RE: [U2] Raising errors through ODBC
raiserror() eg http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/tsqlref/ts_ra-rz_5ooi.asp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does anyone have an example of raising errors through ODBC (or any other way) to Universe. Environment .. uv10x using odbc to read/write data to MSSqlServer. We are using a stored procedure in SqlServer and need to be able to raise an error similar to the way the odbc raises error. ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Universe objects licence
We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe objects licence
If the users were running multiple VB sessions then it might worth looking at device (enterprise) licensing but as Universe doesn't allow the pool of ten connections per license to be shared amongst processes (ie telnet programs) it probably won't work for you. At the end of the day if you're planning on running 100 users then you should have a 100 user license. After all why should an objects license be any cheaper as you have access to the full functionality of universe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 March 2005 11:47 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Happy Odd Day (Unclassified)
Nice one Mike, I'll try to remember to drop you a line on 24680 - the way UK pensions are going I'll still be working ! Piers Tomorrow Saturday 5th March 2005 is, in the U2 / Pick calendar Day Number 13579 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Tatiana Derbinsky is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 03/04/2005 and will not return until 03/14/2005. If this is an emergency, You may contact Tom Cordts [EMAIL PROTECTED] I will respond to your message when I return. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe objects licence
UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the access to the UniVerse database. With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent users can access the database at a time. If you have 40 telnet users and 20 VB6 user then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login would be denied access. The solution might be just to purchase 10 more universe licenses. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Universe objects licence
If the VB6 users are also Telnet users that utilize Dynamic Connect, wIntegrate or AccuTerm with device licensing, then you should only need 40 UniData device licenses. Regards, Ian Renfrew - Original Message - From: David Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:57 AM Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the access to the UniVerse database. With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent users can access the database at a time. If you have 40 telnet users and 20 VB6 user then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login would be denied access. The solution might be just to purchase 10 more universe licenses. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?
Hola - We've got a 9.5 system running on Irix that we're going to be upgrading to 10.1.4 running on Linux on new hardware, and it strikes me that replication might be a good way to minimize system downtime while we do the upgrade. Any idea whether there would be any additional hitches in doing replication across platforms versions? We would of course have fnuxied and otherwise modified the files prior to the replication being set to go. Any thoughts (or alternative strategies to minimize system downtime during an upgrade) would be greatly appreciated. -- Peter Ivanick Sr. Programmer/Analyst School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777 http://www.vet.upenn.edu/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?
Upgrade via replication sounds like a receipe for lots of wailing and knashing of teeth. Have a look at uvbackup and uvrestore. Or read up on rsync as a means to get the data from one machine to another. If it were me, I think I'd do a uvbackup to a network mounted filesystem (samba or nfs) and then do a uvrestore from that disk to the final location. Doing a test conversion would allow you to get an idea of how long it will take and should uncover any hidden gotchas in moving from Irix to Linux. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe objects licence
Unfortunately the Universe device licensing doesn't work like that. Not sure about Unidata but the question related to Universe. The 10 connection pool cannot be shared between the terminal emulator and uniobjects. I asked (via my VAR) if IBM had any plans to allow that and apparently they don't. Even more annoyingly the new licensing model doesn't allow Phantoms to use the device license pool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Renfrew Sent: 04 March 2005 13:31 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe objects licence If the VB6 users are also Telnet users that utilize Dynamic Connect, wIntegrate or AccuTerm with device licensing, then you should only need 40 UniData device licenses. Regards, Ian Renfrew - Original Message - From: David Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:57 AM Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the access to the UniVerse database. With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent users can access the database at a time. If you have 40 telnet users and 20 VB6 user then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login would be denied access. The solution might be just to purchase 10 more universe licenses. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?
