Judy
My condolences to you and your family on your Mom's going home. May the Lord give you all the comfort and encouragement you need at this time.
God bless you...
Michael.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi TT'ers,Does anyone know if DavidM made it through Wilma OK? I saw some TV
- Original Message -
From: michael douglas
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Authority over nature: Guyana
Michael D: Hey Bill, thanx for the question. This is something we discussed at length last summer into early
MD: I thought that this link would be interesting. It's a link to the message preached by the apostle to the Grenadians before Ivan last year. It's not edited,so the reading is not a smooth narrative,but it is manageable.
http://www.geraldgriffith.org/images/Prophetic%20Word%20to%20Grenada.pdf
? Pleaseshare relevant passages. I'm thinking we don't really do much, if all we can do is pray evil into someone else's domain. With power like this, why not eradicate it? Again, relevant passages please.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: michael douglas
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent
Michael D: Very interesting indeed, Izzy. As you said,if true, what a testimony of divine providence... Thank God for His mercy.
Interesting to read your statement about our not having rights, here. While that may be true, sometimes we hae to resist the bully (enemy) from throwing us off course,
Michael D: TTers, as most of you will recall, we had a very lively debate re the ability of Christians to exercise control over nature. This led further to persons questioning whether God uses these types of disasters to judge nations, and even whether He gets so intimately involved in these areas
michael douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael D:
Anyway to some serious stuff. Ivan was originally due to hit Barbados flush. THe Lord showed to my prayer partner and me during a time of prayer, three Caribbean nations that were in serious jeopardy. They are Jamaica, Guyana and Barbados
MD: Stunning, Izzy, just stunning. ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About real heroes/values:
Subject: Ben Stein's final column
For many years Ben Stein has written a biweekly column for the online website called "Monday Night At Morton's." (Morton's is a famous chain of
Hail David
Greetings and many blessings in the name of the Lord Jesus For this new year, Both to you and your blessed family! Please give a special blessing to The Terry's for me as well.
How is it going? I hope that the new year started with bright hope and great expectations for you all. I also
TTers
I sent an email intended for David Miller to TT by error. Please ignore. I apologise for any embarrassment caused to David or any one else on TT.
As I am at it I wish God's perfect will for everyone on TT in this year ahead, and may we all come to know Him who is true, as He requires us to
Michael D: Hello counsellor . Well, I think the context of my quote below should be reconsidered by you, sir...
You'll need to explain to me how I'm out of context here. James and John wanted to call down fire from heaven and destroy some Samaritans. Jesus rebuked them for their attitude and said
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Eye of the Storm
In a message dated 9/26/2004 7:33:07 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is interesting, Michael. Much of Florida is calling for a
Michael D: What do you make of it, Slade? This is very serious business. I feel for you guys. I am fighting with you all. As I write here, it's already at your coast. I am praying for God's mercy while I try to add my fight. Thank God Izzy is in on the battle. May God bless her, and all that
Michael D: Yes Judy, There is much need for prayer. Of course God says, If my people... shall humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land.god requires us to do these things as a
Michael D: I'm relieved to see that. This area is to volatile to take lightly. Anyway, another storm threat is looming over the U.S. Florida again is in the firing line according to latest forcasts. How tough a prospect for you folks out there.
I remember sharing some weeks ago that the Lord
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's unbelievable how this concept is not getting through. Let me give an example or two to express my meaning.
Jan said to John, "Quit beating around the bush!"Let me ask you a question... Was John ACTUALLY beating around the bush or was he verbally not
Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael douglas wrote:
Michael D: I lend my voice here to Judy's and Terry's. As I have repeated often recently, God has made faith the Law by which He intervenes on man's behalf. That's why we are justified by faith. God can do anything He chooses, but our
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael D: When I've share with believers things (even idiomsand slang) that they need to watch, they've frown on it or dismissed it as nonsense
I am one who disagrees with you. Our Master and King used idioms when He was walking the Earth and Our Father in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/21/2004 9:04:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nor dissent?
Wow -- I am embarrassed fr some reason. Jnho
Michael D: One might be excused for wondering why you spelt your name wromg all the time, Jhno...
ALL-NEW
Yahoo!
Michael D: I lend my voice here to Judy's and Terry's. As I have repeated often recently, God has made faith the Law by which He intervenes on man's behalf. That's why we are justified by faith. God can do anything He chooses, but our faith/response to Him regulates His response to us. Jesus did
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jt said: Hi again Slade; I don't know about others but we do need to watch what comes out of our mouths as we have another Kingdom watching and waiting for a doorpoint of entry into our lives and God will not keep them out, this is our responsibility.
