On Jul 31, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 30, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Jul 30, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 30, 2006, at 2:55 PM, ant elder wrote:
What about the dependencies of the extension? It looks like
right now all
the dependency jars
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Jeremy / Jim / Rick / Ant and others
What is the decision about the sca-tools that existed in M1? Do we
plan to
make it a part of the current Tuscany-Java as well?
I think tooling in general is a good thing to have (as long as it's
+1
--
Pete
Jim :-)))..
Please help me understand the scope of not required. If something is not
required then why have it in the first place? Are these things no longer
relevant to the current Tuscany-Java?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 8/1/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:16
Hi Elizabeth,
do you have a test case for this and I'll take a look.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 31/07/06, Elizabeth DeLouise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A problem I came across (not sure if it's on my end or Tuscany's), was
that
I could not have more than one import.sdo wsdlLocation=... tag in my
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-587?page=comments#action_12424809
]
Geoff Winn commented on TUSCANY-587:
I'm working on this.
WSDL XSD is read incorrectly.
-
Key: TUSCANY-587
Hi,
The readme on the supply chain example seems to be a bit out-of-date.
Could someone pls direct me to how to run the sample?
Ta
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Meeraj Kunnumpurath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2006 18:35
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: problem
I've had a look at this code now I think we should be able to get it going
on the new code base, so I'll start trying to port it over. Thanks for the
offer to help, I'm going to need that, and from anyone else who's interested
if this binding is to become a part of Tuscany, not only help with
Hi Ant,
I can help you wherever you might need an additional hand (in testing,
samples, documentation, website updates etc.).
- Venkat
On 8/1/06, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had a look at this code now I think we should be able to get it going
on the new code base, so I'll start
Here's the IRC log from yesterdays scheduled chat.
The main things talked about were what happened with Tuscany at OSCON (the
talk was ok, not so many at the BOF). That Tuscany has a new website was
mentioned (go have a look!). Most of the rest of chat was about modularity
and releases related
+1 Besides working in general on DAS, Brent helped out a lot with DAS
issues with getting Big Bank running for M1.
Kevin Williams wrote:
I would like to recommend Brent for committership. Brent has made
invaluable contributions to the DAS and has been a consistent provider
of quality patches
Update site for C++ M1 release
--
Key: TUSCANY-588
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-588
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Website
Affects Versions: Cpp-M1
There were actually two symptoms: sometimes I would get this
exception, sometimes it would just hang after printing the messages
(which I think Rick mentioned as well).
--
Jeremy
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:30 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Thanks, I have managed reproduce the problem reported
On Aug 1, 2006, at 12:43 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Jim :-)))..
Please help me understand the scope of not required. If
something is not
required then why have it in the first place? Are these things no
longer
relevant to the current Tuscany-Java?
Jim is echoing a goal that SCA
+1
On Monday July 31 2006 11:57 pm, Kevin Williams wrote:
I would like to recommend Brent for committership. Brent has made
invaluable contributions to the DAS and has been a consistent provider
of quality patches since the inception of this project. Here is my +1
for Brent.
--Kevin
+1
On Monday July 31 2006 10:18 pm, Jim Marino wrote:
I'd like to propose we make Raymond a committer. Normally, I would
list some of the things a candidate has done for the community but
with Raymond he has done so much I wouldn't know where to begin. So,
here's my +1 form making Raymond a
+1 from me.
Jim
On Jul 31, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Kevin Williams wrote:
I would like to recommend Brent for committership. Brent has made
invaluable contributions to the DAS and has been a consistent
provider of quality patches since the inception of this project.
Here is my +1 for Brent.
On Jul 31, 2006, at 11:42 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
An end user application developer could write some type of library
that gets reused by different composites. We should have a
mechanism that supports this without resorting to maven. I think we
should have some type of resolver abstraction,
+1 - looking forward to having him on board.
