[Bug 1310671] [NEW] upgrade 13.10 - 14.04 keeps failing, failed to fetch

2014-04-21 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: I have tried to upgrade my laptop from 13,10 to 14.04 multiple times, but I always get the same error: W:Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_trusty_universe_binary-i386_Packages Hash Sum mismatch , E:Some index files

[Bug 1310671] Re: upgrade 13.10 - 14.04 keeps failing, failed to fetch

2014-04-21 Thread N7DR
You might also try switching mirrors. I admit I was skeptical, but switching from Main server to server for United States fixed the problem. I have no idea why. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1241454] Re: Problem installing tex-common on upgrade to 13.10

2013-11-14 Thread N7DR
See bug 1249649... apparently, according to the response there, it was this failure to install tex-common properly that led to a complete failure of the upgrade. At the end I was left with a system that had lost half the desktop information, had no sound, could not mount remote disks, and

[Bug 1241454] Re: Problem installing tex-common on upgrade to 13.10

2013-11-09 Thread N7DR
This is terrible. I use TeX to create almost all my written work. I shall now have to quickly decide on and switch to a different distruibution, since I simply cannot work without TeX. I can't imagine how this was allowed to happen; TeX is hardly obscure. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1249649] Re: upgrade aborts; installArchives() failed

2013-11-09 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: apt-clone_system_state.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1249649/+attachment/3904017/+files/apt-clone_system_state.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1249649] Re: upgrade aborts; installArchives() failed

2013-11-09 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: apt-term.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1249649/+attachment/3904018/+files/apt-term.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1249649] [NEW] upgrade aborts; installArchives() failed

2013-11-09 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Am attaching, as requested, the files in /var/log/dist-upgrade ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: apt.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249649/+attachment/3904016/+files/apt.log -- You

[Bug 1249649] Re: upgrade aborts; installArchives() failed

2013-11-09 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: term.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1249649/+attachment/3904022/+files/term.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1249649] Re: upgrade aborts; installArchives() failed

2013-11-09 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: main.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1249649/+attachment/3904021/+files/main.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1249649] Re: upgrade aborts; installArchives() failed

2013-11-09 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: history.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1249649/+attachment/3904019/+files/history.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1249649] Re: upgrade aborts; installArchives() failed

2013-11-09 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1249649/+attachment/3904020/+files/lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1249649] Re: upgrade aborts; installArchives() failed

2013-11-09 Thread N7DR
This failure occurred exactly 50% into an upgrade from 13.04 to 13.10 on a 64-bit kubuntu system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249649 Title: upgrade aborts; installArchives()

[Bug 990097] Re: package libswt-gtk-3-java 3.7.2-2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2012-05-18 Thread N7DR
I got this error while upgrading from oneiric to precise on my 64-bit principal desktop machine. As a result, I can't run eclipse... I don't know how to work around this, but I *need* eclipse in order to do work. I have /usr/share linked to /home/share. I don't understand why this makes any

[Bug 882789] Re: could not calculate the upgrade 11.04-11.10

2011-10-28 Thread N7DR
That worked. Thank you very much. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882789 Title: could not calculate the upgrade 11.04-11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 882789] [NEW] could not calculate the upgrade 11.04-11.10

2011-10-27 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: I can't upgrade because I get the message: E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks. I am not running a pre-release version. I am not upgrading to a pre-release version. As far as I know, there are no unofficial software packages on this machine. The error

[Bug 882789] Re: could not calculate the upgrade 11.04-11.10

2011-10-27 Thread N7DR
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882789 Title: could not calculate the upgrade 11.04-11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 882789] Re: could not calculate the upgrade 11.04-11.10

2011-10-27 Thread N7DR
Launchpad says: If you were upgrading to a new release of Ubuntu, it'd be quite helpful if you were to add the tag 'distribution-upgrade' to your bug report. Unfortunately, I don't see any kind of link that suggests a way to actually add the distribution-upgrade tag :-( -- You received this

