As you said ""It is still a good idea to leave the old kernel there in case
there's something wrong with the new one. While that may not happen very
often there's always a possibility."" You were and are right! I have
encountered an issue with the latest kernel 4.4.0-186-generic in the
Thank you for the reply. Gnome-disk-utility says the disk (a PATA SSD) is ok.
How managing the next time the rescue shell?
Thank you for the reply. Gnome-disk-utility says the disk (a PATA SSD) is ok.
You can, of course, remove whatever you want - it's your system. It is still
a good idea to leave the old kernel there in case there's something wrong
with the new one. While that may not happen very often (as you say "without
encountering problems") there's always a possibility. There's no
I have been recently updating my old notebook HP510 and via terminal I have
been removing contextually the old kernel before rebooting with the latest,
without encountering problems.
Hi to everyone.
I'm using Trisquel mini on the HP 510, and old 32 bit notebook. After a
general updating and a reboot with the latest linux kernel 4.4.0-178 I had on
the screen the following response by GRUB: " Minimal BASH-like line editing
is supported. For the first word, TAB lists
Trying to install
Snapshot
I have a kernel panic situation after doing apt upgrade.
I forgot to do autoremove and autoclean. My fault.
Now it doesn´t boot.
I dont´t see the option to use another kernel.
I wake up early, I spend 8 euros in a pendrive, I download Trisquel and
create a bootable USB drive.
I connect the
Thanks for the response. I'll chalk it up to RAM, then!
On 12/12/2019 03:36 PM, zap...@dismail.de wrote:
> This has happened to me before also. In my case, it was a very random
> occurance. Possibly from getting overheated. Not sure beyond that
> though. -_-
My laptop was not hot.
<>
This has happened to me before also. In my case, it was a very random
occurance. Possibly from getting overheated. Not sure beyond that though. -_-
Someone on IRC linked me to this "New California" website. My screen
froze, my CAPS LOCK light started flashing, and my computer rebooted
itself. I got a kernel panic.
Why was this?
I have also gotten this when running the web program Twitch in my Abrowser.
<>
Yeah... I would move it into the regular one for free.
Just a thought. :)
> Hi andyprough
Thank you for your recommendation
Im now running the 5.1.15-gnu kernel ;)
Don't thank me, thank jxself. That's a lot of work to push all those kernels
out, and he provides an always up-to-date repository. Even when I compile my
own, his is usually available faster.
Hi andyprough
Thank you for your recommendation
Im now running the 5.1.15-gnu kernel ;)
You may want to state what ETS kernels are good for more clearly. Some people
may want them if you make it more clear.
I'm not sure. I grab your weekly updated kernels for a couple of my systems.
I like having the latest version, and it's wonderful not having to compile
them all the time. Is that what most of your subscribers do?
Would it be helpful if I had 4.4 in my kernel repository too so as to match
versions? Currently the oldest one in there is 4.14.
I mean, 4.4 is already available in a way by being in the separate
extended-term support (ETS) repository since it's supported for 6 years. But
no one seems
4.4 is 3 1/2 years old, meaning old native drivers. And no security updates
for the past 3 months is not great in the current (in)security era.
Personally, I would recommend adding jxself's libre-linux kernel repository
and getting something more up to date. But, that's just me. Obviously,
@Beforemed @chaosmonk
Very generous answers
Thanks to both of you
> So, i saw the kernel version was at 4.4.0-143 I see other distro's
> with Kernel at 4.18 and above. So, is anybody would like to explain
> to me how the 4.4.0-143 can be secure?
Trisquel 8's kernel is based on Ubuntu 16.04's kernel (Trisquel removes
the proprietary blobs). Ubuntu's 4.4.0
Hello Danrobi,
In the case of the kernel version, Trisquel is a Point release distro, that
means it releases a versions of the OS and then it just pushes security
updates. Version 8 of Trisquel is based on ubuntu 16.04 LTS (Long Term
Support) which has support to 04/2021. So I agree the
Hi
I just tried Trisquel-mini In virtualbox to test it
First of, im not a PC engineer, im actually very noob im PC's. However, im
just trying to find a private and secure distro
So, i saw the kernel version was at 4.4.0-143
I see other distro's with Kernel at 4.18 and above.
So, is anybody
There's no information here that indicates the cause. Depending on when it
happened the kernel might not have been able to write anything to the drive
anyway. The only way to diagnose the cause of a kernel crash is through the
use of kdump: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kdump_(Linux) which
I always have issues when my system go to sleep and I'm forced to restart the
system and disable hibernate option in the system.
