be very slow and
seemingly affect different PCs/servers differently. I'm no expert on what
might cause the slowdown in your case, but I have experienced what sound
like similar problems in the past.
From the default server.xml file for
Le mercredi 29 septembre 2004 12:43 -0400, Kurt Overberg a crit :
Gang,
I've been running a fairly large website (25000 pages/day) off of
Tomcat4.1.30/JK/Apache1.3 for quite some time now. Its been running great, but
in expectation of needing some load balancing, I'm thinking of moving
:59 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality?
Le mercredi 29 septembre 2004 à 12:43 -0400, Kurt Overberg a écrit :
Gang,
I've been running a fairly large website (25000 pages/day) off of
Tomcat4.1.30/JK/Apache1.3 for quite some time now. Its been
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
I already have. This exact same setup worked flawlessly under RH 7.3
and
RH 9.0
Actually, I meant a non-Linux platform. But even your results so far
suggest an RHEL-specific issue. Maybe try LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
instead of 2.4? I remember people having
Hi,
You need to achieve a subscription to the httpd-user mailing list and a
response there ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 4:41 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Tomcat 4
-Original Message-
From: Sean Finkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:52 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
Sorry, this is a shared server, and he wants his site available on port
80.
Tomcat
Maybe I am missing something, but wouldn't that not be able to bind to
port 80 since Apache is already bound to it? There is a lot about the
Java world I am not familiar with, so maybe it can...
You would need separate ip addresses for apache and tomcat.
Aye I figured as much
And
I recall RHEL 3.0 comes with an NPTL-based 2.4, which will require
setting LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.4 to disable the NPTL functionality for the
Java process. That may be it.
I am assuming you mean set this as an environment variable? I will
give this a try and see what happens! Thank you for the
Hi,
Perhaps Tomcat standalone would be sufficient for your application
requirements?
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Sean Finkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 11:17 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat causes
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps Tomcat standalone would be sufficient for your application
requirements?
No, because the user also wants access to PHP and other related Apache
features (htacces, mod_rewrite, etc).
-Sean
-
To
Sean Finkel wrote:
Hello,
First a brief background on the setup:
We are running Apache 1.3.31 utilizing mod_jk (not jk2). We are
running two instances of Tomcat. Previously, both were version 4.
Currently, we have one shared instance running the latest 5.x release
(just compiled yesterday). We
Hola,
Just a couple of things ;)
(Apache
hands *everything* off for this domain to Tomcat, including images):
And yet you said Tomcat standalone wasn't an option for this
installation? Too bad. You can do much of mod_rewrite with the
balancer app, you can do much of .htaccess with Servlet
(Apache
hands *everything* off for this domain to Tomcat, including images):
And yet you said Tomcat standalone wasn't an option for this
installation? Too bad. You can do much of mod_rewrite with the
balancer app, you can do much of .htaccess with Servlet security
constraints, and if
Hola,
Sorry, this is a shared server, and he wants his site available on port
80.
Tomcat standalone can run on port 80 without running as root by using
jsvc (from commons-daemon). There are examples and more information on
this configuration at
Sorry, this is a shared server, and he wants his site available on port
80.
Tomcat standalone can run on port 80 without running as root by using
jsvc (from commons-daemon). There are examples and more information on
this configuration at
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:07:29PM -0400, Sean Finkel wrote:
: With that said, we just moved to a new server (Dual Xeon, RHEL 3.0) and
: now the problem we are having is the customer who has this private
: instance has jsp pages that hang. But, it does not hang all the time.
: What's weird, is
What kernel was running on the old box?
Better put, what is different between the two machines?
7.3 on the old system. 9.0 on an intermediary system, with only the
private instance installed (which never hung).
I recall RHEL 3.0 comes with an NPTL-based 2.4, which will require
setting
I had a similar problem on RH EL just a couple of weeks ago. Might not be
the same as yours, though, because in my case apache wasnt hung, just
tomcat. but that might just be a difference in versions, so i'll share it
anyway.
Here's what i did..
I used kill -QUIT on the tomcat process after it
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 06:56:08PM -0400, Kilic, Hakan wrote:
: I'm seeing Tomcat and Apache show many tcp TIME_WAIT connections when
: running netstat under a load test. I was wondering, is this because the web
: browser client is not closing the connection properly, or is this the normal
:
: 18 August 2004 01:13
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https
fast
AFAIK - mod_proxy does not cache DNS lookups. It is looked up on every
request. So a slow lookup could be your problem.
-Tim
Duncan Houston wrote:
Sorry folks, more
ATTENTION: THIS IS AN AUTOMATED RESPONSE. DO NOT
REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE.
If you want to end your subscription, please use this link:
http://www.nethugs.com/unsubscribe.shtml
If you want to subscribe, please use this link:
http://www.nethugs.com/whysubscribe.shtml
If you need to contact a live
Some more info. The problem does not seem to be with HTTP vs HTTPS (was
testing app A on HTTPS, app B on HTTP B - problem seems that A is faster
than B whether on HTTP or HTTPS).
I have a number of .war files deployed to JBoss's /deploy directory
(automatic deployment). Let's call them A and B,
(HTTP) version
not?
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 August 2004 18:03
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https
fast
Some more info. The problem does not seem to be with HTTP vs HTTPS
: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 August 2004 23:28
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https
fast
OK, I made a mistake there (sorry). The issue does still seem to be that
connecting to a webapp over SSL is faster than
Apache, both on
HTTP. The one is fast, the other slow. What could be causing this? Apache
config? DNS lookup issues?