Replication was incredibly slow before version 10 and had a large impact on file updates. We have replication running between Windows and Linux versions in test without problems. Due to limited downtime windows we are planning to switch systems over two weekends with replication running in between. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Ivanick Sent: 04 March 2005 13:38 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility? Hola - We've got a 9.5 system running on Irix that we're going to be upgrading to 10.1.4 running on Linux on new hardware, and it strikes me that replication might be a good way to minimize system downtime while we do the upgrade. Any idea whether there would be any additional hitches in doing replication across platforms versions? We would of course have fnuxied and otherwise modified the files prior to the replication being set to go. Any thoughts (or alternative strategies to minimize system downtime during an upgrade) would be greatly appreciated. -- Peter Ivanick Sr. Programmer/Analyst School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777 http://www.vet.upenn.edu/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?
That's the way we're currently testing it, uvbackup uvrestore, but it adds some additional delays in that the IRIX system is configured rather, um, funkily, and those bits need to be recreated after the system is in place on the new box. Also, unfortunately, we've got a good bit of data programming (about 6 GB total although I assume quite a lot of it is cruft, but we're unlikely to do any massive cleanup before the transfer) and only a single 10mb NIC in the IRIX box, so I'm exploring options for anything to goose the process even a little. Any particular reason you're leery of replicating, is it this particular suituation or replication in general? Rsync, that's an interesting idea I hadn't thought of, thanks very much for your input, I'll definitely be trying that out shortly. Don Kibbey wrote: Upgrade via replication sounds like a receipe for lots of wailing and knashing of teeth. Have a look at uvbackup and uvrestore. Or read up on rsync as a means to get the data from one machine to another. If it were me, I think I'd do a uvbackup to a network mounted filesystem (samba or nfs) and then do a uvrestore from that disk to the final location. Doing a test conversion would allow you to get an idea of how long it will take and should uncover any hidden gotchas in moving from Irix to Linux. -- Peter Ivanick Sr. Programmer/Analyst School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777 http://www.vet.upenn.edu/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe objects licence
Device Licensing does work and if you have the Enterprise Edition of UV then it works very well. We have a VB app as well as wIntegrate including Dynamic Connect and Viaduct that quite happliy share the 10 connection pool. This is in UV 10.1.4 and AIX 5 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews Sent: 04 March 2005 14:16 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Unfortunately the Universe device licensing doesn't work like that. Not sure about Unidata but the question related to Universe. The 10 connection pool cannot be shared between the terminal emulator and uniobjects. I asked (via my VAR) if IBM had any plans to allow that and apparently they don't. Even more annoyingly the new licensing model doesn't allow Phantoms to use the device license pool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Renfrew Sent: 04 March 2005 13:31 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe objects licence If the VB6 users are also Telnet users that utilize Dynamic Connect, wIntegrate or AccuTerm with device licensing, then you should only need 40 UniData device licenses. Regards, Ian Renfrew - Original Message - From: David Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:57 AM Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the access to the UniVerse database. With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent users can access the database at a time. If you have 40 telnet users and 20 VB6 user then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login would be denied access. The solution might be just to purchase 10 more universe licenses. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe objects licence
As I undersand, one connexion of uvObjects consumes one uniVerse licence, then you couldn't buy licence for uvObjects only, and this is because since uniVerse version 9 the uvObjects are bounded with the licence for the same number of users than the UniVerse Licence. Cheers Jose Luis Gutierrez de la Peza Director General e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel y Fax : (52) 55 59 12 44 , 55 75 21 29 Movil : 044 55 52 48 33 87 Pagina : www.abdp.com.mx -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Viernes, 04 de Marzo de 2005 05:47 a.m. Para: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Asunto: [U2] Universe objects licence We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