Sorry I cant help, but I noticed this issue with all the distributions that I
tested in the past (Ubuntu,Manjaro,Trisquel,elementary os,Debian,Fedora)
I just came back to my desk after a few hours and my laptop would not
wake up. The caps lock indicator was blinking. I assumed this was a
kernel panic.
But why?
cal@flexo:~$ cat /var/log/syslog
Jan 20 01:35:41 flexo rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd"
swVersion="8.16.0" x-pid="918"
Using this guide https://trisquel.info/en/wiki/update-linux-libre-kernel
Gets me this error:
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or
I had this issue with a x200 flashed to Libreboot two years ago.
When I ran qemu with --enable-kvm or when I used libvirt (with virt-manager),
it freezed and I was forced to hard shutdown.
The x200 had a a P8400 Core 2 Duo, I don't remember the batch.. but on my
current x200 (with a P8600)
2018-02-15T05:53:08+0100 goodstu...@msn.com wrote:
> I am attempting to install PureOS 8.0 (beta) on a libreboot Taurinus
> laptop running Trisquel 8 using virt-manager. Everytime I try to
> create the PureOS virtual machine, I get a black screen filled with a
> whole lot of meaningless stuff on
Hi,
I'm having the same problem. Have you found any solution or have clues about
this problem?
That is a bug in the CPU. The only solution for this us using a different
CPU. The Vikings D16 and the Talos II do not have that problem.
ah, the ol kernel panic,
yep, I have had that happen on my x200 when I use virtual machines. It may
be related to kvm.
not sure though.
I am attempting to install PureOS 8.0 (beta) on a libreboot Taurinus laptop
running Trisquel 8 using virt-manager. Everytime I try to create the PureOS
virtual machine, I get a black screen filled with a whole lot of meaningless
stuff on it. The screen freezes so all I can do is restart
You're being just a bit too literal there, of course, but I meant not
disappearing as a matter of policy of deleting old versions when disk space
gets low.
Obviously I have backups. 7 of them. In different locations. On different
continents. In different hemispheres of the world. And other
> This git repository has every version of Linux-libre ever, it all fits into
> ~350MB, and versions will never disappear.
Assuming those disks are backed up.
--
Caleb Herbert
OpenPGP public key: http://bluehome.net/csh/pubkey
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
smooth
roger that
There is also another place to get source code which is:
https://jxself.org/git/?p=linux-libre.git
I started this because I found that Alexandre Oliva, who runs fsfla.org,
deletes older kernel source code when disk space runs low and this raised
some questions when people wanted to get some
Also what's the difference between all the places where one can get kernels?
You have jxself https://jxself.org/linux-libre/
and fsfla https://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/
and probably many more...
Some days ago while the Intel ME thing was fresh, jxself had a fix in the
4.14.12 kernel, now there's a 4.14.13 on the releases page:
http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/ , my question is
simple: how important is it to always have the latest kernel?
I will never do it again.
Nickelodeon I am glad to see you helping others and I applaud your
enthusiasm.
With that say.. Could you please not spam the post with a lot of comments
that don't say a thing?
I know you are getting started, and you like Trisquel. That is why I am
asking in a politely way :)
THIS IS WILL HELP IF YOU HAVE Gigabyte Motherboard with Realtek * (I AM AWARE
THAT IT HELPED WITH 8111/8168/8411)
Make sure iommu is enabled in your boot settings
First enable iommu in the uefi by restarting your computer and pressing
delete to enter the uefi
plug your usb mouse, keyboard and thumbdrive in usb 2 ports.
save and exit the uefi
Then In Trisquel:
press Ctrl+Alt+T to open up a terminal
run the following command: sudo emacs
it is indeed related to the kernel
does connecting via dhcpd work at all?
What about holding "shift":
https://askubuntu.com/questions/82140/how-can-i-boot-with-an-older-kernel-version?
Recently I installed the libre kernel from jxself's repo. (I was
unsuccessfully trying to solve a problem:
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/cant-hibernate#comment-119368)
I now have this problem, which I 'think' I have experienced in connection
with installing the libre kernel before: When
1) Why does apt-get source fetch a different source package to the one named
in the arg?
Because the name of the source package is usually not the name of the binary
package. And one source package could result in many binary packages. For
example, when searching for packages on
Two things I don't understand:-
1) Why does apt-get source fetch a different source package to the one named
in the arg?
