On Tue, 2006-22-08 at 19:04 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Well, we also have some time in the bank with the designer who did
the Dapper icon set, so we expect to get some changes and improvements
to that icon set in for Edgy. If you have specific icons that you
think need to be done (that
On Thu, 2006-10-08 at 18:36 -0500, Brandon Holtsclaw wrote:
Sorry for my lack of progress updates to the list , a.u.c is in the process
of
getting reworked by myself and troy, as soon as its useable we will most
likely announce it here and open the staging site up for comments and
Has anyone had any luck getting the Batik scribbler
application to run on Java under amd64?
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/batik/
The following error is output:
AWTError: Cannot load AWT toolkit: gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkToolkit
I suspect it might have to do with my Java paths, but
was hoping
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 19:02 +0100, Peter Savage wrote:
Can I ask do the sounds have the same deadline as the rest of
ubuntu-art? If so, I need to start finalising the login sound so I
can started creating logout, and all the other little soundsGot
mail etc, of course that all hinges on
If everyone who has submitted a wallpaper could take
the time to Gimp test / Inkscape test their layers
and such and ship the parcels off to:
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/
What I would require are 1600x1200 resolution source
files in XCF and SVG where appropriate. The layers
_must_
On Wed, 2006-26-07 at 23:47 -0700, Chuck Huber wrote:
Are any full size mocks available for live testing?
No.
We _must_ get some more compositional sketches in
for Propose so that we can clearly pick a few
directions and focus our energy in that format.
I simply banged out that set so that we
On Thu, 2006-27-07 at 10:02 +0100, Who wrote:
AICs (and Mark, if reading):
Is there any chance of Edgy + 1 looking like this (or Edgy, but I
guess it is a little to late for that)? I am aware we are comitted to
Gloss as a result of Human - but I think this clean look 1)allows us
to use the
On Thu, 2006-27-07 at 09:20 -0400, Viper550 wrote:
Now that the overall style of Edgy has been decided on,
This is completely misleading.
We are only in Proposal. No decisions have been made
yet. Frank will attest to this.
We need more contributions, so please don't post
erroneous
On Thu, 2006-27-07 at 13:39 -0400, Viper550 wrote:
Oh, sorry, I thought it was an official decision, guess the subject was
a little misleading Added completed sample set and a request., I
thought completed represented that it was the offical choice. But still,
I could use some hands with
Are there any sound designers out there? I would suspect the
number is critically low at the moment.
That said, I believe that the opening sounds and such
are very critical to Ubuntu's development. If anyone
is interested in this facet, please contact me as I
know several sound designers from
On Wed, 2006-26-07 at 13:35 -0400, jmak wrote:
Hi,
I've just uploaded three new login screen proposals for xubuntu.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/XubuntuEdgy/Proposals
Personally -- GDM V3 is heading in a distinct new direction.
Fresh. Clean. Simple. Perhaps some variants
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/EdgyProposals/SetSample00
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork
Changes:
* Updated the Documentation page.
* Updated the Documentation/Tools page. This page requires
a large amount of work. Please contribute if you can.
* Added usplash information as per Dennis Kaarsemaker's
terrific update on this mailing list.
On Mon, 2006-24-07 at 17:59 -0400, jmak wrote:
On 7/24/06, Niklas Weidel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
V3 is nice!
But I must say, I think the top gradient is a bit off. It's greyscale, while
the rest is bluescale. Just nitpicking, tho. :)
Thanks for pointing this out. I look into it.
On Sun, 2006-23-07 at 18:28 -0400, Ryan McNeely wrote:
A somewhat rough concept wallpaper, what do you think?
Unfortunately, although it tries a new glossy look, the
specification states that branding is out, especially
in that bold of a form.
Also, the palette is probably too orange -- as we
If I can find some time tonight, I will be attempting
a wiki update.
What I would like to do is trim the incoming dir
and migrate several items to 'Need Sorting'
directories.
We need four solid edgy incoming pages for each item,
plus one summary page for referencing at a distance.
This reflects
On Sat, 2006-22-07 at 12:20 -0400, Viper550 wrote:
p.s. If my Slab specification were to be included, we'll need
fullsized
versions of all the prefrences icons!
With whom have you made progress with in development?