In an account that I made with (IIRC) makeudt, whenver I attempt to type the @ symbol, the cursor jumps to the beginning of the line. So it's rather hard to SELECT FILE.NAME with @ID ... Does anyone know what causes this and how to fix it? I know we've run across it before, but apparently I didn't write down what we did to make it stop. Thanks, Wendy Smoak --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rsync, that's an interesting idea I hadn't thought of, thanks very much for your input, I'll definitely be trying that out shortly. Just be careful! What hardware are your linux and irix systems running on? You may need to use fnuxi. Using fnuxi has nothing to do with Windows/Unix and everything to do with byte order. It's just that most Unix runs on (sensible) little-endian boxes and Windows runs on big-endian Intel so everybody assumes its a Windows/Unix thing. Cheers, Wol --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Happy Odd Day (Unclassified)
Of course the way pensions/Social (In)Security are going in the US, I might be working until 247365... -Original Message- From: Piers Angliss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:49 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Happy Odd Day (Unclassified) Nice one Mike, I'll try to remember to drop you a line on 24680 - the way UK pensions are going I'll still be working ! Piers Tomorrow Saturday 5th March 2005 is, in the U2 / Pick calendar Day Number 13579 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Happy Odd Day (Unclassified)
Ok. I definitely have the wrong job here. Not only do I not get paid for typing spaces.. But I also do not get paid to watch/analyze/notice the internal date! (j/k - don't flame me) Thanks, Marilyn A. Hilb Value Part, Inc Direct: 847-918-6099 Fax: 847-367-1892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.valuepart.com -Original Message- From: Piers Angliss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 6:49 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject:RE: [U2] Happy Odd Day (Unclassified) Nice one Mike, I'll try to remember to drop you a line on 24680 - the way UK pensions are going I'll still be working ! Piers Tomorrow Saturday 5th March 2005 is, in the U2 / Pick calendar Day Number 13579 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
In an account that I made with (IIRC) makeudt, whenver I attempt to type the @ symbol, the cursor jumps to the beginning of the line. Did you check your PTERM (UV) or stty (UD) settings? -Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.PrecisOnline.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?
Replication was incredibly slow before version 10 and had a large impact on file updates. That wouldn't be too bad for our case here when it's a one off, it'd *have* to be faster than plugging the backups over the small pipe we've got, but good to know. We have replication running between Windows and Linux versions in test without problems. Due to limited downtime windows we are planning to switch systems over two weekends with replication running in between. Many thanks for your input, I would love to hear how well that works for you when you go with it -- we're looking atour cutover being sometime in May so I have a goodly amount of time to experiment. -- Peter Ivanick Sr. Programmer/Analyst School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 215.573.2306Fax: 215.573.8777 http://www.vet.upenn.edu/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe objects licence
Maybe it's just the Windows version that doesn't work like that then. IBM support themselves confirmed to me that the scenario you state doesn't work and we can see it on out servers. We have several running enterprise licenses that can handle 10 connections from wIntegrate but without access to the device key the UniObjects sessions can't use the same pool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sunny Matharoo Sent: 04 March 2005 15:01 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Device Licensing does work and if you have the Enterprise Edition of UV then it works very well. We have a VB app as well as wIntegrate including Dynamic Connect and Viaduct that quite happliy share the 10 connection pool. This is in UV 10.1.4 and AIX 5 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews Sent: 04 March 2005 14:16 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Unfortunately the Universe device licensing doesn't work like that. Not sure about Unidata but the question related to Universe. The 10 connection pool cannot be shared between the terminal emulator and uniobjects. I asked (via my VAR) if IBM had any plans to allow that and apparently they don't. Even more annoyingly the new licensing model doesn't allow Phantoms to use the device license pool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Renfrew Sent: 04 March 2005 13:31 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe objects licence If the VB6 users are also Telnet users that utilize Dynamic Connect, wIntegrate or AccuTerm with device licensing, then you should only need 40 UniData device licenses. Regards, Ian Renfrew - Original Message - From: David Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:57 AM Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the access to the UniVerse database. With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent users can access the database at a time. If you have 40 telnet users and 20 VB6 user then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login would be denied access. The solution might be just to purchase 10 more universe licenses. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by
Re: [U2] Is replication across versions a possibility?
