Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

2008-03-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just had the problem of fw_{print,save}env not being able to access > the environment because I was using the default (builtin) environment > after flashing U-Boot. if you're using an embedded env, then the default crc should be correct. i'd

[U-Boot-Users] cache related query for MIPS

2008-03-25 Thread Chetan Nanda
Hi All, I am using u-boot for booting Nucleus on our MIPS 4KC processor. In u-boot code, when we give 'bootelf' command, it load all sections one by one and then do flus_cache for that section. (though flush_cache() function is empty). And in the last before jumping to start location it disable th

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 7/7] tsec: fix link detection for the RTL8211B PHY

2008-03-25 Thread Ben Warren
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:20:30 +0300 > Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > RTL8211B sets link state register after autonegotiation complete, > > so with bootdelay=0 RTL8211B will report lack of the link. > > >

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ColdFire: Add dspi and serial flash support for MCF5445x

2008-03-25 Thread Tsi-Chung Liew
Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/freescale/m54455evb/flash.c | 449 +++-- cpu/mcf5445x/Makefile |2 +- cpu/mcf5445x/dspi.c | 73 ++ include/asm-m68k/coldfire/dspi.h | 10 + include/configs/M54455EVB.h

[U-Boot-Users] compile uboot error

2008-03-25 Thread jie zhao
I compile u-boot1.2.0 using cross2.95.3 cross3.3.2 and cross3.4.1 ,but all failed. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jiejie/uboot/u-boot-1.2.0/post/cpu' make -C cpu/arm920t start.o make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jiejie/uboot/u-boot-1.2.0/cpu/arm920t' /usr/local/arm/3.3.2/bin/arm-linux-gcc -D

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > please pull support for uploading firmware for the Vitesse VSC7385 (an > ethernet switch on some 83xx boards), support for serdes > initialization, and misc fixes: > > The following changes since commit aa6f6d171a1f9f46ee4f03ad6acb97a6bfb71855: > Wo

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V2 0/9] SATA framework and FSL SATA support patch set

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dave, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > [dave] sorry for that, I'm using the webmail to access my mailbox. > the webmail is stupid. I see :-( > Maybe. But still both the existing common/cmd_sata.c and your new > cmd_sata2.c implement the very same functions (like do_sata()) wit

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V2 0/9] SATA framework and FSL SATA support patch set

2008-03-25 Thread Liu Dave
Your message is extremely difficult to read. Can you please use proper quoting? Please read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html if you need help... [dave] sorry for that, I'm using the webmail to access my mailbox. the webmail is stupid. > [dave]the common/cmd_sata.c is more likely c

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V2 0/9] SATA framework and FSL SATA support patch set

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dave, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed 3/26/2008 7:58 AM > To: Liu Dave > Cc: u-boot-external; Phillips Kim > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] SATA framework and FSL SATA support patch > set > >

[U-Boot-Users] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git

2008-03-25 Thread Kim Phillips
Wolfgang, please pull support for uploading firmware for the Vitesse VSC7385 (an ethernet switch on some 83xx boards), support for serdes initialization, and misc fixes: The following changes since commit aa6f6d171a1f9f46ee4f03ad6acb97a6bfb71855: Wolfgang Denk (1): Coding Style cleanyp;

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/7] 83xx/fdt_support: let user specifiy FSL USB Dual-Role controller role

2008-03-25 Thread Kim Phillips
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:20:18 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Linux understands "host" (default), "peripheral" and "otg" (broken). > Though, U-Boot doesn't restrict dr_mode variable to these values (think > of renames in future). > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 7/7] tsec: fix link detection for the RTL8211B PHY

2008-03-25 Thread Kim Phillips
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:20:30 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RTL8211B sets link state register after autonegotiation complete, > so with bootdelay=0 RTL8211B will report lack of the link. > > To fix this, we should wait for aneg to complete, even if the > link is currently down

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V2 0/9] SATA framework and FSL SATA support patch set

2008-03-25 Thread Liu Dave
-Original Message- From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 3/26/2008 7:58 AM To: Liu Dave Cc: u-boot-external; Phillips Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] SATA framework and FSL SATA support patch set Dear Dave, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > The patch set

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] DM644x: (2nd try) This adds support for theProdrive PMDRA board, based on a DM6441

