Litzau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:04 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Objectcall headache...
One last note on the AIX/UD6/DataStage issue; it appears that logging set
at 32 is indeed the only work around that I can get working, but IBM has
beat me to the
One last note on the AIX/UD6/DataStage issue; it appears that logging set
at 32 is indeed the only work around that I can get working, but IBM has
beat me to the punch when it comes to "what to do with the log files".
Apparently defining dev/null in uniapi_admin as the log directory ends up
droppi
Hona, David S wrote:
>Yes, I can confirm - we have two "live" client 'C'
>applications on Solaris
>and HP-UX servers - utilising the IBM UniCall Interface (UCI)
>library, to
>interface to another Solaris host server (where the UV DBMS resides).
>
>The interface works quite well, albeit with a coup
>Ken Wallis wrote:
>>Hona, David S wrote:
>>
>>Well, we've been using UCI on Solaris and HP-UX for a number
>>of years, so it is definitively available.
>Sorry David, can you just confirm that for me? You have client 'C' or
other
>language programs running on Solaris and HP-UX which use UCI as t
Hona, David S wrote:
>Well, we've been using UCI on Solaris and HP-UX for a number
>of years, so it is definitively available.
Sorry David, can you just confirm that for me? You have client 'C' or other
language programs running on Solaris and HP-UX which use UCI as the API
which allows them to
>Ken Wallis wrote:
>InterCall definitely is available for UD. In my earlier post I think I
>erroneously called it UniCall.
>I do not believe that InterCall is the underlying interface for UO or UOJ.
>Those are based on UCI AFAIK. There is no UNIX client piece for UCI that I
>know of. Last time
Hona, David S wrote:
>Isn't InterCall available for UD? It's supposedly the
>underlying interface to UV for UO and UOJ.
David,
InterCall definitely is available for UD. In my earlier post I think I
erroneously called it UniCall.
I do not believe that InterCall is the underlying interface for U
Isn't InterCall available for UD? It's supposedly the underlying interface
to UV for UO and UOJ.
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ken Wallis
I could be way off here, but I strongly suspect that ObjectCall has one
important fea
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of djordan
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 7:20 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Objectcall headache...
Hi Martin
It is a while since I use dobjectcall, but as far as I remember
UniObjects h
David Jordan wrote:
> It is a while since I used objectcall, but as far as I remember
> UniObjects has all the functionality and more that objectcall and is a
> lot simpilar. You should be able to convert the application to
> UniObjects reasonably quickly, unless it is done by some third party,
Lane Cove
NSW 2066
Australia
Ph 61 2 9418 8329
Fax 61 2 9427 2371
www.dacono.com.au
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Martin Canty
Sent: Friday, 9 April 2004 1:00 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Objectcall headache...
On behal
l here about it
if it slows things down too much.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Baakkonen, Rodney
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 12:18 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Objectcall headache...
Logging rea
, April 09, 2004 2:05 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Objectcall headache...
It's fixed!
So here's how it happened. Turned logging on to level of 9 to see what we
would catch, used objping to test the connection and the error changed.
Nothing meaningful in the log file, but si
og path to
/dev/null.
Thanks for the input.
David Litzau
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Baakkonen, Rodney
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 5:58 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Objectcall headache...
We have Dat
essary. Contact the CBH Help Desk if you have any questions.
VIRUS: Virus Scanner found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus
in the attached file: order3.pif
-Original Message-
From: Baakkonen, Rodney
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 7:58 AM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: R
maybe there is something in 6.0.9 that makes a difference. - Rod
-Original Message-
From: Martin Canty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 10:00 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Objectcall headache...
On behalf of Dave, let me expand.
We have a
cc
Subject
04/08/2004 09:00 RE: Objectc
In a message dated 4/8/2004 8:01:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> We have a DataStage job which is still relying on ObjectCall (until we can
> rewrite it to utilise the new UniData6 stage), unfortunately, after the
> UniData upgrade ObjectCall ceased to function & no matt
gain
Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ken Wallis
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 5:05 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Objectcall headache...
> Client upgraded UD to 6.0.3 on an AIX 4.31 box. Try as I may, I
> Client upgraded UD to 6.0.3 on an AIX 4.31 box. Try as I
> may, I can no
> longer get an Objectcall connection to that server.
Well, IBM end-of-lifed ObjectCall a while ago, but I still think they ship
it.
IBM also end-of-lifed AIX 4.3 mid last year IIRC.
Having just checked the availability
Hi Dave :)
Sayhopefully you'll get some expert responses...(disregard the fact
that IBM doesn't support object call anymore, but.) there's a couple
of simple things to check that's gotten me before
1) make sure it's licensed w/ VERSION (if it's even still listed at 6?)
2) In uniapi_ad
21 matches
Mail list logo
