Re: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap
But, you will run into problems if you use JNDIRealm with SSL (ldap with ssl - Container Managed Security)use mozilla-java sdk if you prefer to do this way. http://www.mozilla.org/directory On 7/27/05, Nili Adoram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about single sign-on for web applications and PHP? Does tomcat delegate credentials back to Apache so Apache would not authenticate again? Thanks Nili On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:05:49 +0100, Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you use Form-based authentication (login page) then tomcat needs to do it... Regards Guru -Original Message- From: Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 July 2005 13:02 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap Ask tomcat Because if sometime you change the webserver ( in the worst case ) then you don't need to change anything :) Tomcat has good support for OpenLdap ... ( I have been using it for 1 year ) Guru -Original Message- From: Nili Adoram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 July 2005 12:54 To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap Hi, I need to setup the following system: - Tomcat 5.5.9 - Apache 2 (using mod_jk) - Redhat 7.3 - User authentication against Ldap (using OpenLdap) - Single sign-on (e.g. if the user is authenticated for entering a web application he will not have to authenticate again when browsing a PHP page) - Form-based authentication (login page) I still need to figure out the following: - Should Tomcat or Apache do ldap authentication ? - How are credentials passed between Tomcat and Apache (to ensure single sign-on) ? Your help is appreciated. -- Nili Adoram ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) SEMPRE Team, RD Qlusters Inc. 972-3-6081976 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap
Ask tomcat Because if sometime you change the webserver ( in the worst case ) then you don't need to change anything :) Tomcat has good support for OpenLdap ... ( I have been using it for 1 year ) Guru -Original Message- From: Nili Adoram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 July 2005 12:54 To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap Hi, I need to setup the following system: - Tomcat 5.5.9 - Apache 2 (using mod_jk) - Redhat 7.3 - User authentication against Ldap (using OpenLdap) - Single sign-on (e.g. if the user is authenticated for entering a web application he will not have to authenticate again when browsing a PHP page) - Form-based authentication (login page) I still need to figure out the following: - Should Tomcat or Apache do ldap authentication ? - How are credentials passed between Tomcat and Apache (to ensure single sign-on) ? Your help is appreciated. -- Nili Adoram - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap
If you use Form-based authentication (login page) then tomcat needs to do it... Regards Guru -Original Message- From: Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 July 2005 13:02 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap Ask tomcat Because if sometime you change the webserver ( in the worst case ) then you don't need to change anything :) Tomcat has good support for OpenLdap ... ( I have been using it for 1 year ) Guru -Original Message- From: Nili Adoram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 July 2005 12:54 To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap Hi, I need to setup the following system: - Tomcat 5.5.9 - Apache 2 (using mod_jk) - Redhat 7.3 - User authentication against Ldap (using OpenLdap) - Single sign-on (e.g. if the user is authenticated for entering a web application he will not have to authenticate again when browsing a PHP page) - Form-based authentication (login page) I still need to figure out the following: - Should Tomcat or Apache do ldap authentication ? - How are credentials passed between Tomcat and Apache (to ensure single sign-on) ? Your help is appreciated. -- Nili Adoram - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap
What about single sign-on for web applications and PHP? Does tomcat delegate credentials back to Apache so Apache would not authenticate again? Thanks Nili On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:05:49 +0100, Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you use Form-based authentication (login page) then tomcat needs to do it... Regards Guru -Original Message- From: Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 July 2005 13:02 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap Ask tomcat Because if sometime you change the webserver ( in the worst case ) then you don't need to change anything :) Tomcat has good support for OpenLdap ... ( I have been using it for 1 year ) Guru -Original Message- From: Nili Adoram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 July 2005 12:54 To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: tomcat 5 - apache 2 - ldap Hi, I need to setup the following system: - Tomcat 5.5.9 - Apache 2 (using mod_jk) - Redhat 7.3 - User authentication against Ldap (using OpenLdap) - Single sign-on (e.g. if the user is authenticated for entering a web application he will not have to authenticate again when browsing a PHP page) - Form-based authentication (login page) I still need to figure out the following: - Should Tomcat or Apache do ldap authentication ? - How are credentials passed between Tomcat and Apache (to ensure single sign-on) ? Your help is appreciated. -- Nili Adoram ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) SEMPRE Team, RD Qlusters Inc. 972-3-6081976 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and Apache
I don t know details about your problem but i can answer that j_secutiry_check is not a way of integrating tomcat into apache. It is an authentition scheme defined by J2EE specs. What you need is the jk_mount apache module, to let your Apache install bypass the dynamic calls to tomcat, and then to serve only static content with apache. Details of configuration can be found at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc-archive/jk2/ Christian Stalp escribió: Hello together, I still have some trouble running Apache and Tomcat together in one host. I heard that I have to write a j_secutiry_check into apache.conf or httpd.conf. Where exactly I have to write this, and with which syntax. What else I have to consider while running Apache and Tomcat together. Important: Tomcat is not embedded in Apache in my case. It has its own process!!! Thank you... Gruss Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and Apache
Am Montag, 11. Juli 2005 13:34 schrieb Ivan Rodriguez: I don t know details about your problem but i can answer that j_secutiry_check is not a way of integrating tomcat into apache. It is an authentition scheme defined by J2EE specs. What you need is the jk_mount apache module, to let your Apache install bypass the dynamic calls to tomcat, and then to serve only static content with apache. Details of configuration can be found at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc-archive/jk2/ No this isn't the solution. Tomcat and Apache are full independent. They don't cooperate together nor they communicate. Apache listens at port 80 and Tomcat at port 8180 ( its the Debian Solution ). But I cannot run tomcat under these configuration. I get an error dump each time: [quote] HTTP Status 500 - type Exception report message description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request. exception org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP at org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java:432) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:142) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:240) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:187) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:200) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.access$000 (ApplicationFilterChain.java:51) at org.apache.cata. .. [/quote] Apache works fine and makes no trouble. Gruss Christian -- Christian Stalp Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Tel.: 06131 / 17-3107 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and Apache
I have the same issue! with debian sarge, and tomcat installed from scratch: org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP Generated servlet error: The return type is incompatible with JspSourceDependent.getDependants() org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.javacError(DefaultErrorHandler.java:84) org.apache.jasper.compiler.ErrorDispatcher.javacError(ErrorDispatcher.java:328) org.apache.jasper.compiler.JDTCompiler.generateClass(JDTCompiler.java:397) jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-src.tar.gz Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 jdk1.5.0_03 No this isn't the solution. Tomcat and Apache are full independent. They don't cooperate together nor they communicate. Apache listens at port 80 and Tomcat at port 8180 ( its the Debian Solution ). But I cannot run tomcat under these configuration. I get an error dump each time: [quote] HTTP Status 500 - type Exception report message description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request. exception org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP at org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java:432) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:142) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:240) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:187) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:200) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.access$000 (ApplicationFilterChain.java:51) at org.apache.cata. .. [/quote] Apache works fine and makes no trouble. Gruss Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and Apache
Check the permission in the work directory change it to 777 and try -Original Message- From: Ivan Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 July 2005 15:14 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat and Apache I have the same issue! with debian sarge, and tomcat installed from scratch: org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP Generated servlet error: The return type is incompatible with JspSourceDependent.getDependants() org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.javacError(DefaultErrorHandle r.java:84) org.apache.jasper.compiler.ErrorDispatcher.javacError(ErrorDispatcher.java:3 28) org.apache.jasper.compiler.JDTCompiler.generateClass(JDTCompiler.java:397) jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-src.tar.gz Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 jdk1.5.0_03 No this isn't the solution. Tomcat and Apache are full independent. They don't cooperate together nor they communicate. Apache listens at port 80 and Tomcat at port 8180 ( its the Debian Solution ). But I cannot run tomcat under these configuration. I get an error dump each time: [quote] HTTP Status 500 - type Exception report message description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request. exception org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP at org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java: 432) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java: 142) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:240) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:187) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applicatio nFilterChain.java:200) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.access$000 (ApplicationFilterChain.java:51) at org.apache.cata. .. [/quote] Apache works fine and makes no trouble. Gruss Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and Apache
It was my first attempt. I think i have problems with library dependencies, cause I have copied the install from development to integration enviroment. Development is a mandriva cooker (urpmi setup), and integration a debian sarge system(from scratch setup). Installing and getting running tomcat 5.5 is not as easy than with 5.0 series :) Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy escribió: Check the permission in the work directory change it to 777 and try - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and Apache
From: Christian Stalp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat and Apache Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:53:09 +0200 Am Montag, 11. Juli 2005 13:34 schrieb Ivan Rodriguez: I don t know details about your problem but i can answer that j_secutiry_check is not a way of integrating tomcat into apache. It is an authentition scheme defined by J2EE specs. What you need is the jk_mount apache module, to let your Apache install bypass the dynamic calls to tomcat, and then to serve only static content with apache. Details of configuration can be found at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc-archive/jk2/ No this isn't the solution. Tomcat and Apache are full independent. They don't cooperate together nor they communicate. Apache listens at port 80 and Tomcat at port 8180 ( its the Debian Solution ). But I cannot run tomcat under these configuration. I get an error dump each time: [quote] HTTP Status 500 - type Exception report message description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request. exception org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP at org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java:432) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:142) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:240) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:187) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:200) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.access$000 (ApplicationFilterChain.java:51) at org.apache.cata. .. [/quote] Apache works fine and makes no trouble. Gruss Christian -- Christian Stalp Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informatik Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Tel.: 06131 / 17-3107 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tomcat and apache are fully independent, but to enable Apache to use Tomcat as the J2EE container, you need to use mod_jk, which is what Ivan stated. Then when a request comes into Apache, your jk mount point will tell it to deliver the JSP from tomcat. That's a high level anyway. Do you really need apache? You can just use Tomcat for your static content, JSP, beans etc... _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5.0 + Apache 2.0 + ErrorDocument
in your Apache PUT ErrorDocument 400 /errors/404.jsp ErrorDocument 500 /errors/500.jsp And move /errors/404.jsp and /errors/404.jsp to the context path .. .not in WEB-INF as apache wont be able to see the code in WeB-INF ( UNLESS YOU ALIAS IT WHICH I DONT THINK IS A GOOD IDEA ) Any Doubts ? Give me a shout ... - Original Message - From: Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:39 PM Subject: Tomcat 5.0 + Apache 2.0 + ErrorDocument Hi I would like to have Tomcat handle all the error documents, how can I do this? At this stage, whenever there is a page not found, I see an Apache error page. I have already setup mod_jk. I have this: JKMount /*.jsp ajp13 In my web.xml, I have this: error-page error-code404/error-code location/WEB-INF/errors/404.jsp/location /error-page My mod_jk log has the following lines: jk_handler::mod_jk.c (1952): No body with status=404 for worker=ajp13 jk_handler::mod_jk.c (1952): No body with status=404 for worker=ajp13 Somehow I can't see my /WEB-INF/errors/404.jsp when there is a page not found. Thanks, Ben - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
Hi Woodchuck, Am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2005 21:46 schrieb Woodchuck: another (simple) way to think about the difference is that Apache serves static web pages, whereas Tomcat *can* do some server-side processing and serve dynamic web pages. all else being equal (and with no mods installed on Apache such as CGI/SSI/PHP), everyone visiting an Apache hosted website will see exactly the same set of web pages. in contrast, a Tomcat hosted website *can* display different content for the same requested web page for each visitor. you can use Tomcat to host totally static websites and not use Apache if you wanted to. but Tomcat is meant for dynamic websites that interact in some way with the user (ie. capture and process user information) to produce custom results. You are aware, that Apache can do the same as Tomcat. The only difference is that it will use PHP or Perl for doing this. You can run totally dynamic php websites with Apache and they can be as scalable and performant as JSP websites. I.e. PHP provides caching technologies which are very simple but at the same time close to static page performance. It only depends on your programming capabilities and your understanding of how the technology you are using ist working. You can write non-scalable and unperformant applications with both, PHP and Java. And if you try to programme PHP like Java or the other way round, yo will very likely not get the best results. So, the real difference between Tomcat and Apache - in my eyes - is not what each of them can do but how heydo it. The technology makes the difference. It is a decision between two different worlds and philosophies. I like both. Both have there strengthes. Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
Hi - thanks for that, I hadn't realised that the servlet-name default would still work in my webapp's web.xml. So I can reverse the logic as you suggest. Works great. Tim Parsons Technical Services wrote: Look here: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/default-servlet.html If you override the mapping by putting your own reference to the default in your web.xml for the app, you should be able to map it the way you want and then have a mapping to your servlet with the / path. Or have your Spring dispatcher catch everything and parse the path to redirect the static stuff. Haven't tried this myself, just some thoughts. Doug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat vs Apache
You can find Peter's Benchmarks at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/articles/benchmark_summary.pdf kr Marco --- http://www.kontaktlinsen-preisvergleich.de http://www.parfuem-faq.de Am Mittwoch, den 18.05.2005, 16:50 -0500 schrieb Caldarale, Charles R: From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache I think there is not much question that the Apache server is far more efficient serving static html. Is there really any issue on that? If so, things sure have changed. I thought the comparison was like 5 to 1. Is that no longer true? That is definitely no longer true - search the archives for Peter Lin's test results. It's not quite parity, but it's close. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
This has been a great and informative thread... I'm wondering now, how to accomplish what I want to do in Tomcat alone, rather than looking for a Tomcat+Apache solution (sounds simpler). The issue is that I want ALL directory-like urls resolved by a particular servlet (which is a Spring dispatcher servlet, but never mind that), but I would like very few kinds of static files (which I could name explictly *.gif, *.png, *.css or put under a static place) served statically (ie by the default servlet. The problem is that the url-pattern for a directory-like urls covers all urls. Is there a way to do the reverse of normal, state that you want a particular url-pattern (e.g. /static/*) to go to the default servlet , and everything else (e.g. /*) to go to a particular servlet. If so, how do I indicate the default servlet in my web.xml? (And I've already had recommendations from people to change the URLs for the dynamic stuff to something else, but that's not what the client/customer/user/design wants -- the url is very much part of the user interface in this application). thanks Tim Fritz Schneider wrote: Chris, Earlier versions of Tomcat were quite a bit slower than Apache when delivering static pages. For high volume work the preferred solution was to have Apache listening on port 80, and when it received a request for a page from in a J2EE context, to forward it to Tomcat, listening on 8080. A similar connector is used for Microsoft IIS. Tomcat had a major rewrite for Tomcat 5, and the performance difference on static pages is now minor. An Apache-to-Tomcat connector is now used for the following reasons (and probably a few more): 1) History. We started out that way, and there's no reason to change. 2) Expansion. We have been running Apache (or IIS) and we need to add a J2EE container. 3) Load balancing. We have too many requests for a single server, so we have Apache take the incoming requests and dole them out to three or four Tomcat servers. 4) Management. We have a lot of customers. Some need CGI, some need PHP, and some need J2EE. I hope this helps, Fritz -Original Message- From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:39 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache Apache is not a J2EE container - you are off-roading on this one ;-) Thanks. That was pretty much what I wanted to find out. BTW, I keep hearing of people using Apache and Tomcat in conjunction. How does that work? Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
