if support for winsock below v2.2 was actually required in
ICS v7?
As Wiki says,
Version 2.1 of Winsock was supplied in an add-on package for Windows 95. It was
an integral component of Windows 98, Windows NT 4.0, and all subsequent Windows
releases. (Microsoft did not supply implementations
I'm going to look at how to implement IPv6 in ICS and wonder
if support for winsock below v2.2 was actually required in
ICS v7?
No, I don't believe ICS v6 and v7 need to support any OSs earlier than
Windows 2000, since they are long out of support and there is no need for
them to support new
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
I'm going to look at how to implement IPv6 in ICS and wonder
if support for winsock below v2.2 was actually required in
ICS v7?
No, I don't believe ICS v6 and v7 need to support any OSs earlier than
Windows 2000, since they are long out of
Is it valid for an HHTP header to relocate to an empty URL?
Currently, HttpProt seems to parse the relocation to the same URL, and
goes into a loop.
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: http://
Temporary Redirection: http://www.telecomstrader.com/ to:
http://www.telecomstrader.com/
Angus
--
To
There's an option to dynamically load a different winsock version at
runtime (see properties ReqVerHigh and ReqVerLow).
However loading v2.x requires winsock2 headers, and if we want IPv6
we must use winsock2 API. I think I'll keep these two properties as
dummies, they would no longer work,
Hi, Angus,
I'm not sure if it's valid, but it is used by server-side scripts for assigning
some cookies and reloading the same page under new conditions:
Location: /
It's up to the site to prevent looping.
Stan
- Original Message -
From: Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
The temporary URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the
response. Unless the request method was HEAD
I am using the HEAD method, this is a web site checker confirming 1,500
URLs in a database still exist each week... I'll try GET.
Angus
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for
On May 20, 2010, at 05:59, Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
The temporary URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the
response. Unless the request method was HEAD
I am using the HEAD method, this is a web site checker confirming 1,500
URLs in a database still exist each
Not exactly what I said ;-)
I said that irrespective to what RFC could imply, some sites intentionally
use redirection to the same location, and the site (server) should normally
prevent endless looping. If it's not, than indeed a client should protect itself
- whether it is implemented in
It is not clear to me from the spec, but if it makes the express
assertion that it SHOULD give the new URI in the response to
non-HEAD requests, by omission it seems to me that it then MUST
do so for HEAD.
It's not unusual for servers to treat HEAD differently, I had to fix the
ICS web
Hello,
When under stress test, the service -project- crashes and needs a Task
manager kill with more than 5,860 connections. When I use the same source
with GUI project, it easily scales up to 20,000 connections. Any idea what
we should be taking care of that we have not??
Thanks,
SZ
--
To
Hello everyone:
In my program, I created a thread to read data and put it into the
buffer, then the thread will post a message to main form and suspend
itself. When the main form receives the message, it sends the data in
buffer to the server.
I wrote code in the OnDataSent event of TWSocket to
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
There's an option to dynamically load a different winsock version at
runtime (see properties ReqVerHigh and ReqVerLow).
However loading v2.x requires winsock2 headers, and if we want IPv6
we must use winsock2 API. I think I'll keep these two
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
There's an option to dynamically load a different winsock version at
runtime (see properties ReqVerHigh and ReqVerLow).
However loading v2.x requires winsock2 headers, and
Here is what I have done more: - attached the debugger to service process
and got,
http://www.fastream.com/ics/icserror8.png
Hope you can help,
SZ
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Fastream Technologies
ga...@fastream.comwrote:
Hello,
When under stress test, the service -project- crashes and
New API GetAddrInfo() handles both IPv4 and IPv6 but it is
blocking. Should I try to emulate asynchron
lookups using a thread? Ideas are welcome.
Yes definitely, we must be consistent with everything else, no blocking
allowed in ICS!
How do we test IPv6 host lookups, presumably need an
Bruce Zhao wrote:
Hello everyone:
In my program, I created a thread to read data and put it into the
buffer, then the thread will post a message to main form and suspend
itself. When the main form receives the message, it sends the data in
buffer to the server.
I wrote code in the
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Here is what I have done more: - attached the debugger to service
process and got,
http://www.fastream.com/ics/icserror8.png
ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY 8 (0x8)
--
Arno Garrels
Hope you can help,
SZ
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Fastream Technologies
Fastream Technologies wrote:
But there's another problem with WSocket_WSAAsyncGetHostByName.
AKAIK, this old API doesn't support IPv6. New API GetAddrInfo()
handles both IPv4 and IPv6 but it is blocking. Should I try to
emulate asynchron lookups using a thread? Ideas are welcome.
--
Arno
Yes I see but under the same computer, same Win7Pro, same 4GB RAM, the GUI
-debug- project that does exactly the same thing works very well!! I am
trying to push the 32-bit compiler to its limits.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Arno Garrels arno.garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Fastream Technologies
Fastream Technologies wrote:
Yes I see but under the same computer, same Win7Pro, same 4GB RAM,
the GUI -debug- project that does exactly the same thing works very
well!!
I guess both use the same ICS, isn't it?
So most likely something in your service-code makes the difference.
--
Arno
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
New API GetAddrInfo() handles both IPv4 and IPv6 but it is
blocking. Should I try to emulate asynchron
lookups using a thread? Ideas are welcome.
Yes definitely, we must be consistent with everything else, no
blocking allowed in ICS!
OK.
22 matches
Mail list logo