Yes, going from Irix (MIPS?) to Linux on X86 will most likely require fnuxi to be run on everything after the transfer. Since the fnuxi process would run on the newer machine, it would probably still be much faster to run an rsync, then find - fnuxi script. Just be very carefull with rsync! It's a sharp knife. Flip around the systems and you could step on the live account with test data Do some testing with a couple of small directories until your comfortable with it. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
It sounds like your PTERM KILL is set to the @ char.
Do a PTERM KILL {ctrl X}, then see if you can do your select.
Something in the LOGIN or ./profile could be setting stty/PTERM settings on
you. If it's only one account then I'd suspect the LOGIN paragraph for that
account.
Hope this helps.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 10:22 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
In an account that I made with (IIRC) makeudt, whenver I attempt to type
the @ symbol, the cursor jumps to the beginning of the line.
So it's rather hard to SELECT FILE.NAME with @ID ...
Does anyone know what causes this and how to fix it? I know we've run
across it before, but apparently I didn't write down what we did to make
it stop.
Thanks,
Wendy Smoak
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
Hennessey, Mark F.
It sounds like your PTERM KILL is set to the @ char.
Do a PTERM KILL {ctrl X}, then see if you can do your select.
CTRL-X made a 'Host Information' dialog box appear saying 'Sending data
to printer...'. And locked the session, I had to close the [wIntegrate]
window.
Something in the LOGIN or ./profile could be setting
stty/PTERM settings on you. If it's only one account then
I'd suspect the LOGIN paragraph for that account.
There was no LOGIN paragraph in VOC, so I looked in our other accounts,
but most of the setup is done by programs provided by our VAR. I'm just
trying to set up an account on our backup server so that my
authentication system can fail over to it. It doesn't need to be a full
Datatel/Envision account.
Actually, it works fine from UOJ, I just can't work directly in the
account from a telnet session.
Any suggestions for things to put in the LOGIN paragraph that might
help? I have UDT.OPTIONS 41 ON because it was there in the other
accounts. I haven't looked up what it is yet. But still no @ sign.
--
Wendy Smoak
Applications Systems Analyst, Sr.
Arizona State University, PA, IRM
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
execute PTERM KILL {some character you'll never use}. That should help you use
the @ sign.
Maybe first verify this is the issue with a PTERM DISPLAY and look to see what
KILL is set to...
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 12:40 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
Hennessey, Mark F.
It sounds like your PTERM KILL is set to the @ char.
Do a PTERM KILL {ctrl X}, then see if you can do your select.
CTRL-X made a 'Host Information' dialog box appear saying 'Sending data
to printer...'. And locked the session, I had to close the [wIntegrate]
window.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
Hennessey, Mark F.
execute PTERM KILL {some character you'll never use}. That
should help you use the @ sign.
Maybe first verify this is the issue with a PTERM DISPLAY and
look to see what KILL is set to...
Is this supposed to be done at the colon prompt? I just get syntax
errors. I'm on UniData, if that matters. (I suspect it does, and I
forgot to state that up front.)
--
Wendy Smoak
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
Try this and post the results please:
PTERM -DISPLAY
You might also try (to fix):
PTERM -KILL ^X
...or some other character other than X.
-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendy Smoak
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 12:29 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
Hennessey, Mark F.
execute PTERM KILL {some character you'll never use}. That should
help you use the @ sign.
Maybe first verify this is the issue with a PTERM DISPLAY and look
to
see what KILL is set to...
Is this supposed to be done at the colon prompt? I just get syntax
errors. I'm on UniData, if that matters. (I suspect it does, and I
forgot to state that up front.)