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > 2nd try, previous one was wrapped: > Double checked spaces and coding style... Sorry, I know this must be frustrating to you, but... > Content-Type: application/octet-stream; > name="0002-DM644x-This-adds-support-for-theProdrive-PMDRA-boar.patc

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH V2 0/9] SATA framework and FSL SATA support patch set

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dave, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > The patch set include two parts: > 1. SATA framework support > 2. The Freescale SATA controller support ... > Dave Liu (8): > ATA: Add the support for SATA framework Why add new support? We already have some... > board/freescale/mp

Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

2008-03-25 Thread Aras Vaichas
Wolfgang Wegner wrote: > On our board we have an FPGA, and for different applications a different > FPGA file shall be loaded without updating the firmware. For this, the > application has to set an U-Boot environment variable that specifies which > FPGA file to load on next boot. > We use an i2

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Enable CONFIG_FLASH_SHOW_PROGRESS on the MPC8360EMDS.

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Kim, do you intend to pick this up? ... > Kim picked it up yesterday. I've seen his message after sending my mail. I haven't seen a pull request yet, though. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & D

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull Request mpc86xx repository

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I have three outstanding patches to move a few Freescale > boards from board/* to board/freescale/*. I wasn't sure > if you would apply them directly or not, and didn't get > any response from you when I asked. (No problem.) > > So I decided to make

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Pull request: u-boot-testing new-image

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Bartek, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Support for the new uImage format is available in the git repository at: > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-testing.git new-image > > The branch contains all patches related to the new uImage development > that have been posted to th

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Enable CONFIG_FLASH_SHOW_PROGRESS on the MPC8360EMDS.

2008-03-25 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Gerald Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> --- >> include/configs/MPC8360EMDS.h |1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/configs/MPC8360EMDS.h b/include/configs/MPC8360EM

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Remove deprecated CONFIG_OF_HAS_UBOOT_ENV and CONFIG_OF_HAS_BD_T

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > These defines embedded the u-boot env variables and/or the bd_t structure > in the fdt blob. The conclusion of discussion on the u-boot email list > was that embedding these in the fdt blob is not useful: there are better > ways of passing the data (in f

Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Wegner
Hi Wolfgang, On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:16:13PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Quite a number of boards use an embedded environment which gets > auto-installed when programming the U-Boot image. And a significant > percentage of boards I know use some installation tool that will set > u

Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM custodian change

2008-03-25 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
> On Thursday 20 March 2008, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Ulf Samuelsson atmel.com> writes: >> > > Too bad. I think it would be a good idea, if "they" would try to work >> > > with the "official" U-Boot community again. Now with the custodian >> > > framework in place, some problems of the past should

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Update CONFIG_PCIAUTO_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE to related boards

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/pci/pci_auto.c |2 +- > include/configs/BC3450.h|1 + > include/configs/M54455EVB.h |2 +- > include/configs/M5475EVB.h |2 +- > include/configs/M5485EVB.h |1

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] lwmon5 dspic POST spezification

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Ups. > > Best regards > > Sascha Laue > > diff -u -r -N u-boot/post/board/lwmon5/sysmon.c u-boot-mod/post/board/lwmon= > 5/sysmon.c Sorry, but this patch does not apply: Applying lwmon5: update dsPIC POST spezification .dotest/patch:29: trailing whit

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ATA: Add missing defines to ata.h

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Add defines that intersects with the libata patch sent by Dave Liu > > Signed-off-by: Tor Krill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> error: u-boot/include/ata.h: does not exist in index fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless (u-boot/include/ata.h). Repository

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] rtc: Remove 2nd reference to max6900.o in drivers/rtc/Makefile

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/rtc/Makefile |1 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Flex-OneNAND booting support (take #2)

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Flex-OneNAND booting support > > Flex-OneNAND is a monolithic integrated circuit with a NAND Flash array > using a NOR Flash interface. This on-chip integration enables system designers > to reduce external system logic and use high-density NAND Flash >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mpc5200 without fec

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Okay then. > > Acked-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Wolfgang, can you please pick this one up? Sure - done. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office:

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] mpc5200 without fec

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > --090008080204070507060201 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > include fec specific nodes in ft_cpu_setup only if CONFIG_MPC5xxx_F

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] net: Add support AX88796L ethernet deivice

