RE: Installing universe as uvadm

2004-03-15 Thread Trevor . Williams
EC Change permissions on / and /var/spool Install Change permissions back t -Original Message- From: Evgenios Charalambus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 March 2004 3:11 pm To: Discussion Universe

Help Needed regarding performance improvement of delete query

2004-03-15 Thread ashish ratna
Hi All, We are working for purging of old data from the database. But we are facing performance problems in this. We are using select query which is created dynamically on the basis of number of records. We want to know if there is any limit for size of query in Universe. Although in

RE: Help Needed regarding performance improvement of delete query

2004-03-15 Thread ashish ratna
Hi Wol, The scenario is that- We have a master file having more than 3-4 million records and have corresponding reference file which contains reference data for this master file. Now we start our purge program which selects records from master file on the basis of date. Corresponding data

Re: Help Needed regarding performance improvement of delete query

2004-03-15 Thread Scott Richardson
Great points from Wol, as always. What kind of /tmp disk space do you have on this system? (Assuming that /tmp is where UV does some of it's SELECT scratch pad intermediate writing when processing large queries, consult your sites actual uvconfig for all of your actual values...). If this /tmp

Re: Help Needed regarding performance improvement of delete query

2004-03-15 Thread Mike Masters
Folks, It's a real nightmare when you have to purge +2gig files, eh? They can run for weeks and have your users complaining that entire week too. Nag.. nag..nag... Simple solution: Backup entire data file to media. Select what you want to KEEP and move those records to a temp file. Clearfile

Re: Help Needed regarding performance improvement of delete query

2004-03-15 Thread Lost on Air Force One
Oh, by the way Don't forget to use fuser in unix or the equalivant on Bill Gates' machines in order to verify that you truly do have exclusive access rights; otherwise, no worky. - Original Message - From: Mike Masters To: U2 Users Discussion List Sent: Monday, March 15,

Re: Help Needed regarding performance improvement of delete query

2004-03-15 Thread Mark Johnson
I have a client that needs roughly 250,000 items removed monthly from a file containing 5-6 million records. Since there is no need to use the keys (records) for any other purpose except for deleting because they are old, a standard data/basic SELECT statement is just about as fast as you can

Re: UV 10.1.0 on Linux

2004-03-15 Thread mballinger
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:45:39PM +1300, Phil Walker wrote: All, I know this question has been asked before, but is UniVerse supported on versions of Linux other than Redhat, such as Debian, SUSE etc? I imagine it is not hard to get working, but would IBM then regard it as being certified?

Suppressing detail in UniObjects command

2004-03-15 Thread Nick Southwell
Trying to run the command SORT FILE WITH ACTION-CODE = NAG BY WEB-IND BREAK-ON WEB-IND TOTAL CRED.AMT TOTAL COUNT DET.SUPP ID.SUPP via a vb6 program using Uniobjects. objCommand.Text = SORT DTA WITH ACTION-CODE = 'NAG' BY WEB-IND BREAK-ON WEB-IND TOTAL CRED.AMT TOTAL COUNT DET.SUPP ID.SUPP

Re: Suppressing detail in UniObjects command

2004-03-15 Thread Lembit Pirn
Have You tried with DET.SUP ? Just idea, synonyms. Lembit Pirn 7+7 Software Tondi 1 Tallinn 11313 Estonia +372 65 66 232 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Nick Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 6:15 PM

RE: Suppressing detail in UniObjects command

2004-03-15 Thread Brian Leach
Sounds like your ECL type is set differently for your login and Objects sessions. Remember, UniObjects doesn't run LOGIN. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Southwell Sent: 15 March 2004 16:15 To: U2 Users Discussion

RE: Suppressing detail in UniObjects command

2004-03-15 Thread Nick Southwell
It produces output with just ID.SUPP but same error with DET.SUPP on its own. Thanks Nick -Original Message- From: Lembit Pirn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 March 2004 16:31 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Suppressing detail in UniObjects command Have You tried with

RE: Suppressing detail in UniObjects command

2004-03-15 Thread Nick Southwell
Sooo.. Coming from a very small Unidata background sounds like you're saying I need to set my ECL type within the Uniobjects session? Thanks Nick -Original Message- From: Brian Leach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 March 2004 16:30 To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE:

RE: UV 10.1.0 on Linux

2004-03-15 Thread Don Kibbey
I've found that when installing UniVerse on Linux, you have to edit a few things before it's happy. Others have mentioned the uv.load and cpio issue, I've also found that you should look in the following files and make sure they have the right info. .unishared -- This is at the root level of

RE: Linux kernel params

2004-03-15 Thread Stu Glancy
Do you have a source for pg. Our admin guy couldn't find one. Stu Glancy Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. Senior Analyst/DBA 770-792-3907 I think on linux they're different programs, and pg may not be installed (but it can be installed) [EMAIL PROTECTED] john]$ ls -shil `which more less`

How do I copy Unix files 2 gig

2004-03-15 Thread iggchamp
Hi all, How do I go about copying a file that is 2 gig? I had no idea that this would be a problem when I decided to let one of my data files extend beyond the 2 gig limit with the 64 bit option. The man pages for cp do not mention any size limitations. What am I missing? As always,

RE: Suppressing detail in UniObjects command

2004-03-15 Thread alfkec
Yes, it sounds like you use the Pick style by either turning UDT.OPTIONS 2 ON or with ECLTYPE P for your regular sessions. I believe UniObjects defaults to ECLTYPE U. I haven't tried in a UniObjects session to change the ECLTYPE - you just need to learn the U type syntax which is somewhat