--
Wendy Smoak
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe objects licence
That is a bug, IBM sold it on the basic that you can run 10 sessions on any combination of ODBC, OLE-DB, Telnet, UniObjects. I have it working on Windows. What version of Wintegrate are you running, if it is to early it may not handle device licensing. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews Sent: Saturday, 5 March 2005 2:59 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Maybe it's just the Windows version that doesn't work like that then. IBM support themselves confirmed to me that the scenario you state doesn't work and we can see it on out servers. We have several running enterprise licenses that can handle 10 connections from wIntegrate but without access to the device key the UniObjects sessions can't use the same pool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sunny Matharoo Sent: 04 March 2005 15:01 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Device Licensing does work and if you have the Enterprise Edition of UV then it works very well. We have a VB app as well as wIntegrate including Dynamic Connect and Viaduct that quite happliy share the 10 connection pool. This is in UV 10.1.4 and AIX 5 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews Sent: 04 March 2005 14:16 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Unfortunately the Universe device licensing doesn't work like that. Not sure about Unidata but the question related to Universe. The 10 connection pool cannot be shared between the terminal emulator and uniobjects. I asked (via my VAR) if IBM had any plans to allow that and apparently they don't. Even more annoyingly the new licensing model doesn't allow Phantoms to use the device license pool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Renfrew Sent: 04 March 2005 13:31 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe objects licence If the VB6 users are also Telnet users that utilize Dynamic Connect, wIntegrate or AccuTerm with device licensing, then you should only need 40 UniData device licenses. Regards, Ian Renfrew - Original Message - From: David Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:57 AM Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the access to the UniVerse database. With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent users can access the database at a time. If you have 40 telnet users and 20 VB6 user then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login would be denied access. The solution might be just to purchase 10 more universe licenses. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
RE: [U2] Universe objects licence
We run Wintegrate 5.2 which fully supports device licensing. What I wanted to do was to run 5 sessions with wintegrate and 5 sessions with uniobjects and only take 1 license. IBM said that this will not work and they have no intention of making it work. The problem is that you need to know the subkey that wintegrate is using to pass over with the uniobjects call apparently. Are you sure it's working on your setup? It looks like it does on ours until you do a cross comparison of the user count against uvlictool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan Sent: 04 March 2005 20:45 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence That is a bug, IBM sold it on the basic that you can run 10 sessions on any combination of ODBC, OLE-DB, Telnet, UniObjects. I have it working on Windows. What version of Wintegrate are you running, if it is to early it may not handle device licensing. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews Sent: Saturday, 5 March 2005 2:59 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Maybe it's just the Windows version that doesn't work like that then. IBM support themselves confirmed to me that the scenario you state doesn't work and we can see it on out servers. We have several running enterprise licenses that can handle 10 connections from wIntegrate but without access to the device key the UniObjects sessions can't use the same pool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sunny Matharoo Sent: 04 March 2005 15:01 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Device Licensing does work and if you have the Enterprise Edition of UV then it works very well. We have a VB app as well as wIntegrate including Dynamic Connect and Viaduct that quite happliy share the 10 connection pool. This is in UV 10.1.4 and AIX 5 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews Sent: 04 March 2005 14:16 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Unfortunately the Universe device licensing doesn't work like that. Not sure about Unidata but the question related to Universe. The 10 connection pool cannot be shared between the terminal emulator and uniobjects. I asked (via my VAR) if IBM had any plans to allow that and apparently they don't. Even more annoyingly the new licensing model doesn't allow Phantoms to use the device license pool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Renfrew Sent: 04 March 2005 13:31 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe objects licence If the VB6 users are also Telnet users that utilize Dynamic Connect, wIntegrate or AccuTerm with device licensing, then you should only need 40 UniData device licenses. Regards, Ian Renfrew - Original Message - From: David Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:57 AM Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the access to the UniVerse database. With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent users can access the database at a time. If you have 40 telnet users and 20 VB6 user then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login would be denied access. The solution might be just to purchase 10 more universe licenses. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly
