-deployed...
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Johannes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: TC 5 production use
hi there,
I saw TC5.0.18 is marked stable on the Tomcat-Website
(production
5 production use
hi there,
I saw TC5.0.18 is marked stable on the Tomcat-Website
(production
quality). Is anybody using TC 5.0.x in production already ?
Did any
remarkable issues arise?
thx
Johannes
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential
business communication
, I do deploy and run only packed
WARs,
nothing
reloadable or auto-deployed...
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Johannes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: TC 5 production use
Hi,
I use Apache in front of Tomcat a long ago and see no
problems? BTW, Apache executes all static content,
such as image files. Why you don't recommend Apache?
Again, that's not what I said. You just have to evaluate your
requirements carefully. Various factors like the content mix (%static
Hi,
--- Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, that's not what I said. You just have to
evaluate your
requirements carefully. Various factors like the
content mix (%static
vs. %dynamic), scalability requirements, SSL load,
and others all figure
into this decision.
Apache is web
If only tomcat had the mod_rewrite capabilities that apache does, and
strong perl and php performance, I would be glad to trash mod_jk (thus
getting rid of apache as well).
Are there any good rewrite-like capabilities available for URL matching
/ rewriting that someone could share?
I'm sure a
Daniel Gibby wrote:
If only tomcat had the mod_rewrite capabilities that apache does, and
strong perl and php performance, I would be glad to trash mod_jk (thus
getting rid of apache as well).
Would this work for you as a mod_rewrite replacement?
http://noodle.tigris.org/
(perl php support
Hi,
Apache is web server, but Tomcat is not, while
Tomcat is a web server: all that a piece of software needs to do in
order to be a web server is implement the HTTP protocol, which tomcat
does.
It is not a problem with JK connector, I don't use
JK2.
It's not a problem for you, and not for
Hi,
If only tomcat had the mod_rewrite capabilities that apache does, and
strong perl and php performance, I would be glad to trash mod_jk (thus
getting rid of apache as well).
This is a good example of something that hits on Apache's strong points:
perl, mod_php, rewriting. So it's probably
Also, I definitely don't want to be changing the configuration whenever
I have a new partner that needs another cobranded version of the webapp
(meaning I would need to give them their own hostname or subdomain...
Can tomcat be setup to allow a VirtualHost to accept multiple domain names?
Subject
Please respond to RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use
Tomcat Users
List
to RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use
Tomcat Users
List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rta.apache.org
Hi,
(perl php support in any servlet container seems...unlikely :)
PHP, not so unlikely ;)
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat/UsingPhp
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=108099227127507w=2
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=223
As for perl, you can do it through CGI.
Yoav
Hi,
Is Tomcat considered to *be* a web server vs *having* a web server? I
thought the HTTP connector was the way to connect HTTP clients
(browsers)
to the JSP/Servlet container.
Purely a philosophical question IMHO ;) Technically, a piece of
software that can respond to HTTP requests per the
PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use
Also, I definitely don't want to be changing the configuration whenever
I have a new partner that needs another cobranded version of the webapp
(meaning I would need
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
(perl php support in any servlet container seems...unlikely :)
PHP, not so unlikely ;)
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat/UsingPhp
Fascinating - I'd love to know what the web.xml looks like and what the
server looks like. I'd guess the php servlet is a very simple
to press delete.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:47 PM
Subject: RE: Yoav --RE: TC 5 production use
Is Tomcat considered to *be* a web server vs *having* a web server? I
thought the HTTP connector was the way
Norris Shelton wrote:
What are you thoughts on a JBoss 4 setup? Do you still
recommend staying away from Apache?
JBoss 4 is alpha for now. I recommend trying JBoss 3.2.4 RC 1 if you
want something more stable.
--
x
Rémy Maucherat
Developer Consultant
JBoss Group
-Original Message-
From: Josh Rehman
(perl php support in any servlet container seems...unlikely :)
But don't put your money on it. Perhaps we'll surprise few peoples :-)
MT.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Also keep in mind that Apache isn't the *only* thing you can put in
front of Tomcat. grin
While we do have Apache in the mix (for some legacy apps), we also run
Squid [1] in reverse-proxy mode in front of *that* to (a) reduce
response time on cachable content and (b) remove some of the load
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Howdy,
I'm using it in production, no issues. But then again I steer clear of
the practices that tend to cause issues frequently: I don't redeploy my
apps in production (when I ship a new version I do so during our
maintenance window and restart the server), I profile
Howdy,
I see. Do you have a large internal user base then? It doesn't sound
like
a classic production use server if you're not even using the standard
ports.