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ben, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Ben, I haven't seen you picking up these NE2000 patches, so I went > > ahead. Hope you don't mind... > > > No problem. I scanned through them all as they arrived and moved them > into a 'get to later' folder since there wasn't anythin

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] DHCP request fix for Windows Server 2003

2008-03-25 Thread Aras Vaichas
Aras Vaichas wrote: > This patch fixes a problem I had with a client who was getting DHCP > request retries with our network device and their DHCP server. > > It turns out that their Windows Server 2003 DHCP server couldn't handle > fast DHCP transactions and it just "forgets" some of them. I verif

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] DHCP request fix for Windows Server 2003

2008-03-25 Thread Aras Vaichas
This patch fixes a problem I had with a client who was getting DHCP request retries with our network device and their DHCP server. It turns out that their Windows Server 2003 DHCP server couldn't handle fast DHCP transactions and it just "forgets" some of them. I verified this with my own Windows

[U-Boot-Users] => tftp 100000 fpganew.bit Using FEC ETHERNET device TFTP from server 192.168.1.100; our IP address is 192.168.1.1 Filename 'fpganew.bit'. Load address: 0x100000 Loading: ######### done

2008-03-25 Thread Tales Toledo
Hi, does anybody have a CRC problem programming Xilinx Spartan3 in slave serial mode? I'm using u-boot-1.3.0 with Matthias suggested changes in bit swapping and always get the same error. The .bit is ok since it was programmed using JTAG and works fine. The command sequence and u-boot debug messag

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Regarding my patch to move FSL boards...

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I sent a patch last week that moved 3 FSL boards > from board/ so that they would instead be under > board/freescale/. Yupp... > As that patch is for a 7448, 826x and 8266 families, > I didn't apply it to my mpc86xx repository. Would you > be willin

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for new AVR32 board

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Hi > > This patch adds support for our new AVR32 based board. > > diff -Nur old/u-boot-1.3.0/board/miromico/hammerhead/config.mk > new/u-boot-1.3.0/board/miromico/hammerhead/config.mk > --- old/u-boot-1.3.0/board/miromico/hammerhead/config.mk1970-0

Re: [U-Boot-Users] U-Boot 1.3.2 release

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Since we are commenting on this. I'm sure Freescale would appreciate > that any work attributed to me got associated with them. They do pay > me for this stuff :) EMap.py:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]': 'Freescale', Looks OK to me :-) Best regards,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Altera Stratix II support

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Addes Support for Altera's Stratix II. > > Patch against commit 661bad63a076a96c39c64f136915f146725af92b > A.k.a v1.3.2-rc3 > > can be downloaded publicly from: > https://fo.extricom.com/pub/u-boot/u-boot-1.3.2-rc3_stritixII.patch Please post patches i

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] net: Add support AX88796L ethernet deivice

2008-03-25 Thread Ben Warren
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >> AX88796L is device of NE2000 compatible. >> This patch support AX88796L ethernet device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yusuke Goda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > Applied, thanks. > > > Ben, I haven't seen you picking up these NE2000 p

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Enable CONFIG_FLASH_SHOW_PROGRESS on the MPC8360EMDS.

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gerald Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > include/configs/MPC8360EMDS.h |1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/configs/MPC8360EMDS.h b/include/configs/MPC8360EMDS.h > index eff9fba..82860b

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] FSL: Move board/mpc8260ads under board/freescale

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 18:05, Jon Loeliger wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > Makefile |6 +++--- > > board/{ => freescale}/mpc8260ads/Makefile |0 > > board/{ => freesc

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] FSL: Move board/mpc8266ads under board/freescale

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Makefile |2 +- > board/{ => freescale}/mpc8266ads/Makefile |0 > board/{ => freescale}/mpc8266ads/config.mk|0 > board/{ => freescale}/mpc

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] FSL: Move board/mpc7448hpc2 under board/freescale

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Makefile|2 +- > board/{ => freescale}/mpc7448hpc2/Makefile |0 > board/{ => freescale}/mpc7448hpc2/asm_init.S|0 > board/{ => freescal

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] FSL: Move board/mpc8260ads under board/freescale

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Makefile |6 +++--- > board/{ => freescale}/mpc8260ads/Makefile |0 > board/{ => freescale}/mpc8260ads/config.mk|0 > board/{ => freescale}

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [new uImage] Fix build issue on ARM

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > ARM platforms don't have a bd->bi_memsize so use bd->bi_dram[0].size instead. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > Let's see if this fixes the issue on ARM. > > common/image.c |8 +++- > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+),

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] net: Add support AX88796L ethernet deivice

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > AX88796L is device of NE2000 compatible. > This patch support AX88796L ethernet device. > > Signed-off-by: Yusuke Goda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks. Ben, I haven't seen you picking up these NE2000 patches, so I went ahead. Hope you don't mind..