Are they on board? Who is implementing it? Who is packaging it?
Where are
On Sat, 2006-22-07 at 08:55 +0200, Niklas Weidel wrote:
I'm also quite fascinated with wall_troy_04 which I'd appreciate some
inside information on how it was done. :)
2006/7/22, Chuck Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like the look and wonder if you could briefly go over the
technique used to
On Sat, 2006-22-07 at 21:26 +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
hi,
On Sa, 2006-07-22 at 12:16 -0700, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
My only thoughts are that it would seem a colossal task
to try and get _three_ full looks included. What
are you encompassing by a look when you suggest those
three
On Sat, 2006-22-07 at 23:12 +0200, Niklas Weidel wrote:
Could someone also please point out where to submit specs for edgy +1?
It eludes me in the wiki.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Specs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
On Fri, 2006-21-07 at 18:12 -0400, jmak wrote:
I am just wondering why the Scope section of those pages don't include
xubuntu.
We welcome your participation jmak!
I believe the idea was to not appear as though we are 'forcing'
any of these specs on a particular distribution, but rather
On Fri, 2006-21-07 at 09:03 -0400, Viper550 wrote:
http://shots.osdir.com/slideshows/original.php?release=703slide=2
Now, who was responsible for that very nice temporary pattern? If you
want, I can try to make you a similarly themed wallpaper for the desktop...
It would seem logical to use
On Sat, 2006-22-07 at 02:56 +0200, Niklas Weidel wrote:
Once more I've played around with some wallpaper ideas. For those
wondering why I'm pumping out these things, it's my own little way of
experimenting up a feel and form in my own head. Each idea directs the
next one, and I think I'm
On Thu, 2006-20-07 at 12:37 -0700, Chuck Huber wrote:
For instance, is there required size for the login splash? If so
where
would we find this information? On the spec page under 'Design' it
mentions that the glassy look will carry forward but does not mention
whether general size and shape
On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 09:49 +0100, Matthew East wrote:
It seems to me that a representative council can be a good thing for
the art team because art decisions can sometimes be difficult to come to
a consensus on. However it is important to be careful about designating
the competence of the
On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 12:41 +0100, Joao Inacio wrote:
- I think a dark background is nicer than a lighter one, though the
4th one may be a bit too dark.
Tonal issues are easily and quickly dealt with once
a guiding direction is chosen. Don't get too fussy about
the small details just yet.
On
On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 16:58 +0100, Matthew East wrote:
1. The Art Council should not be responsible for granting Ubuntu
membership, because the risk is that the community won't get to know new
members or hear about good work being done in the art area, and there
is a risk of less consistency
On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 22:31 -0400, jmak wrote:
Thanks for the comments. Tomorrow, I will change the black to
something else. I am going to make a few color variations.
If I might ask, can we postpone the colour variations until
a little further down the road? Colour is a minor tweak.
We need
Here is a contact sheet of all submissions.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/EdgyProposals/Summary_18JULY2006
Note that I kept a few of the logo designs out
as they are so similar that the variations were
not even visible on the contact sheet.
Keep the variations such that they are
On Mon, 2006-17-07 at 09:49 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
But... none of these really reminds me of the Dapper login splash,
which I think is a nice combination of glassy and human. Did nobody
submit anything along those lines? I would really like it if we could
shape the login screen around
Please consider this the last call for Art Council
applications.
The deadline is Friday, the 21st of July 2006.
The Art Council will become an extremely important
are of the Ubuntu project, so I would encourage everyone
and anyone who has interest to apply.
Thank you for your time,
TJS
PS: A
On Mon, 2006-17-07 at 20:20 +0200, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
A request I hear often is to have a gdm theme with face browser. Such a
theme has been ready for inclusion for a few months now, but
unfortunately didn't make it into dapper. Can anyone tell me which steps
I should take to see this
Some terrific work coming down the pipes in a
good direction right now! jmak, Who_, Weidel,
etc are all busy banging out some terrific stuff
that is along the lines of what we need.
If _everyone_ who offers up some loose mocks could
send me a wiki page with their variations, I will
contact
On Fri, 2006-14-07 at 14:00 -0400, jmak wrote:
These are some of my explorations in the direction of developing a new
feel for the logo an gdm greeter screen for Xubuntu/edgy.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XubuntuEdgySpecs
Please note that these artworks are still a work in progress.
