As to the support, email lists are much preferred here, as they just
work, so you don't have to go downloading the latest news etc, or
crawling a web-forum.
I would just ignore a web forum, totally hopeless.
But I would prefer an NNTP news server, it would need to be
authenticated to
Scrive Francois PIETTE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
Generic speaking, I think that the introducing of an incompability is
acceptable when:
- the application will not compile so the developer get the attention of the
problem
- the changes needed are documented
- these changes are few and quick to
Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
I prefer the best solution for each platform. If the use of
an array of byte will slow down the Win32 version then keep the use
of pointer for Win32 and use the array in the .net version. This is
important for components like ICS.
I second that, I don't want to give
I prefer the best solution for each platform. If the use of
an array of byte will slow down the Win32 version then keep the use
of pointer for Win32 and use the array in the .net version. This is
important for components like ICS.
I second that, I don't want to give up high speed of ICS
Using a dynamic array of byte will not slow down the component if
the array size is not constanly changed.
And if the Move function is used to move data around, specifically when
the project uses the FastMove unit which has very efficient move code.
Mind Move uses pointers, so might be
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
Mind Move uses pointers, so might be useless in .net, but that's a
problem for people wanting to use .net, not win32.
If so, I'm happy again.
---
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
--
To unsubscribe or change
Using a dynamic array of byte will not slow down the component if
the array size is not constanly changed.
And if the Move function is used to move data around, specifically when
the project uses the FastMove unit which has very efficient move code.
That's not a problem. The code can be
Scrive Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
And if the Move function is used to move data around, specifically when
the project uses the FastMove unit which has very efficient move code.
Small OT question: which FastMove do you use?
Bye, Maurizio.
Small OT question: which FastMove do you use?
John O'Harrow's v3.03 Dec 2005. It's 1600 lines of code, against the 14
lines for the 'pure pascal' version, but is very efficient.
Angus
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto
Hello Francois,
V6 is still in beta state, that's why I prefer the best solution
regardless whether it breaks existing application code or not, as
long as such 'breaking' changes are well documented.
Just my two cents.
---
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
I am a newcomer to using ICS and have been very pleased with it so
far. I prefer the non-blocking functions to anything I have seen in
Indy, and I prefer the reduced number of components. I originally used
Argosoft Internet Mail Suite before converting to Indy a couple of
years ago.
As far as
11 matches
Mail list logo