(Er, and sorry I just realised I posted __some__ of this as part of a question on the list last week, but the question I have is now posed more concretely and wasn't answered then)! Tim Diggins wrote: This has been a great and informative thread... I'm wondering now, how to accomplish what I want to do in Tomcat alone, rather than looking for a Tomcat+Apache solution (sounds simpler). The issue is that I want ALL directory-like urls resolved by a particular servlet (which is a Spring dispatcher servlet, but never mind that), but I would like very few kinds of static files (which I could name explictly *.gif, *.png, *.css or put under a static place) served statically (ie by the default servlet. The problem is that the url-pattern for a directory-like urls covers all urls. Is there a way to do the reverse of normal, state that you want a particular url-pattern (e.g. /static/*) to go to the default servlet , and everything else (e.g. /*) to go to a particular servlet. If so, how do I indicate the default servlet in my web.xml? (And I've already had recommendations from people to change the URLs for the dynamic stuff to something else, but that's not what the client/customer/user/design wants -- the url is very much part of the user interface in this application). thanks Tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE : Tomcat vs Apache
See comment in message. -Message d'origine- De : Tim Diggins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 19 mai 2005 13:24 À : Tomcat Users List Objet : Re: Tomcat vs Apache (Er, and sorry I just realised I posted __some__ of this as part of a question on the list last week, but the question I have is now posed more concretely and wasn't answered then)! Tim Diggins wrote: This has been a great and informative thread... I'm wondering now, how to accomplish what I want to do in Tomcat alone, rather than looking for a Tomcat+Apache solution (sounds simpler). The issue is that I want ALL directory-like urls resolved by a particular servlet (which is a Spring dispatcher servlet, but never mind that), but I would like very few kinds of static files (which I could name explictly *.gif, *.png, *.css or put under a static place) served statically (ie by the default servlet. The problem is that the url-pattern for a directory-like urls covers all urls. Is there a way to do the reverse of normal, state that you want a particular url-pattern (e.g. /static/*) to go to the default servlet , and everything else (e.g. /*) to go to a particular servlet. If so, how do I indicate the default servlet in my web.xml? SRV.11.2 Specification of Mappings In the web application deployment descriptor, the following syntax is used to define mappings: * A string beginning with a '/' character and ending with a '/*' postfix is used for path mapping. * A string beginning with a '*.' prefix is used as an extension mapping. * A string containing only the '/' character indicates the default servlet of the application. In this case the servlet path is the request URI minus the context pth and the path info is null. * All other strings are used for exact matches only. (And I've already had recommendations from people to change the URLs for the dynamic stuff to something else, but that's not what the client/customer/user/design wants -- the url is very much part of the user interface in this application). thanks Tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
Look here: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/default-servlet.html If you override the mapping by putting your own reference to the default in your web.xml for the app, you should be able to map it the way you want and then have a mapping to your servlet with the / path. Or have your Spring dispatcher catch everything and parse the path to redirect the static stuff. Haven't tried this myself, just some thoughts. Doug - Original Message - From: Tim Diggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 7:23 AM Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache (Er, and sorry I just realised I posted __some__ of this as part of a question on the list last week, but the question I have is now posed more concretely and wasn't answered then)! Tim Diggins wrote: This has been a great and informative thread... I'm wondering now, how to accomplish what I want to do in Tomcat alone, rather than looking for a Tomcat+Apache solution (sounds simpler). The issue is that I want ALL directory-like urls resolved by a particular servlet (which is a Spring dispatcher servlet, but never mind that), but I would like very few kinds of static files (which I could name explictly *.gif, *.png, *.css or put under a static place) served statically (ie by the default servlet. The problem is that the url-pattern for a directory-like urls covers all urls. Is there a way to do the reverse of normal, state that you want a particular url-pattern (e.g. /static/*) to go to the default servlet , and everything else (e.g. /*) to go to a particular servlet. If so, how do I indicate the default servlet in my web.xml? (And I've already had recommendations from people to change the URLs for the dynamic stuff to something else, but that's not what the client/customer/user/design wants -- the url is very much part of the user interface in this application). thanks Tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
I think I need to ask a question before offering any information. When you say applet, do you mean a java applet that runs in a client's browser window? Or, do you have a web application comprised of servlets/jsps (or some analogous configuration)? -Anthony On May 18, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Chris wrote: I've been working with Tomcat for a while now, but I haven't messed with Apache yet. Could someone explain or point me to something explaining the differences between Tomcat and Apache? I have a large applet hosted on Tomcat, and am investigating using Apache instead. Is this feasable? TIA. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
If all you're doing is serve static pages, both are equivalent. However, if you ever need dynamic content, either client or server side, for example a page whose content is extracted from a database, or a form for which you need to record the values, you need some kind of intelligence. For that job, Apache relies on cgi and php, while Tomcat relies on Servlets and JSP, both based on Java. Unless you have a good reason to switch to Apache, you should stick to Tomcat. Le 18 mai 05 à 16:37, Chris a écrit : I've been working with Tomcat for a while now, but I haven't messed with Apache yet. Could someone explain or point me to something explaining the differences between Tomcat and Apache? I have a large applet hosted on Tomcat, and am investigating using Apache instead. Is this feasable? TIA. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
Apache is not a J2EE container - you are off-roading on this one ;-) Michael - Original Message - From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 7:37 AM Subject: Tomcat vs Apache I've been working with Tomcat for a while now, but I haven't messed with Apache yet. Could someone explain or point me to something explaining the differences between Tomcat and Apache? I have a large applet hosted on Tomcat, and am investigating using Apache instead. Is this feasable? TIA. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
I think I need to ask a question before offering any information. When you say applet, do you mean a java applet that runs in a client's browser window? Or, do you have a web application comprised of servlets/jsps (or some analogous configuration)? We have a large java applet that runs in the client's browser window. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
If all you're doing is serve static pages, both are equivalent. However, if you ever need dynamic content, either client or server side, for example a page whose content is extracted from a database, or a form for which you need to record the values, you need some kind of intelligence. For that job, Apache relies on cgi and php, while Tomcat relies on Servlets and JSP, both based on Java. Unless you have a good reason to switch to Apache, you should stick to Tomcat. Ah, okay. The only reason we were considering switching to Apache was to possibly improve the performance of our Java applet. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
Apache is not a J2EE container - you are off-roading on this one ;-) Thanks. That was pretty much what I wanted to find out. BTW, I keep hearing of people using Apache and Tomcat in conjunction. How does that work? Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
Chris: I guess that the applet is just a static file that is served to the client's browser window. Therefore, ANY web server would work just fine. There are no appreciable differences between Tomcat and Apache for your requirements so far. They act very similarly when serving static content. Some can spout off about performance, configurability, etc... But, if you've got it working on Tomcat, I don't think that you'll see any difference using Apache-- unless, of course, there's more to your situation than meets the eye. Hope it helps, -Anthony On May 18, 2005, at 12:14 PM, Chris wrote: I think I need to ask a question before offering any information. When you say applet, do you mean a java applet that runs in a client's browser window? Or, do you have a web application comprised of servlets/jsps (or some analogous configuration)? We have a large java applet that runs in the client's browser window. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
Chris wrote: Ah, okay. The only reason we were considering switching to Apache was to possibly improve the performance of our Java applet. The performance of the applet should have nothing to do with the server that delivers it, unless perhaps the server happens to be downloading slower than the user's link would allow. The applet by definition runs on the browser's computer, not the server. A. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
On 5/18/05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all you're doing is serve static pages, both are equivalent. However, if you ever need dynamic content, either client or server side, for example a page whose content is extracted from a database, or a form for which you need to record the values, you need some kind of intelligence. For that job, Apache relies on cgi and php, while Tomcat relies on Servlets and JSP, both based on Java. Unless you have a good reason to switch to Apache, you should stick to Tomcat. Ah, okay. The only reason we were considering switching to Apache was to possibly improve the performance of our Java applet. However the Apache Web Server may well have better performance when serving large files, I don't believe I have seen any benchmarks dealing with large files only smaller ones that you typically see included in a web page like images. I would recommend at least doing some testing by serving your applet under Apache. Just out of curiosity what does your large applet do? From the sound of it it was like 60mb, which is quite a large applet to say the least... -- Jason Bainbridge http://kde.org - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Site - http://jasonbainbridge.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat vs Apache
Chris, Earlier versions of Tomcat were quite a bit slower than Apache when delivering static pages. For high volume work the preferred solution was to have Apache listening on port 80, and when it received a request for a page from in a J2EE context, to forward it to Tomcat, listening on 8080. A similar connector is used for Microsoft IIS. Tomcat had a major rewrite for Tomcat 5, and the performance difference on static pages is now minor. An Apache-to-Tomcat connector is now used for the following reasons (and probably a few more): 1) History. We started out that way, and there's no reason to change. 2) Expansion. We have been running Apache (or IIS) and we need to add a J2EE container. 3) Load balancing. We have too many requests for a single server, so we have Apache take the incoming requests and dole them out to three or four Tomcat servers. 4) Management. We have a lot of customers. Some need CGI, some need PHP, and some need J2EE. I hope this helps, Fritz -Original Message- From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 9:39 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache Apache is not a J2EE container - you are off-roading on this one ;-) Thanks. That was pretty much what I wanted to find out. BTW, I keep hearing of people using Apache and Tomcat in conjunction. How does that work? Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
The dynamic aspect of Tomcat is used to write HTML dynamically. This is unrelated to the service of applets. If all you are doing is serving an applet, you don't need Tomcat, as your HTML is static. I don't know what some of the other replies mean, but this much is clear. On 5/18/05, Anthony E. Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I need to ask a question before offering any information. When you say applet, do you mean a java applet that runs in a client's browser window? Or, do you have a web application comprised of servlets/jsps (or some analogous configuration)? -Anthony On May 18, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Chris wrote: I've been working with Tomcat for a while now, but I haven't messed with Apache yet. Could someone explain or point me to something explaining the differences between Tomcat and Apache? I have a large applet hosted on Tomcat, and am investigating using Apache instead. Is this feasable? TIA. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
For my own education, what the heck is off-roading? On 5/18/05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Apache is not a J2EE container - you are off-roading on this one ;-) Thanks. That was pretty much what I wanted to find out. BTW, I keep hearing of people using Apache and Tomcat in conjunction. How does that work? Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
I think there is not much question that the Apache server is far more efficient serving static html. Is there really any issue on that? If so, things sure have changed. I thought the comparison was like 5 to 1. Is that no longer true? On 5/18/05, Jason Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/18/05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all you're doing is serve static pages, both are equivalent. However, if you ever need dynamic content, either client or server side, for example a page whose content is extracted from a database, or a form for which you need to record the values, you need some kind of intelligence. For that job, Apache relies on cgi and php, while Tomcat relies on Servlets and JSP, both based on Java. Unless you have a good reason to switch to Apache, you should stick to Tomcat. Ah, okay. The only reason we were considering switching to Apache was to possibly improve the performance of our Java applet. However the Apache Web Server may well have better performance when serving large files, I don't believe I have seen any benchmarks dealing with large files only smaller ones that you typically see included in a web page like images. I would recommend at least doing some testing by serving your applet under Apache. Just out of curiosity what does your large applet do? From the sound of it it was like 60mb, which is quite a large applet to say the least... -- Jason Bainbridge http://kde.org - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Site - http://jasonbainbridge.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
hihi, another (simple) way to think about the difference is that Apache serves static web pages, whereas Tomcat *can* do some server-side processing and serve dynamic web pages. all else being equal (and with no mods installed on Apache such as CGI/SSI/PHP), everyone visiting an Apache hosted website will see exactly the same set of web pages. in contrast, a Tomcat hosted website *can* display different content for the same requested web page for each visitor. you can use Tomcat to host totally static websites and not use Apache if you wanted to. but Tomcat is meant for dynamic websites that interact in some way with the user (ie. capture and process user information) to produce custom results. hth, woodchuck --- Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The dynamic aspect of Tomcat is used to write HTML dynamically. This is unrelated to the service of applets. If all you are doing is serving an applet, you don't need Tomcat, as your HTML is static. I don't know what some of the other replies mean, but this much is clear. On 5/18/05, Anthony E. Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I need to ask a question before offering any information. When you say applet, do you mean a java applet that runs in a client's browser window? Or, do you have a web application comprised of servlets/jsps (or some analogous configuration)? -Anthony On May 18, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Chris wrote: I've been working with Tomcat for a while now, but I haven't messed with Apache yet. Could someone explain or point me to something explaining the differences between Tomcat and Apache? I have a large applet hosted on Tomcat, and am investigating using Apache instead. Is this feasable? TIA. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Yahoo! Mail Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
Ah, okay. The only reason we were considering switching to Apache was to possibly improve the performance of our Java applet. However the Apache Web Server may well have better performance when serving large files, I don't believe I have seen any benchmarks dealing with large files only smaller ones that you typically see included in a web page like images. I would recommend at least doing some testing by serving your applet under Apache. Just out of curiosity what does your large applet do? From the sound of it it was like 60mb, which is quite a large applet to say the least... Basically it's the desktop version of our app redone as an applet. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat vs Apache
According to benchmarks posted a few months ago, depending on your circumstances, that may no longer be true (or it may even be the reverse). I don't have the url, but I am sure someone else does, or search for the benchmark site. On May 18, 2005, at 1:01 PM, Dakota Jack wrote: I think there is not much question that the Apache server is far more efficient serving static html. Is there really any issue on that? If so, things sure have changed. I thought the comparison was like 5 to 1. Is that no longer true? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat vs Apache
-Original Message- From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 2:01 PM To: Tomcat Users List; Jason Bainbridge Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache I think there is not much question that the Apache server is far more efficient serving static html. Is there really any issue on that? If so, things sure have changed. I thought the comparison was like 5 to 1. Is that no longer true? /me awaits an email from Remy or Peter. ;) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat vs Apache
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat vs Apache I think there is not much question that the Apache server is far more efficient serving static html. Is there really any issue on that? If so, things sure have changed. I thought the comparison was like 5 to 1. Is that no longer true? That is definitely no longer true - search the archives for Peter Lin's test results. It's not quite parity, but it's close. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 + Apache SOAP?