Thank you
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/EdgyProposals/LSplashProposal
In the limited time I had today, I tried to offer up
a better selection of mockups for the lsplash.
I chose the lsplash initially because all of the critical
elements are contained within it -- backing texture (TBD),
loose
I took the time to wiki up a contact based on the current
submissions for gloss approaches. These are all artistic
based. Once Frank and Niel get the bugs out of the Blender
processes, I'll contact up the results.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/EdgyProposals/GlossProposal
I have created a proposal sub area of the incoming section
on the wiki.
Thus far, I have dropped Niel's early work on some logo props:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/EdgyProposals/LogoProposal
and the full contact that I have churned out:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/EdgyProposals/
Root page now shows subchildren as per the template.
I have probably missed several wiki pages that need to
be moved here. Sorry if I overlooked some pages -- I
was in a huge rush and must escape. Please migrate
accordingly. Thanks.
On Thu, 2006-13-07 at 22:19 +0200, Niklas Weidel wrote:
Pinch off? You mean you'd like to see the same gloss effect I made on
the ubuntu-logo for the textlogo?
Bingo! With variants. Don't worry about polish.
Let's get a good set of design directions going first, then
we can work our way
On Thu, 2006-13-07 at 22:39 +0200, Niklas Weidel wrote:
I'll look into it. I tend to overwork everything, but I'll try to keep
it moderately simple. :)
At this development point, it is more useful to have many
variations. Various applications of your sheen would be
very useful to compare
On Fri, 2006-14-07 at 03:09 +0200, Niklas Weidel wrote:
I've been playing around a bit with both desktop ideas and the
textlogo. I know we're in a basic-ideas-phase, but as usual I couldn't
stop, so these are somewhat advanced.
Unfortunately my time is horribly crimped at the moment,
so please
The following is a link to a good cross section of sample
work that I have churned out for this cycle. With the hopes
that someone can perhaps build on some of the starting points,
I offer them here.
Included on the page is a contact sheet with all the photos
I have spec'd. There are a _few_
Limited on time, I have adjusted the wiki page for a
clearer guide to specifications.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Team/GetInvolved
CHANGELOG:
* It now points to the official SpecTemplate that the
other Ubuntu developers use.
* Attempts to explain the parties involved more.
* Has the
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 21:29 +0100, Lisa Savage wrote:
Hi Artwork Team,
I thought I should just introduce myself. I am Lisa Savage and I have
been given the task of heading up the edubuntu artwork team. I'm fairly
new to the whole ubuntu community, so go easy on me :D
I would be
On Mon, 2006-10-07 at 14:15 +0200, Niklas Weidel wrote:
Feel free to use the glassy ubuntu-logo I've upped earlier for
logon/isplash. I'll see if I can make some complete variants, but I'd
rather have them connect in some way to the desktop background for a
really sleek feel.
That is the idea
On Mon, 2006-10-07 at 22:15 -0400, Viper550 wrote:
So, how do you like my idea? I love Slab to death, it's easily one of
the best things you can ever have on a desktop, just do a few
modifications and it will be all set for primetime!
This is more of a development issue.
Further still,
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 00:03 +0200, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
http://bootsplash.org/kdm-edgy.pngideas
http://bootsplash.org/kdm-edgy1.png Work on the black version
http://bootsplash.org/edgy3a.png An idea for a Bg for kdm,
desktop
splash, etc.
The third element of
SUMMARY: Request for glassy demonstrations.
I thought Who's and Weidel's glassy looks
would do wonderfully for the branding across
the two higher resolution items (Logon and l-splash).
However, it would be nice if we could get an idea
as to how to accomplish this in 16 colours.
If Weidel and
Perhaps Frank or Ken could answer this. It was
general enough that I believe it is of interest
to the general list:
Q) Are there any compositional considerations for
the current implementation of usplash. For example,
is there a reserved area on the screen for text
or something else?
On Thu, 2006-06-07 at 01:51 +0100, Who wrote:
I was working on using SVGs to get fyre-like effects a while ago and I
have dugg up some of the ideas - I have put together a 'ponder-pic'
that shows off the style a bit
This is much more what ponder is for. The idea is
to get fresh directions
If you would like to become a member of the extremely
important Art Council for the Ubuntu project, please
take note. This is your second of three reminders.