RE: Suppressing detail in UniObjects command

2004-03-15 Thread Nick Southwell
Cheers, I'll give that a try! Nick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 March 2004 17:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Suppressing detail in UniObjects command Yes, it sounds like you use the Pick style by either turning UDT.OPTIONS 2 ON

RE: How do I copy Unix files 2 gig

2004-03-15 Thread George Gallen
what about using tar? cd destination ; tar cvf - /sourcetreename | tar xvf - I think the above will work. George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How do I copy Unix files 2 gig

RE: Universe Sockets Interface

2004-03-15 Thread Jeff Schasny
There's a files area? -Original Message- From: Ray Wurlod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 4:53 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: Universe Sockets Interface However, the attachment gets stripped. How about sending it to the moderator to put into the

RE: How do I copy Unix files 2 gig

2004-03-15 Thread Dan Fitzgerald
There should be a file under /etc somewhere (/etc/security/limits on AIX) named limits, or something similar, in which a parameter (on AIX, it's fsize) defines that limit. Change it to a larger number, or on many unices a -1 means no limit. Our greatest duty in this life is to help others.

Re: Installing universe as uvadm

2004-03-15 Thread Glenn Herbert
Actually, you don't really INSTALL as non-root. The idea of uvadm is that it is an ADMINISTRATOR, thus, your initial root install sets the product up so that internally uvadm can administer all facets of the product without the need of su-ing to root. The fact remains that you still need to

Strange results from I Descriptor

2004-03-15 Thread Gordon Glorfield
UV 10.0.8 I am trying to create an I-Descriptor that calls a subroutine. The subroutine does a select on another file. When the select is executed I get this error: Non-SQL re-entrant query calls are not allowed. I'm clueless as to what is wrong. Any hints would be greatly appreciated.

RE: Strange results from I Descriptor

2004-03-15 Thread Mike Randall
Not sure what you are doing but since it's in an i-descriptor and being used as part of another listing, I'd use numbered selects in my subroutine to make sure it doesn't bump heads with the current listing that's using the i-descriptor. HTH Mike R. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: Strange results from I Descriptor

2004-03-15 Thread Dave Davis
Don't do a select (or any query statement) within an I-descriptor subroutine that gets called from query. That's what the message means. Even if it did work it would be a dog. If I need to do something like this in UniData I use the UniBasic index commands like SETINDEX READFWD, etc and

RE: Strange results from I Descriptor

2004-03-15 Thread Mike Randall
Maybe creating indices on your PROV.DIR.DB file for the MAMSI field is the way to go. Then selectindex to do your processing. Mike R. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Davis Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:40 PM To: U2 Users

Win 2K and UV 9.5.2.1r6-1

2004-03-15 Thread Daniel Jorgenson
Hello group, Does anyone know if UV 9.5.2.1r6-1 is compatible with Windows 2000 Server? We are currently running this UV version on NT with service pack 4. Regards, Dan Jorgenson SICK, Inc. 6900 West 110th Street Bloomington, MN 55438 USA Direct: 952-829-4732 Fax: 952-941-9287

RE: Suppressing detail in UniObjects command

2004-03-15 Thread Stuart Boydell
DET.SUPP is not a valid attribute. Any ideas? This works perfectly from the udt prompt. Try ID.SUP DET.SUP (just one 'P'). ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended

RE: Installing universe as uvadm

2004-03-15 Thread Trevor . Williams
EV Note down current permissions chmod 777 / /var/spool install chmod back again Glenn's -Original Message- From: Evgenios Charalambus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 March 2004 9:44 pm To: U2 Users Discussion

RE: Installing universe as uvadm

2004-03-15 Thread Trevor . Williams
(sorry about the duplication. Hit the wrong key) EV Note down current permissions chmod 777 / /var/spool install chmod back again Glenn's methodology seems a good one.Though I did not install it that way (for 'historical' reasons ie I did not have root access). However, when upgrading to

Terminology

2004-03-15 Thread Mark Johnson
Dear all: I'm not familiar with the following as referred to by MV: SLA and OLA metrics. Also, what is Dataflo. My guess is it may be a 4GL or it could be a 3.5GL like Eclipse. thanks. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

RE: Terminology

2004-03-15 Thread Ross Ferris
I'm on the wrong side of the world, but IIRC DataFlo is a product, like InfoFlo - these days out of the Epicore stable I'd imagine SLA would be a Service Level Agreement and OLA would be an Operational Level Agreement, both relating (more or less) to the uptime availability of a system Ross

RE: File permissions problem with UniObjects for Java

2004-03-15 Thread Adrian Merrall
Apologies for the delay. Wendy I had this same problem a while back. From memory the reason it works at the colon prompt but not from uniobjects it the umask. When you run udt it inherits it's umask from your environment. On linux I have a unidata.sh file in /etc/profile.d which sets it to

Pre variable assignment and memory fragmentation

2004-03-15 Thread Marco Manyevere
Hi All, In response to a message I posted recently, many users expressed strong opinion against the pre-assignment (or declaration) of variables at the top of a subroutine. Although I dont normally do this in my programs I would like to understand the impact on memory fragmentation of

How would I find the block size on a W2K Server?

2004-03-15 Thread Dennis Bartlett
Everything seems to revolve around block size. I know we've been over this a thousand times, but I'm trying to make sure (coz I'm being hounded to prove my theories) I've been using 2k as a general rule-of-thumb (on W2k NT), but have now been informed (albeit wrongly perhaps) that Pick is 2k,