OK, I'll attach them to the wiki shortly amd place a pointer here.
On 7/5/06, Jojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kelvin,
I also didn't see any attachment in the mail. Probably the
mailing-list removed the binary attachment ?
--
Warm regards,
jojo.
On 7/5/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got some patches I need to apply that may fix that. One thing I
need from you is to call the Connector durng the build phase ;-).
I've temporarily changed method signatures of loaders to pass the
parent through so I can get things like the Monitor property injector
to work. I'll
OK, pictures should be visible at
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/LogoCandidates
The missing attachments in my earlier note are a mystery, I guess google
mail does some smarts with recognising an incoming mail that you have sent?
I definitely see an incoming note from tuscany-dev with two
I will be out of the office starting 07/05/2006 and will not return until
07/22/2006.
I will respond to your message when I return.
For urgent messages please contact my backup Thomas F
Mutdosch/Durham/[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
my manager Jay Cagle/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had some problems yesterday using my old subclipse 0.9.x plugin.
Upgraded to 1.0 rechecked out for good measure and all seems fine.
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 7/4/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works for me (I just did an svn up).
Jim
On Jul 4, 2006, at 7:54 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
There's a thread going on over on incubator-general about the use of IRC:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11511128601r=1w=2
Are people happy with having our current weekly hour long IRC chat? I find
the chat a useful way to find whats going on and gauge peoples opinions. A 1
hour chat isn't
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-514?page=all ]
Ed Slattery reassigned TUSCANY-514:
---
Assign To: Ed Slattery
Various problems building with VC7
--
Key: TUSCANY-514
URL:
I think IRC is goodness as long as
1. the log gets posted
2. formal votes are done on email
Communities that meet regularly on IRC might have an issue if they
dont post logs, but if the discussion is posted on email then its a
very productive.
Paul
On 7/5/06, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All seemed OK when I got home and tried again, and its working from the
office now.
Cheers, Kelvin.
On 7/5/06, Jeremy Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had some problems yesterday using my old subclipse 0.9.x plugin.
Upgraded to 1.0 rechecked out for good measure and all seems fine.
Cheers,
Augmenting / Modifying generated Java SDO Types to enable better conversion to
XSDs
---
Key: TUSCANY-515
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-515
Project: Tuscany
Type:
Annotating generated SDO Types for the associated 'Factory' and 'Package'
generated classes
---
Key: TUSCANY-516
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-516
Project: Tuscany
Hi
I have found the chat logs useful to catch up with the discussions. But
then we must be more choosy about the sort of topics we discuss.
In my opinion the chat must be reserved for subjects that simply cannot be
allowed to drag over for days, over the mailing lists. It would be good if
we
Show component-to-component invocation in Calculator sample
---
Key: TUSCANY-517
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-517
Project: Tuscany
Type: Improvement
Components: C++ SCA
Versions:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-517?page=all ]
Andrew Borley updated TUSCANY-517:
--
Attachment: TUSCANY-517.patch
This patch adds a DivideService. Have also updated the automake (linux) and
make (windows) files, but they will need extra
On Jul 5, 2006, at 3:04 AM, ant elder wrote:
There's a thread going on over on incubator-general about the use
of IRC:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11511128601r=1w=2
Are people happy with having our current weekly hour long IRC chat?
I find
the chat a useful way to find whats going
I can see merit in an SDO chat and I like the idea publishing the chat
topics and summarising the chat log. For me that would enable me to work
smarter, since I could decide ahead of time whether to attend the wider
meeting or catch up later by reading the log summary. Hopefully the net
time
Mapping Complex Type XSD that allows mixed content (mixed=true)
---
Key: TUSCANY-518
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-518
Project: Tuscany
Type: Sub-task
Components: Java SDO Tools
Mapping xsd:choice into properties with names starting with 'group'
-
Key: TUSCANY-519
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-519
Project: Tuscany
Type: Sub-task
Components: Java SDO
On 7/5/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got some patches I need to apply that may fix that. One thing I
need from you is to call the Connector durng the build phase ;-).
I've temporarily changed method signatures of loaders to pass the
parent through so I can get things like the
Are you saying you'd prefer not to participate, or do you want us all to
stop having the weekly chat?
...ant
On 7/5/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/5/06, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a thread going on over on incubator-general about the use of
IRC:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-515?page=comments#action_12419283
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-515:
I'm very confused by this set of issues.
The SDO spec says very clearly that roundtripping from an XSD to SDO types and
Frank,
No, calling endLogging doesn't resolve the issue. That is the
pattern that the DAS is using today.
I sent the XSD I used to generate the required types with the last
message rather than the types for simplicity. I'll go ahead and attach
the generated files and test case to T-153.
Brent
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-153?page=all ]
Brent Daniel updated TUSCANY-153:
-
Attachment: tuscany153.jar
I'm attaching a copy of the test case that was discussed on the dev list.