Other people have already replied as to why the above assumption is
invalid. We have other things (portals mostly, but also some
Only for port redirection you don't need to buy any hardware.
If you are running tomcat inside a linux box, you can configure iptables
to do the port redirection. Everything via software, no hardware.
Vitor
David Wall wrote:
We run Tomcat on 8080 using Cisco Routers for port redirection.
Only for port redirection you don't need to buy any hardware.
If you are running tomcat inside a linux box, you can configure iptables
to do the port redirection. Everything via software, no hardware.
Vitor
You are absolutely correct. In fact, I've abandoned JSVC precisely because
I can do
I'm curious, why don't you use Apache and JK
connector?
Evgeny Gesin
--- David Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are absolutely correct. In fact, I've abandoned
JSVC precisely because
I can do this. This is great because not only do
you need the extra JSVC,
but you don't need to start as
I'm curious, why don't you use Apache and JK
connector?
Evgeny Gesin
We currently do, but we're creating a new simpler version for smaller
offices and corporate departmental computing. The fewer running parts the
better, and the fewer things that need to be patched going forward, the
easier
We run Tomcat on 8080 using Cisco Routers for port redirection.
Nobody has to type in a port number.
Well, I agree that would work for everyone who just buys some hardware to
give the illusion of using port 80. Of course, running tomcat on port 80
itself would be nice if anybody knows
David Wall wrote:
We run Tomcat on 8080 using Cisco Routers for port redirection.
Nobody has to type in a port number.
And the best part is that we're happy to know that some more heavily used
production sites are using TC 5, which was the original question and
interest!
Interesting how
I tryed today current release TC5 and seen errors:
1. I have the following lines which run under 4.1.29
but not in TC5 (locale exists in the HttpSession !)
jsp:useBean id=locale scope=session
class=java.util.Locale /
fmt:setLocale value=%= locale % /
I got
[javac] symbol : constructor Locale
On Saturday 07 February 2004 12:18 pm, you wrote:
We run Tomcat on 8080 using Cisco Routers for port redirection.
Nobody has to type in a port number.
Well, I agree that would work for everyone who just buys some hardware to
give the illusion of using port 80. Of course, running tomcat on
this practice is rather common. for a couple different
reasons.
1. routers/load balancer all have redirect capability.
actually not all, but most routers do.
2. running webserver on port 8080 means it doesn't
require running it as a service or root user
3. hardware load balancing is more
hi there,
I saw TC5.0.18 is marked stable on the Tomcat-Website (production
quality). Is anybody using TC 5.0.x in production already ? Did any
remarkable issues arise?
thx
Johannes
:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: TC 5 production use
hi there,
I saw TC5.0.18 is marked stable on the Tomcat-Website (production
quality). Is anybody using TC 5.0.x in production already ? Did any
remarkable issues arise?
thx
Johannes
This e-mail, including any attachments
I'm using it in production, no issues. But then again I steer clear of
the practices that tend to cause issues frequently: I don't redeploy my
apps in production (when I ship a new version I do so during our
maintenance window and restart the server), I profile and test carefully
for memory
Howdy,
How do you run it in production with the security manager? I've been
looking at this and can't tell how to configure JSVC to use the JVM
options
that specify the security manager:
I don't, as we don't use port 80 for any of our apps.
Yoav Shapira
This e-mail, including any
I don't, as we don't use port 80 for any of our apps.
Yoav Shapira
I see. Do you have a large internal user base then? It doesn't sound like
a classic production use server if you're not even using the standard
ports.
David
You can have any port be the default http port. It doesn't have to be 80.
If you change /etc/services and just tell tomcat or apache to listen on
something else, it still works fine, and people don't have to remember
the port.
Right?
Daniel
David Wall wrote:
I don't, as we don't use port 80
You can have any port be the default http port. It doesn't have to be 80.
If you change /etc/services and just tell tomcat or apache to listen on
something else, it still works fine, and people don't have to remember
the port.
Right?
Daniel
All true since no port number has to mean
We run Tomcat on 8080 using Cisco Routers for port redirection.
Nobody has to type in a port number.
On Friday 06 February 2004 07:11 pm, you wrote:
You can have any port be the default http port. It doesn't have to be 80.
If you change /etc/services and just tell tomcat or apache to
39 matches
Mail list logo
