[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
But the problem has always been the equivalent of what mvInternet does. That is, connect Apache to Universe. So you have another idea of how to connect Apache (or really any other page server) to Universe? I don't understand what open port 80 means or whether this
OOPS my nice looking cut and paste thingy didn't stick:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
But the problem has always been the equivalent of what mvInternet does. That is, connect Apache to Universe. So you have another idea of how to connect Apache (or really any other page server) to Universe?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's my expertise:
1) Pick BASIC
2) I can write HTML and I wrote a few javascripts!
3) I setup Apache as a web server
Then Pixius' product is *perfect* for you, that's all you need. Using
exactly that, we
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Katz
Does anyone know if they have uniobjects for php?
Not that I'm aware of, but if you're brave you can convince UniObjects
for Java and PHP to work together. Look on http://www.pickwiki.com for
more information, at least
In a message dated 4/20/2004 2:20:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Not that I'm aware of, but if you're brave you can convince UniObjects
for Java and PHP to work together. Look on
http://www.pickwiki.com for
more information, at least two of us here have done it.
So
If you want to play around with PHP interacting with the Universe
environment in an extremely simple way you can try the stuff below. Note
that I dont recommend this methodology for production systems but its a good
simple example.
The following stuff will execute any Universe command/cataloged
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stuart Boydell
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 5:54 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Uniobjects / php
Behalf Of Dawn M. Wolthuis
The fastest, bestest, free way I know to have html--U2 with update
capability is by using tomcat
In a message dated 4/20/2004 3:12:12 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Do you have a specific project in mind? There are at least half a dozen
ways to get U2 data to appear on a web page, the best way depends on
what expertise you already have in-house and how complex
the
Have a look at the subkey property on the session object. You will need to
alter this to be unique (after every 10 connections). HTH.
Regards,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin Vezertzis
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 5:57 PM
To:
UniObjects does not use a sockets-based interface, so SSL and so on aren't relevant.
Rather, UniObjects uses a proprietary interface built on an architecture called
InterCall. The only security is a port number that's not used for anything else, and
a check in the unirpcservices file about
:47 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: UniObjects
UniObjects does not use a sockets-based interface, so SSL and so on
aren't relevant.
Rather, UniObjects uses a proprietary interface built on an architecture
called InterCall. The only security is a port number that's not used
for anything
Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: UniObjects
UniObjects does not use a sockets-based interface, so SSL and so on
aren't relevant.
Rather, UniObjects uses a proprietary interface built on an architecture
called InterCall. The only security is a port number that's not used
for anything else
Kevin wrote:
Does anyone have knowledge of how to handle secure communications from
UniObjects into Universe? (SSL, SSH, etc.) We are covered from end
user to UniObjects, but not from UniObjects to Universe. I
haven't been able to find any supporting documentation..
We have firewalls in
Subject: Re: UniObjects
UniObjects does not use a sockets-based interface, so SSL and so on
aren't relevant.
Rather, UniObjects uses a proprietary interface built on an architecture
called InterCall. The only security is a port number that's not used
for anything else, and a check
] On
Behalf Of James F Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 5:26 PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: UniObjects
While we are discussing UniObject... has anyone out there had any luck
with it and ColdFusion? We are having a problem with assigning a value
to a dynamic array using
Steve,
Look at NRG (Nucleus Accuterm). The screens are fast, the security
is all server based (even at the field level), and the tool allows you
to use the same code base to service green screens during the
transition. Nucleus also lets you develop for the web and use those web
pages as
-3655 Ext. 102
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 12:30 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Uniobjects
Ahem -- 30 Days Dave? Admittedly it's a nice product and very easy to use but 30 days
Steve, (and others who may be curious about migrating to GUI)
As one with extensive experience in development of GUI and character based
applications with the Nucleus/NRG environment, I would like to offer a rapid
2 cents worth.
You wrote:
We are in the process of analyzing different approaches
I think there was a thread a while back about this. There was a problem with
stacking the commands (but you can try that). The other things you can do is
to put them into a paragraph and run the paragraph or write a basic routine
to process a list of commands. You may also want to use the
I solved it.
I just didn't follow the syntax. Here some snipptets
'Instantiate the List Object
Set pSelectlist = UniSession.SelectList(0)
'associating the record is which are attributes of a dynamic Array 'Claims'
pSelectlist.FormList (Claims)
'Saving the List
pSelectlist.SaveList (CLAIMS)
I wander if UD 6.1 will be a requirement to use UO.NET? For example
would OU.NET run on UD 5.2?
snip
I heard from a reliable source at IBM that UO.NET will be released with
UniData 6.1 targeted for 6/30/04. Sometime after that release, Q3
timeframe, for Universe.
rudy
snip
--
u2-users mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/27/2004 1:05:29 PM
From documentation I have seen Uniobjects.net will be thread safe,
however I have not heard anything recently regarding a release date.
Does anyone have any update on when this will be available?
Greg
From the White paper: Using IBM U2 and Microsoft
Nick,
Depends on how you far you need to scale, and if you are looking to support
large numbers of users.
UniObjects is NOT thread safe, but you can roll your own connection pooling
- ie. write your logic into a DLL that maintains a series of connections
with some form of semaphoring, and call
Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Uniobjects Asp
No. Let me try and prevent the pain I had to go through.
We avoided Uniobjects because by design its use is for client/server
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
From documentation I have seen Uniobjects.net will be thread safe,
however I have not heard anything recently regarding a release date.
Does anyone have any update on when this will be available?
Greg
snip
Does anyone know if Uniobjects.net will be thread safe ?
snip
thx,
rudy
--
u2-users
Sounds like a Redback task. Fully thread safe, and totally scalable.
Mike R.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cooper, Rudy
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Uniobjects Asp
Hello Everyone,
I
26 matches
Mail list logo
