mailing"
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] NOFORMS
>
>
>> Paul wrote:
>>> I always thaught that NOFORMS had to be defined for its own thread-
>>> save window allocation proc (and dealloc)
>>
>> That's correct
I'm using V5.
So I still need to use define NOFORMS and undef NOFORMS for each thread's
execute begin/end.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:39 PM
Subject: R
n't need it, but it was not thread-safe in V5!
Don't do that.
--
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
>
> Paul
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Francois Piette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support maili
Hello Paul,
> So as long as the Forms unit in included in the project's uses clause, I
> don't need to define NOFORMS in any of the threads ?
correct
---
Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
http://www.mestdagh.biz
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings
Francois Piette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] NOFORMS
>> Do I need to define NOFORMS in a thread when a blocking call (Http-Get)
>> is
> used ?
>>
>> I'm using it with
> Do I need to define NOFORMS in a thread when a blocking call (Http-Get) is
used ?
>
> I'm using it without in a thread and it works fine (using it 2 years)
>
> I need to exchange a lot of database connections to webservice connections
and the main thread doesn't need the NOFORMS define.
> I would
> > Looking at the change you've made, I see that you have not the latest ICS
> > (beta) version. In the latest beta version, Arno Garrels already made those
> > changes ! In the history, it is dated march 11th.
>
> I downloaded and used the ICS v5 from your web site - that indicates
> that it's fr
Hi Francois,
Francois PIETTE wrote:
>>I have sent the file directly to your e-mail address, rather than the
>>list.
>
>
> Looking at the change you've made, I see that you have not the latest ICS
> (beta) version. In the latest beta version, Arno Garrels already made those
> changes ! In the
> I have sent the file directly to your e-mail address, rather than the
> list.
Looking at the change you've made, I see that you have not the latest ICS
(beta) version. In the latest beta version, Arno Garrels already made those
changes ! In the history, it is dated march 11th.
--
[EMAIL PROT
Hi Francois,
I have sent the file directly to your e-mail address, rather than the list.
Regards,
Bevan
Francois PIETTE wrote:
>>I was compiling ICS v5 with NOFORMS defined and found that the TTnCnx
>>class is not properly setup for this - it uses WSocket.AllocateHWND and
>>WSocket.DeallocateH
> I was compiling ICS v5 with NOFORMS defined and found that the TTnCnx
> class is not properly setup for this - it uses WSocket.AllocateHWND and
> WSocket.DeallocateHWnd. I have corrected it by copying the appropriate
> code from another component, but thought that Francois my like to fix
> the o
Hi
Did you excluded debug information? See compiler and linker options
[]
Arnaldo
Wilfried Mestdagh wrote:
>Hello Jack,
>
>I dont know wy it is so mutch bigger, sorry :(
>
>TWSocket is listening socket, it does nothing else than listening. When
>new connection comes in then the connection is ac
Hello Jack,
> With NOFORMS defined, the application size is about 111KB.
the NOFORMS exclude some units in the uses clause to decrease the
filesize.
> After I replaced TWSocket with TWSocketServer, the file size
> becomes over 300KB. I went through the uses clauses. It's
> the minimum already. I
Jack wrote:
> Hi Francois, Wilfried and others,
>
> I noticed that the Console server demo uses TWSocket.
> With NOFORMS defined, the application size is about 111KB.
Compiled with D7 it's 159 KB here.
>
> After I replaced TWSocket with TWSocketServer, the file size
> becomes over 300KB. I went
14 matches
Mail list logo
