http://www.starboundranch.com/
Once again, your scripture? I think I know which one, but my translation speak of those who "had not sinned after the order of Adam's."
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does this mean -- Death ruled from Adam to Moseseven over those who had not sinned
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
As far as I know, temptation preceeds sin and sinning. And temptation
appeals to personal desire (called lust by James). Human nature is sin
nature. I do not mean to say that a sin nature sins
Hello, David. My comments below .
I don't disagree with your understanding that the root of temptation is found in the lust of our flesh, but the forcefulness of that flesh to move us in a certain direction is not the same in all people now, and it was not the same in Adam Eve before the
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/22/2006 9:09:34 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
Are you saying that Christ sinned and served Satan John? Notice 1John started by warning of deception-He
JD wrote:
Regarding Adam and Eve - if they did not have a
sinful nature before their decision to disobey the
Lord, they would have never disobeyed Him !!
What is your basis for this assumption, John?
Consider the following passage:
Ezekiel 28:15
(15) Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the
DAVID:
Do you intend to answer my questions concerning your thesis?
Lancel
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 23, 2006 08:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
JD wrote:
Regarding Adam
Lance wrote:
Do you intend to answer my questions concerning
your thesis?
Sorry, Lance. I have lots of unread messages. What thesis? What
questions?
David Miller
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.
Ph.D. thesis, David.
Title, chapter headings, availability to be read?
That one!
Lance
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 23, 2006 09:18
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
Lance wrote:
Do
Lance wrote:
Ph.D. thesis, David.
Title, chapter headings, availability to be read?
That one!
In my biology program, we did not have a thesis for the Ph.D. We had a
dissertation. I never completed this part of the Ph.D. program; hence, I
never earned a Ph.D. My Master's thesis concerned
Thanks David.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 23, 2006 13:38
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
Lance wrote:
Ph.D. thesis, David.
Title, chapter headings, availability to be read
As far as I know, temptation preceeds sin and sinning. And temptation appeals to personal desire (called "lust" by James). Human nature is sin nature. I do not mean to say that a sin nature sins !! Christ had this very nature - I believe you called it "sinful flesh" on several occasions in the
of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 12:23:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
I know this is too
not of God,
neither he that loveth not his brother.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 12:23:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance,
Bill, John, David?
I know this i
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/22/2006 8:05:45 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
Hallelujah!!
Thank you Dean. Maybe now we can make some headway; you are right on the mark
vil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 12:23:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
I know this is to
cd: Bill I have condenses articlewritten by Darby: Do you agree with it?If not why?
This shews us the Christ standing in the midst of those who are saved, whom God brings to glory, although at their head. It is this which our epistle sets before us He who sanctifies (the Christ), and they
Sent: January 21, 2006 07:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance,
Bill, John, David?
cd: Bill I have condenses articlewritten by Darby: Do you
agree with it?If not why?
This shews us the Christ standing in the midst of those who are saved,
whom God
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 7:17:47 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
One would assume, Dean, that herein lies something of your own understanding on the matter at hand. Why not draw
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 6:26
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance,
Bill, John, David?
Ah! This then would put JND in the position
of denying that which Bill Taylor is affirming. Allow me to suggest that if
JND's understanding
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 8:26:24 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
Ah! This then would put JND in the position of denying that which Bill Taylor is affirming. Allow me to suggest
a little short. Thereafter, I'd
ask him to read the balance of what I said.
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 21, 2006 09:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance,
Bill, John, David?
- Original
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 9:26:25 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
1. Yes
cd:Then if I prove myself right you will have to live with your hersery or repent to God and others whom you called
I know this is too long -- but please take the time. I was having one of the moments in the Lord. If doesn't work for you, then it was just for me. I can live with that !!
jd
-- Original message -- From: "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cd: Bill I have condenses
al Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 7:10
AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill,
John, David?
cd: To help us understand each other better: What part do
you not agree with the below written by Darby.
Sent: January 20, 2006 07:44
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance,
Bill, John, David?
Hi Dean, thanks for caring enough about this
subject to search out and post this. I hope you do not mindifI
decline comment, as it is much too long to critique point by point. I would
prefer
Scripture. Is she unaware of that too? I don't think so.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 5:45
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance,
Bill, John, David?
IFO and, I may be the last
Sent: January 20, 2006 08:04
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance,
Bill, John, David?
I will still entertain that possibility, Lance;
however, it is becoming rather obvious to me that her constant attacks against
the early fathers (not to mention every other theologian we hold dear
well.