--
Jeremy
On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
I'd like to propose we make Raymond a committer. Normally, I would
list some of the things a candidate has done for the community but
with Raymond he has done so much I wouldn't know where
Venkata: I was planning on at least using the WSDL2Java M1 tool to generate
the java interface, but I'm not sure of the value beyond that.
Ant: To generate the dummy data, The code in 419 definitly looks like it can
be of alot of use. Thanks.
-David
On 8/1/06, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The recursive changes include support for complex properties accessed
via XPath 2.0 expressions and the only XPath 2.0 engine I have found
is Saxon (http://saxon.sourceforge.net) - others such as the one in
the JRE and Jaxen only seem to support XPath 1.0. I have a couple of
concerns over
+1
On 7/31/06, Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose we make Raymond a committer. Normally, I would
list some of the things a candidate has done for the community but
with Raymond he has done so much I wouldn't know where to begin. So,
here's my +1 form making Raymond a
I'm ok with that. I just thought we may want ones without axis. But I'll
put it in the others, if I hear nothing different.
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Can we just add the binding to the existing distros?
--
Jeremy
On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Rick wrote:
I'm currently in the process of trying to
How about the JavaScript container be included by default as well then?
Would make it easier to run samples but this brings up all the kitchen sink
distro type questions being discussed on the modularity thread.
...ant
On 8/1/06, cr22rc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm ok with that. I just
I've had a go at adding support for introspection of JavaScript components
and wondered if anyone had any comments.
As JavaScript is untyped and doesn't have the concept of annotations its not
possible to have this work as well as with Java components. How I've done it
is to have the script
I mostly agree, but one of the big benefits for Web services is the
JavaScript E4X support. With that and when TUSCANY-419 and the magic
databinding stuff is done this is going to make JavaScript components really
really useful to use with WS i think. All the old WS debates
about databindings and
Hi Jeremy / Jim, first thanks for those answers.
I am able to understand your perspectives. But just that one more
question. If we do not generate a WSDL what do we publish for clients who
which to connect to this component's service? How would client applications
know about the service's
The Apache Tuscany community is pleased to announce its first C++
milestone
release.
--
Pete
Congratulations! We hope to follow this up soon with a PHP SDO release
exploiting the latest C++ code.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This looks cool.
Graham Charters has been looking at similar things for a PHP
programming model - if you haven't had chance yet you should sync up
with him.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:08 AM, ant elder wrote:
I've had a go at adding support for introspection of JavaScript
components
Yea this is definitely simpler than a side file. I came across this
but never tried it out a few years back:
http://dotnetjunkies.com/WebLog/anoras/archive/2004/08/09/21502.aspx
Apparently it provides a way to introspect the script to retrieve
Javadoc style annotations but the way you have
FWIW, I think I've been running into a problem at build time because of
this exact issue. There's a bit of code in the javascript sample
HelloWorldTestCase.java test that gathers up all of the
META-INF/sca/default.scdl resources it can find. The test then throws
away the first resource in
David,
Axis2's WSDL2Java has an option to generate a junit test case. We
could make sure that it works now and enhance that as appropriate.
-- dims
On 8/1/06, David Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Venkata: I was planning on at least using the WSDL2Java M1 tool to generate
the java interface,
On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Jeremy / Jim, first thanks for those answers.
I am able to understand your perspectives. But just that one more
question. If we do not generate a WSDL what do we publish for
clients who
which to connect to this component's service?
On Aug 1, 2006, at 11:28 AM, Matthew Sykes wrote:
FWIW, I think I've been running into a problem at build time
because of this exact issue. There's a bit of code in the
javascript sample HelloWorldTestCase.java test that gathers up all
of the META-INF/sca/default.scdl resources it can
How about until we have a way to do extensions properly to fix the problem
Matthew is seeing the testcase could determine which is the application
default.scdl by seeing if the resource URL starts with the current working
directory which it can get from System.getProperty(user.dir)?