2) Why can't key 0x92D284CF33C66596 be found?
$ apt-get source linux-image-3.13.0-76-generic
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
Thanks @jxself, good explanation.
Is there a standard procedure for reporting the fact that the package
downloaded by `apt-get source linux` (linux_3.13.0-77.121+7.0trisquel2) is
signed with a key (0x92D284CF33C66596) for which no public cert appears to be
available?
Hi everybody, I updated my kernel following the instructions from many
websites (because I´m not a developer, so don´t use advanced concepts with
me) and finally I could, but it gives me a kernel panic.
I was like Yes! Finally I could do it! but then me was like Oh, Jesus!
These are the
Why not use https://jxself.org/linux-libre/
Then, getting the latest kernel is as easy as installing any other program
via your package manager.
20151113xiaodaige
moncler jackets
supra shoes
uggs outlet
louis vuitton handbags outlet
nfl jersey wholesale
hermes birkin bag
hermes outlet store
babyliss flat iron
giuseppe zanotti outlet
barbour jackets
coach outlet store
ysl outlet
tiffany and co
coach handbags outlet
pandora outlet
moncler
Hi everybody, I just joined the forum with the intention to report this.
I'm also being affected by this bug, it has happened after installing
updates, according to the update manager the new kernel installed would be
3.13.0-63.103+7.0trisquel2
Changes for
I had a kernel panic a week ago or something like that, but I didn't think
much of it so I didn't bother saving the log then.
Did it happen more than one time ?
I got a kernel panic, curious if anybody can see what happened.
Using latest Trisquel Mini. I wasn't at my computer when it happened so it
shouldn't have been very busy.
Sep 29 18:29:15 binky kernel: [177994.643992] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
pointer dereference at 002f
x25 is an EXPERIMENTAL kernel module and not loaded on my Trisquel systems,
even though it is present in /lib/modules/...
I've never heard of that before, so I don't know if it exists or not.
I have never heard about one such protocol. Where did you read about it?. Can
you provide a link?.
Its refreshing to see someone who acknowledges absence of knowledge does not
equate with knowledge of absence.
Sorry I don't / can't.
I thought about doing a search of kernel sources for x.25 and seeing if it is
in there anywhere although there is no guarantee it is labled as such or that
x.25 is the one in question.
Someone told me that there is an antiquated networking protocol that is in
the kernel that slows it down a lot because the kernel keeps pausing to check
on that protocol even if you are not using. I think maybe it was x.25 or
something but not sure. Anyway, the story goes that the kernel
I wanted to try recompiling my kernel with optimizations for my cpu. I've
never done it before. I thought I would post here first in case someone knows
of a concise how to or has warnings or observations. Thanks.
I believe I have isolated the cause of all the weird problems.
Once first up with Trisquel 6.0 Live, I did the following 3 commands:
$ free -m
Mem: 431 425 5
buffers176 254
Swap: 1014 0 1014
$ sudo swapoff /dev/zram0
$ free -m
Mem: 431 425 5
buffers
Magic Banana: Thank-you for getting me this far. The live system boots
without any hard drives present leaving me with 4 megabytes free RAM. A solid
state drive, not visible in gparted, was found using the disk utility. All of
the space appeared as grey and unallocated (approx. 200MB) and
175mb used after booting in trisquel for me: powaa :)
Thank-you again for your valuable time helping me:
Indeed I have a hardware issue: I would like to bypass zram0 [SWAP] which
makes up 184.1M of total Swap memory of 983M; where the Disk utility 'sees'
only the /dev/sdb6 [SWAP] |-sdb6 of 799M which was wiped using DoD
5220.28-STD (7 passes)
Trisquel gnome flashback runs perfectly on my lappy 1 gb ram.
Sure if I open 10 apps or even 5 heavy ones.. swap swap swp
One thing you could try to mitigate that is edit the suspend scripts to
unmount and the resume scripts to mount the devices.
I remember seeing that error message once and editing some text file on the
usb stick changing isolinux to syslinux in the path. I believe this might be
related to
Thank-you.
I stand corrected in reference to mount points. When running live, the device
list changes after each resume from suspend. I specified do-nothing under
system power options when closing lid, but system goes into suspend
nevertheless. Device UUID's remain unchanged.
With the
Thank-you for your time and assistance.
The usb I made was from the utility included with the Trisquel Live 6.0
System settings menu, using an .iso file and opting out of persistent storage
for it.
