For what it's worth, I like that approach too. I'm with Pete on this, in
general I dislike IRC, although I can see there are times when it is useful.
I particularly like the idea that the subjects for the regular IRC chat
should be announced in advance as far as possible. I think that will help a
+1
and I stick to my earlier suggestion that the topics of discussion be fixed
ahead over the mailing list instead of choosing the topics over the list and
then actually picking them up for discussion only in the IRC. Choosing them
ahead brings in a committment that a topic would surely get disc
yea that's cool. I just thought if a decision was made on IRC it
couldn't be "undone" by a vote on the list. I like the idea of using
quick chats to clear out lingering things and then have them ratified
on the list.
Jim
On Jul 6, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006, a
On 7/6/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>>
>> We will also hold pre-announced chats at other times so try and
>> bring closure to issues that seem to be dragging on in email
>> threa
On Jul 6, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
We will also hold pre-announced chats at other times so try and
bring closure to issues that seem to be dragging on in email
threads. The point of these is to come to a decision and such
out
On Jul 6, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I'd like to see if I can recap where this thread went. There seem
to be two sets of opinion:
1) that regular scheduled chats are helpful
2) that impromptu, unscheduled chats are helpful
In light of this, I'd like to propose the following IRC
This sounds good to me. +1
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I'd like to see if I can recap where this thread went. There seem to
be two sets of opinion:
1) that regular scheduled chats are helpful
2) that impromptu, unscheduled chats are helpful
In light of this, I'd like to propose the following IRC p
+1
that just about covers it from my point of view. I'd also be interested in
experimenting with a 1hr email session. Email is pretty fast nowadays and
refreshing and responding via the mailing list could also work. It would
also remove the really annoying thing about IRC which is the loss of con
I'd like to see if I can recap where this thread went. There seem to
be two sets of opinion:
1) that regular scheduled chats are helpful
2) that impromptu, unscheduled chats are helpful
In light of this, I'd like to propose the following IRC policy for
the project:
==
We will hold a regula
You'll get a rise of this: I'm in Rome now and the other day I was
out doing my run, all sweaty, in terrible heat, and I run past this
women and she asks if I have a lighter for her cigarette :-) Classic
Italy.
Jim
On Jul 6, 2006, at 2:10 AM, Andrew Borley wrote:
On 7/6/06, Jim Marino <[
On 7/6/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
at the squash courts ;-)
That's for the healthy, athletic guys - us cooler types hang out behind the
bike sheds, smoking woodbines and cracking jokes ;-)
at the squash courts ;-)
On Jul 5, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:10 AM, haleh mahbod wrote:
IRC has been a useful tool for timely community brainstorming to
handle
issues that need quick attention.
Right.
+1 for including DAS related topics on the IRC Chats.
- Luciano
"ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/05/2006 06:47 AM
Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
Email versus IRC
There's a thread going
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:10 AM, haleh mahbod wrote:
IRC has been a useful tool for timely community brainstorming to
handle
issues that need quick attention.
Right. That was the basis for saying IRC should be an impromptu,
consensus buildin
Paul Fremantle wrote:
I think IRC is goodness as long as
1. the log gets posted
2. formal votes are done on email
Communities that meet regularly on IRC might have an issue if they
dont post logs, but if the discussion is posted on email then its a
very productive.
Paul
+1
I find these regul
On 05/07/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:10 AM, haleh mahbod wrote:
> IRC has been a useful tool for timely community brainstorming to
> handle
> issues that need quick attention.
>
Right. That was the basis for saying IRC should be an impromptu,
consensus bu
On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:10 AM, haleh mahbod wrote:
IRC has been a useful tool for timely community brainstorming to
handle
issues that need quick attention.
Right. That was the basis for saying IRC should be an impromptu,
consensus building mechanism - there's no need to wait for a
schedu
IRC has been a useful tool for timely community brainstorming to handle
issues that need quick attention.
We have started to summarize the chat content on the mailing list in
messages that include the IRC chat. That is very useful.
It would be good to decide on chat subject before the chat sessi
I think a weekly one-hour scheduled IRC chat is a good idea, even
though my personal record of attendance isn't too good :-( I have
scheduled these into my calendar now, whoch should help. The few
chats I have been on have been useful, though perhaps closer to
decision-making affairs than would
On Jul 5, 2006, at 8:57 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
Ant was just trying to be helpful by gauging what people would like
to use IRC for, although I also have to say I didn't interpret
Jeremy's previous mail to be advocating a ban on IRC.
I did not mean to advocate that. Ironically, Ant and I we
AFAICT no one has suggested a ban on IRC, what I'm trying to find out is if
we should be continuing with the regularly scheduled weekly chat. If enough
people don't think we should be having it then we should stop. Thats a
perfectly fine thing to happen if thats what the community want, but its no
Ant was just trying to be helpful by gauging what people would like
to use IRC for, although I also have to say I didn't interpret
Jeremy's previous mail to be advocating a ban on IRC.
I think there has been a lot of heated discussion on the list lately,
and it would probably be good for us
On 7/5/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you saying you'd prefer not to participate, or do you want us all to
stop having the weekly chat?
Ant, please, that's not what I said at all.
I said that, IMO (for what that's worth), I see the main benefit of
IRC is its use as tool to help
Are you saying you'd prefer not to participate, or do you want us all to
stop having the weekly chat?
...ant
On 7/5/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/5/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a thread going on over on incubator-general about the use of
IRC:
> http:
On 7/5/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's a thread going on over on incubator-general about the use of IRC:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11511128601&r=1&w=2
Are people happy with having our current weekly hour long IRC chat? I find
the chat a useful way to find whats going o
I can see merit in an SDO chat and I like the idea publishing the chat
topics and summarising the chat log. For me that would enable me to work
smarter, since I could decide ahead of time whether to attend the wider
meeting or catch up later by reading the log summary. Hopefully the net
time spe
On Jul 5, 2006, at 3:04 AM, ant elder wrote:
There's a thread going on over on incubator-general about the use
of IRC:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11511128601&r=1&w=2
Are people happy with having our current weekly hour long IRC chat?
I find
the chat a useful way to find whats goin
Hi
I have found the chat logs useful to catch up with the discussions. But
then we must be more choosy about the sort of topics we discuss.
In my opinion the chat must be reserved for subjects that simply cannot be
allowed to drag over for days, over the mailing lists. It would be good if
we c
I think IRC is goodness as long as
1. the log gets posted
2. formal votes are done on email
Communities that meet regularly on IRC might have an issue if they
dont post logs, but if the discussion is posted on email then its a
very productive.
Paul
On 7/5/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
There's a thread going on over on incubator-general about the use of IRC:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11511128601&r=1&w=2
Are people happy with having our current weekly hour long IRC chat? I find
the chat a useful way to find whats going on and gauge peoples opinions. A 1
hour chat isn't
30 matches
Mail list logo
