Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x GPS Antenna

Mark, I can get you one ;) Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 27, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Mark Montgomery wrote: > > Does anyone have a GPS antenna for an AF5x they are willing to sell? > > We have a tower site that has an AirFiber 5x link on it. This same tower has > a buzzard

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x GPS Antenna

or run it on sync over power... you do need to have an epmp AP to steal it off though. I did it once when I was replacing a rocket with an AF5x... got to the top of the tower and realized I left the GPS antenna sitting on my desk, so I borrowed the GPS antenna off an ePMP AP that was on the

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x GPS Antenna

but the epmp ones do work... probably doesn't help much though. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re:

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x GPS Antenna

IIRC you need a 3-5v gps antenna with a normal sma connector. *Daniel Peoples* Resonance Broadband *Resonancebroadband.com* 918-429-3620 On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > I know the rocket ones don't work... > >

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x GPS Antenna

I know the rocket ones don't work... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 27, 2017 5:30 PM, "Keith Yoder" wrote: > Would something like this work? > >

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

Your hair looks great today. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Kees H wrote: > Go ahead, cheer me up. > > > *From:* Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Monday, February 27, 2017 1:35 PM >

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

Go ahead, cheer me up. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 1:35 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor Correction: As of 2000, most gigabit channel-bonding schemes use the IEEE standard of Link Aggregation which was formerly clause 43 of the

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

LAG > On Feb 27, 2017, at 16:35, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Correction: As of 2000, most gigabit channel-bonding schemes use the IEEE > standard of Link Aggregation which was formerly clause 43 of the IEEE 802.3 > standard added in March 2000 by the IEEE 802.3ad task

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

Correction: As of 2000, most gigabit channel-bonding schemes use the IEEE standard of Link Aggregation which was formerly clause 43 of the IEEE 802.3 standard added in March 2000 by the IEEE 802.3ad task force.[4] Nearly every network equipment manufacturer quickly adopted this joint standard over

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

LACP is like 1990 dude... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Kees H wrote: > Where do you guys find the time to keep up with all that new stuff? > > > *From:* Matt Hoppes >

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

Use it in the network? :) > On Feb 27, 2017, at 16:31, Kees H wrote: > > Where do you guys find the time to keep up with all that new stuff? > > > From: Matt Hoppes > Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 1:15 PM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users]

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

Where do you guys find the time to keep up with all that new stuff? From: Matt Hoppes Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 1:15 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor Yup On Feb 27, 2017, at 16:13, Josh Luthman wrote: Netonix

Re: [Ubnt_users] UniFi

Great :) Thanks for the input. On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Peoples wrote: > Yup, folks love them > > *Daniel Peoples* > Resonance Broadband > *Resonancebroadband.com* > 918-429-3620 > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:48 PM, DW

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

Yup > On Feb 27, 2017, at 16:13, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Netonix and LACP? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Kees H wrote:

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

Netonix and LACP? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Kees H wrote: > What would be the easiest way to get these working into your network? A > router at each end of the link?

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor

What would be the easiest way to get these working into your network? A router at each end of the link? We use a lot of Netonix, but those are not routers. From: Matt Hoppes Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 11:33 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AirFiber Multiplexor Yes.

Re: [Ubnt_users] UniFi

Yup, folks love them *Daniel Peoples* Resonance Broadband *Resonancebroadband.com* 918-429-3620 On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:48 PM, DW wrote: > We use them in residential settings all the time. They work very well. > > David > > On 2/27/2017

Re: [Ubnt_users] UniFi

We use them in residential settings all the time. They work very well. David On 2/27/2017 7:50 AM, Jorge Santiago wrote: Any of you using Unifi access points for residential installations? I have a 90 lot project we are working on and would like to include the AP as a standard.

Re: [Ubnt_users] FW: Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be Generated

My office is sending you all the RMA’s, when they were submitted, and when we got a response. Rory From: Ben Moore [mailto:ben.mo...@ubnt.com] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 11:04 AM To: Rory Conaway Cc: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] FW: Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on APs

I’ll have to look but why would that matter? 8.0 APs were showing 8.0 clients but not 6.0 client names. 6.0 aren’t showing any client names. Rory From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jesse DuPont Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 8:02 AM To:

Re: [Ubnt_users] FW: Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be Generated

Hi Rory - This is what I received back from RMA team: RM39- Submitted 2/6/17- Cancelled as Out of Warranty - Date code from 2012 RM40- Submitted 2/6/17- Approved 2/6/17 - Received 2/22/17- Shipped 2/24/17 Let me know if you find other info and will check. Thanks, Ben On Mon, Feb 27,

Re: [Ubnt_users] FW: Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be Generated

Thanks. Let me know what you find. I am also checking with RMA team. Thanks, Ben On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: > Ben, to be clear, we submitted at least 10 devices if not more and it took > at least a week to hear back on most of them. I will

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF24 6mile link

So we have a 2.5 mile link in central Texas. You can read about it here. https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber-Stories/AF24HD-2-5-mile-link/cns-p/1656005 Over the last year we have noticed drops during heavy rains but only momentary. We have set ours up to drop the ethernet if the signal

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0 Firmware not showing Device Names of clients on APs

Rory, What is the AirMax Priority set to on your stations having issues on 6.0? Jesse DuPont Network Architect email:

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF24 6mile link

Ditto On Feb 27, 2017 7:51 AM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > Links in our area (ITU rain zone K) still drop in the rain at 1.5 miles. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > > Intelligent Computing Solutions > >

Re: [Ubnt_users] FW: Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.: Invoice #To Be Generated

If I heard, "it took weeks to hear back" from any vendor on an RMA I would agree this is an issue. But over a week? Hearing back from any vendor in less then two weeks on an RMA is a good rating in my experience, especially if multiple units are involved. You have the shipping time, plus going