Take care,
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 7:10
AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill,
John, David?
cd: To help us understand each oth
well.
Take care,
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Dean Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006
7:10 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] J
Judy wrote:
I am amazed that anyone reading Church history
would want to hold the early fathers in such honor
and follow their example. With their politics, heresy
hunting, banishing those who didn't agree with them
etc. Where is the love? and faith for that matter.
Why choose dead
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy wrote: I am amazed that anyone reading
Church history would want to hold the early fathers in such
honor and follow their example. With their politics,
heresy hunting, banishing those who didn't agree with them etc.
Where is the love? and faith
.
Rather, perhaps we should offer them a little more respect because they have
already finished the race and are waiting for us to finish ours.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:11 PM
Subject: [TruthTalk
Well said, David.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 20, 2006 12:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
Judy wrote:
I am amazed that anyone reading Church history
would want to hold the early
Well said again, David.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 20, 2006 16:09
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
Hi Judy. Calvin is generally NOT considered a church father. I think
over
- Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:11 PM Subject: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David? From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Judy wrote: I am amazed that anyone reading Church history &
sources from Church history. This to me speaks not only to her theology, but to her character as well.
Take care,
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Dean Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 7:10 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, Dav
cd: Judy is what Bill say in the below true-do you view Christ as being made of a special kindof flesh?
- Original Message -
From: Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/18/2006 10:25:23 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus , neither God nor Man
Certainly I think Jesus was
No I most certainly don't Dean; those are Bill's words
and Bill's concepts. Not mine. What I believe is that
he was not born by procreation like
the rest of us since he had no human father. Mary may
have
contributed an ovum butthe male determines
achild's gender and his spiritual
is much more precious.
Note #10
Four distinct grounds may be noticed in the Chapter for the humiliation of Jesus: it became God there was His glory; the destruction of Satan's power; reconciliation or really propitiation by His death; and capacity for sympathy in priesthood.
- Original Me
May I write down that Judy T denies the deity of Christ?
jd
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think so Lance, if they were you would understand that God CAN NOT die or are
you of the same persuasion a certain Germanwho proclaimedGod
..CPL was working
on this same case from a different angletoday--death/resurrection as sides
of JCs NT coin
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 18:10:22 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:53:01 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
May I write down that Judy T denies the deity
I am serious and I repeat. If this is wrong, please clarify.
jd
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
May I write down that Judy T denies the deity of Christ?
jd
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't
IFF I've read you correctly on this then, you ought
to be called on to apologize by the moderator (if he can drag himself away from
the MC) "I don't believe He is the same god, JD")
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
'Them'? The Scriptures?
I should actually appreciate staying with this
important matter until it is abundantly clear. Clear to me, to you, and, to
DAVID MILLER and to all others on TT, Judy.
DAVID MILLER ACCUSED ME OF BLASPHEMY, as I recall,
ON THIS VERY MATTER AND, VIS A VIS JUDY TAYLOR!
Yes Lance "them" - (that is unless you receive
interpretation through some educated person that you
respect). You do not believe that the scriptures
I cite below are operative in my life no matter what I say which
is in effect blaspheming the Holy Spirit if in fact, I
am speaking the truth.
@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 19, 2005 08:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASSERTS
THAT I, LANCE, NEITHER UNDERSTAND NOR BELIEVE 'THEM' Who blasphemes?
Yes Lance "them" - (that is unless you receive
interpretation through some educated perso
You couldn't make this kind of a judgment call unless
you considered yourself to have apprehended
ALL TRUTH which would put you in the position to judge
in your own estimation.
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:53:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NO! I very much believe that the
Your response here indicates ignorance
Lance
When the Holy Spirit gives understanding there is no
interpretation involved
One either understands or they don't .. just like a
foreign language
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:53:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NO! I very much believe
-
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 19, 2005 09:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASSERTS
THAT I, LANCE, NEITHER UNDERSTAND NOR BELIEVE 'THEM' Who blasphemes?
Your response here indicates ignorance
Lance
o nobody but you..oh and David 'cause I think he also believes sumpin like this.
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 19, 2005 09:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASSERTS THAT I, LANCE, NEITHER UNDERSTAND NOR
"I don't have to accept their public teachings when
they are not in line with the CLEAR TEACHING OF GOD'S WORD' (implicit within
this: AS I SEE IT/God has granted Me (Judy Taylor) the 'spiritual discernment'
to see what such as Calvin Barth could not see) IMO, what is further
implicit in
You are doing with my words what your mentors do with
God's Word Lance - which is interjecting your own reasonings.