Apache SOAP is the original apache SOAP implementation. I recommend you check out apache Axis, its successor. I have Axis 1.2 (formerly ran 1.1) running in Tomcat 5.5.8, and I had it running in Tomcat 4.x for over a year. Just make sure that the jar files that Axis needs are in the common/lib directory (if Tomcat needs them also). Not sure if HttpServlet is in that catagory, but worth a try. Kristian Rink wrote: Hi all; being into the state of having to check out several SOAP implementations to decide which one to be used for a certain project, I currently (for the first time) am playing around with Tomcat and Apache SOAP, trying to get a simple SOAP service up and running... Actually, I'm not very close to that, right now, getting stuck in the very first stage of getting Tomcat to work with Apache-SOAP: * Tomcat itself is up and running. * http://localhost:8080/soap/ works * Trying to access http://localhost:8080/soap/servlet/rpcrouter ends up with an error message like this: ---snip--- type Exception report message description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request. exception javax.servlet.ServletException: Error allocating a servlet instance org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke (ErrorReportValve.java:105) org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service (CoyoteAdapter.java:148) org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process (Http11Processor.java:856) org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol $Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.java:744) org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket (PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt (LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run (ThreadPool.java:684) java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) root cause java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:620) java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass (SecureClassLoader.java:124) java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass (URLClassLoader.java:260) java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100 (URLClassLoader.java:56) java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run (URLClassLoader.java:195) java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged (Native Method) java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass (URLClassLoader.java:188) ---snip--- Googling for that error left me pretty helpless since I by now tried several hints regarding problems with Apache SOAP on top of Tomcat 4.x, but none of these worked. So, can anyone enlighten me on where to tweak to make the SOAP package find the javax.servlet package? System I'm running: Debian unstable Tomcat 5.5.9 JDK 1.5.0 Apache SOAP 2.3.1 Additionally: Are there any other implementations of SOAP for Tomcat that might be worth investigating? Thanks for your patience and bye, Kris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 + Apache SOAP?
I also would recommend Axis, but if you put the jar files in common/lib you will not be able to reload your app. At least that happened to me with axis 1.1 under 5.0.28... That also breaks the rule that the app should be as self-contained as possible to make it as portable as possible. Trond Mark Leone wrote: Apache SOAP is the original apache SOAP implementation. I recommend you check out apache Axis, its successor. I have Axis 1.2 (formerly ran 1.1) running in Tomcat 5.5.8, and I had it running in Tomcat 4.x for over a year. Just make sure that the jar files that Axis needs are in the common/lib directory (if Tomcat needs them also). Not sure if HttpServlet is in that catagory, but worth a try. Kristian Rink wrote: Hi all; being into the state of having to check out several SOAP implementations to decide which one to be used for a certain project, I currently (for the first time) am playing around with Tomcat and Apache SOAP, trying to get a simple SOAP service up and running... Actually, I'm not very close to that, right now, getting stuck in the very first stage of getting Tomcat to work with Apache-SOAP: * Tomcat itself is up and running. * http://localhost:8080/soap/ works * Trying to access http://localhost:8080/soap/servlet/rpcrouter ends up with an error message like this: ---snip--- type Exception report message description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request. exception javax.servlet.ServletException: Error allocating a servlet instance org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke (ErrorReportValve.java:105) org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service (CoyoteAdapter.java:148) org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process (Http11Processor.java:856) org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol $Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.java:744) org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket (PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt (LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run (ThreadPool.java:684) java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) root cause java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:620) java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass (SecureClassLoader.java:124) java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass (URLClassLoader.java:260) java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100 (URLClassLoader.java:56) java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run (URLClassLoader.java:195) java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged (Native Method) java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass (URLClassLoader.java:188) ---snip--- Googling for that error left me pretty helpless since I by now tried several hints regarding problems with Apache SOAP on top of Tomcat 4.x, but none of these worked. So, can anyone enlighten me on where to tweak to make the SOAP package find the javax.servlet package? System I'm running: Debian unstable Tomcat 5.5.9 JDK 1.5.0 Apache SOAP 2.3.1 Additionally: Are there any other implementations of SOAP for Tomcat that might be worth investigating? Thanks for your patience and bye, Kris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 + Apache SOAP?
I agree with Trond. And since I wrote my reply rather quickly I want to make sure I'm clear. You only need to put in common/lib any jar files that both Tomcat and Axis need, which certainly does not include axis.jar and the other jars that come with the Axis distribution. I thought that maybe Axis needed access to the jar file that contains class HttpServlet, because I remember the installation instructions aaying that certian other jar files had to be on the classpath; but I checked and it doesn't look like axis needs to see HttpServlet. Other than needing access to an XML parser, I don't think there's much the Axis server needs beyond what you already have in Tomcat. You should be able to just drop Axis in to Tomcat and have it run almost immediately, unless you have a non-standard configuration. Maybe apache SOAP required it, but it seems doubtful. It seems like the reported error is more of a Tomcat problem. If you install Axis and get the same error, please report back to us. Trond G. Ziarkowski wrote: I also would recommend Axis, but if you put the jar files in common/lib you will not be able to reload your app. At least that happened to me with axis 1.1 under 5.0.28... That also breaks the rule that the app should be as self-contained as possible to make it as portable as possible. Trond Mark Leone wrote: Apache SOAP is the original apache SOAP implementation. I recommend you check out apache Axis, its successor. I have Axis 1.2 (formerly ran 1.1) running in Tomcat 5.5.8, and I had it running in Tomcat 4.x for over a year. Just make sure that the jar files that Axis needs are in the common/lib directory (if Tomcat needs them also). Not sure if HttpServlet is in that catagory, but worth a try. Kristian Rink wrote: Hi all; being into the state of having to check out several SOAP implementations to decide which one to be used for a certain project, I currently (for the first time) am playing around with Tomcat and Apache SOAP, trying to get a simple SOAP service up and running... Actually, I'm not very close to that, right now, getting stuck in the very first stage of getting Tomcat to work with Apache-SOAP: * Tomcat itself is up and running. * http://localhost:8080/soap/ works * Trying to access http://localhost:8080/soap/servlet/rpcrouter ends up with an error message like this: ---snip--- type Exception report message description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request. exception javax.servlet.ServletException: Error allocating a servlet instance org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke (ErrorReportValve.java:105) org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service (CoyoteAdapter.java:148) org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process (Http11Processor.java:856) org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol $Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.java:744) org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket (PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt (LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run (ThreadPool.java:684) java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) root cause java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:620) java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass (SecureClassLoader.java:124) java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass (URLClassLoader.java:260) java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100 (URLClassLoader.java:56) java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run (URLClassLoader.java:195) java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged (Native Method) java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass (URLClassLoader.java:188) ---snip--- Googling for that error left me pretty helpless since I by now tried several hints regarding problems with Apache SOAP on top of Tomcat 4.x, but none of these worked. So, can anyone enlighten me on where to tweak to make the SOAP package find the javax.servlet package? System I'm running: Debian unstable Tomcat 5.5.9 JDK 1.5.0 Apache SOAP 2.3.1 Additionally: Are there any other implementations of SOAP for Tomcat that might be worth investigating? Thanks for your patience and bye, Kris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5/Apache 2 in-process
Faine, Mark wrote: Has anyone succeeded in getting Tomcat 5 to run in-process with Apache 2 using mod_jk? Does anyone know of a howto on this? I've read the docs, I've searched the web, I have it working using AJP13 but I have had no luck on getting it to work in-process. I don't even know where to start. Forget the in-process. The JNI connector is deprecated, and the reasons are many. On of the major is that it can work only on WIN32 Apache and IIS. Also bringing JVM in the same address space as web server, makes you server unusable in case of OutOfMemory errors, etc... There is a project called tomcat-native that will eventually bring faster connections to WS-TC by using unix sockets or windows named pipes, and still offer the process isolation. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat + SSL, apache
Don't think so. Apache takes on the connection and therefore is in charge of the SSL handshake. So you will have to confiure apache to support SSL. They only way to make tomcat handle the handshake is to make it directly available to the browser. But guess you allready kind of suspected it :) Regards, Wouter On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:25:59 +0200, Laurentiu Vasiescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to have the Tomcat with SSL and a front-end Apache, wich should only serve as a interface between client and tomcat? I mean tomcat should serve the certificates and do all the ssl, apache only to redirect traffic to it. thanks. Laurentiu Vasiescu Network Administrator S.A. Tri-Pen TravelMaster Technologies, SRL Eastern Europe - Bucharest (Romania) Office: +40 (31) 401 1152 +40 (31) 402 5027 Fax: +40 (21) 323 4357 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.tri-pen.ro Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Tri-Pen TavelMaster Technologies at +40 (31) 401 1152 and destroy all copies of the original message. -- Regards, Wouter Boers business: http://www.abcdarium.nl personal: http://www.ikke.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat + SSL, apache
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:25:59 +0200, Laurentiu Vasiescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to have the Tomcat with SSL and a front-end Apache, wich should only serve as a interface between client and tomcat? I mean tomcat should serve the certificates and do all the ssl, apache only to redirect traffic to it. thanks. Google for configuring Apache as a Forward Proxy, I think that should do what you want but not 100% sure. Regards, -- Jason Bainbridge KDE - Conquer Your Desktop - http://kde.org KDE Web Team - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat + SSL, apache
Actually I believe its the opposite. Apache serves the certificate the communication between Tomcat and Apache shouldnt be public anyway. From: Laurentiu Vasiescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: tomcat + SSL, apache Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:25:59 +0200 Is there any way to have the Tomcat with SSL and a front-end Apache, wich should only serve as a interface between client and tomcat? I mean tomcat should serve the certificates and do all the ssl, apache only to redirect traffic to it. thanks. Laurentiu Vasiescu Network Administrator S.A. Tri-Pen TravelMaster Technologies, SRL Eastern Europe - Bucharest (Romania) Office: +40 (31) 401 1152 +40 (31) 402 5027 Fax: +40 (21) 323 4357 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.tri-pen.ro Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Tri-Pen TavelMaster Technologies at +40 (31) 401 1152 and destroy all copies of the original message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat + SSL, apache
Didier McGillis wrote: Actually I believe its the opposite. Apache serves the certificate the communication between Tomcat and Apache shouldnt be public anyway. Apache makes the SSL handshake and passes any client certificate to Tomcat. Any servlet sees that like it came directly from Tomcat. Communication between apache and tomcat is not encrypted, so if you are concerned about the security, put the apache on the box with two NIC cards, and use the second for the apache-tomcat communication. AJP14 protocol will have encryption embedded, so until then :). Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5.0.27/Apache 2.0.40 with mutible developers
Dwayne Ghant wrote: Hello All, I have successfully set up tomcat/ apache /mod_jk Just one quick question I need all the developers to have access like http://hostname/~username And I need tomcat to automatically pick up the developers accounts so they can write web-applications. I got everything else working fine just need this last piece. Your help is greatly appreciated. If someone could just point me to a place to read I will be fine. -- Dwayne A. Ghant Application Developer Temple University 215.204. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 5.0.27/Apache 2.0.40 with mutible developers
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/host.html section User Web Applications may help. -Original Message- From: Dwayne Ghant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2004 17:31 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0.27/Apache 2.0.40 with mutible developers Dwayne Ghant wrote: Hello All, I have successfully set up tomcat/ apache /mod_jk Just one quick question I need all the developers to have access like http://hostname/~username And I need tomcat to automatically pick up the developers accounts so they can write web-applications. I got everything else working fine just need this last piece. Your help is greatly appreciated. If someone could just point me to a place to read I will be fine. -- Dwayne A. Ghant Application Developer Temple University 215.204. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FONT SIZE=1 FACE=VERDANA,ARIAL COLOR=BLUE --- QAS Ltd. Developers of QuickAddress Software a href=http://www.qas.com;www.qas.com/a Registered in England: No 2582055 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474 --- /FONT - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and apache in Oracle9.2.0.1
How about http://www.oracle.com/support/index.html ? -Tim Daxin Zuo wrote: After install Oracle9.2.0.1, Apache and Tomcat are installed. What are the versions of the TOMCAT and the apache in this version of Oracle? Do you know the location of the document where oracle describe its http server? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and apache in Oracle9.2.0.1
Can anybody forward more specific information? This Oracle site definitely has the information. But the doc sea is too wide. Thanks -Original Message- From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:14 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat and apache in Oracle9.2.0.1 How about http://www.oracle.com/support/index.html ? -Tim Daxin Zuo wrote: After install Oracle9.2.0.1, Apache and Tomcat are installed. What are the versions of the TOMCAT and the apache in this version of Oracle? Do you know the location of the document where oracle describe its http server? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat, mod_jk, Apache and virtual host
Will this help? http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg136432.html On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Glen Ezkovich wrote: Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 16:55:10 -0500 From: Glen Ezkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat, mod_jk, Apache and virtual host We have set up Tomcat and Apache using mod_jk and are using virtual hosting on both. We can throw a jsp page into our default directory and it displays fine so we know things work. We have serveral servlets to deploy for each virtual host and we'd rather not make entries in the main server.xml for each contex. We'd also like to be able to set a default servlet for each virtual host. Is there a way to do this in each appBase? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat, mod_jk, Apache and virtual host
Thanks Alex, Its a good resource but, we were hoping to be able to define the context some where besides the server.xml, such as in the appBase. I've run across mentions of using xml fragments for this, but as yet haven't been able to find out much. If anyone knows about how this can be done, I'd appreciate hearing about it. On Oct 6, 2004, at 6:12 AM, Alex wrote: Will this help? http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ msg136432.html On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Glen Ezkovich wrote: Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 16:55:10 -0500 From: Glen Ezkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat, mod_jk, Apache and virtual host We have set up Tomcat and Apache using mod_jk and are using virtual hosting on both. We can throw a jsp page into our default directory and it displays fine so we know things work. We have serveral servlets to deploy for each virtual host and we'd rather not make entries in the main server.xml for each contex. We'd also like to be able to set a default servlet for each virtual host. Is there a way to do this in each appBase? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Glen Ezkovich HardBop Consulting glen at hard-bop.com http://www.hard-bop.com - new and improved site coming soon A Proverb for Paranoids: If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers. - Thomas Pynchon Gravity's Rainbow - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality?
