*I'm extremely unsettled. *I'm agreeing with Dewald Pretorius's comments
above... Here's an earlier related story: I was the first to market with a
drag drop interface for Windows...Yes: back in the stone ages of windows
2.x and windows 3.0 there was no such thing. And soon after HP, Xerox, and
Twitter has now displayed a distinctive predatorial stance towards the
developer ecosystem.
That's incredibly over dramatic, I think. We have, and continue to
maintain a platform that will allow for a vibrant ecosystem. We want
everybody to succeed.
There will always be room for developers on the fringes, and novel ways of
using twitter. I would hope that twitter will concentrate on the maintenance
and development of the core system, and allow us to add the bells and
whistles as required by our own set of users.
On 9 April 2010 13:56, Dewald
100%
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Nigel Legg nigel.l...@gmail.com wrote:
There will always be room for developers on the fringes, and novel ways of
using twitter. I would hope that twitter will concentrate on the maintenance
and development of the core system, and allow us to add the bells
story of my life.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:29 AM, mikawhite mikawh...@me.com wrote:
Thanks Raffi, though I doubt your comment will make headlines :)
--
To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject.
--
Raffi Krikorian
Twitter Platform Team
http://twitter.com/raffi
I think once the ad sharing platform is in place, you'll see more
clever/recommendation apps around products and services.
Being able to create/project a revenue stream, with low barrier to entry
(simply tying into the ad platform like AdSense), seems like it would create
a business-as-usual
- Mike Champion mike.champ...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, interesting post form Fred, especially coming a week before
Chirp.
Are there classes of killer apps that should be built but haven't
been? I left a comment on his blog that I would love an app that
somehow aggregated the
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Mike Champion mike.champ...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be curious to hear what folks think.
For me, the appeal of Twitter is its brevity and its simplicity for
integration with one's website.
I worry that once basic authentication is discontinued, that I will
have
i would love to know how we can make oauth simpler for people. should we
provide better documentation? examples? libraries?
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Lil Peck lilp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Mike Champion mike.champ...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd be curious to
I think an site explaining OAuth similar to
http://business.twitter.com/twitter101/ would go a long way.
Abraham
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 15:30, Raffi Krikorian ra...@twitter.com wrote:
i would love to know how we can make oauth simpler for people. should we
provide better documentation?
On 04/07/2010 03:07 PM, Lil Peck wrote:
[snip]
I worry that once basic authentication is discontinued, that I will
have to stop using Twitter in my web based apps. Seems to me that
oauth is needlessly too complicated and bloated for many Twitter uses.
oAuth is easy if you're using one of the
On 04/07/2010 03:30 PM, Raffi Krikorian wrote:
i would love to know how we can make oauth simpler for people. should we
provide better documentation? examples? libraries?
I can't speak for all of the libraries, but certainly Marc Mims'
Net::Twitter makes it totally easy - plug-and-play if
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Raffi Krikorian ra...@twitter.com wrote:
i would love to know how we can make oauth simpler for people. should we
provide better documentation? examples? libraries?
Here is the Classic ASP code (by Ariel Saputra) that my site uses:
function
13 matches
Mail list logo