As for Calvin and Barth. Barth had his own issues
with God's Word which I prefer to let lie with him - Calvin however is in my
face at church and heis something else. Here is
Sent: December 15, 2005 06:20
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy says:'I
don't know these men and I have said nothing, repeat nothing, about them
personally.."
You are doing with my words what your mentors do with
God's Word Lance - which is interjecting your own reaso
.?
Perhaps we should not be upset when you charge
either us or 'living/dead theologians' as the problem is indeed
yours.
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 15, 2005 06:37
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy says:'I
don't
Probably so, no need to repeat myself; anyone who loves
truth by nature hates error. I can accept that these men may have been
well meaning and may have even done good things. But why camp around their
error? I understand that you will not agree since you don't believe that
anyone can know
Your words are for the most part personal opinions
Lance and Garys are indecipherable so I leave those to others who
may be better equipped -
some of you seem to get a kick out of them but I'm not interested in Dylan or
the speculations
of his fans.. Have you
said something profound from
@mail.innglory.org Sent: December 15, 2005 06:37 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy says:'I don't know these men and I have said nothing, repeat nothing, about them personally.."I take your correction to heart, Judy. As to the aforemention persons, let's just say that you've offered a much milder tre
your straw man,
clearly straw
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:57:31 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But why camp around their
error?
myth
(noProtestant here'sthat stupid--you are really arrogant,
M'am! E.g., like JC himself, acc to their writing, Protestants Calvin
Lutherthemselves dismisstheir readersfrom everything contrary
tofaith in God's word, in their case,inc their own
folly;unlike their historic detractors,
Your DISCERNMENT ON THIS MATTER (who knows, maybe a
few other matters also) is wide of the mark.I've occasionally drawn a
comparison between yourself and David Miller on this discernment thingy, Judy.
Do take care won't you, Judy, in consigning persons to
Hell?
Yes Lance, I do appreciate your concern
But I have yet to consign the first person to hell -
it's all in your too vivid imagination.
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:19:44 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your DISCERNMENT ON THIS MATTER (who knows, maybe
a few other matters also) is
Are Kevin and Judy chasing them down to behead them or
burn them at the stake taking away their
opportunity to repent, Lord willing? The latter
(as you call them) do not argue with orthodoxy as they
are part of it but neither do they sanctify the Lord in
their hearts which is apparent by the
No one is consigning persons to Hell. Persons are responsible to God if they reject his ways He is the one that will consign them FOREVER.All the great big crocidile tears in the world will not change God's truth. There is a HELL and Most people end up going there according to Jesus
Not necessarily, Judy! I most assuredly do not want
to 'look', as you put it, like you, yet I do read
you!n
Want to add anyone else to the
list?
The difference is in the way we read. You do not
respect/revere me in the way you do your
favorite theologians and authors and that makes all the
difference. They are your teachers...
and they are who you will become like
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:55:16 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
more time on this in 2006. izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005
9:58 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] JUDY
ASKS: Is Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific
Stone the flock.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005
10:14 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY SAYS
THAT THE WORD OF GOD NEEDS NO INTERPRETATION..TWOG IS SPIRITUALLY
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Monday, December 05, 2005 9:58 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific imagination? Call it what you want butI see it as
Anyone ever read the novel by Joseph Conrad
upon which 'Apocalypse Now' was based?(nonsense penultimatesly
issues from persons...Judy, Kevin) And David Miller sees you two as the 'high
points' of TT? Yikes!!
We are cautioned NOT TO READ NOVELS?
May I see the hands of ALL INERRANTISTS on TT?
Methinks we've got the T-shirt on this one but, I'd thoroughly appreciate
hearing from David Miller on this. What think ye..will he duck this one?
Yup!
As to Peter Wagner and John Wimber...well...just
what
openairmission@yahoo.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:58:20 -0800 (PST)Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific imagination?
Call it what you want butI see it as Gods Commands to a christian to keep themselves
)Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific imagination?Call it what you want butI see it as Gods Commands to a christian to keep themselves pure. It is taught in the OT the New.2 Co 6 Be ye not unequally yoked together
I shall venture an answer and, would like to hear
from all on this. JESUS IS THE STANDARD/PLUMBLINE. To the extent that HE is
misrepresented via anything then, to that extent what is said as truth is less
than the truth.