[U2][UV] COMMON question
Hello All, Question on COMMON. Is there a way to use COMMON so that any subroutine can use the COMMON variables for that account. I'm thinking I could write a program that will set some COMMON variables and run as a phantom job. I would then have other processes call subroutines that would use the variables that are set by this program in the COMMON area. Is this possible? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
Your terminal type in the telnet session is probably not the same as the terminal type set up for the account. Type in term and see if it is the same as your session terminal type. - Original Message - From: Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 9:22 AM Subject: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt In an account that I made with (IIRC) makeudt, whenver I attempt to type the @ symbol, the cursor jumps to the beginning of the line. So it's rather hard to SELECT FILE.NAME with @ID ... Does anyone know what causes this and how to fix it? I know we've run across it before, but apparently I didn't write down what we did to make it stop. Thanks, Wendy Smoak --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] COMMON question
A labeled/named common might work. As long as your phantom doesn't stop, you might be able to. BobW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:51 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2][UV] COMMON question Hello All, Question on COMMON. Is there a way to use COMMON so that any subroutine can use the COMMON variables for that account. I'm thinking I could write a program that will set some COMMON variables and run as a phantom job. I would then have other processes call subroutines that would use the variables that are set by this program in the COMMON area. Is this possible? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] COMMON question
I do not believe this is possible. Named common is about as close as you'll come, and that's session dependent. Can you write the information to a file somewhere, load it up into named common, and then be good for the rest of the phantom session? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 2:51 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2][UV] COMMON question Hello All, Question on COMMON. Is there a way to use COMMON so that any subroutine can use the COMMON variables for that account. I'm thinking I could write a program that will set some COMMON variables and run as a phantom job. I would then have other processes call subroutines that would use the variables that are set by this program in the COMMON area. Is this possible? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] COMMON question
But named common only persists for the life of that session. If you want some variables set to be used by several sessions then your only recourse is to have your phantom write the variables to some kind of constant file. Your other subroutines/programs would then read the constant item from the file. Gordon J. Glorfield Sr. Applications Developer MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company) 301-360-8839 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/04/2005 05:06:34 PM: A labeled/named common might work. As long as your phantom doesn't stop, you might be able to. BobW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:51 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2][UV] COMMON question Hello All, Question on COMMON. Is there a way to use COMMON so that any subroutine can use the COMMON variables for that account. I'm thinking I could write a program that will set some COMMON variables and run as a phantom job. I would then have other processes call subroutines that would use the variables that are set by this program in the COMMON area. Is this possible? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] COMMON question
That would mean passing common across sessions. Something that I wish was possible but unfortunately is not as far as I know. Any routines that your phantom calls can see the common. But if you telnet in or start another phantom that can't see it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: 04 March 2005 21:51 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2][UV] COMMON question Hello All, Question on COMMON. Is there a way to use COMMON so that any subroutine can use the COMMON variables for that account. I'm thinking I could write a program that will set some COMMON variables and run as a phantom job. I would then have other processes call subroutines that would use the variables that are set by this program in the COMMON area. Is this possible? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
Kevin King wrote: You might also try (to fix): PTERM -KILL ^X Thank you! That's what Mark was trying to get me to do, but I wasn't using a dash before KILL, (or DISPLAY) and I was trying to actually hold down CTRL and press X. I put that in the LOGIN paragraph, and now I can type @. But... :PAGE VOC LOGIN PA UDT.OPTIONS 41 ON PTERM -KILL ^X :PTERM -DISPLAY Erase =^H = 010 octal Kill = ^ = 0136 octal FULL duplex. XOFF enabled. BREAK ON Now I can't type ^ anymore. (It jumps to the beginning of the line just like @ used to.) How do I actually get ^X in there? That's what our other accounts have: :PTERM -DISPLAY Erase =^H = 010 octal Kill = ^X = 030 octal FULL duplex. XOFF enabled. BREAK ON Thanks, -- Wendy Smoak Applications Systems Analyst, Sr. Arizona State University, PA, IRM --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UV] COMMON question