Inititally I would have agreed. However, after lots of reading, monkeying around, and working out everything, I can now say that we have implemented successfully the jk2 adapter with both iis5 and apache2 withiout issue. for it to work properly, i found you needed to have virtual-hosts in tomcat .. if you were doing something a bit more complex with multiple hosts. how many exact pages/traffic do they get? i can't answer that right now. i'll take a look in a bit. haven't noticed any problems though. -alex - pass the salt... On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Brantley Hobbs wrote: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:19:53 -0400 From: Brantley Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality? I second this. I've had nothing but trouble out of JK2, configuration difficulties on Apache and just flatly broken on IIS. The original JK adapter has worked great. -Brantley - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 4/Apache 2 Connector slow down
Try turning off ip to name resolution, this can sometimes be very slow and seemingly affect different PCs/servers differently. I'm no expert on what might cause the slowdown in your case, but I have experienced what sound like similar problems in the past. From the default server.xml file for v5.0.27: By default, DNS lookups are enabled when a web application calls request.getRemoteHost(). This can have an adverse impact on performance, so you can disable it by setting the enableLookups attribute to false. When DNS lookups are disabled, request.getRemoteHost() will return the String version of the IP address of the remote client. The same adverse impact can also be caused when converting IP to name for logging purposes. -Original Message- From: Steve Forsyth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday 30 September 2004 00:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 4/Apache 2 Connector slow down I have a very bizarre situation: I have everything working as far as the connectivity between Tomcat 4 and Apache 2 with both the JK and JK2 connectors (of course not at the same time :) I am currently testing on 2 computers... both connected through the same little hub and both have the exact same IP configuration coming from DHCP. However, computer A (my computer) hits the websites and runs just fine Whereas, computer B hits the websites and reacts in different ways depending on what my setup is and how I hit the website... explained hereafter Different ways of hitting the website and the different configurations (only affected computer B) 1) Using JK connector and port 8080 (so bypassing Apache 2): Everything flies 2) Using JK connector and port 80 (going through Apache 2): Moderate slow down of about 4 to 5 times slower than going direct on port 8080. So a page that would come up instantly now comes up about 2 to 5 seconds 3) Using JK2 connector and port 8080:Again, everything flies 4) Using JK2 connector and port 80: EXTREMELY SLOW... something happens that makes the connection go slower than a modem... on a LAN. We sniffed the traffic (unfortunately, none of us are all that good with exactly what we are seeing so we had to rely on what the sniffer was telling us) and it looks like there is some very fast handshaking for a few packets back and forth and then a WINS packet to the client, the client sends back the computer name and user name and the server sits on it for about 7 secs... the server sends another WINS packet... sits for another 7 secs this all happens for about 30 secs and then the server starts sending packets but slowly. So... all in all... it takes 30 seconds to send a page that normally takes far less than a second if going directly to Tomcat via port 8080. The part that makes this whole thing interesting is the fact that I have found my computer... and the other servers seem to not be affected by any of this... and yet most of our pcs... which are of varying speeds, types, (however all are windows OSs... XP and NT4). I haven't seen any difference between IP settings or any other network settings. However, I must admit that I'm a developer and not a net admin :) Anyway, anyone have any ideas or comments... places to search? WINS is about the worst search term that you would want to search for since it never pulls up exactly what you are looking for :) Thanks, Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality?
Le mercredi 29 septembre 2004 12:43 -0400, Kurt Overberg a crit : Gang, I've been running a fairly large website (25000 pages/day) off of Tomcat4.1.30/JK/Apache1.3 for quite some time now. Its been running great, but in expectation of needing some load balancing, I'm thinking of moving to Tomcat5/Apache2/JK2. Anyone have any thoughts or experiences with running these versions in a production environment? Thanks! Henri Gomez stated yesterday on JPackage lists JK2 was not ready for production and there would be a new integrated connector module in apache 2.1 anyway. He got as far as to suggest we remove our JK2 package. Now since he's heavily involved with JK1 you might want to take his words with a grain of salt, but I personnally won't discount them (of course, the hellish config system of JK2 helps a lot to make one's mind). You'll notice even in the official JK2 doc pages there is no clear endorsement of JK2 over JK1, and in fact large parts of it deal only with JK1. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
RE: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality?
I second this. I've had nothing but trouble out of JK2, configuration difficulties on Apache and just flatly broken on IIS. The original JK adapter has worked great. -Brantley -Original Message- From: Nicolas Mailhot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 7:59 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality? Le mercredi 29 septembre 2004 à 12:43 -0400, Kurt Overberg a écrit : Gang, I've been running a fairly large website (25000 pages/day) off of Tomcat4.1.30/JK/Apache1.3 for quite some time now. Its been running great, but in expectation of needing some load balancing, I'm thinking of moving to Tomcat5/Apache2/JK2. Anyone have any thoughts or experiences with running these versions in a production environment? Thanks! Henri Gomez stated yesterday on JPackage lists JK2 was not ready for production and there would be a new integrated connector module in apache 2.1 anyway. He got as far as to suggest we remove our JK2 package. Now since he's heavily involved with JK1 you might want to take his words with a grain of salt, but I personnally won't discount them (of course, the hellish config system of JK2 helps a lot to make one's mind). You'll notice even in the official JK2 doc pages there is no clear endorsement of JK2 over JK1, and in fact large parts of it deal only with JK1. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
Shapira, Yoav wrote: I already have. This exact same setup worked flawlessly under RH 7.3 and RH 9.0 Actually, I meant a non-Linux platform. But even your results so far suggest an RHEL-specific issue. Maybe try LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 instead of 2.4? I remember people having success with that in the past. You know what's funny? I stopped APF (the firewall) and it runs fine. I don't understand this. The needed ports were open (the shutdown, standalone and connector ports). I used the same firewall with the same ports open on the other servers/OSs and it worked fine. But I turn the firewall off and it stops hanging immediately. -Sean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 4 / Apache 2 / .htacess
Hi, You need to achieve a subscription to the httpd-user mailing list and a response there ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 4:41 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Tomcat 4 / Apache 2 / .htacess I would like to use .htacess of Apache aproach to restrict user access. It works fine on normal html site, but does not work on JSP base site, what else I need to do to achieve. thx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Sean Finkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:52 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
Sorry, this is a shared server, and he wants his site available on port
80.
Tomcat standalone can run on port 80 without running as root by using
jsvc (from commons-daemon). There are examples and more information on
this configuration at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/security.html#jsvcExample.
Maybe I am missing something, but wouldn't that not be able to bind to
port 80 since Apache is already bound to it? There is a lot about the
Java world I am not familiar with, so maybe it can...
You would need separate ip addresses for apache and tomcat.
reason we hand everything off, is because he has his application hosted
inside a directory (ie: ~/public_html/appdir) but wants it to be
available to users as http://www.domainname.com/whatever.jsp instead of
http://www.domainname.com/appdir/whatever.jsp.
You can configure Tomcat to have a Context whose docbase is
~/public_html/appdir but whose path is (the empty string, not null or
/).
And indeed that is what we are doing for him right now. However, my
previous attempts at fiddling with mod_rewrite to translate root request
/whatever.jsp into /appdir/whatever.jsp had failed. I now have this
working in a preliminary stage. Since I was unable to get mod_rewrite
processing the requests right, we just did a jkMount /* workername,
which passed every request off to tomcat, and since we had the root
context setup to serve from ~/public_html/appdir it all worked out fine.
But of course, this results in trying to pass PHP requests (and things
outside the appdir) to tomcat.
how about passing only requests that are not php to tomcat? You can do this
in httpd.conf:
LocationMatch ^/(?!phpdir)
jkUriSet ...
/LocationMatch
He also wants to use PHP
on his main domain for forums or some such, once we get him to move his
application out of appdir and into his website root.
This is the deal breaker I think, for a commercial organization anyways.
While you can use PHP on Tomcat, the performance is apparently not good
enough for a large scale installation. See
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat/UsingPhp for how to do this
anyways.
Well, I don't think I want to run PHP through Tomcat as we already have
Apache running with PHP and it runs solid (and quite snappy too).
What I am currently working on is this for his .htaccess (well, testing
on a test instance):
( snip )
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/appdir/
RewriteRule ^(.*\.jsp)$ /appdir/$1
---( /snip )-
This results in all jsp pages being sent to tomcat. I also added a
jkMount /appdir/* workername to the httpd.conf file. This means, that
in the user's JSP pages, if he uses absolute paths for images, css, etc
then they will be handed off to tomcat as well so that a complete page
is sent back.
The problem currently is, the user used relative paths for all his
images, css files, etc. So while the JSP is being served correctly from
Tomcat with the above .htaccess lines, it is not passing the css and
image files off, which is the expected behavior. So I am trying to find
some way to remedy this via .htaccess so the user doesn't have to change
his 50+ jsp pages =|
Thanks again for taking the time to answer my questions and provide your
suggestions. It really is much appreciated!
-Sean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
Maybe I am missing something, but wouldn't that not be able to bind to
port 80 since Apache is already bound to it? There is a lot about the
Java world I am not familiar with, so maybe it can...
You would need separate ip addresses for apache and tomcat.
Aye I figured as much
And indeed that is what we are doing for him right now. However, my
previous attempts at fiddling with mod_rewrite to translate root request
/whatever.jsp into /appdir/whatever.jsp had failed. I now have this
working in a preliminary stage. Since I was unable to get mod_rewrite
processing the requests right, we just did a jkMount /* workername,
which passed every request off to tomcat, and since we had the root
context setup to serve from ~/public_html/appdir it all worked out fine.
But of course, this results in trying to pass PHP requests (and things
outside the appdir) to tomcat.
how about passing only requests that are not php to tomcat? You can do this
in httpd.conf:
LocationMatch ^/(?!phpdir)
jkUriSet ...