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] net: Divided code of NE2000 ethernet driver

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > drivers/net/ne2000.c | 213 +- > > drivers/net/ne2000.h | 316 > > - > > drivers/net/ne2000_base.h | 282 > > 3 files chang

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] net: Divided code of NE2000 ethernet driver

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > There are more devices of the NE2000 base. > A present code is difficult for us to support more devices. > To support more NE2000 clone devices, separated the function. > > Signed-off-by: Yusuke Goda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied. Thanks. Best regards,

Re: [U-Boot-Users] DDR-II @ MPC8343A

2008-03-25 Thread Kim Phillips
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:54:53 +0100 Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kim Phillips schrieb: > > btw, the spd code is being used by default on the 834x mds, not this > > fixed_sdram stuff - it's mostly there for board porting completeness. > > > > > But it is known to work, isn't it ? I

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] net/Blackfin: move on-chip MAC driver into drivers/net/

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > The Blackfin on-chip MAC driver was being managed in the BF537-STAMP board > directory, but it is not board specific, so relocate it to the drivers dir > so that other Blackfin ports can utilize it. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] smc91111: use SSYNC() rather than asm(ssync) for Blackfin

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Since the "ssync" instruction may have hardware anomalies associated with > it, have the smc9 driver use the SSYNC macro rather than invoking it > directly. We workaround all the anomalies via this macro. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PR

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] 8xx: Update of support on 8xx

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Resubmit- previous patch mangled by milter @ 80 characters. > > This patch does some shifting around of OF support on 8xx. > > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Got it this time - applied, thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DE

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc: Allow boards to specify how much memory they can map

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > For historical reasons we limited the stack to 256M because some boards > could only map that much via BATS. However newer boards are capable of > mapping more memory (for example 85xx is capble of doing up to 2G). > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 3/3] 8xx: Update and extend 8xx fdt support - resubmit

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Attached patch updates the 8xx fdt support for 8xx. As pointed out by Scott > Wood - OF_CPU, OF_TBCLK aren't needed and get_tbclk() should be used instead > of > bd->bi_busfreq. > > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... > --- a/cpu/mpc

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] 8xx : Add of support to Adder875 board port - resubmit

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Greetings. > > Adds OF support to the Adder875 board port. > > Re: some stuff pointed out by Scott Wood, have removed some superfluous stuff > from Adder.h as against last submission > > Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, tha

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH v2] Add setexpr command

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Add a simple expr style command that will set an env variable as the result > of the command. This allows us to do simple math in shell. The following > operations are supported: &, |, ^, +, -, *, /. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add setexpr command

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Add a simple expr style command that will set an env variable as the result > of the command. This allows us to do simple math in shell. The following > operations are supported: &, |, ^, +, -, *, /. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Delete all env vars except read onlys

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I wrote: > > After a longish discussion with Detlev we came up with a new > proposal, which hopefully is acceptable to all. We agreed that a > command name like "clearenv" or "scrubenv" or similar (which doesn't > require any arguments) might be too

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/3] 8xx: Add FDT support to 8xx

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Bryan, un message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Minimal - just a bare bones copy of code already done by others. > > Adds the get_brgclk - for the purposes of enumerating a brg clock-frequency > entry in a of tree. Adds fdt.c so that 8xx will have a ft_cpu_setup function. > > Signed-off-

Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > AFAIK there is currently no way to check this from the U-Boot > shell. Nevertheless I think that would be the way to go instead of > hard-coding this. How about setting an environment variable like > "env_default" if the default environment is used? Th