ChangeSummary on root data object not supported
Ant was just trying to be helpful by gauging what people would like
to use IRC for, although I also have to say I didn't interpret
Jeremy's previous mail to be advocating a ban on IRC.
I think there has been a lot of heated discussion on the list lately,
and it would probably be good for
Brent,
The source file was attached to the original note but I did not see the XSD.
Brent Daniel wrote:
Frank,
No, calling endLogging doesn't resolve the issue. That is the
pattern that the DAS is using today.
I sent the XSD I used to generate the required types with the last
message
On Jul 5, 2006, at 8:57 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
Ant was just trying to be helpful by gauging what people would like
to use IRC for, although I also have to say I didn't interpret
Jeremy's previous mail to be advocating a ban on IRC.
I did not mean to advocate that. Ironically, Ant and I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-515?page=comments#action_12419305
]
Venkatakrishnan commented on TUSCANY-515:
-
Frank, I perfectly understand your perspective here about the 'no necessity'
for this sort of round tripping.
My
I think a weekly one-hour scheduled IRC chat is a good idea, even
though my personal record of attendance isn't too good :-( I have
scheduled these into my calendar now, whoch should help. The few
chats I have been on have been useful, though perhaps closer to
decision-making affairs than would
IRC has been a useful tool for timely community brainstorming to handle
issues that need quick attention.
We have started to summarize the chat content on the mailing list in
messages that include the IRC chat. That is very useful.
It would be good to decide on chat subject before the chat
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:10 AM, haleh mahbod wrote:
IRC has been a useful tool for timely community brainstorming to
handle
issues that need quick attention.
Right. That was the basis for saying IRC should be an impromptu,
consensus building mechanism - there's no need to wait for a
The attached patch adds the ability to have the DAS manage collision
columns. Currently this is implemented with a managed attribute on
column -- there may be some room for improvement here, as having
managed and collision on Column doesn't seem all that intuitive.
Also, the first cut only
Jim Marino wrote:
On Jul 3, 2006, at 5:34 AM, ant elder wrote:
One of the big reasons for me is summed up well in Sebastien's proposal:
This will get our community members involved in building the runtime
together and will lead to a wider knowledge base that makes it
possible to
quickly
The cypress on the hill motif is pretty cool and it doesn't need to
be too busy - take a look at http://www.tuscanystyle.it/index.html
for an example of how it can be stylized.
--oh
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I really liked the wine stain on the white background. That was pretty
clever, simple, evocative, etc.
Plus it'd look really cool on a white tee shirt, and it makes branding
of cocktail napkin-based design documents really easy.
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Oisin Hurley
Hi Jim,
Sorry about the disconnect, I was out Monday and yesterday. I'll be sure to
attend the IRC chat tomorrow. In the meantime, some more quick comments.
- Original Message -
snip/
If I understand correctly, would a system service transport use a
low level
communication
Cheers!
-Original Message-
From: Pete Robbins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 5:45 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tuscany Icon
On 05/07/06, Hawkins, Joel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really liked the wine stain on the white background. That was
I have posted a candidate for the first C++ release here.
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC1
Would all interested parties take some time to review this so that we can
either re-spin the release or vote on it asap.
The website documentation is out of date and will be re-written to sync
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-520?page=all ]
David Wheeler updated TUSCANY-520:
--
Attachment: 520-patch.txt
Patch for build-dist.bat for paths that include spaces.
built script cannont handle working directory paths that contain
On Jul 5, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I guess I can understand how to get credits for the committer
status.
As a contributor, I would like to see a well-defined measurable
path which I can see how I make progresses toward the goal. It
leads two questions:
1) How many
On Jul 5, 2006, at 5:05 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
I'm wondering if we plan to move to JUnit 4.1? I see more
flexibilities and simplicities offered by JUnit 4.x. Now I can also
use the wizards from Eclipse 3.2 to take advantage of it.
Do we see any issues? I understand Junit 4.x requires JDK
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:10 AM, haleh mahbod wrote:
IRC has been a useful tool for timely community brainstorming to
handle
issues that need quick attention.
Right. That was the basis for saying IRC should be an impromptu,
consensus
+1 for including DAS related topics on the IRC Chats.
- Luciano
ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/05/2006 06:47 AM
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Email versus IRC
There's a thread going on over on incubator-general
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-518?page=all ]
Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-518:
Resolution: Duplicate
See TUSCANY-521
Mapping Complex Type XSD that allows mixed content (mixed=true)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-516?page=comments#action_12419389
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-516:
I'm not sure I understand this request. Please provide more details and an
example. Thanks.
Annotating generated SDO
Hmm, it seems that Surefire plugin 2.2 doesn't support JUnit 4.x yet. Here's
the JIRA issue for the topic:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-31
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 05,
Hi,
We don't have problems with JDK 5 + Maven 2 and in fact the combination is
used in the code base now.
I'm looking for the new features such as annotation support from JUnit 4.x.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Eddie O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
46 matches
Mail list logo