I have not yet looked for any suspend scripts, in the ram-resident file
system. I will try
Just finished downloading and trying trisquel mini. Cannot find option to
disable mouse clicks with touchpad. After disabling automount, was getting
error pop ups on the desktop for every media change but /media/trisquel
stayed clean after umounting those universal id's initially placed
Thank-you for your assistance. When suspending on live version, the system is
able to recover but mount points for /dev/sdb.. are invalid. Checking with
sudo fdisk-l they have migrated to /dev/sdc.. remounting restores operation
until next suspend, then I have to remount the same to
if ram is a problem trisquel mini will run on 128mb of ram
here are the minimum system requirements:
https://trisquel.info/en/wiki/system-requirements
To me it seems that it is just lacking in RAM.
Trisquel's requirements can be found here
(http://trisquel.info/en/wiki/system-requirements) , but you will have to
confirm that you are using the default ISO (uses GNOME).
The processor seems to be 64-bit
The following happened on a Gateway MX3410 notepad running Trisquel 6.0 Live
from a bootable usb memory. The built-in hardrive with a full and updated
Trisquel 6.0 installation was now intentionally excluded from BIOS. The issue
continues to happen. At present an external replacement
also when ever i ran it it was crashing alot
so i think it needs more development
yrk,
I looked some more at the GNU/hurd website, and it seems you need quite a lot
of time to play around with, and then you will be working on hurd and not
working as usual.
If only there was infinite time :)
Does anyone know what would work and what would not switching to GNU/Hurd on
my Trisquel
I have
* gnome3
* atom text editor
* apache + mysql + php5 + mcrypt + gdimage
and then all the stuff that comes with Trisquel 7.
Sorry, forgot to mention that.
and who cares if is not FREE CULTURE, at least is information that will
teach you.
A good book I started about a week ago was Linux from Scratch (Ahem,
publisher, don't you mean GNU/Linux from Scratch? :p)- it goes into detail
about how the kernel works, how GNU/Linux boots, and the basics of using it.
Thank you for your answer, what are steps of compiling a kernel? i have
downloaded understanding the linux kernel book. i hope it will help me
understand the kernel a lot better. Are there any books you recommend for me
to read,to further my knowladge and understand the kernel on a deeper
Here's a guide https://trisquel.info/en/wiki/compiling-gnu-linux-libre-kernel
I don't know a book to recommend. (There is some documentation in the
tarball.)
Thank you.
Hi i have a question, why would one compile the kernel and what are the
benefits of doing so?
Lembas said:
Also you get to peek inside the kernel and see how sausage is made!
Come on man! don't be so twisted and deceiving, my kernel components and
sausage still functioning fine. They are not GPL certified but very
proprietary, extremely and excellent piece of work.
Hello there! You get a kernel that's optimized for the specific hardware you
have. The difference however isn't noticeable, at least not in light everyday
use. On the other hand the kernel is one thing you're constantly running so
it does make sense to optimize it. Besides that if you have
Hey, guys. I'm really getting into the performance stuff, I downloaded the
mini version of Trisquel and I bought 4gb of RAM for my Optiplex 320 (which
is the most it can get) so, I was searching more things to do and I found
something very interesting, but I don't know, I tend to be a little
This is purely a technical question from a legal angle, personal whims and
opinions are not relevant on this one.
If Linus did switch the GPLv3, would that force him to make all releases with
all code contained therein 100% open source?
I am asking this from a OpenBSD perspective in that
El 17/04/13 22:20, o2314...@rtrtr.com escribió:
This is purely a technical question from a legal angle, personal whims
and opinions are not relevant on this one.
Legal question have legal opinions. So...these are my opinions.
If Linus did switch the GPLv3, would that force him to make all
I look at projects like FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Replicant, Trisquel, Parabola, and
with all of them being 100% open source in terms of what's included in the
installation, and that they are a lot better for security and anonymity or
privacy.
Unfortunately the BSDs are not free
There's an important misunderstanding here: the GPLv2 doesn't have a fixed
loophole allowing binary blobs. Richard Stallman's opinion is that binary
blobs were already a violation of the GPLv2, and if they weren't, nothing
about the GPLv3 would change that.
As far as I'm aware, the reason
Is there a libre kernel for netbooks? I installed the regular Trisquel on my
netbook and only get about 2 and a half hours of battery life when using
XFCE/LXDE (and less when using GNOME). I only have a 3 cell battery but the
Windows version apparently gives about 4 hours of battery life (my
97 matches
Mail list logo