Re: [U-Boot-Users] DDR-II @ MPC8343A

2008-03-25 Thread Andre Schwarz
Kim Phillips schrieb: On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:25:45 +0100 Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've seen things like this in mpc8349emds code : #if (CFG_DDR_SIZE != 256) #warning Currenly any ddr size other than 256 is not supported #endif Is this reasonable ? Why ? that's in the

Re: [U-Boot-Users] DDR-II @ MPC8343A

2008-03-25 Thread Kim Phillips
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:25:45 +0100 Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've seen things like this in mpc8349emds code : > > #if (CFG_DDR_SIZE != 256) > #warning Currenly any ddr size other than 256 is not supported > #endif > > Is this reasonable ? Why ? > that's in the fixed sdram init

Re: [U-Boot-Users] DDR-II @ MPC8343A

2008-03-25 Thread Andre Schwarz
Kim Phillips schrieb: On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:41:41 +0100 Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kim Phillips schrieb: On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:36:47 +0100 Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As far as I can see there are only DDR-I boards from Freescale. Th

[U-Boot-Users] Large initramfs

2008-03-25 Thread Templeton, Bill
Hello, I'm having trouble getting U-boot (based on 1.3.0) to boot a MV Pro 5.0 (based on 2.6.18) kernel image with a large built-in initramfs on the PPC440 Taishan eval board. The boot process hangs after the output of "Finalizing device tree..." I'm attempting to boot the cuImage target. I'

Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hello, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I just had the problem of fw_{print,save}env not being able to access > the environment because I was using the default (builtin) environment > after flashing U-Boot. > I wonder if I am the only one having this problem, or is it common > practi

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

2008-03-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I took the U-Boot version 1.3.2; now I am able to generate the make env > -> fw_printenv utility. > > I copy the jw_printenv binary and rename it to fw_setenv. ... > I want to access a NAND flash. [Pagesize = 0x800; ERASEBLOCKSIZE=0x2] ... > Is t

Re: [U-Boot-Users] DDR-II @ MPC8343A

2008-03-25 Thread Kim Phillips
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:41:41 +0100 Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kim Phillips schrieb: > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:36:47 +0100 > > Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> As far as I can see there are only DDR-I boards from Freescale. > >> > >> > > The MDS can do ddr2: > > >

[U-Boot-Users] PCI broken on MPC8323ERDB

2008-03-25 Thread Michael Barkowski
This commit in U-Boot tree breaks the PCI in Linux MPC8323ERDB. Do I need to define CONFIG_PCI_SKIP_HOST_BRIDGE now? I don't see any other boards defining it. commit 55774b512fdf63c0516d441cc5da7c54bbffb7f2 Author: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri Mar 7 16:04:25 2008 +0900

Re: [U-Boot-Users] DDR-II @ MPC8343A

2008-03-25 Thread Andre Schwarz
Kim Phillips schrieb: On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:36:47 +0100 Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, has anyone set up the DDR-II controller on a Freescale MPC8343A without ? without what? typo - sorry. As far as I can see there are only DDR-I boards from Freescale. Th

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] Freescale eLBC FCM NAND driver

2008-03-25 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Scott Wood wrote: > >> +static void fsl_elbc_select_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, int chip) > >> +{ > >> + /* The hardware does not seem to support multiple > >> + * chips per bank. > >> + */ > > > > please use this comment style > > Do we really need such trivial style

Re: [U-Boot-Users] DDR-II @ MPC8343A

2008-03-25 Thread Kim Phillips
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:36:47 +0100 Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > has anyone set up the DDR-II controller on a Freescale MPC8343A without ? without what? > As far as I can see there are only DDR-I boards from Freescale. > The MDS can do ddr2: U-Boot 1.3.2-00097-gbc508d1 (

Re: [U-Boot-Users] DDR-II @ MPC8343A

2008-03-25 Thread David Hawkins
Hi Andre, > has anyone set up the DDR-II controller on a Freescale MPC8343A without ? > As far as I can see there are only DDR-I boards from Freescale. > > Are there any patches not yet posted to handle this ? Chances are that the MPC8343 DDR controller is much the same as the MPC8349EA controll

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

2008-03-25 Thread Ben Warren
On 3/25/08, Andy Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Andy Fleming wrote: > > > > I thought about this some more, and the problem is that > cpu_eth_init() > > > > and board_eth_init() are mutuall