/LocationMatch
We are using mod_jk not mod_jk2. The above would only work with mod_jk2
correct? In any case, I have finally gotten this to work (only passing
off java requests to tomcat). For those interested:
in the site's root .htaccess file:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/appdir/
RewriteRule ^(.*\.jsp)$ /appdir/$1 [L]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/appdir/ [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^(.*)\.jsp.*$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /appdir/$1 [R,NC]
then in httpd.conf, we just jkMount /appdir/*
Still having problems with Tomcat hanging Apache child processes. I
lowered the MaxRequestsPerChild in Apache to 10. Results in more cpu
work, but keeps the hung processes to a minimum. This morning there were
only 3 instead of 50-200 of them. They all seem to be hanging on image
files now. Weird
-Sean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
I recall RHEL 3.0 comes with an NPTL-based 2.4, which will require setting LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.4 to disable the NPTL functionality for the Java process. That may be it. I am assuming you mean set this as an environment variable? I will give this a try and see what happens! Thank you for the suggestion! Well, that did not work. I was using the AJP13 connector. I have changed the private (Tomcat4) instance to use the Coyote connector to see if that makes a difference. It didn't before, and I doubt it will now. :( This is really becoming frustrating. At least it is not hanging Apache, as in, Apache still responds to *new* requests, it just has 50+ child process tied up waiting for previous Tomcat responses. -Sean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
Hi, Perhaps Tomcat standalone would be sufficient for your application requirements? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Sean Finkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 11:17 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas? I recall RHEL 3.0 comes with an NPTL-based 2.4, which will require setting LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.4 to disable the NPTL functionality for the Java process. That may be it. I am assuming you mean set this as an environment variable? I will give this a try and see what happens! Thank you for the suggestion! Well, that did not work. I was using the AJP13 connector. I have changed the private (Tomcat4) instance to use the Coyote connector to see if that makes a difference. It didn't before, and I doubt it will now. :( This is really becoming frustrating. At least it is not hanging Apache, as in, Apache still responds to *new* requests, it just has 50+ child process tied up waiting for previous Tomcat responses. -Sean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Hi, Perhaps Tomcat standalone would be sufficient for your application requirements? No, because the user also wants access to PHP and other related Apache features (htacces, mod_rewrite, etc). -Sean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
Sean Finkel wrote: Hello, First a brief background on the setup: We are running Apache 1.3.31 utilizing mod_jk (not jk2). We are running two instances of Tomcat. Previously, both were version 4. Currently, we have one shared instance running the latest 5.x release (just compiled yesterday). We have one customer running a private 4.x instance. With that said, we just moved to a new server (Dual Xeon, RHEL 3.0) and now the problem we are having is the customer who has this private instance has jsp pages that hang. But, it does not hang all the time. What's weird, is most of the time, I can stop the shared instance and the customer's pages will stop hanging. I would like to fix the hanging completely, obviously. Ok this is happening again right now. Here is some output from various programs: From Apache Status (blanked out the VHost) - these Apache child processes have been running for 15+ minutes waiting on Tomcat. They are not servicing new requests and then dieing like they should be (Apache hands *everything* off for this domain to Tomcat, including images): ( snip )--- *Srv* *PID* *Acc* *M* *CPU* *SS* *Req* *Conn* *Child* *Slot* *Host* *VHost* *Request* *0-0* 24535 0/21/1803 *W* 0.23 0 0.0 0.14 21.56 4.153.20.11 GET /images/pics/todayspic27.jpg HTTP/1.1 *1-0* 23257 0/39/2065 *W* 0.46 3452 0 0.0 0.27 12.33 4.153.20.11 GET /images/pics/todayspic16.jpg HTTP/1.1 *2-0* 23252 0/17/1868 *W* 0.20 3593 0 0.0 0.26 15.75 207.69.137.135 GET /images/pics/todayspic13.jpg HTTP/1.1 *3-0* 23377 0/22/1825 *W* 0.26 3445 0 0.0 0.34 20.29 4.153.20.11 GET /images/pics/todayspic21.jpg HTTP/1.1 *4-0* 23378 0/22/1839 *W* 0.38 3439 0 0.0 0.07 16.09 4.153.20.11 GET /images/pics/todayspic15.jpg HTTP/1.1 *5-0* 22810 0/43/1750 *W* 0.26 3584 0 0.0 0.54 19.31 207.69.137.135 GET /images/pics/todayspic12.jpg HTTP/1.1 *6-0* 23267 0/37/1788 *W* 0.68 3425 0 0.0 0.52 14.50 4.153.20.11 GET /images/pics/todayspic19.jpg HTTP/1.1 *7-0* 26919 0/33/1586 *W* 0.15 3143 0 0.0 0.27 12.33 4.153.20.11 GET /images/pics/todayspic36.jpg HTTP/1.1 *8-0* 23441 0/22/1532 *W* 0.28 3385 0 0.0 0.09 11.07 4.153.20.11 GET /images/pics/todayspic25.jpg HTTP/1.1 *9-0* 26920 0/30/1396 *W* 0.36 3147 0 0.0 0.17 8.23 4.153.20.11 GET /images/pics/todayspic34.jpg HTTP/1.1 -( /snip )- From A thread dump of the JVM - obviously there were more than three, but I only included three for the sake of brevity: ---( snip )--- Thread-20 daemon prio=1 tid=0x08192b68 nid=0x3560 in Object.wait() [a84db000..a84db87c] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0xab9bcba8 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:512) - locked 0xab9bcba8 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) Thread-19 daemon prio=1 tid=0x08195450 nid=0x3560 in Object.wait() [a855c000..a855c87c] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0xab9bcc10 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:512) - locked 0xab9bcc10 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) Thread-18 daemon prio=1 tid=0x0824b148 nid=0x3560 in Object.wait() [a85dd000..a85dd87c] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0xab7b9ae0 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:429) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:512) - locked 0xab7b9ae0 (a org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534) - ( /snip )-- So, as another user suggested earler, it seems some blocking is happening. Also as I mentioned, I am on RHEL 3.0 and JDK version: 1.4.2_04. Does anyone have any ideas as to how to prevent the threads from locking up? I have already tried the LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.4 and that does not help. -Sean
RE: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
Hola, Just a couple of things ;) (Apache hands *everything* off for this domain to Tomcat, including images): And yet you said Tomcat standalone wasn't an option for this installation? Too bad. You can do much of mod_rewrite with the balancer app, you can do much of .htaccess with Servlet security constraints, and if Tomcat already handles all the requests than you're losing performance by adding Apache and the connector layer. From A thread dump of the JVM - obviously there were more than three, but I only included three for the sake of brevity: How did you pick these three threads? ---( snip )--- Thread-20 daemon prio=1 tid=0x08192b68 nid=0x3560 in Object.wait() [a84db000..a84db87c] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on 0xab9bcba8 (a The three threads in your trace are waiting on different objects. They don't appear to be locked with each other. It is normal and expected that some thread will be waiting when you do a thread trace like this: it's extremely unlikely all threads will be working when you do the trace ;) So, as another user suggested earler, it seems some blocking is happening. Also as I mentioned, I am on RHEL 3.0 and JDK version: 1.4.2_04. Does anyone have any ideas as to how to prevent the threads from locking up? I have already tried the LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.4 and that does not help. The next step would be to try your app on a different platform, IMHO, to try and tell if this is indeed an RHEL-related problem or something else. Yoav This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
(Apache hands *everything* off for this domain to Tomcat, including images): And yet you said Tomcat standalone wasn't an option for this installation? Too bad. You can do much of mod_rewrite with the balancer app, you can do much of .htaccess with Servlet security constraints, and if Tomcat already handles all the requests than you're losing performance by adding Apache and the connector layer. Sorry, this is a shared server, and he wants his site available on port 80. I suppose we could give him a dedicated IP. Currently, the only reason we hand everything off, is because he has his application hosted inside a directory (ie: ~/public_html/appdir) but wants it to be available to users as http://www.domainname.com/whatever.jsp instead of http://www.domainname.com/appdir/whatever.jsp. He also wants to use PHP on his main domain for forums or some such, once we get him to move his application out of appdir and into his website root. Once he does that, we can modify the jkMount apache directives to only pass off .jsp and /servlet/ requests instead of *everything* Unless you can suggest a way around this currently? From A thread dump of the JVM - obviously there were more than three, but I only included three for the sake of brevity: How did you pick these three threads? They were the only ones that had anything to do with apache (well, there were about 20 of them actually). But now it hits me, duh. Tomcat = Apache project. *sigh* I guess I thought the locked had something to do with it, though I now see it seems all threads say this. So, as another user suggested earler, it seems some blocking is happening. Also as I mentioned, I am on RHEL 3.0 and JDK version: 1.4.2_04. Does anyone have any ideas as to how to prevent the threads from locking up? I have already tried the LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.4 and that does not help. The next step would be to try your app on a different platform, IMHO, to try and tell if this is indeed an RHEL-related problem or something else. I already have. This exact same setup worked flawlessly under RH 7.3 and RH 9.0 however, moving (back) to either of those platforms is not an option. With that said however, I compiled tomcat under RH 7.3 and copied everything over. The JDK stayed the same throughout though. Could this be the problem? Should I recompile Tomcat? I *have* recompiled mod_jk on the new system though. thanks for your help! -Sean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
Hola, Sorry, this is a shared server, and he wants his site available on port 80. Tomcat standalone can run on port 80 without running as root by using jsvc (from commons-daemon). There are examples and more information on this configuration at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/security.html#jsvcExample. reason we hand everything off, is because he has his application hosted inside a directory (ie: ~/public_html/appdir) but wants it to be available to users as http://www.domainname.com/whatever.jsp instead of http://www.domainname.com/appdir/whatever.jsp. You can configure Tomcat to have a Context whose docbase is ~/public_html/appdir but whose path is (the empty string, not null or /). He also wants to use PHP on his main domain for forums or some such, once we get him to move his application out of appdir and into his website root. This is the deal breaker I think, for a commercial organization anyways. While you can use PHP on Tomcat, the performance is apparently not good enough for a large scale installation. See http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat/UsingPhp for how to do this anyways. I already have. This exact same setup worked flawlessly under RH 7.3 and RH 9.0 Actually, I meant a non-Linux platform. But even your results so far suggest an RHEL-specific issue. Maybe try LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 instead of 2.4? I remember people having success with that in the past. With that said however, I compiled tomcat under RH 7.3 and copied everything over. The JDK stayed the same throughout though. Could this be the problem? Should I recompile Tomcat? I *have* recompiled mod_jk on the new system though. The connectors are more important. Recompiling Tomcat is not needed IMHO, including not needed in the first place for RH 7.3 (you could have just downloaded the binary). But I'm not a Linux expert. Yoav This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
Sorry, this is a shared server, and he wants his site available on port
80.
Tomcat standalone can run on port 80 without running as root by using
jsvc (from commons-daemon). There are examples and more information on
this configuration at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/security.html#jsvcExample.
Maybe I am missing something, but wouldn't that not be able to bind to
port 80 since Apache is already bound to it? There is a lot about the
Java world I am not familiar with, so maybe it can...
reason we hand everything off, is because he has his application hosted
inside a directory (ie: ~/public_html/appdir) but wants it to be
available to users as http://www.domainname.com/whatever.jsp instead of
http://www.domainname.com/appdir/whatever.jsp.
You can configure Tomcat to have a Context whose docbase is
~/public_html/appdir but whose path is (the empty string, not null or
/).
And indeed that is what we are doing for him right now. However, my
previous attempts at fiddling with mod_rewrite to translate root request
/whatever.jsp into /appdir/whatever.jsp had failed. I now have this
working in a preliminary stage. Since I was unable to get mod_rewrite
processing the requests right, we just did a jkMount /* workername,
which passed every request off to tomcat, and since we had the root
context setup to serve from ~/public_html/appdir it all worked out fine.
But of course, this results in trying to pass PHP requests (and things
outside the appdir) to tomcat.
He also wants to use PHP
on his main domain for forums or some such, once we get him to move his
application out of appdir and into his website root.
This is the deal breaker I think, for a commercial organization anyways.
While you can use PHP on Tomcat, the performance is apparently not good
enough for a large scale installation. See
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat/UsingPhp for how to do this
anyways.
Well, I don't think I want to run PHP through Tomcat as we already have
Apache running with PHP and it runs solid (and quite snappy too).
What I am currently working on is this for his .htaccess (well, testing
on a test instance):
( snip )
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/appdir/
RewriteRule ^(.*\.jsp)$ /appdir/$1
---( /snip )-
This results in all jsp pages being sent to tomcat. I also added a
jkMount /appdir/* workername to the httpd.conf file. This means, that
in the user's JSP pages, if he uses absolute paths for images, css, etc
then they will be handed off to tomcat as well so that a complete page
is sent back.
The problem currently is, the user used relative paths for all his
images, css files, etc. So while the JSP is being served correctly from
Tomcat with the above .htaccess lines, it is not passing the css and
image files off, which is the expected behavior. So I am trying to find
some way to remedy this via .htaccess so the user doesn't have to change
his 50+ jsp pages =|
Thanks again for taking the time to answer my questions and provide your
suggestions. It really is much appreciated!
-Sean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:07:29PM -0400, Sean Finkel wrote: : With that said, we just moved to a new server (Dual Xeon, RHEL 3.0) and : now the problem we are having is the customer who has this private : instance has jsp pages that hang. But, it does not hang all the time. : What's weird, is most of the time, I can stop the shared instance and : the customer's pages will stop hanging. I would like to fix the hanging : completely, obviously. What kernel was running on the old box? Better put, what is different between the two machines? I recall RHEL 3.0 comes with an NPTL-based 2.4, which will require setting LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.4 to disable the NPTL functionality for the Java process. That may be it. -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
What kernel was running on the old box? Better put, what is different between the two machines? 7.3 on the old system. 9.0 on an intermediary system, with only the private instance installed (which never hung). I recall RHEL 3.0 comes with an NPTL-based 2.4, which will require setting LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.4 to disable the NPTL functionality for the Java process. That may be it. I am assuming you mean set this as an environment variable? I will give this a try and see what happens! Thank you for the suggestion! -Sean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas?