Michael D: How about ...as many as I love I rebuke and chasten...ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lance,
We get tornadoes in St. Louis. And floods. Pretty much the same stuff in a different form.
What does God use to discipline Canadians? Ice?
My God loves us enough to warn us
Michael D: PTL, Judy. Good to hear you're okay. I wonder what's the situation with Terry? Hope he's doing well also. God is a faithful God! HE's worthy of our praise.
Terry was asking for rain all the time. I guess we better be careful about what we ask for...
Did the eye miss him as he was
Folks, I sent this on Friday nite, but it seems like it didn't get through. It was in response to Izzy'inquiry in particular.
Michael D: Oh boy, seems like I have to thread carefully on this terrain... I would not want to ruffle Lance's or Izzy's feathers... Go easy guys!!! Is that possible on
on Friday night, and also today, and neither shows up on TT. I might try one more time on that one.
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to thank Michael Douglas for a small Biblical passage he mentioned in one of his last Weather Management emails.
I alsowould like to provide you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/9/2004 4:22:18 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I do not agree on this prayer controlling weather thing, I have to let you know that this weekend, while in Pismo Beach, the local news station over there described the dramatic
Michael D: Oh boy, seems like I have to thread carefully on this terrain... I would not want to ruffle Lance's or Izzy's feathers... Go easy guys!!! Is that possible on TT??? H.
Anyway to some serious stuff. Ivan was originally due to hit Barbados flush. THe Lord showed to my prayer partner
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your parents, obviously, never spanked you. Too bad. Izzy
Michael D: Why do you say that Izzy? Is it because he seems to have the methodology all wrong???Just being mischievous folks... And to think that I was going to thread carefully around you
I really thought you needed the help, but since you have now reassured me, I will give you a clear path to the subject... Seems like you're trying your best to liberate a liberal. Hmmm. Tread carefully, Izzy. Anyway, he's all yours. I'll fight with the weather...ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/7/2004 7:56:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael D: Well, what do you know?!?!?! Trinidad and Tobago are inder a warning re Ivan. It has concerned me alot. I have been fighting it and praying against. I am doing all that I can
Michael D: As you all should know by now, There is another threat looming over Florida. This is the worst so far. Jamaica and Cubaare also in serious danger. I encourage those who believe that God intervense in response to faith and authority in these areas, like Izzy has encouraged, to fight this
Michael D: Well, what do you know?!?!?! Trinidad and Tobago are inder a warning re Ivan. It has concerned me alot. I have been fighting it and praying against. I am doing all that I can to stave off the danger. I'll be continuing as long as the threat looms. I am looking to God for mercy on our
Michael D: Keep fighting the fight, Izzy. I continue to do the same. Thank God Trinidad and Tobago are not affected by the storm. I am curious, Iz, what brought that question up?
Anyway, Folks have to keep holding faith and taking authority over that threat and the enemy that is tis
Message -
From: michael douglas
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 02, 2004 10:33
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Christians' authority over nature
Michael D: Izzy, I am glad to hear that you have taken time to share your stand with us. Personally, I am rebuking the storm and speaking death
Michael D: I hear you, John. I would encourage you to revisit some of the scriptures I have been sharing that reveal God's attitude towards these things. Believe me, I did not make this up. If God were not for it, then there would never be any consistent results to show for it. The thing is He
.
I think God is trying to enforce a paradigm shift here.
A la Judy... Crush the status quo...
michael douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jt: True Jesus came to do good and to heal ALL who are oppressed of the devil. I know faith is important but spiritual discernment is vital also Michael. If the
and make demands on His power?. THere's nothing to lose and all to gain, I would think.
I think God is trying to enforce a paradigm shift here.
A la Judy... Crush the status quo...
michael douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jt: True Jesus came to do good and to heal ALL who are oppressed of the devil. I
jt: True Jesus came to do good and to heal ALL who are oppressed of the devil. I know faith is important but spiritual discernment is vital also Michael. If the enemy has a toehold or doorpoint in our lives with our consent then God's hands are tied in that area.
I agree. That's where depending
Michael D: Judy touched on much that I would offer in response to the questions asked. You see, all through Jesus' walk on earth He kept asking, where is your faith; oh ye of little faith; how come you have no faith? and on and on and on. The biggest problem God has is not as much with whether it
ail to see that He gave us theresult we wanted. In which case some never see that God answered their prayer in the affirmitive, and others see it only later.