[U-Boot-Users] Problems on IDE

2008-03-25 Thread Rodolfo Giometti
Hello, on my custom board (PXA270) I have an IDE bus on DoM (mapped at 0x1440) and an IDE bus on PCMCIA/CF (mapped at 0x2000). The DoM works while CF not. Here my output (please, note that I modified a bit the cmd_ide code in order to remove a device from Standby Mode): equantum> pinit o

[U-Boot-Users] DDR-II @ MPC8343A

2008-03-25 Thread Andre Schwarz
All, has anyone set up the DDR-II controller on a Freescale MPC8343A without ? As far as I can see there are only DDR-I boards from Freescale. Are there any patches not yet posted to handle this ? regards, Andre Schwarz Matrix Vision MATRIX VISION GmbH, Talstraße 16, DE-71570 Oppenweiler -

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] Freescale eLBC FCM NAND driver

2008-03-25 Thread Scott Wood
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> +#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_NAND) && defined(CONFIG_NAND_FSL_ELBC) > Please move to the Makefile OK. >> +/* READOOB reads only the OOB because no ECC is performed. */ >> +case NAND_CMD_READOOB: >> +vdbg("fsl_elbc_cmdfunc: NAND_CMD_READOOB

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

2008-03-25 Thread Markus Klotzbücher
Manuel Sahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > but why is there a error concerning NAND flashs if only NOR flashs are > supported ? > > "nand_write: attempting to write not page aligned data" Of course NAND is supported by the kernel. This is why it almost works :-) The error is caused because the too

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

2008-03-25 Thread Andy Fleming
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Andy Fleming wrote: > > > I thought about this some more, and the problem is that cpu_eth_init() > > > and board_eth_init() are mutually exclusive, with board_eth_init() having > > > a higher p

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

2008-03-25 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 11:56 -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:57 -0400, Ben Warren wrote: > >> Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:22 -0400, Ben Warren wrote: > >>> > Stefan Roese wrote: > > > On Saturday 2

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 2/2] Freescale eLBC FCM NAND driver

2008-03-25 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 12:53 Mon 24 Mar , Scott Wood wrote: > This is a driver for the Flash Control Machine of the enhanched Local Bus > Controller found on some Freescale chips (such as the mpc8313 and the > mpc8379). > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > This patch applies to the mtd-2.6.22

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/7] 83xx/fdt_support: let user specifiy FSL USB Dual-Role controller role

2008-03-25 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Kim Phillips wrote: [snip] > yeah, that's too much code for a header file though. > > I think your original patch was the more prudent approach, it follows > existing practice and it fits with the assumption that there'll be a > usb driver one day :). I'll put it in my queue and apply it unles

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/7] 83xx/fdt_support: let user specifiy FSL USB Dual-Role controller role

2008-03-25 Thread Kim Phillips
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:06:34 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:42:11AM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > [...] > > > > but the QE based 83xx SoCs don't use this fixup. So while > > > > CONFIG_HAS_FSL_DR_USB gives you more control, I doubt saving 200 bytes >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

2008-03-25 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Andy Fleming wrote: > > I thought about this some more, and the problem is that cpu_eth_init() > > and board_eth_init() are mutually exclusive, with board_eth_init() having > > a higher priority. I think the following will work, but would appreciate > > some feedback. > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/7] 83xx/fdt_support: let user specifiy FSL USB Dual-Role controller role

2008-03-25 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:42:11AM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > [...] but the QE based 83xx SoCs don't use this fixup. So while CONFIG_HAS_FSL_DR_USB gives you more control, I doubt saving 200 bytes justifies the new config either. Either way really, but I

Re: [U-Boot-Users] make env

2008-03-25 Thread Manuel Sahm
Hello, but why is there a error concerning NAND flashs if only NOR flashs are supported ? "nand_write: attempting to write not page aligned data" Thank you Manuel Sahm Markus Klotzbücher schrieb: > Hi Manuel, > > Manuel Sahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I took the U-Boot version 1.3.2

Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

2008-03-25 Thread w . wegner
On 25 Mar 2008 at 17:00, Markus Klotzbücher wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I just had the problem of fw_{print,save}env not being able to access > > the environment because I was using the default (builtin) environment > > after flashing U-Boot. [...]> > AFAIK there is currently no

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

2008-03-25 Thread Andy Fleming
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Roese wrote: > > On Saturday 22 March 2008, Ben Warren wrote: > > Using Markus's idea, why not use a cpu (platform) specific *and* a board > > specific init function, both with an empty weak alias in the common eth.