I had a similar problem on RH EL just a couple of weeks ago. Might not be the same as yours, though, because in my case apache wasnt hung, just tomcat. but that might just be a difference in versions, so i'll share it anyway. Here's what i did.. I used kill -QUIT on the tomcat process after it had hung to find a stack trace of the tomcat threads. This showed that every thread was blocked on a synchronized statement in program code. I investigated it (thoroughly!) and concluded that there is a bug in the JVM on this OS related to synchronized statements, only manifesting itself occasionally and under certain conditions. I refactored my code slightly around this and it appears to have fixed the problem. I'd be interested in hearing how it works out for you. -Original Message- From: Sean Finkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 August 2004 2:07 AM To: Tomcat User Subject: Tomcat causes Apache to hang. Any ideas? Hello, First a brief background on the setup: We are running Apache 1.3.31 utilizing mod_jk (not jk2). We are running two instances of Tomcat. Previously, both were version 4. Currently, we have one shared instance running the latest 5.x release (just compiled yesterday). We have one customer running a private 4.x instance. With that said, we just moved to a new server (Dual Xeon, RHEL 3.0) and now the problem we are having is the customer who has this private instance has jsp pages that hang. But, it does not hang all the time. What's weird, is most of the time, I can stop the shared instance and the customer's pages will stop hanging. I would like to fix the hanging completely, obviously. Today though, the only thing that kept his pages from hanging was a full reboot. I am wondering if this is related to swap space usage. I don't know what else it would be, as I stopped/started his tomcat and apache numerous times. I tried using a different connector (AJP instead of Coyote). Could this last problem be due to running tomcat5 *and* tomcat 4? I would say no, as that makes no sense this would be the case, especially when it (still)occurred after stopping the Tomcat 5 instance. Essentially what happens is, Apache receives the request for the page, hands it off to Tomcat, tomcat returns half of the page (header/left menu) and just sits there. Hitting stop on the browser stops the transfer, however Tomcat never releases the Apache process. So we end up with dozens, sometimes hundreds of Apache processes that are hung by tomcat. This results in memory usages exceeding 2gb! Has anyone experienced similar problems or have any suggestions? -Sean Finkel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and Apache with TCP TIME_WAIT state
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 06:56:08PM -0400, Kilic, Hakan wrote: : I'm seeing Tomcat and Apache show many tcp TIME_WAIT connections when : running netstat under a load test. I was wondering, is this because the web : browser client is not closing the connection properly, or is this the normal : behavior of apache/tomcat under load, and the connections simply time out. This is the normal behavior of TCP on a network stack that's not tuned for web-style traffic. What's happening is far beneath Tomcat or Apache. The short (and oversimplified) version: before the web came along, most connections to a machine were long-lasting, so the default post-disconnection timeout was pretty high. (A few minutes, I recall.) HTTP gave us short, bursty traffic and most machines aren't tuned for that out of the box. Check your OS to lower the timeout to something more reasonable and see what that does for you. -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast
Thanks for the help - problem solved! Was running a box with LVS, and running DNS. I don't think all the zone files were there, but stopping named worked like a charm - all webapps fast! What a stupid error (on my part). -Original Message- From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 August 2004 01:13 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast AFAIK - mod_proxy does not cache DNS lookups. It is looked up on every request. So a slow lookup could be your problem. -Tim Duncan Houston wrote: Sorry folks, more info (hope somebody will has experienced these problems as well!). I can hit 2 JSPs in different webapps, both proxied behind Apache, both on HTTP. The one is fast, the other slow. What could be causing this? Apache config? DNS lookup issues? -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 23:28 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast OK, I made a mistake there (sorry). The issue does still seem to be that connecting to a webapp over SSL is faster than connecting to another webapp over non-SSL, both running in the same Tomcat (JBoss) instance and proxied behind Apache. Any ideas why the SSL version would be fast and the normal (HTTP) version not? -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 18:03 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast Some more info. The problem does not seem to be with HTTP vs HTTPS (was testing app A on HTTPS, app B on HTTP B - problem seems that A is faster than B whether on HTTP or HTTPS). I have a number of .war files deployed to JBoss's /deploy directory (automatic deployment). Let's call them A and B, and let's say each has an image folder. Accessing an image from inside A's folder is fast, but accessing an image from B's folder is slow. Proxy setup appears to be the same for both apps. -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 17:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast Hi Background: Firstly I should state that I am running Tomcat 4.0.1 with JBoss 2.4.4, Sun JVM 1.3. In front of that, Apache 2 is running. All of this is running on RedHat. Requests are passed through to Tomcat by proxy, using rewrite rules. I know, I should be running a newer version of JBoss Tomcat, and should be using mod_jk, but haven't had the time to upgrade quite yet. The problem: Connections to webapps run on Tomcat via http are slow over the internet. It appears that establishing a new connection (for page, images on page etc) takes time - once established (seconds later) the data gets transferred quickly. But, interestingly, connecting via https is fast. My test server, when hit on a test intranet, is very quick to respond. Any ideas? I have set enableLookups=false, for what that is worth. Help would be much appreciated. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast
ATTENTION: THIS IS AN AUTOMATED RESPONSE. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. If you want to end your subscription, please use this link: http://www.nethugs.com/unsubscribe.shtml If you want to subscribe, please use this link: http://www.nethugs.com/whysubscribe.shtml If you need to contact a live person, use this link: http://www.nethugs.com/contactus.shtml Sincerely, NetHugs.com Admin http://www.nethugs.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast
Some more info. The problem does not seem to be with HTTP vs HTTPS (was testing app A on HTTPS, app B on HTTP B - problem seems that A is faster than B whether on HTTP or HTTPS). I have a number of .war files deployed to JBoss's /deploy directory (automatic deployment). Let's call them A and B, and let's say each has an image folder. Accessing an image from inside A's folder is fast, but accessing an image from B's folder is slow. Proxy setup appears to be the same for both apps. -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 17:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast Hi Background: Firstly I should state that I am running Tomcat 4.0.1 with JBoss 2.4.4, Sun JVM 1.3. In front of that, Apache 2 is running. All of this is running on RedHat. Requests are passed through to Tomcat by proxy, using rewrite rules. I know, I should be running a newer version of JBoss Tomcat, and should be using mod_jk, but haven't had the time to upgrade quite yet. The problem: Connections to webapps run on Tomcat via http are slow over the internet. It appears that establishing a new connection (for page, images on page etc) takes time - once established (seconds later) the data gets transferred quickly. But, interestingly, connecting via https is fast. My test server, when hit on a test intranet, is very quick to respond. Any ideas? I have set enableLookups=false, for what that is worth. Help would be much appreciated. Thanks Duncan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast
OK, I made a mistake there (sorry). The issue does still seem to be that connecting to a webapp over SSL is faster than connecting to another webapp over non-SSL, both running in the same Tomcat (JBoss) instance and proxied behind Apache. Any ideas why the SSL version would be fast and the normal (HTTP) version not? -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 18:03 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast Some more info. The problem does not seem to be with HTTP vs HTTPS (was testing app A on HTTPS, app B on HTTP B - problem seems that A is faster than B whether on HTTP or HTTPS). I have a number of .war files deployed to JBoss's /deploy directory (automatic deployment). Let's call them A and B, and let's say each has an image folder. Accessing an image from inside A's folder is fast, but accessing an image from B's folder is slow. Proxy setup appears to be the same for both apps. -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 17:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast Hi Background: Firstly I should state that I am running Tomcat 4.0.1 with JBoss 2.4.4, Sun JVM 1.3. In front of that, Apache 2 is running. All of this is running on RedHat. Requests are passed through to Tomcat by proxy, using rewrite rules. I know, I should be running a newer version of JBoss Tomcat, and should be using mod_jk, but haven't had the time to upgrade quite yet. The problem: Connections to webapps run on Tomcat via http are slow over the internet. It appears that establishing a new connection (for page, images on page etc) takes time - once established (seconds later) the data gets transferred quickly. But, interestingly, connecting via https is fast. My test server, when hit on a test intranet, is very quick to respond. Any ideas? I have set enableLookups=false, for what that is worth. Help would be much appreciated. Thanks Duncan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast
Sorry folks, more info (hope somebody will has experienced these problems as well!). I can hit 2 JSPs in different webapps, both proxied behind Apache, both on HTTP. The one is fast, the other slow. What could be causing this? Apache config? DNS lookup issues? -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 23:28 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast OK, I made a mistake there (sorry). The issue does still seem to be that connecting to a webapp over SSL is faster than connecting to another webapp over non-SSL, both running in the same Tomcat (JBoss) instance and proxied behind Apache. Any ideas why the SSL version would be fast and the normal (HTTP) version not? -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 18:03 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast Some more info. The problem does not seem to be with HTTP vs HTTPS (was testing app A on HTTPS, app B on HTTP B - problem seems that A is faster than B whether on HTTP or HTTPS). I have a number of .war files deployed to JBoss's /deploy directory (automatic deployment). Let's call them A and B, and let's say each has an image folder. Accessing an image from inside A's folder is fast, but accessing an image from B's folder is slow. Proxy setup appears to be the same for both apps. -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 17:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast Hi Background: Firstly I should state that I am running Tomcat 4.0.1 with JBoss 2.4.4, Sun JVM 1.3. In front of that, Apache 2 is running. All of this is running on RedHat. Requests are passed through to Tomcat by proxy, using rewrite rules. I know, I should be running a newer version of JBoss Tomcat, and should be using mod_jk, but haven't had the time to upgrade quite yet. The problem: Connections to webapps run on Tomcat via http are slow over the internet. It appears that establishing a new connection (for page, images on page etc) takes time - once established (seconds later) the data gets transferred quickly. But, interestingly, connecting via https is fast. My test server, when hit on a test intranet, is very quick to respond. Any ideas? I have set enableLookups=false, for what that is worth. Help would be much appreciated. Thanks Duncan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast
AFAIK - mod_proxy does not cache DNS lookups. It is looked up on every request. So a slow lookup could be your problem. -Tim Duncan Houston wrote: Sorry folks, more info (hope somebody will has experienced these problems as well!). I can hit 2 JSPs in different webapps, both proxied behind Apache, both on HTTP. The one is fast, the other slow. What could be causing this? Apache config? DNS lookup issues? -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 23:28 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast OK, I made a mistake there (sorry). The issue does still seem to be that connecting to a webapp over SSL is faster than connecting to another webapp over non-SSL, both running in the same Tomcat (JBoss) instance and proxied behind Apache. Any ideas why the SSL version would be fast and the normal (HTTP) version not? -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 18:03 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast Some more info. The problem does not seem to be with HTTP vs HTTPS (was testing app A on HTTPS, app B on HTTP B - problem seems that A is faster than B whether on HTTP or HTTPS). I have a number of .war files deployed to JBoss's /deploy directory (automatic deployment). Let's call them A and B, and let's say each has an image folder. Accessing an image from inside A's folder is fast, but accessing an image from B's folder is slow. Proxy setup appears to be the same for both apps. -Original Message- From: Duncan Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 August 2004 17:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat and Apache by Proxy http connections slow but https fast Hi Background: Firstly I should state that I am running Tomcat 4.0.1 with JBoss 2.4.4, Sun JVM 1.3. In front of that, Apache 2 is running. All of this is running on RedHat. Requests are passed through to Tomcat by proxy, using rewrite rules. I know, I should be running a newer version of JBoss Tomcat, and should be using mod_jk, but haven't had the time to upgrade quite yet. The problem: Connections to webapps run on Tomcat via http are slow over the internet. It appears that establishing a new connection (for page, images on page etc) takes time - once established (seconds later) the data gets transferred quickly. But, interestingly, connecting via https is fast. My test server, when hit on a test intranet, is very quick to respond. Any ideas? I have set enableLookups=false, for what that is worth. Help would be much appreciated. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and Apache Axis Security
Actually I have tried that and it doesn't work. One of the problems is that class is visible to Tomcat only. I tried placing a copy of the jar in the common/lib area and get classloading problems. I am not sure how to make that work. If you have any other ideas I would appreciate it. Thanks for your help. -Original Message- From: Isen,Ciji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 5:00 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat and Apache Axis Security Have you tried access it from the Principal. GenericPrincipal p = (GenericPrincipal)request.getUserPrincipal(); String uid = p.getName(); String passwd = p.getPassword(); Srofe, Douglas (c) wrote: We use single sign for our Tomcat applications. We have another Tomcat that hosts various web services. I would like to be able to send the logged on users name and password as credentials to the web service and have Tomcat authenticate it. I have tested this part with a hardcoded user name and password and this works fine. But I need to send the username and password used when the user logged on. How do I get access to the password that was used when the user logged on so I can send it as part of the credentials to the web service? Am I going to have to write custom authenticators and realms in order to do this? Thanks for any response. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and Apache Axis Security