Jeff
- Original Message -----
From: michael douglas
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 6:14 PM
Subject: Re:
Jeff Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
I see that Slade has giving the forcast and coordinates so I will not bother. Weather of this nature is of concern to me as I have several friends and aquaintences in Florida and the surrounding Gulf states. Also, currently my travels are keeping
Michael D: Sorry, Izzy. I realized after sending it. I don't want to add more to your annual count than is due...
Izzy, When I started mypleacrying 'Lord' He immediately countered 'angel', stunning me... To me it's like Moses at the Red Sea.
You asked previously about how do I see angels relative
Michael D: Thanks for the info, Slade.
I would count it that God answered the prayers of those who took up the challenge to fight Earl off. The fact that it didn't get to do the damage speaks volumes to me. I see the fate of Danielle as significant also.
Actually, I did a Yahoo search for myself
Michael D: John, Like Izzy, I do not pray to angels. I loose them to do God's/my bidding by faith and with the authority God gave us through Christ. Scriptural basis for doing this: Jesus gave us the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Angels are a part of the kingdom of heaven. I can call upon them to
not heard much about it recently. Can you provide an update as to where it went, and its current status?
DId anyone on the list take up the vigil to forbid Earl from coming to the US? I would be interested to know.
Jeff Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My comments in red.
Michael Douglas wrote:
Just
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/16/2004 5:13:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Good Morning John: I sat under this teaching for many years. The Authority of the Believer is taught in "faith" circles -
Michael D: That is true, Judy. I like to
Michael D: I have used angels as well when I have lost stuff and got it back. In fact, I have been using angels since 1983it's very practical and powerful, and the saints of God need to seek to incorporate all of the provisions of the covenant into our walk as God gives us insight. Of course, it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/13/2004 3:23:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree with this conclusion. I do not think that it excludes God's interdiction or His cooperative involvement affecting the course of nature. But, I do not believe that He so
Michael D: Sorry I could not get back into the discussion before now, folks.
To answer your question Izzy, I live in the English-speaking nation of Trinidad and Tobago which is a twin island state in the Caribbean 7 miles north of Venezuela.
To try and address Terry's question: I see storms as
Michael D:
I read with serious concern this evening the news of threats to Tampa and other Florida cities posed by the approaching storm. These are truly serious situations. The good thing is that the Lord Jesus has equipped the Church with the necessary spiritual tools to avert these and other
Michael D: Sorry I didn't bring this up earlier. I know however that there are more than the proverbial10 righteous folks in Tampa. Even if evacuation is mandated, the battle for averting landfall can still continue. It can spare the place much disaster. ...The righteous cry and the Lord hears and
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lance wrote: If you beat a child with a rod he will not die (in most cases) but you will likely be 'charged'. (Penal code)I have been charged for preaching Christ in public, but never forspanking my child with a rod. Has this been a big problem in
Michael D: Hansen, I think I inadvertently deleted your last response to me. Can you please resend.Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Miller wrote:
John S. wrote:
Soo, you are saying that we must be intellectually
correct on the teaching of hell in order to be saved?
No. Salvation
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael douglas wrote:
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John wrote: I don't understand this observation. Doesn't the reality of hell (whatever that is) exist apart from our consideration? Why would God punish us for being wrong in our understanding of eternal
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John wrote: I don't understand this observation. Doesn't the reality of hell (whatever that is) exist apart from our consideration? Why would God punish us for being wrong in our understanding of eternal judgment. And if we have to think correctly on this
Michael D: Sorry for the delay in answering this Blainer. I only have time to shoot off a couple quick questions.Blaine Borrowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blaine: I will give this another shot, hopefully some light will emerge.
First, Mormonism teaches there is no such thing as an angel that
Michael D: Congrats perry. You're the new 'master' of the cauldron. I do wish you much grace, since all of the Locke in the world wouldn't be enough for you to face this heatDavid Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
February 11, 2004Dear TruthTalk members,I have asked Perry to take over as moderator
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael douglas wrote:
Blainer:. But he was denied the privilege of tabernacling in the flesh,
because he made war in heaven, and actually overcame one-third of the
hosts of heaven. The other two-thirds are you and I
(here Blainer is saying that he is an angel
the quotes were taken from, but did not include everything for brevity.
I really would like Blaine to respond, though. Blaine?
