Only know do I understand.
Thanks
George
-Original Message-
From: Wjhonson
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 1:47 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
WED is not an inplace full screen editor.
It
ace full screen editor
-Original Message-
From: George R Smith
To: u2-users
Sent: Mon, Feb 20, 2012 11:43 am
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
>Share ?
Accuterm Wed would be alternative. Good price great service.
Geo
Share ?
Accuterm Wed would be alternative. Good price great service.
George
-Original Message-
From: Wjhonson
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 1:15 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
Share
Share ?
-Original Message-
From: Les Hewkin
To: 'U2 Users List'
Sent: Mon, Feb 20, 2012 6:04 am
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
Long live telnetwe use a full screen editor for Universe, written in house
...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Richard
Sent: 20 February 2012 13:41
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
--- On Sat, 18/2/12, Symeon Breen wrote:
> I seriously believe most
--- On Sat, 18/2/12, Symeon Breen wrote:
> I seriously believe most MV people
> are not programming in ED on telnet (or
> ssh) and that they are using some form of
> GUI editor.
With respect, I disagree. I work alongside dozens of UniVerse developers and I
am in a very small minority who use
as opposed to LIST.DICT
> which in it's original form has to be one of THE most archaic features of
> the environment. Especially in a 25 x 80 green screen.
> >
> > Stuart.
> > ____________
> > From: Symeon Breen
> > Sent: 18-Feb-12 21:15
clipse based and that is a throwback to the IBM days. Please people look
> beyond eclipse there is a much bigger wider (and easier) world out there.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of D
Same here
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Ed Clark
Sent: 19 February 2012 00:43
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools - dictionaries
_______
> From: Symeon Breen
> Sent: 18-Feb-12 21:15
> To: 'U2 Users List'
> Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
> telnet-based tools
>
> I seriously believe most MV people are not programming in ED on telnet (or
> ssh) and that the
-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Doug Averch
Sent: 18 February 2012 02:48
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
Whether we are talking about Telnet that uses port 23 or Un
to install properly.
- Original Message -
*From:* syme...@gmail.com
*To:* 'U2 Users List'
*Date:* 2/18/2012 2:14 AM
*Subject:* Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
I se
-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Doug Averch
Sent: 18 February 2012 02:48
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
Whether we are talking about Telnet that uses port 23 or UniObjects that
uses or 31438 or HTTP that uses
500 Megabytes and counting, so I can see where a variable is used
That's a non-starter for me.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Averch
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Fri, Feb 17, 2012 6:48 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based
Whether we are talking about Telnet that uses port 23 or UniObjects that
uses or 31438 or HTTP that uses 80, it not the port that is the problem.
It is not the way packets are transported or what overhead each different
protocol has. The fact remains for me it is the presentation.
Why do you thi
> From: Bill Haskett
> Just to let people know, mvNET offer telnet as one of
> the connection methods (I use uodotnet) but it's fine
> for external developers for our ..NET application.
> Also, if I'm not mistaken, Fusionware uses telnet as
> their underlying connection method.
(mv.NET also s
ever is to globally rename files
Ren *.txt *.doc
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Phil Walker
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:11 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about
It's still easier from DOS :)
-Original Message-
From: Phil Walker
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Fri, Feb 17, 2012 12:11 pm
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
Actually, if you are on a newer version of windows the explorer
-users-
> boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Ed Clark
> Sent: Saturday, 18 February 2012 7:55 a.m.
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
> telnet-based tools
>
> actually your example is pretty easy on current windows vers
From: Ed Clark
To: U2 Users List
Sent: Fri, Feb 17, 2012 10:55 am
Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
actually your example is pretty easy on current windows versions. Type *.txt
nto the windows explorer search box, then select and delete. On t
od.
Bill
- Original Message -
*From:* u...@edclark.net
*To:* U2 Users List
*Date:* 2/17/2012 10:54 AM
*Subject:* Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want
telnet-based tools
actually your example is pretty easy on current window
actually your example is pretty easy on current windows versions. Type *.txt
into the windows explorer search box, then select and delete. On the upside,
when you delete the files, you know for sure what directory you are in because
it's in the title bar. On the down side, your search retrieved
22 matches
Mail list logo