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/7] 83xx/fdt_support: let user specifiy FSL USB Dual-Role controller role

2008-03-25 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:42:11AM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: [...] > > > but the QE based 83xx SoCs don't use this fixup. So while > > > CONFIG_HAS_FSL_DR_USB gives you more control, I doubt saving 200 bytes > > > justifies the new config either. Either way really, but I tend to be > > > against

Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

2008-03-25 Thread Markus Klotzbücher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I just had the problem of fw_{print,save}env not being able to access > the environment because I was using the default (builtin) environment > after flashing U-Boot. > I wonder if I am the only one having this problem, or is it common > practice to flash the environme

[U-Boot-Users] Pull Request mpc86xx repository

2008-03-25 Thread Jon Loeliger
Wolfgang, I have three outstanding patches to move a few Freescale boards from board/* to board/freescale/*. I wasn't sure if you would apply them directly or not, and didn't get any response from you when I asked. (No problem.) So I decided to make it easier for you and just placed them in my

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

2008-03-25 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:57 -0400, Ben Warren wrote: >> Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>> On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:22 -0400, Ben Warren wrote: >>> Stefan Roese wrote: > On Saturday 22 March 2008, Ben Warren wrote: [snip] > Using Markus's idea, why not

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Remove deprecated CONFIG_OF_HAS_UBOOT_ENV and CONFIG_OF_HAS_BD_T

2008-03-25 Thread Kim Phillips
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:23:49 -0400 Jerry Van Baren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These defines embedded the u-boot env variables and/or the bd_t structure > in the fdt blob. The conclusion of discussion on the u-boot email list > was that embedding these in the fdt blob is not useful: there are be

[U-Boot-Users] RE: [PATCH] ARM: Davinci: Fix DM644x timer overflow handling and cleanup

2008-03-25 Thread Pieter Voorthuijsen
Hi Dirk, > -Original Message- > From: Dirk Behme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: dinsdag 25 maart 2008 11:19 > To: Pieter Voorthuijsen > Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Davinci: Fix DM644x timer overflow > handling and cleanup > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/7] 83xx/fdt_support: let user specifiy FSL USB Dual-Role controller role

2008-03-25 Thread Kim Phillips
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:48:54 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:00:49PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:44:19 +0300 > > Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 08:35:58PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrot

Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

2008-03-25 Thread w . wegner
Hi, On 25 Mar 2008 at 16:24, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > diff --git a/common/env_common.c b/common/env_common.c > > index a494812..8acee8f 100644 > > --- a/common/env_common.c > > +++ b/common/env_common.c > > @@ -243,6 +243,11 @@ void env_relocate (void) > > #endif > >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

2008-03-25 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:57 -0400, Ben Warren wrote: > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:22 -0400, Ben Warren wrote: > > > >> Stefan Roese wrote: > >> > >>> On Saturday 22 March 2008, Ben Warren wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > All I'm asking for

Re: [U-Boot-Users] auto-save environment if using default environment?

2008-03-25 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 14:36 Tue 25 Mar , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I just had the problem of fw_{print,save}env not being able to access > the environment because I was using the default (builtin) environment > after flashing U-Boot. > I wonder if I am the only one having this problem, or is it common >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

2008-03-25 Thread Ben Warren
Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:22 -0400, Ben Warren wrote: > >> Stefan Roese wrote: >> >>> On Saturday 22 March 2008, Ben Warren wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > All I'm asking for is to make sure that this can be configured in a > board specific way

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

2008-03-25 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Ben Warren wrote: > I thought about this some more, and the problem is that cpu_eth_init() and > board_eth_init() are mutually exclusive, Right. > with board_eth_init() having a > higher priority. I think the following will work, but would appreciate some > feedback. >

Re: [U-Boot-Users] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] Add board_eth_init() function

2008-03-25 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:22 -0400, Ben Warren wrote: > Stefan Roese wrote: > > On Saturday 22 March 2008, Ben Warren wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>> All I'm asking for is to make sure that this can be configured in a > >>> board specific way. If there is a zensible default setting which

  1   2   >