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAVEH: My latest comments are in PINK...
michael douglas wrote:
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael douglas wrote:
Blainer
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:48:49 -0600 Blainer:. But he was denied the privilege of tabernacling in the flesh,becausehe made war in heaven, and actually overcame one-third of the hostsofheaven. The other two-thirds are you and I (here Blainer is saying
The whole matter was a great blessing, andmany good men lived in that house, some men being discipled in the ways of the Lord, and other men who tutored others in the ways of the Lord.In fact, one of those men is a member of this list today (Michael Douglas). :-)
Oh David, David, why did you do
Michael D: Blainer, I am curious... What authoratative LDS scripture do you base this explanation re Jesus et al on. It is particularly interesting because not all hold the same position (as you mentioned). Do they have an LDS scriptural backing for their divergent view?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael D: Dave H, I did not notice a response to David's and my request for your explanation re the pprophecy of J. Smith below and it's non-fulfilment. I am truly eager to hear your reply, as David stated that he is, and I am sure alot of other TTers are as well. Would you oblige?michael douglas
Michael D: Dave H, You asked me earlier when I said J Smith was proven to be a false prophet in the past on TT, what was the occasion of the false prophecy. Well, it has been posted on TT (Thanx David) for some time now.
My question is do you see this prophecy and its non-fulfilment as evidence
jt: I understand what you are saying but not the point of all of it. Why accuse God? This is just the way it is and if there is more to it that we should know he will reveal this also - in his time. But then I've been doing a little research, and have read that your Church believes that
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAVEH: My latest post is in BLUE
michael douglas wrote:
DAVEH: We believe JS was a prophet of God despite his warts, much in the same way Moses was a prophet. I've never heard anybody claim that Wesley was a prophet, but rather merely a reformer
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Miller wrote: DAVEH wrote: I explained that we have always considered ourselves (members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) to be Christian. Our Church is even named after him. Is yours??? The term "Mormon" was given to us by our
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see any sabbath in the NT other than the sabbath rest spoken of in Hebrews 4
Well, keep looking.
shalom
Michael D: Slade,do you often send folks on wild goose chases? It would be nice if you were able to help himout by showing a specific
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael, What difference does it make? After all, according to many on TT, we are heretics if we keep Gods Commandments. Izzy
Michael D: Nice one Izzy. You should remember though, that the new covenant forbids sexual immorality.
Those of you who are
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now please answer my question. According to Torah, is it right or wrong to pick up sticks on Sabbath. Shouldn't we define work on the Sabbath according to God's Word and not according to what we personally think is ok or not?That's been my point... allow the
Michael D: Iz, A close friend of mine (brother in the Lord) had the same thing dealt to him here in Trinidad by the courts a few years ago. It is stunning indeed.ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lesbians not guilty of adultery? http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35496.
to characterize your contributions as such, I will concede that that's fair enough.
shalom
slade
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: michael douglas
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 04 November, 2003 11:49
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Seventh Day Sabbath
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Original Message]
From: Judith H. Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is here and now while we are living in this world of fear,
stress,
anxiety, and unbelief that we need his 'sabbath' rest every day of the
week
not just Saturday and/or Sunday.
Exodus
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-Notice how Paul says that the law has DOMINION over a man as long as he
lives. Now he tries to explain a way for us to die that we should no
longer be married to the law and be under its dominion, but rather now
we can be
Slade wrote:
I understand where you're coming from, Izzy. The Text tells us two things: we cannot have righteousness without faith, but the Text also says the commandments of God are our righteousness.
Michael D: Slade, I say thisnot in contention, but out of concern. It seems that you do not
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael D wrote : As you know Iz, I do not disagree with the above statement. It's the notion that this is a requirement for all believers that I, and others, are trying toshow is contrary to the word of God.
Izzy wrote:
Michael, You have to do
Michael D: I have not been able to keep up with my contributions concerning this topic like I would like. Thank God David is doing a wonderful job at it. I will try to get back to Izzy's reply to my last contribution soon. I am also looking foward to Chris Barr's reply to my response to his
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
Those who attempt to obtain salvation by the obeying the Law are under the law. I am not.
I do, however, choose to be obedient to the commandment of resting on the Sabbath.
Michael D: Good to hear that you are not under the law Izzy.
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
Those who attempt to obtain salvation by the obeying the Law are under the law. I am not. I do, however, choose to be obedient to the commandment of resting on the Sabbath. God never voided the Sabbath. Jesus, Paul, and all the apostles
Bruce Woodford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Izzy,You wrote:"Bruce, I am surprised at you for wondering why the issue of the 10 Commandments being banned by our federal government is cause for alarm to God-fearing Americans. It seems that if there is, indeed, a God who judges nations for their
Chris Barr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\o/ !HALALUYah! \o/
Greetings Marlin et al in the Matchless NameofYahShua!!