FAQ:
* Who should apply?
Anyone interested in the overall
governance of Art in the Ubuntu project.
* How to apply?
Submit
On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I've been fairly liberal about approving specs, since I don't think
we can
expect the same level of definition for creative targets as we
currently do
for technical ones.
I think this has been part of the problem with the existing
Thanks to Ken for pointing this app out to me!
If you haven't already found this program, you should
probably do yourself a favour and check it out. It has
recently migrated to open source, so it deserves some
attention.
http://www.xaraxtreme.org/
If you download the precompiled binaries,
On Fri, 2006-30-06 at 09:37 +0200, Michiel Sikma wrote:
I personally work on resolutions in the 4000 px wide
regions to ensure that my wallpapers will always, no matter what
kinds of strange things will happen, will work on the highest
resolutions that are available. That includes the
On Fri, 2006-30-06 at 17:36 +0200, Michiel Sikma wrote:
The only ones that are widely used are 4:3 and 16:10. I don't really
see a reason to support 5:4 (??) and 16:9.
Huge can of worms. We talked about this in Paris, and
this is why I brought it up.
I can tell you that 5:4 is pretty
On Fri, 2006-30-06 at 23:41 +0100, Who wrote:
It would be really, really nice if someone would write this up as a wiki
page as guidelines for an Ubuntu wallpaper!
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Documentation/Guidelines/WallPapers
In addition to this, the spec has been altered
On Wed, 2006-28-06 at 11:10 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
As you suggest this could do good as a unifying theme for splashes,
wallpapers and such, I am totally with you on that. Maybe even
metacity borders?
Indeed, once we have finished our pondering regarding loose
textures, the
On Wed, 2006-28-06 at 15:56 +0100, Who wrote:
This is an idea tha just occurred to me - no mock ups or anything till
I get home tonight, sorry
I believe the team is expected to prove itself with
the four initial specs before further tasks will
be assigned.
Let's try to keep focused and
The textures are there to inspire and create new ideas, so it is
nice to see someone trying to use them as a leapboard. Thiago's
sample shows how we might be able to get some sort of glossy
effect across a background. It is worth brainstorming early
before everyone starts putting pen to paper
It should be noted that Mark wants to proceed along
the lines of the GDM logon splash in terms of the
glossy look.
This means that during the proposal phase, we should
aim to keep focused development using the gloss look.
To this end, I provided a sample textural reference page,
which Frank has
As per my request to the mailing list, someone took
the time to step up and contribute a very useful
document to the new Artwork archives...
j michaelson provided the following guide that I
Wikized.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/HowToCompileInkscape
Thanks again to Mr. Michaelson
On Mon, 2006-26-06 at 21:15 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
No, there's no published guideline, and fixing that should be our
first step. Human was created over a series of phone calls between me,
Dave (from the company that did the design work), Daniel Holbach, Jeff
Waugh and Jane Silber.
Do not manually update your specification to anything other
than braindump. The assigning of specifications comes during
the summit meetings.
As of now, we should have the wiki specification, which is
underway, and the four primary targets for Edgy.
Hope this clears things up a little more.
On Sun, 2006-25-06 at 19:21 +0200, Michiel Sikma wrote:
I don't understand why it is so pertinently important to keep Human
in. In all objectivity, it's simply a suboptimal icon set when
compared to Tango. I also don't see why any of the arguments that I
have given have to be ignored.
The Art Council will provide form basis of an incredibly
important aspect of the Ubuntu project.
If you are interested in becoming a member of the art council,
and believe that you have the experience and education required,
please provide an online link to your resume / cv and email
it to me
On Sat, 2006-17-06 at 00:31 +0200, Niel Drummond wrote:
well I didn't much like the hodge podge of new theme ideas scattered
around https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkTeam/Drafts/ so I created another
page, in an effort to reduce the clutter.
I don't know how much room there is to adjust the
I added a link to that LaunchpadHowTo at the wiki that
a wise ArtworkTeam member managed to dig up.
It contains a plethora of information on tracking features
and assigning tasks to individuals. I encourage everyone
who wants to participate to read through the docs if you
can find a few moments.
