Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-20 Thread Richard
--- On Sat, 18/2/12, Symeon Breen syme...@gmail.com wrote: I seriously believe most MV people are not programming in ED on telnet (or ssh)   and that they are using some form of GUI editor. With respect, I disagree. I work alongside dozens of UniVerse developers and I am in a very small

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-20 Thread Les Hewkin
...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Richard Sent: 20 February 2012 13:41 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools --- On Sat, 18/2/12, Symeon Breen syme...@gmail.com wrote: I seriously

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-20 Thread Wjhonson
Share ? -Original Message- From: Les Hewkin les.hew...@travisperkins.co.uk To: 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Mon, Feb 20, 2012 6:04 am Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools Long live telnetwe use

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-20 Thread George R Smith
Share ? Accuterm Wed would be alternative. Good price great service. George -Original Message- From: Wjhonson Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 1:15 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools Share

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-20 Thread Wjhonson
editor -Original Message- From: George R Smith geo...@grsmith.arcoxmail.com To: u2-users u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Mon, Feb 20, 2012 11:43 am Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools Share ? Accuterm Wed would

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-20 Thread George R Smith
Only know do I understand. Thanks George -Original Message- From: Wjhonson Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 1:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools WED is not an inplace full screen editor. It's

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools - dictionaries

2012-02-19 Thread Symeon Breen
Same here -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Ed Clark Sent: 19 February 2012 00:43 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools - dictionaries

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools - dictionaries

2012-02-19 Thread Brian Leach
there. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Doug Averch Sent: 18 February 2012 02:48 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools Whether we are talking about

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools - dictionaries

2012-02-19 Thread Doug Averch
. From: Symeon Breen Sent: 18-Feb-12 21:15 To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools I seriously believe most MV people are not programming in ED on telnet (or ssh

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-18 Thread Symeon Breen
-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Doug Averch Sent: 18 February 2012 02:48 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools Whether we are talking about Telnet that uses port 23 or UniObjects that uses or 31438 or HTTP that uses

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-18 Thread Bill Haskett
. - Original Message - *From:* syme...@gmail.com *To:* 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org *Date:* 2/18/2012 2:14 AM *Subject:* Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools I

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools - dictionaries

2012-02-18 Thread Boydell, Stuart
original form has to be one of THE most archaic features of the environment. Especially in a 25 x 80 green screen. Stuart. From: Symeon Breen Sent: 18-Feb-12 21:15 To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools - dictionaries

2012-02-18 Thread Ed Clark
Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Doug Averch Sent: 18 February 2012 02:48 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools Whether we are talking about

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Ed Clark
actually your example is pretty easy on current windows versions. Type *.txt into the windows explorer search box, then select and delete. On the upside, when you delete the files, you know for sure what directory you are in because it's in the title bar. On the down side, your search retrieved

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Bill Haskett
- Original Message - *From:* u...@edclark.net *To:* U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org *Date:* 2/17/2012 10:54 AM *Subject:* Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools actually your example is pretty easy

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Wjhonson
...@edclark.net To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Fri, Feb 17, 2012 10:55 am Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools actually your example is pretty easy on current windows versions. Type *.txt nto the windows explorer search box

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Phil Walker
...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Ed Clark Sent: Saturday, 18 February 2012 7:55 a.m. To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools actually your example is pretty easy on current windows versions. Type *.txt into the windows

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Wjhonson
It's still easier from DOS :) -Original Message- From: Phil Walker p...@gnosys.co.nz To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Fri, Feb 17, 2012 12:11 pm Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools Actually, if you

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread George Gallen
is to globally rename files Ren *.txt *.doc -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Phil Walker Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:11 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Tony Gravagno
From: Bill Haskett Just to let people know, mvNET offer telnet as one of the connection methods (I use uodotnet) but it's fine for external developers for our ..NET application. Also, if I'm not mistaken, Fusionware uses telnet as their underlying connection method. (mv.NET also

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Doug Averch
Whether we are talking about Telnet that uses port 23 or UniObjects that uses or 31438 or HTTP that uses 80, it not the port that is the problem. It is not the way packets are transported or what overhead each different protocol has. The fact remains for me it is the presentation. Why do you

Re: [U2] mvToolbox--digression about why anyone would want telnet-based tools

2012-02-17 Thread Wjhonson
why anyone would want telnet-based tools Whether we are talking about Telnet that uses port 23 or UniObjects that uses or 31438 or HTTP that uses 80, it not the port that is the problem. It is not the way packets are transported or what overhead each different protocol has. The fact remains