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 August 2004 23:28
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow
for your help.
-Original Message-
From: Isen,Ciji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 5:00 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat and Apache Axis Security
Have you tried access it from the Principal.
GenericPrincipal p = (GenericPrincipal
Have you tried access it from the Principal.
GenericPrincipal p = (GenericPrincipal)request.getUserPrincipal();
String uid = p.getName();
String passwd = p.getPassword();
Srofe, Douglas (c) wrote:
We use single sign for our Tomcat applications. We have another Tomcat that
hosts various web
Dear all,
I am using Apache2.0-50 and tomcat 5.0-27 with mod_jk2, Apache is
compiled by source and the tomcat and mod_jk are using binary
The OS I using is Solaris9. After configuration, the web site for
static page is normal, but when try to run servlets, it return 404 not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm...so is there any workaround? For example, using an older version of the
JK connector or some older combination of Tomcat/Apache and the JK connector?
Thanks,
Kevin
Not as far as I know.
-
To
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25367
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am having a problem getting Tomcat 5 to use Apache authentication. We
have an existing CGI application that is handled by Apache 2, and I am tring to
integrate some java stuff using Tomcat 5. Here is
Hmmm...so is there any workaround? For example, using an older version of the
JK connector or some older combination of Tomcat/Apache and the JK connector?
Thanks,
Kevin
Quoting Joseph Shraibman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25367
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have a look at the JK or JK2 connectors, they are used to connect Tomcat and Apache
webserver.
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: mpforste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 May 2004 15:43
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Tomcat and Apache
I am trying to start using Tomcat on my server
Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Filter Apache Axis ?
Sorry, Axis' web.xml now recognised the filter\fliter pattern, but
Axis still did not work properly.
Rui
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Rui Zhang wrote:
Thanks.
I did change it to 2.3 DTD, but it still doesn't work.
Cheers,
Rui
Oxford Univ
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:37:12PM +0100, Rui Zhang wrote:
:The Axis 1.1 does not support a filter.../filter in its web.xml. And if I
insert
: the Filter into the Tomcat default web.xml, Axis even won't return its
: index.html page. The Filter, however, works fine with other webapps in my
:
Sorry, Axis' web.xml now recognised the filter\fliter pattern, but
Axis still did not work properly.
Rui
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Rui Zhang wrote:
Thanks.
I did change it to 2.3 DTD, but it still doesn't work.
Cheers,
Rui
Oxford Univ Computing Lab
What's the XML doctype declaration
Thanks.
I did change it to 2.3 DTD, but it still doesn't work.
Cheers,
Rui
Oxford Univ Computing Lab
What's the XML doctype declaration for the Axis web.xml?
Servlet filters were introduced in servlet spec 2.3.
If your doctype declaration specifies 2.2 or earlier, the DTD won't
Hi,
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Tomcat/Links
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: C. Kukulies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat 5 - apache 13 howto
Is there a FAQ
Are you trying to perhaps use JNI to connect them? Thats the only thing I can think of.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 March 2004 06:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat and Apache on diff m/c's
Hello all,
I've successfully configured and
Sorry, forgot to mention the connector I was using.
I to connect using JK.
--Steven
--- Dale, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you trying to perhaps use JNI to connect them?
Thats the only thing I can think of.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't think you need to. I am running httpd2(SSL)+tomcat4/5+mod_jk2. Apache
will
take care of the SSL side, and mod_jk should forward everything unencrypted
via
localhost(if that is your setup) to tomcat.
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Rutishauser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25
You're right normally .. but I want to use the auto-generated
conf/auto/mod_jk.conf , which includes everything necessary to a
VirtualHost of apache ... without the SSL-Stuff!
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Don't think you need to. I am running httpd2(SSL)+tomcat4/5+mod_jk2. Apache
will
take care
Hi, you might get more answers if you ask this question on httpd mail list.
This is not a tomcat problem, rather it's the proxy configuration in httpd
that's giving you grief. You might want to take a look on how you define you
Directory and Location directives. Without looking at your
: possible to store JSP's on the server where apache is running? It's just
: a matter of convenience - it would be nice to upload the whole site with
: JSPs and have it running without remembering that you should upload all
: JSPs to some special place on a second server.
A sideways solution for
It's a great idea, what you want to do is configure as normal, and then
edit the workers.properties to point to the remote tomcat.
Camron G. Levanger
The Dreamlab
www.dreamlabmedia.com
(866) 890-3705
On Jan 5, 2004, at 11:36 PM, Richard Wray wrote:
Hi All,
I have what I hope will be a simple
At 01:36 AM 1/6/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Hi All,
I have what I hope will be a simple question. I have 2 Win 2K boxes. One
running Tomcat and the other Apache.
How do I deploy a web app on the Tomcat server and configure it to talk to
the Apache web server on a completely separate box.
Do I need
WOW!!!
Thanks for the quick response.
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:46 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat and Apache on Separate servers
At 01:36 AM 1/6/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Hi All,
I have what I hope
Howdy,
Yes: read the Host configuration reference in the tomcat documentation,
specifically the section on Host Name Aliases.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Sascha Alff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL
, December 30, 2003 3:37 PM
Subject: RE: Tomcat and apache - localhost?
Howdy,
Yes: read the Host configuration reference in the tomcat documentation,
specifically the section on Host Name Aliases.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Sascha Alff [mailto:[EMAIL
Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and
W2000
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/common/AJP
v13.html#Questions%20I%20Have
What happens if the request headers max packet size? There is no
provision to send a second packet of request
1 - 100 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