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:51:02 -0500, you wrote: Question on COMMON. Is there a way to use COMMON so that any subroutine can use the COMMON variables for that account. I'm thinking I could write a program that will set some COMMON variables and run as a phantom job. I would then have other processes call subroutines that would use the variables that are set by this program in the COMMON area. Is this possible? Thanks. Nope. Blank Common and Named Common are specific to each user process. So, if I run a program which initializes common, any other program run by me during that session has that data available, but that data is NOT available to any other process. -- Allen Egerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
You might try pressing Ctrl-X instead of typing ^X. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendy Smoak Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 4:00 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt Kevin King wrote: You might also try (to fix): PTERM -KILL ^X Thank you! That's what Mark was trying to get me to do, but I wasn't using a dash before KILL, (or DISPLAY) and I was trying to actually hold down CTRL and press X. I put that in the LOGIN paragraph, and now I can type @. But... :PAGE VOC LOGIN PA UDT.OPTIONS 41 ON PTERM -KILL ^X :PTERM -DISPLAY Erase =^H = 010 octal Kill = ^ = 0136 octal FULL duplex. XOFF enabled. BREAK ON Now I can't type ^ anymore. (It jumps to the beginning of the line just like @ used to.) How do I actually get ^X in there? That's what our other accounts have: :PTERM -DISPLAY Erase =^H = 010 octal Kill = ^X = 030 octal FULL duplex. XOFF enabled. BREAK ON Thanks, -- Wendy Smoak Applications Systems Analyst, Sr. Arizona State University, PA, IRM --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2][UV] COMMON question
Allen wrote: Nope. Blank Common and Named Common are specific to each user process. So, if I run a program which initializes common, any other program run by me during that session has that data available, but that data is NOT available to any other process. Allen it is my understanding that unnamed common is specific to each program tree, not process. If you get to the TCL prompt, your unnamed common is disgarded. Any subsequent code that is run, can not access those stored variables any longer. However NAMED Command is different in that you can go to TCL and then later into other code, and as long as you don't log out of that session, the named common is still active and available to access what you stored in it previously. So named, and unnamed, common are different imho. Will Johnson --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
Or leaving off the quotes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin King Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 5:17 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt You might try pressing Ctrl-X instead of typing ^X. Kevin King wrote: You might also try (to fix): PTERM -KILL ^X --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
Kevin King wrote: You might try pressing Ctrl-X instead of typing ^X. That causes the session to lock up and a window to appear saying it's sending something to the printer. (And how would I 'press Ctrl-X' in the LOGIN paragraph?) But I can live with never being able to type ^ in that account. :) -- Wendy Smoak --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt
You might try setting it in Unix via stty...? I know, I know... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendy Smoak Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 4:53 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Getting CR instead of @ at colon prompt Kevin King wrote: You might try pressing Ctrl-X instead of typing ^X. That causes the session to lock up and a window to appear saying it's sending something to the printer. (And how would I 'press Ctrl-X' in the LOGIN paragraph?) But I can live with never being able to type ^ in that account. :) -- Wendy Smoak --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe objects licence (LeRoy F. Dreyfuss Comment)
LeRoy can you comment on this. Why pay more for Enterprise licensing if it doesn't work properly? Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews Sent: Saturday, 5 March 2005 8:30 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence We run Wintegrate 5.2 which fully supports device licensing. What I wanted to do was to run 5 sessions with wintegrate and 5 sessions with uniobjects and only take 1 license. IBM said that this will not work and they have no intention of making it work. The problem is that you need to know the subkey that wintegrate is using to pass over with the uniobjects call apparently. Are you sure it's working on your setup? It looks like it does on ours until you do a cross comparison of the user count against uvlictool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan Sent: 04 March 2005 20:45 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence That is a bug, IBM sold it on the basic that you can run 10 sessions on any combination of ODBC, OLE-DB, Telnet, UniObjects. I have it working on Windows. What version of Wintegrate are you running, if it is to early it may not handle device licensing. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews Sent: Saturday, 5 March 2005 2:59 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Maybe it's just the Windows version that doesn't work like that then. IBM support themselves confirmed to me that the scenario you state doesn't work and we can see it on out servers. We have several running enterprise licenses that can handle 10 connections from wIntegrate but without access to the device key the UniObjects sessions can't use the same pool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sunny Matharoo Sent: 04 March 2005 15:01 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Device Licensing does work and if you have the Enterprise Edition of UV then it works very well. We have a VB app as well as wIntegrate including Dynamic Connect and Viaduct that quite happliy share the 10 connection pool. This is in UV 10.1.4 and AIX 5 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews Sent: 04 March 2005 14:16 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence Unfortunately the Universe device licensing doesn't work like that. Not sure about Unidata but the question related to Universe. The 10 connection pool cannot be shared between the terminal emulator and uniobjects. I asked (via my VAR) if IBM had any plans to allow that and apparently they don't. Even more annoyingly the new licensing model doesn't allow Phantoms to use the device license pool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Renfrew Sent: 04 March 2005 13:31 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe objects licence If the VB6 users are also Telnet users that utilize Dynamic Connect, wIntegrate or AccuTerm with device licensing, then you should only need 40 UniData device licenses. Regards, Ian Renfrew - Original Message - From: David Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 7:57 AM Subject: RE: [U2] Universe objects licence UniObjects does not have licenses, the licenses are related to the access to the UniVerse database. With a 50 user license only 50 concurrent users can access the database at a time. If you have 40 telnet users and 20 VB6 user then you need 60 concurrent licenses and the last 10 users to login would be denied access. The solution might be just to purchase 10 more universe licenses. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 4 March 2005 10:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Universe objects licence We have Universe 10.0.10 running on a Windows 2000 server with a 50 user licence. We have about 40 users using telnet sessions and about 20 using a VB6.0 program to enter data. We are having problems where the session drops because users are not logging out of the VB program, I have increased the NETTIME but we still get the odd session dropping and then users cant login as we have hit the maximum licences. I thought there was no limit in the objects licence, or was this only in earlier versions. Can someone tell me if I can buy a licence just for objects as I want to increase this to 100 users. Has anyone resolved similar problems with this. Many thanks --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Re: [U2][UV] COMMON question
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:40:55 -0500, you wrote: Allen wrote: Nope. Blank Common and Named Common are specific to each user process. So, if I run a program which initializes common, any other program run by me during that session has that data available, but that data is NOT available to any other process. Allen it is my understanding that unnamed common is specific to each program tree, not process. If you get to the TCL prompt, your unnamed common is disgarded. Any subsequent code that is run, can not access those stored variables any longer. However NAMED Command is different in that you can go to TCL and then later into other code, and as long as you don't log out of that session, the named common is still active and available to access what you stored in it previously. So named, and unnamed, common are different imho. You are absolutely correct. Just wrote a snippet of code under Universe Personal Edition to test it, and the named common persists across programs (as I expected), and the blank common is re-initialized in between program executions. -- Allen Egerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UD] CREATE.FILE
I have fixed-width records in a text file that I want to import to a UD hashed file, but have to create this file first. If the text file is 46,061 KB, and the UD file would not be added to, what CREATE.FILE specs should I use to create this file? TIA Shawn --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] UV Programmer/Analyst contract position
My department, Residential and Student Services, at the Univeristy of California, Berkeley, is seeking a contract programmer/analyst to work on existing Universe business-type applications on an 11-month full-time closed-term contract at the Berkeley campus. The key qualification is Universe Basic chops, but we are increasingly using SQL Server and ASP pages for standalone apps or things like student housing applications which interface in more or less painful ways with the pure Univere back end, and relevant experience would be a plus. The job is listed at $54,600 - $66,000. I'm not sure of the benefits at the moment, but they're of course limited for contract positions, although they at least include holidays, vacation, and sick leave. For more information go to http://jobs.berkeley.edu/, click external applicants on the nav bar, then the view job listing link, check the Info Tech checkbox and type universe in the keyword box (this will bring up our job at Housing plus incidentally a P/A career job at the Space Science Lab -- not Pick-based, but their mission is designed to observe the expansion history of the Universe and explore the nature of Dark Energy... pays better, too). --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