On Wed, 2006-14-06 at 14:20 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
It would mean that the art-team in Launchpad would become a part of
the ubuntumembers team. Members of the art team would automatically
get to vote in CC resolutions put to all Ubuntu members, and
confirmations of new appointments to
Ok, despite being horribly short on time tonight, I straggled
a little bit of info together for those of you out there who
need to know how polls and such work on Launchpad.
Revise this page if you feel you can add more. Launchpad
information needs documentation, and it currently isn't too
easy
On Fri, 2006-09-06 at 21:04 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
It would be nice to have a space for each theme, which has a
standardised top page. So you could have:
Artwork/Themes/Human - top-level theme page with thumbnails of
desktop, splash etc
Artwork/Themes/Outdoors - as above for
Voice off on the targets and flesh them out folks.
Consider it a shortlisting for a breakdown of deadlines.
If you have other areas that need addressing, they
need to be brought up BEFORE the Edgy cycle begins.
Paris is coming rapidly...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Sat, 2006-10-06 at 14:22 +1000, Pascal Klein wrote:
* Reviews must remains
I think we might be able to condense Propositions and Drafts into one
page, personally. We'll see how it progesses.
Agree. Basically this is a submission pool area.
We must define what we want to
In an effort to document a full listing for the
development cycle, I am seeking your contributions
regarding what is a viable set of artistic elements
to adjust. Please cut the following list and
reply it to the mailing list with your additions.
If we can pound this out in a week, I'll take it
-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Targets for Edgy:
* USplash
* GDM Logon
* GDM Splash
* GNOME Wallpaper
* Window Color / Theme
* GTK Theme (probably incremental improvements on Human)
* KDE Theme that integrates well with the GTK Theme
* Panel background image
*
On Sat, 2006-10-06 at 17:02 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
All of those targets are very exciting ! Wikize it !
We really must write GuideLines for each Theme we want to ship. We must
define what is a theme GuideLines. For me its :
* color palette
* color policy (e.g. orange for
On Sat, 2006-10-06 at 14:12 -0500, Billy wrote:
A complete Tango/Tangerine would be nice before venturing out. As long
as it takes, I don't see how anyone could suggest other icon themes,
especially after having icon themes cut from us on dapper. Lets keep
it realistic and managable.
If everyone could try and get through Frank's document,
perhaps we can get a relatively finished document together
in time for Paris, at which point Frank and I will try
to further the cause.
Thanks folks.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
On Fri, 2006-09-06 at 13:15 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
Hello,
Before Edgy cycle, we have the time and the ability to deeply rework our
wiki architecture, including breaking Google cache, however we should
avoid that.
I suggest :
* Gather Artwork and ArtworkTeam into Artwork.
On Sun, 2006-04-06 at 01:00 +1000, Pascal Klein wrote:
If I recall correctly we were going to hold in the second or third week
after the release of Dapper. :)
So can we agree that we shall meet after Paris?
We can still meet for a light chat, of course for those interested, but
as always
On Sat, 2006-03-06 at 17:05 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
Those are interesting numbers... Perhaps they should be put somewhere
for referance just so people know how much effort is put into
pre-release testing...
Way ahead of you. I have it in my mail folder for
wikizing.
--
On Thu, 2006-01-06 at 09:17 -0700, Chuck Huber wrote:
Hopefully what comes from the Paris meeting will be rather broad style
guidelines and not a ton of overly confining details. I'm sure we all
appreciate that as artists we need room for creativity or else Bad Art
happens.
Details are the
On Thu, 2006-01-06 at 14:26 +0200, Michiel Sikma wrote:
Don't we have yet to decide exactly which direction we're
going to take with Edgy? Like I've said before, I don't think it's a
good idea to start exclaiming what to do next out loud just now.
Paris is going to lead to a hard
I think the student idea is wonderful.
Things can actually get done, as it has been
demonstrated with the Summer of Code type
efforts.
Wikize.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
ompaul: where are the images for cd's and dvd's for dapper I have to
submit them to a printer today so I can have them published tomorrow for
the session in the *house of celebration of dapper* (cough pub)
We really need a way to get the darn Launchpad email set to
the mailing list.