Have you tried access it from the Principal. GenericPrincipal p = (GenericPrincipal)request.getUserPrincipal(); String uid = p.getName(); String passwd = p.getPassword(); Srofe, Douglas (c) wrote: We use single sign for our Tomcat applications. We have another Tomcat that hosts various web services. I would like to be able to send the logged on users name and password as credentials to the web service and have Tomcat authenticate it. I have tested this part with a hardcoded user name and password and this works fine. But I need to send the username and password used when the user logged on. How do I get access to the password that was used when the user logged on so I can send it as part of the credentials to the web service? Am I going to have to write custom authenticators and realms in order to do this? Thanks for any response. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and apache problem
Dear all, I am using Apache2.0-50 and tomcat 5.0-27 with mod_jk2, Apache is compiled by source and the tomcat and mod_jk are using binary The OS I using is Solaris9. After configuration, the web site for static page is normal, but when try to run servlets, it return 404 not found The HelloWorld.class is located under /$DocumentRoot/WEB-INF/classes. The catalina.out show the following: Jul 22, 2004 11:32:40 AM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080 Jul 22, 2004 11:32:40 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina load INFO: Initialization processed in 1800 ms Jul 22, 2004 11:32:41 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService start INFO: Starting service Tomcat-Apache Jul 22, 2004 11:32:41 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/5.0.27 Jul 22, 2004 11:32:41 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost start INFO: XML validation disabled Jul 22, 2004 11:32:42 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost getDeployer INFO: Create Host deployer for direct deployment ( non-jmx ) Jul 22, 2004 11:32:42 AM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol start INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080 Jul 22, 2004 11:32:42 AM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init INFO: JK2: ajp13 listening on /0.0.0.0:8009 Jul 22, 2004 11:32:42 AM org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start INFO: APR not loaded, disabling jni components: java.io.IOException: java. lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no jkjni in java.library.path Jul 22, 2004 11:32:42 AM org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=1/180 config=/usr/local/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.27/conf/jk2.properties Jul 22, 2004 11:32:42 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start INFO: Server startup in 2231 ms Attached plese find the tomcat config, and would you please give me some advice. Thank you very much. tomcat_problem.txt Best Regard, Terry Chow IT Department Tel: 29458018 Mobile: 92046004 workers2.properties # Define the communication channel [channel.socket:localhost:8009] info=Ajp13 forwarding over socket tomcatId=localhost:8009 port=8009 host=127.0.0.1 # Define the worker [ajp13:localhost:8009] channel=channel.socket:localhost:8009 [uri:/*.jsp] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 [uri:/servlets/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 # only at beginnin. In production uncomment it out [logger.apache2] level=DEBUG [shm] #file=/usr/local/apache/logs/shm.file file=/usr/local/apache/logs/jk2.shm size=1048576 Virtual host Location /*.jsp JkUriSet worker ajp13:localhost:8009 /Location Location /servlets/* JkUriSet worker ajp13:localhost:8009 /Location Tomcat server.xml !-- Define a Coyote/JK2 AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector port=8009 minProcessors=50 maxProcessors=400 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=10 debug=0 connectionTimeout=0 useURIValidationHack=false protocolHandlerClassName=org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler/ Engine name=Apache defaultHost=stream-test.peoples.com.hk debug=0 !-- Virtual host for stream-test -- Host name=stream-test.peoples.com.hk debug=1 appBase=/u02/stream-test/htdocs/html unpackWARs=tr ue autoDeploy=true Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve directory=logs prefix=stream-test_access. suffix=.log pattern=common resolveHosts=false/ Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=stream-test. suffix=.log timestamp=true/ Context path= docBase=/u02/stream-test/htdocs/html debug=1 reloadable=true / /Host jk2.properties shm.file=/usr/local/apache/logs/jk2.shm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 Apache Authentication
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm...so is there any workaround? For example, using an older version of the JK connector or some older combination of Tomcat/Apache and the JK connector? Thanks, Kevin Not as far as I know. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 Apache Authentication
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am having a problem getting Tomcat 5 to use Apache authentication. We have an existing CGI application that is handled by Apache 2, and I am tring to integrate some java stuff using Tomcat 5. Here is what I have: ## ## APACHE 2 conf/httpd.conf: ## # Tomcat Connector LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2.so JKSet config.file /opt/apps/apache/conf/workers2.properties # Tomcat 5 Alias /web/ja/ /opt/web/prod/ja/ Directory /opt/web/prod/ja/ SSLRequireSSL AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /opt/work/apps/trade/conf/ft_webauth AuthGroupFile /opt/work/apps/trade/conf/ft_webauthg require group mygroup AllowOverride All order allow,deny allow from all Options MultiViews Indexes FollowSymLinks /Directory # CGI Webapp ScriptAlias /web/ /opt/web/prod/ directory /opt/web/prod/ SSLRequireSSL AuthUserFile /opt/work/apps/trade/conf/ft_webauth AuthGroupFile /opt/work/apps/trade/conf/ft_webauthg AuthName privy AuthType Basic require group ftgroup1 vedp demoskin umass choosemd wtctacoma wtcstl wtcc belmont wtcchicago wtcdemo wtcfrance wisconsin aim medc efi testgroup webdev twr dcca wtcdn matrade ft_g2 ft_g3 ft_g4 ft_g5 ft_g6 ft_g7 ft_g8 ft_g9 AllowOverride All order allow,deny allow from all Options MultiViews ExecCGI /directory ## ## workers2.properties ## [shm] info=Scoreboard. Required for reconfiguration file=/opt/apps/tomcat/logs/jk2.shm size=1048576 debug=0 disabled=0 # Defines a load balancer named lb. Use even if you only have one machine. [lb:lb] # Example socket channel, override port and host. [channel.socket:localhost:8009] port=8009 host=127.0.0.1 # define the worker [ajp13:localhost:8009] channel=channel.socket:localhost:8009 group=lb # java web app [uri:/web/ja/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 group=lb ## ## TOMCAT 5 conf/server.xml ## Server port=8005 shutdown=SHUTDOWN debug=0 Listener className=org.apache.catalina.mbeans.ServerLifecycleListener debug=0/ Listener className=org.apache.catalina.mbeans.GlobalResourcesLifecycleListener debug=0/ GlobalNamingResources Environment name=simpleValue type=java.lang.Integer value=30/ Resource name=UserDatabase auth=Container type=org.apache.catalina.UserDatabase description=User database that can be updated and saved /Resource ResourceParams name=UserDatabase parameter namefactory/name valueorg.apache.catalina.users.MemoryUserDatabaseFactory/value /parameter parameter namepathname/name valueconf/tomcat-users.xml/value /parameter /ResourceParams /GlobalNamingResources Service name=Catalina Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 tomcatAuthentication=false / Engine name=Catalina defaultHost=localhost debug=0 Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.RequestDumperValve/ Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=catalina_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Realm className=org.apache.catalina.realm.UserDatabaseRealm debug=0 resourceName=UserDatabase/ Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false !-- Java Web App -- Context path=/web/ja docBase=/opt/web/prod/ja debug=2 reloadable=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=wtprod_file_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ /Context Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve directory=logs prefix=localhost_access_log. suffix=.txt pattern=common resolveHosts=false/ Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ /Host /Engine /Service /Server ## ## END SCRIPTS ## Ok, so I placed tomcatAuthentication=false and also in my httpd.conf file, I put the directory to my java stuff since I want it to be protected by Apache's authentication. However, when I try my java app, the request.getRemoteUser() comes up null, now do I get prompted for a password. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Kevin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat 5 Apache Authentication
Hmmm...so is there any workaround? For example, using an older version of the JK connector or some older combination of Tomcat/Apache and the JK connector? Thanks, Kevin Quoting Joseph Shraibman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am having a problem getting Tomcat 5 to use Apache authentication. We have an existing CGI application that is handled by Apache 2, and I am tring to integrate some java stuff using Tomcat 5. Here is what I have: ## ## APACHE 2 conf/httpd.conf: ## # Tomcat Connector LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2.so JKSet config.file /opt/apps/apache/conf/workers2.properties # Tomcat 5 Alias /web/ja/ /opt/web/prod/ja/ Directory /opt/web/prod/ja/ SSLRequireSSL AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /opt/work/apps/trade/conf/ft_webauth AuthGroupFile /opt/work/apps/trade/conf/ft_webauthg require group mygroup AllowOverride All order allow,deny allow from all Options MultiViews Indexes FollowSymLinks /Directory # CGI Webapp ScriptAlias /web/ /opt/web/prod/ directory /opt/web/prod/ SSLRequireSSL AuthUserFile /opt/work/apps/trade/conf/ft_webauth AuthGroupFile /opt/work/apps/trade/conf/ft_webauthg AuthName privy AuthType Basic require group ftgroup1 vedp demoskin umass choosemd wtctacoma wtcstl wtcc belmont wtcchicago wtcdemo wtcfrance wisconsin aim medc efi testgroup webdev twr dcca wtcdn matrade ft_g2 ft_g3 ft_g4 ft_g5 ft_g6 ft_g7 ft_g8 ft_g9 AllowOverride All order allow,deny allow from all Options MultiViews ExecCGI /directory ## ## workers2.properties ## [shm] info=Scoreboard. Required for reconfiguration file=/opt/apps/tomcat/logs/jk2.shm size=1048576 debug=0 disabled=0 # Defines a load balancer named lb. Use even if you only have one machine. [lb:lb] # Example socket channel, override port and host. [channel.socket:localhost:8009] port=8009 host=127.0.0.1 # define the worker [ajp13:localhost:8009] channel=channel.socket:localhost:8009 group=lb # java web app [uri:/web/ja/*] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 group=lb ## ## TOMCAT 5 conf/server.xml ## Server port=8005 shutdown=SHUTDOWN debug=0 Listener className=org.apache.catalina.mbeans.ServerLifecycleListener debug=0/ Listener className=org.apache.catalina.mbeans.GlobalResourcesLifecycleListener debug=0/ GlobalNamingResources Environment name=simpleValue type=java.lang.Integer value=30/ Resource name=UserDatabase auth=Container type=org.apache.catalina.UserDatabase description=User database that can be updated and saved /Resource ResourceParams name=UserDatabase parameter namefactory/name valueorg.apache.catalina.users.MemoryUserDatabaseFactory/value /parameter parameter namepathname/name valueconf/tomcat-users.xml/value /parameter /ResourceParams /GlobalNamingResources Service name=Catalina Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 tomcatAuthentication=false / Engine name=Catalina defaultHost=localhost debug=0 Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.RequestDumperValve/ Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=catalina_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ Realm className=org.apache.catalina.realm.UserDatabaseRealm debug=0 resourceName=UserDatabase/ Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false !-- Java Web App -- Context path=/web/ja docBase=/opt/web/prod/ja debug=2 reloadable=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger prefix=wtprod_file_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ /Context Valve className=org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve directory=logs prefix=localhost_access_log. suffix=.txt pattern=common resolveHosts=false/ Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=localhost_log. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ /Host /Engine /Service /Server ## ## END SCRIPTS ## Ok, so I placed tomcatAuthentication=false and also in my httpd.conf file, I put the directory to my java stuff since I want it to be protected by Apache's authentication. However, when I try my java app, the request.getRemoteUser() comes up null, now do I get prompted for a password. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks,
RE: Tomcat and Apache
Have a look at the JK or JK2 connectors, they are used to connect Tomcat and Apache webserver. Ta Matt -Original Message- From: mpforste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 May 2004 15:43 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Tomcat and Apache I am trying to start using Tomcat on my server without having to stop using the Apache and PHP (at least for the moment) While if I select http://localhost:8080/test.jsp it works when I select http://mysite.com/test.jsp it doesn't I have in my Apache config the following extract (which should work) VirtualHost mysite.com:80 ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ServerName mysite.com ProxyPass / http://localhost:8080 ProxyPassReverse / http://localhost:8080 /VirtualHost Sometimes it serves a jsp page but will not serve any graphics or other files (and now it isn't even serving JSP's) Any idea where I am going wrong or is there another way to do what I need Mike. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 10/05/2004 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any opinions expressed in this E-mail may be those of the individual and not necessarily the company. This E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this E-mail in error and that any use or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error please notify the beCogent postmaster at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless expressly stated, opinions in this email are those of the individual sender and not beCogent Ltd. You must take full responsibility for virus checking this email and any attachments. Please note that the content of this email or any of its attachments may contain data that falls within the scope of the Data Protection Acts and that you must ensure that any handling or processing of such data by you is fully compliant with the terms and provisions of the Data Protection Act 1984 and 1998. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat Filter Apache Axis ?
Hi, Why don't you ask on the Axis mailing list? Since you said your filter works fine in other webapps, it's clearly an Axis issue. Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Rui Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 7:32 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat Filter Apache Axis ? Sorry, Axis' web.xml now recognised the filter\fliter pattern, but Axis still did not work properly. Rui On Tue, 4 May 2004, Rui Zhang wrote: Thanks. I did change it to 2.3 DTD, but it still doesn't work. Cheers, Rui Oxford Univ Computing Lab What's the XML doctype declaration for the Axis web.xml? Servlet filters were introduced in servlet spec 2.3. If your doctype declaration specifies 2.2 or earlier, the DTD won't recognize the filter (and related) tags. (Solution: specify the 2.3 DTD or 2.4 schema.) -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat Filter Apache Axis ?
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:37:12PM +0100, Rui Zhang wrote: :The Axis 1.1 does not support a filter.../filter in its web.xml. And if I insert : the Filter into the Tomcat default web.xml, Axis even won't return its : index.html page. The Filter, however, works fine with other webapps in my : Tomcat. What's the XML doctype declaration for the Axis web.xml? Servlet filters were introduced in servlet spec 2.3. If your doctype declaration specifies 2.2 or earlier, the DTD won't recognize the filter (and related) tags. (Solution: specify the 2.3 DTD or 2.4 schema.) -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat Filter Apache Axis ?
Sorry, Axis' web.xml now recognised the filter\fliter pattern, but Axis still did not work properly. Rui On Tue, 4 May 2004, Rui Zhang wrote: Thanks. I did change it to 2.3 DTD, but it still doesn't work. Cheers, Rui Oxford Univ Computing Lab What's the XML doctype declaration for the Axis web.xml? Servlet filters were introduced in servlet spec 2.3. If your doctype declaration specifies 2.2 or earlier, the DTD won't recognize the filter (and related) tags. (Solution: specify the 2.3 DTD or 2.4 schema.) -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat Filter Apache Axis ?