- Original Message -
From: Marlin Halverson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/01/2003 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Ten Commandments Support
"you are adding
Michael D: HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!!!Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During this lull in the conversation, I thought I would offer some humor for Dave Hanson and anyone else who needs a smile.
Terry
1. How Do You Catch A Unique bird? Unique Up On It. 2. How Do You Catch A Tame
Marlin Halverson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marlin, What is the rest that the Israelites did not enter into? Was it the keeping of the seventh day, or something else? Could it have been the entering into the promised land that they were forbidden to do because of their failure to believe the
MD: Hey folks, I've been out of circulation for a while. Been on vacation, among other things... I'll have to try and get caught up a bit.
It is very good to see that Carroll is back on TT, especially since he's crossed my mind lately. I probably should have lifted you up in prayer, Carroll,so
Michael D:
Laura, rest assured that one has not experienced church till he has experienced a proper NT gathering where the Spirit is allowed to move through whomever He chooses. It is a real faith builder and edifier when one realizes that he can flow in the spirit and be used to touch lives in
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Perry Locke wrote: DaveH, If Jesus was the God of the OT that the Jews worshiped (Jehovah), then it must be for Jesus that they built the temple(s). Yet Jesus calls the Temple his Father's house. Doesn't that create a circular argument?DAVEH: Not in my
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
michael douglas wrote:
Michael D: Dave H, you have stated a few times I believe that you believe that Jesus is the Jehovah of the OT. Can you explain what you mean by that, and how do you figure that? DAVEH: Yes, Michael..I do believe JC was the &quo
Michael D: Dave H, you have stated a few times I believe that you believe that Jesus is the Jehovah of the OT. Can you explain what you mean by that, and how do you figure that?Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[re Rapture]
FTR, _The [(scholarly)] Presence of the Future_ doesn't deal with 'the rapture', but Dr Ladd wroteseveral other books that do deal with it in very clearlanguage; and, quite well, actually, partic relative to thetime line/theology of the NT (that i've
to be led to the proverbial slaughter...Extra, Extra thickskin is definitely a must for your survival kit. Crocodiles might be one's best friend in this zone...
Well Lon, to be forewarned is to be forearmed.
Enjoy the ride...
Michael Douglas (Trinidad Tobago)
Lonnie mackley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Michael D: Please permit me a few observations on this topic, gentlemen...Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Clifton wrote:
To DaveH:A short time back, if I remember correctly, you said that in your opinion, people do not die and go to Heaven. I gathered from what you were saying that Paradise
Michael D:Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ShieldsFamily wrote: Dave H, I too believe in free agency, and therefore would not try to pressure someone into my own beliefs. I know that without the inspiration of the Holy Spirit in their lives there is NOTHING I can do to influence anyone to seek after
perception that TT is a well of truth. How can that be when you have corrupted it so! No Izzy, if anything.it seems you've poisoned the well with your inaccurate portrayal of me.
From: "Michael Douglas"
Blainer's words:
However, if she had children younger than Jesus,
why did t
Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all.
I'm glad to see we have some people in the TruthTalk Email Service who are not motivated by human dogma. The concept of grace plus nothing minus nothing is a great place to start. Grace plus nothing minus nothing in terms of salvation is
Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael:
Sounds as though you agonized over your decision in much the same way that we did. Some in our group are still unable to break away from the institutional setting..
Michael D: It did take some adjustment as I mentioned. The thing with me
From: michael douglas
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] hypnotism
Michael D:
I understand hypnosis to be a very dangerous thing. Anything that unnaturally suspends your controlover your mind exposes you to spiritual influence. People whom
Michael D wrote: I understand hypnosis to be a very dangerous thing. Anything that unnaturally suspends your control over your mind exposes you to spiritual influence.
Are you sure hypnosis suspends control of your mind, or is that just the impression you get from stage hypnotists?
Michael D: I
Michael D:
I understand hypnosis to be a very dangerous thing. Anything that unnaturally suspends your controlover your mind exposes you to spiritual influence. People whom the Lord has led into major deliverence activities discover this phenomenon. As to the apparent absence of physical evidence
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael D,
If you dont know that Gods Commandments and Gods Laws are the same thing, I cant even begin to know how to have a discussion with you about this. If the Law no longer applies to you, I am very sorry to hear that you are a lying,
ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by required? If you mean Will you go to hell if you dont?, the answer is not any more than if you violate any other Commandment.
Do you mean, Does God want you to do this?the answer is yes, if the 4th Commandment still means
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