Mark,
On Wed, 2006-31-05 at 17:36 +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
ompaul: where are the images for cd's and dvd's for dapper I have to
submit them to a printer today so I can have them published tomorrow for
the session in the *house of celebration of dapper* (cough pub)
Yes sorry Oliver, I missed those.
Anyways, there is a printing issue regarding colours.
Thankfully ompaul is doing the work to fix it in time.
Thanks for your input Oliver. I guess they weren't cleared
with the printer before it became a little 'critical'.
He needs the NEW marketing artwork
Thank you very much for all of your work Who. Work
get things done, and for that, I appreciate you making
Ubuntu that little bit better for everyone.
On Mon, 2006-29-05 at 18:57 +0100, Who wrote:
Last 5 minutes.
Enjoy :)
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Let's try to collect all of Mark's posts so that
we can keep within his goals for Ubuntu artwork.
To this end, and after MUCH restructuring by
Etienne, I have added to Et's page structure:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkTeam/Documentation/Guidelines
Also, I suspect Et would appreciate some
==
Mark said:
Billy wrote:
Yes, I understand all of that, I was just curious about
going from 2 or 3 to just 1 or 2, so soon :D
Hmm... depends how optimistic I'm feeling when I hit send. Call it 1,
and if it looks like the team can handle more, 2. We have very tight
constraints
.
Thanks again for offering to contribute!
On Tue, 2006-30-05 at 03:07 +0200, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
On ma, 2006-05-29 at 15:32 -0700, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
* We need package information so Daniel doesn't get another bomb.
* We need details on how to add / adjust / integrate various
I agree... I just tried to stick it in there.
At some point someone should snag the related links from
the mail archives.
Starting points.
On Tue, 2006-30-05 at 03:02 +0100, Who wrote:
Cathcing hold of every comment Mark makes is probably not the best way
to organise things - short statements
Thanks, I knew about that, but why the change in address? I mean, I
knew it had been edited but did not notice the change in address,
because I just thought it was edited, as usual. What is unusual about
it that it needed another address?
Because the structure of the wiki was horrible, and
On Sat, 2006-27-05 at 14:20 -0700, Brian Burger wrote:
Having an art team entry in Launchpad is useful for bug reporting, if
nothing else. The wiki is far more flexible for displaying draft
artwork, brainstorming, and all the other stuff that goes on there.
Agree 100%.
Launchpad has
New page at the wiki:
Tasks.
The following task has been added. Please attack as able.
I will add it to Launchpad.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkTeam/Tasks
Of course, this link is available off the root ArtworkTeam page
as well.
On Sun, 2006-28-05 at 00:20 +0100, Henrik Nilsen Omma
On Fri, 2006-26-05 at 11:11 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Why reinvent the wheel a bazillion times just because something is Not
Invented Here[tm]?
Perhaps it should be a nice idea to start polishing other parts of the
interface during Edgy. There are lots of stuff that needs a lot of love
First can we start clipping QUOTES down to the minimum?
Fishing stinks.
On Fri, 2006-26-05 at 02:40 -0500, Billy wrote:
Choice is good business. Strangely, many include color in their choice
of whether to install or buy. If they knew they had a few choices, or
even one they wanted. They
Since we have indirectly gotten to the point before we probably
should have, let's just assume that we will be discussing
Motifs and such once we get a little more structure
for recording, commenting, and decision making in place.
It has begun, but it will take a little more time before we
can
Ubuntu-Art Edgy Planning Meeting*
*SATURDAY 4th June 22:00 UTC**
which is also
Saturday, 3 June 2006, 17:00:00 CDT
Saturday, 3 June 2006, 15:00:00 PDT
Sunday, 4 June 2006, 08:00:00EST
(see http://tinyurl.com/hlet5)
What are we going to accomplish there that we
On Fri, 2006-26-05 at 21:13 +0200, Michiel Sikma wrote:
I'm sure we all have time during weekends.
I sooo wish. And I am quite certain I am not alone.
Careers and life.
Which is exactly my point.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Étienne Bersac has done some great work
collecting the information on the
overall looks for 6.06 release of Ubuntu.
If anyone can find the time to follow his
lead and finish up the others, it would be
greatly appreciated. We will need these
sample pages to discuss future work, so it
is quite
101 - 200 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