Thanks. I did change it to 2.3 DTD, but it still doesn't work. Cheers, Rui Oxford Univ Computing Lab What's the XML doctype declaration for the Axis web.xml? Servlet filters were introduced in servlet spec 2.3. If your doctype declaration specifies 2.2 or earlier, the DTD won't recognize the filter (and related) tags. (Solution: specify the 2.3 DTD or 2.4 schema.) -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 5 - apache 13 howto
Hi, http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Tomcat/Links Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: C. Kukulies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 5 - apache 13 howto Is there a FAQ which answers the question: Is there an HOWTO to get tomcat 5 running with apache13? -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_physik.rwth-aachen.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and Apache on diff m/c's
Are you trying to perhaps use JNI to connect them? Thats the only thing I can think of. -Original Message- From: Steven Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 March 2004 06:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat and Apache on diff m/c's Hello all, I've successfully configured and run Apache 2.x and Tomcat 5.x on the same machine numerous times without any hitch. But, I'm having problems configuring them on different machines. I tried to use load-balancing but it seems not to be working. I would appareciate any help. Thank you, Steven. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any opinions expressed in this E-mail may be those of the individual and not necessarily the company. This E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this E-mail in error and that any use or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error please notify the beCogent postmaster at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless expressly stated, opinions in this email are those of the individual sender and not beCogent Ltd. You must take full responsibility for virus checking this email and any attachments. Please note that the content of this email or any of its attachments may contain data that falls within the scope of the Data Protection Acts and that you must ensure that any handling or processing of such data by you is fully compliant with the terms and provisions of the Data Protection Act 1984 and 1998. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and Apache on diff m/c's
Sorry, forgot to mention the connector I was using. I to connect using JK. --Steven --- Dale, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you trying to perhaps use JNI to connect them? Thats the only thing I can think of. -Original Message- From: Steven Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 March 2004 06:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat and Apache on diff m/c's Hello all, I've successfully configured and run Apache 2.x and Tomcat 5.x on the same machine numerous times without any hitch. But, I'm having problems configuring them on different machines. I tried to use load-balancing but it seems not to be working. I would appareciate any help. Thank you, Steven. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any opinions expressed in this E-mail may be those of the individual and not necessarily the company. This E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this E-mail in error and that any use or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error please notify the beCogent postmaster at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless expressly stated, opinions in this email are those of the individual sender and not beCogent Ltd. You must take full responsibility for virus checking this email and any attachments. Please note that the content of this email or any of its attachments may contain data that falls within the scope of the Data Protection Acts and that you must ensure that any handling or processing of such data by you is fully compliant with the terms and provisions of the Data Protection Act 1984 and 1998. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 4 + Apache 2 + mod_jk (auto-config) + https
Don't think you need to. I am running httpd2(SSL)+tomcat4/5+mod_jk2. Apache will take care of the SSL side, and mod_jk should forward everything unencrypted via localhost(if that is your setup) to tomcat. -Original Message- From: Samuel Rutishauser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 February 2004 15:09 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Tomcat 4 + Apache 2 + mod_jk (auto-config) + https Hello all, I have Tomcat 4 + Apache 2 + mod_jk (in auto-config mode). Everything's fine, but I don't see how to tell Tomcat to build the generated mod_jk.conf as to listen to https traffic. Any ideas? Thank you Samuel Rutishauser - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. Note:__ This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Jaguar Freight Services and any of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs.
Re: Tomcat 4 + Apache 2 + mod_jk (auto-config) + https
You're right normally .. but I want to use the auto-generated conf/auto/mod_jk.conf , which includes everything necessary to a VirtualHost of apache ... without the SSL-Stuff! Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote: Don't think you need to. I am running httpd2(SSL)+tomcat4/5+mod_jk2. Apache will take care of the SSL side, and mod_jk should forward everything unencrypted via localhost(if that is your setup) to tomcat. -Original Message- From: Samuel Rutishauser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 February 2004 15:09 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Tomcat 4 + Apache 2 + mod_jk (auto-config) + https Hello all, I have Tomcat 4 + Apache 2 + mod_jk (in auto-config mode). Everything's fine, but I don't see how to tell Tomcat to build the generated mod_jk.conf as to listen to https traffic. Any ideas? Thank you Samuel Rutishauser - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. Note:__ This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Jaguar Freight Services and any of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: tomcat and apache
Hi, you might get more answers if you ask this question on httpd mail list. This is not a tomcat problem, rather it's the proxy configuration in httpd that's giving you grief. You might want to take a look on how you define you Directory and Location directives. Without looking at your directives, it's hard to say where the problem could be... -Original Message- From: Mark Tebong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 7:50 AM To: Tomcat Users List (E-mail) Subject: tomcat and apache I have a little problem with my web site. It has to do with the session disconnecting on my proxy server. Basically, I have an apache 2.0 server that acts as a web proxy. Its IP is 192.168.11.11. I also have another server which is internal, and running tomcat with IP 192.168.11.211. On the proxy server, I have it configured so that when a request for a URL (say www.mydom1.com) comes in, the proxy sends it to 192.168.11.211/mydom1. www.mydom1.com maintains a session. When I access the pages of the site that use the session thru www.mydom1.com, I get an exception. When I access it through 192.168.11.211/mydom1, it works fine. I am accessing it from IP 192.168.11.40. But from outsite, the only way to access it is through the domain name, and it gives the same error. Similarly, The web site has large graphics, and what happens is that half the graphics is displayed when you try to access through the proxy, but when you access it directly, everything is fine. This happens the same way from different computers. I looked at the tomcat logs and I saw that the session was disconnecting when you used the proxy. I have looked everywhere on the web, and I can't find any solutions. PLEASE HELP. Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tomcat and apache+mod_jk on different servers - another story
: possible to store JSP's on the server where apache is running? It's just : a matter of convenience - it would be nice to upload the whole site with : JSPs and have it running without remembering that you should upload all : JSPs to some special place on a second server. A sideways solution for your problem: upload your site to the same location on each server , then configure Apache and Tomcat to use that directory as the document root/context base path. A little work up front that pays off in spades. Downside: this requires you use an expanded WAR file Upside: site uploads just got a lot easier, since the code goes to the same place regardless of the server's function (i.e. you could write a quick loop to upload) Upside: upgrading Tomcat/Apache is easier, because your site's content exists separate from the Tomcat/Apache trees (and for several other site management/architecture reasons) This has worked very well for me, for quite some time now. YMMV. -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and Apache on Separate servers
It's a great idea, what you want to do is configure as normal, and then edit the workers.properties to point to the remote tomcat. Camron G. Levanger The Dreamlab www.dreamlabmedia.com (866) 890-3705 On Jan 5, 2004, at 11:36 PM, Richard Wray wrote: Hi All, I have what I hope will be a simple question. I have 2 Win 2K boxes. One running Tomcat and the other Apache. How do I deploy a web app on the Tomcat server and configure it to talk to the Apache web server on a completely separate box. Do I need to configure both ends? Does it make sense to split the boxes this way just to have Apache server static files? Thanks for your time, Regards Tomcat-Apache Newbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Tomcat and Apache on Separate servers
At 01:36 AM 1/6/2004 -0500, you wrote: Hi All, I have what I hope will be a simple question. I have 2 Win 2K boxes. One running Tomcat and the other Apache. How do I deploy a web app on the Tomcat server and configure it to talk to the Apache web server on a completely separate box. Do I need to configure both ends? Does it make sense to split the boxes this way just to have Apache server static files? Here's a copy of information from the list a while back. I would post the url to the archived message, but I don't have that at the moment. Attribution of this solution goes to the original poster, not myself... Here it goes. Machine A (Apache), Machine B (tomcat) - httpd.conf changes... - Below # LoadModule foo_module modules/mod_foo.so Add following lines # # Load mod_jk # LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so # # Configure mod_jk # JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log JkLogLevel debug Below DocumentRoot /usr/local/apache/htdocs Add following lines... JkMount /examples ajp13 JkMount /examples/* ajp13 (if you want to configure a application examples running under webapps on tomcat, just specify /examples, you need not sepcify the full path of the application) Then create workers.properties under $Apache_Home$/conf/ like this # In Unix, we use forward slashes: ps=/ # list the workers by name worker.list=ajp13 # worker.ajp13.port=8009(ajp13 port from server.xml on tomcat machine) worker.ajp13.host=hostname(Machine B) worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 (no need to define tomcat_home and java_home parameters here, you define them on catalina.sh on tomcat machine) this is all you need to do on apache machine... server.xml changes on Machine B(tomcat machine) -- Set the required environment variables JAVA_HOME AND CATALINA_HOME in $TOMCAT_HOME$/bin/catalina.sh Commen out the Standalone HTTP port(port 8080) Connector. !-- Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=10 debug=0 connectionTimeout=6/ -- Also Comment out the WARP connector Service name=Tomcat-Apache !-- Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnector port=8008 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true appBase=webapps acceptCount=10 debug=0/ -- Change the both the Engine Tag and Host tag defaultHost to tomcat hostName(ex: tomcat.apache.com) (This should match with your workers.properties host name.) Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=tomcat.apache.com debug=0 Host name=tomcat.apache.com debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true /Host /Engine start tomcat and apache, you should be able to access examples from apache machine I have pretty much followed the http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat/ documentation..many many thanks to Pascal Forget. Let me know, how it goes... -Raj Thanks for your time, Regards Tomcat-Apache Newbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and Apache on Separate servers
WOW!!! Thanks for the quick response. -Original Message- From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:46 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat and Apache on Separate servers At 01:36 AM 1/6/2004 -0500, you wrote: Hi All, I have what I hope will be a simple question. I have 2 Win 2K boxes. One running Tomcat and the other Apache. How do I deploy a web app on the Tomcat server and configure it to talk to the Apache web server on a completely separate box. Do I need to configure both ends? Does it make sense to split the boxes this way just to have Apache server static files? Here's a copy of information from the list a while back. I would post the url to the archived message, but I don't have that at the moment. Attribution of this solution goes to the original poster, not myself... Here it goes. Machine A (Apache), Machine B (tomcat) - httpd.conf changes... - Below # LoadModule foo_module modules/mod_foo.so Add following lines # # Load mod_jk # LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so # # Configure mod_jk # JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log JkLogLevel debug Below DocumentRoot /usr/local/apache/htdocs Add following lines... JkMount /examples ajp13 JkMount /examples/* ajp13 (if you want to configure a application examples running under webapps on tomcat, just specify /examples, you need not sepcify the full path of the application) Then create workers.properties under $Apache_Home$/conf/ like this # In Unix, we use forward slashes: ps=/ # list the workers by name worker.list=ajp13 # worker.ajp13.port=8009(ajp13 port from server.xml on tomcat machine) worker.ajp13.host=hostname(Machine B) worker.ajp13.type=ajp13 (no need to define tomcat_home and java_home parameters here, you define them on catalina.sh on tomcat machine) this is all you need to do on apache machine... server.xml changes on Machine B(tomcat machine) -- Set the required environment variables JAVA_HOME AND CATALINA_HOME in $TOMCAT_HOME$/bin/catalina.sh Commen out the Standalone HTTP port(port 8080) Connector. !-- Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.http.HttpConnector port=8080 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=10 debug=0 connectionTimeout=6/ -- Also Comment out the WARP connector Service name=Tomcat-Apache !-- Connector className=org.apache.catalina.connector.warp.WarpConnector port=8008 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true appBase=webapps acceptCount=10 debug=0/ -- Change the both the Engine Tag and Host tag defaultHost to tomcat hostName(ex: tomcat.apache.com) (This should match with your workers.properties host name.) Engine name=Standalone defaultHost=tomcat.apache.com debug=0 Host name=tomcat.apache.com debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true /Host /Engine start tomcat and apache, you should be able to access examples from apache machine I have pretty much followed the http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat/ documentation..many many thanks to Pascal Forget. Let me know, how it goes... -Raj Thanks for your time, Regards Tomcat-Apache Newbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat and apache - localhost?
Howdy, Yes: read the Host configuration reference in the tomcat documentation, specifically the section on Host Name Aliases. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Sascha Alff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat and apache - localhost? Hello, i'm a new mailing-list member. today, i installed apache, tomcat and the jk connector. i have one problem: when i enter in the web-browser the URL http://localhost/examples - i get the tomcat sample-page. it works also with the tomcat port 8080. but my computer has in the company network a hostname like pcnbsaal.company.de. my apache-webserver is available under localhost and the hostname pcxxx. it is possible, that tomcat also listen to localhost and the hostname pcxxx? sorry for my bad english :-) regards, sascha (from germany) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tomcat and apache - localhost?
hi, i have read the manual. i have definied a server alias. but it doesn't work. only localhost work. can you tell me more? it's the first time for me that i use tomcat. - Original Message - From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 3:37 PM Subject: RE: Tomcat and apache - localhost? Howdy, Yes: read the Host configuration reference in the tomcat documentation, specifically the section on Host Name Aliases. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Sascha Alff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat and apache - localhost? Hello, i'm a new mailing-list member. today, i installed apache, tomcat and the jk connector. i have one problem: when i enter in the web-browser the URL http://localhost/examples - i get the tomcat sample-page. it works also with the tomcat port 8080. but my computer has in the company network a hostname like pcnbsaal.company.de. my apache-webserver is available under localhost and the hostname pcxxx. it is possible, that tomcat also listen to localhost and the hostname pcxxx? sorry for my bad english :-) regards, sascha (from germany) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000
Your quote from the site is a question, not a statement. And I'm quie shure that the post parameters are not part of the header. (They are part of the 'body') -Original Message- From: Robert Leftwich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:45 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1.29, Apache 2.0.48, mod_jk2 2.02, JDK 1.4.2 and W2000 http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/common/AJP v13.html#Questions%20I%20Have What happens if the request headers max packet size? There is no provision to send a second packet of request headers in case there are more than 8K So more correctly if the http request has more than 8k in the headers it will fail (e.g. posting a lot of form information) and one of the servlets I'm trying to hook into Apache is the Chiba XForms implementation which can (relatively) easily exceed this limit. Robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