So now we are back to your old question - Who is
Jesus? and which Jesus is the Standard/Plumbline?
Is He God the Word as in Scripture or is he the figment
of your or some theologian's prolific imagination?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:54:16 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I shall
The definitive answer to your query concerning
'your own Jesus' is...well...YES.
Meaning that everyone has their own Jesus and there is
no standard of Truth?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:16:42 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The definitive answer to your query concerning
'your own Jesus' is...well...YES.
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep
INFALLIBLE. That then, would include your interpretation(s) of Scripture would
it not?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 05, 2005 07:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is
Jesus
ry.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 05, 2005 07:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is
Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific
imagination?
Meaning that everyone has their own Jesus and there
is no standard of Truth?
Read 1 Cor 2:12-16, this is the teaching and this is
what I believe. Understanding rather than
some man's natural or carnal interpretation is the
problem.
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:53:42 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These are two rather large
observations/statements. PLEASE
Lance Muir wrote:
I shall venture an answer and, would
like to hear from all on this. JESUS IS THE STANDARD/PLUMBLINE. To the
extent that HE is misrepresented via anything then, to that extent what
is said as truth is less than the truth.
These are two rather large observations/statements.
PLEASE DAVID (et al) comment on these?
Another way of saying this might be:'The Word of
God is spiritually discerned (1Cor2:14) therefore, it needs no interpretation.
Are you, Judy, saying this?
And which Jesus is this?
The Mormon Jesus?
Jesus God's Word?
The "incarnational" Jesus?
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:22:33 -0600 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Lance Muir wrote:
I shall venture an answer and, would like to
hear from all on this. JESUS IS THE
PS: Which Jesus did you evaluate Francis Schaeffers
teachings in the light of?
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:36:39 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And which Jesus is this?
The Mormon Jesus?
Jesus God's Word?
The "incarnational" Jesus?
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:22:33 -0600 Terry
Judy:You are just being silly, silly, silly!!
Wasnew?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 05, 2005 08:48
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy asks:WHAT
STANDARD, PLUMBLINE
What is so silly Lance?
From what you write I get the impression that your own
opinion is King... prove me wrong. please!!
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:55:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy:You are just being silly, silly, silly!!
Wasnew?
From: Judy Taylor
are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he
bears much fruit, for
apart from Me you can do nothing.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005
5:54 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Judy
asks:WHAT
the church did not have ready access tomost of those document copies.
jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:40:02 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is Jesus..the figment o
! iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005
6:31 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY
ASKS: Is Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific
imagination?
There most
, 2005 08:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy asks:WHAT
STANDARD, PLUMBLINE..EVALUATING TRUTH?
And which Jesus is this?
The Mormon Jesus?
Jesus God's Word?
The "incarnational" Jesus?
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:22:33 -0600 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Lance
5 08:05:49 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY SAYS THAT THE WORD OF GOD NEEDS NO INTERPRETATION..TWOG IS SPIRITUALLY DISCERNED
Read 1 Cor 2:12-16, this is the teaching and this is what I believe. Understanding rather than
some man's natural or carnal interpretation is the problem.
On Mon, 5 Dec 200
ifferences of opinion about whoHe is and associated concerns and yet serve the same Jesus.
jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:36:39 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy asks:WHAT STANDARD,
-
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 05, 2005 08:05
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY SAYS THAT
THE WORD OF GOD NEEDS NO INTERPRETATION..TWOG IS SPIRITUALLY DISCERNED
Read 1 Cor 2:12-16
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Lance
MuirSent: Monday, December
05, 2005 6:31 AMTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is
Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific
imagination?
There most
interpretation of in
scripture is when one prophesies in tongues. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005
9:26 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] JUDY SAYS
THAT THE WORD OF GOD NEEDS NO INTERPRETATION
JESUS IS LORD!
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 05, 2005 10:28
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] JUDY ASKS: Is
Jesus..the figment of my (Judy is also 'some theologian') prolific
imagination?
Perhaps we
ASS U ME??
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 05, 2005 10:14
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy asks:WHAT
STANDARD, PLUMBLINE..EVALUATING TRUTH?
The question is: Do
YOU understand that truth??? We dont
Jesus Himself has some input on this subject - Are you
interested in hearing what He has to say???
"If you abide in My word (hold fast to My teachings and
live in accordance with them), you are truly my disciples,
and you will know the truth and the truth will make you
free" (Jn 8:31,32
Is that what you're doing, Judy? 'Splain it to me,
please?
1 - 100 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