...ant
On
Maybe we should take a conservative approach initially (and this is
probably something similar to #3, #4). As long as milestones are not
too infrequent then I think we can release the three subprojects on the
same schedule. Users should be able to easily pull SCA , SDO and DAS
components
It seems like having the build infrastructure make it really easy to
configure what components go into a distro would help us iterate our
way to the right number and makeup of distros. While the POM and
project structure manipulation required right now isn't particularly
difficult, it could
Ken,
I think the factories should wait until their init method is called
otherwise they are registering before they have finished being
initialized. This also allows a this reference to leak before the
object has finished being constructed (i.e. it could be invoked
before it is fully
And please set the svn:ignore property for bigbank
Thanks
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there an import.wsdl function or anything similar for defining wsdl files
in scdl implemented yet in the new code base?
...ant
Jim Marino wrote:
I'd like to propose we make Raymond a committer. Normally, I would
list some of the things a candidate has done for the community but
with Raymond he has done so much I wouldn't know where to begin. So,
here's my +1 form making Raymond a committer.
Jim
I was seeing a ScopeNotFoundException rather than an NPE I think, but
yeah, it happened when a component defaulted to STATELESS scope (in
the absence of an @Scope(MODULE)). I talked with Jim and we came to
this fix together.
Just so's I understand what you're saying -- the problems you're
done, thanks for the reminder
On 8/1/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And please set the svn:ignore property for bigbank
Thanks
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
I was seeing a ScopeNotFoundException rather than an NPE I think, but
yeah, it happened when a component defaulted to STATELESS scope (in
the absence of an @Scope(MODULE)). I talked with Jim and we came to
this fix together.
Just so's I understand
Proposal 1: Support independent build and distributions at the top level
Rationale: Users interested in different technologies such as SCA and
SDO do not want to have to build all of them together. This also
gives a false impression that there are strong dependencies between
them.
What this
I'm about to start working on a binding for the Sun JAX-WS RI, akin to
the Celtix Axis2 bindings. Anyone else interested, please chime in!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
I was seeing a ScopeNotFoundException rather than an NPE I think, but
yeah, it happened when a component defaulted to STATELESS scope (in
the absence of an @Scope(MODULE)). I talked with Jim and we came to
this fix together.
OK - thanks for fixing
On Aug 1, 2006, at 5:44 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
done, thanks for the reminder
Thanks - now we can both remind Jim the next time he forgets ;-)
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Splitting into a different thread
On Aug 1, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
Proposal 4: We need a test suite for each distribution that mirrors
user experience
Rationale: When a user installs a distribution it's helpful if it
works.
...
We can't do this every time we build as not everyone
On Aug 1, 2006, at 4:49 PM, ant elder wrote:
Is there an import.wsdl function or anything similar for defining
wsdl files
in scdl implemented yet in the new code base?
IIRC the spec group had murmured something about using the WSDL2.0
wsdlLocation attribute e.g.
interface.wsdl
On Aug 1, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
Proposal 1: Support independent build and distributions at the top
level
Rationale: Users interested in different technologies such as SCA and
SDO do not want to have to build all of them together. This also
gives a false impression that there are
How about moral support - I'm swamped ;-) Seriously, you may want to
sync with Jervis since he mentioned reusing some pieces across Axis2
and Celtix.
Jim
On Aug 1, 2006, at 6:23 PM, Ken Tam wrote:
I'm about to start working on a binding for the Sun JAX-WS RI, akin to
the Celtix Axis2
On Aug 1, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
Yea for some reason it's not picking it up on my machine. Have any
idea what may be happening since you have the same box as me?
I don't think it does it automatically - I always have to set it
manually before checking in. I typically do an svn
Hi Jeremy,
Why not name them as extension.scdl. Though for most parts they might be
treated as any other scdl some where we treat them a little differently as
in adding them to extensions and so on. Infact a solution developer could
develop some extensions and applications and keep them all
54 matches
Mail list logo