[Bug 805261] Re: no audio from cwdaemon

2011-07-05 Thread N7DR
to continue to supply a kernel with OSS support -- see the lengthy complaints about bug #579300). 73 -- Doc, N7DR -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805261 Title: no audio from cwdaemon

[Bug 805261] [NEW] no audio from cwdaemon

2011-07-03 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: natty, 64-bit: There seems to be no way to obtain audio from cwdaemon. The following should work (I believe): 1. as root: cwdaemon -n -v 100 -x b 2. in another terminal: nc 127.0.0.1 6789 test [test is a file that contains text] When I do this no audio is heard. Indeed,

[Bug 805261] Re: no audio from cwdaemon

2011-07-03 Thread N7DR
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805261 Title: no audio from cwdaemon To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 383517] Re: system-config-printer-kde doesn't work

2011-05-31 Thread N7DR
I started getting this error following an upgrade from maverick to natty: [HN:~] systemsettings QInotifyFileSystemWatcherEngine::addPaths: inotify_add_watch failed: No such file or directory QFileSystemWatcher: failed to add paths: /home/n7dr/.config/ibus/bus [HN:~] Traceback (most recent

[Bug 411193] Re: wish: moving/copying photos in digikam should automatically rename the underlying file if necessary

2011-04-22 Thread N7DR
Why is this suddenly, nearly two years after filing, deemed invalid? A comment to explain the change of status would have been useful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to digikam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411193

[Bug 606652] Re: E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages.

2011-02-03 Thread N7DR
Just hit this bug when tryng to upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10, having previous upgraded from 8.04 and 9.10. That is 8.04-9.10-10.04 were successful. 10.04-10.10 hits this bug. The bug reporter software says to include the files in /var/log/dist- upgrade... but there are a lot of them. Which files

[Bug 711007] Re: eclipse C++ editor fails to open

2011-02-02 Thread N7DR
Replying to self, I did those three steps, and now I can at least see my C++ files. It remains to be seen if I've messed anything up, but at least I appear to be able to work again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 711007] Re: eclipse C++ editor fails to open

2011-02-01 Thread N7DR
Since the sed command didn't work, am I right in thinking that the following is more likely to fix the problem: 1. Uninstall the eclipse and eclipse-cdt packages 2. Remove my ~/.eclipse durectory 3. Installthe eclipse and eclipse-cdt packages If that is supposed to work, how much of importance

[Bug 711007] [NEW] eclipse C++ editor fails to open

2011-01-31 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eclipse Trying to edit any C++ files I get the message: Could not open the editor: No editor descriptor for id org.eclipse.cdt.ui.editor.CEditor I have a LOT of C++ files and I need either a fix or a workaround for this ASAP in order to do my work.

[Bug 711007] Re: eclipse C++ editor fails to open

2011-01-31 Thread N7DR
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711007 Title: eclipse C++ editor fails to open -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 711007] Re: eclipse C++ editor fails to open

2011-01-31 Thread N7DR
I'm not sure how to check that for certain... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633198 seems (more or less) just to point to http://bugs.debian.org/587657, which is a very long thread It probably is the cause of the problem, though, since this is an update, not a fresh install. However, executing

[Bug 639933] Re: 10.04 - 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades - Couldn't configure pre-depend x11-common for x11-xkb-utils, probably a dependency cycle.

2011-01-11 Thread N7DR
Maverick is now halfway through its cycle of being the latest Kubuntu... and this bug is still stopping us from upgrading production machines (for which unofficial workarounds that require removal of core packages are simply not an option). For months I've been trying to ignore people imploring us

[Bug 151093] Re: [Kubuntu] [amd64] text in Openoffice.org can't be pasted correctly with the middle mouse button

2010-12-15 Thread N7DR
1. Open Writer with a new document. 2. Type the word This. 3. Select the text by dragging with the left mouse button depressed. 4. Left-click after the word to place the cursor there. 5. Hit middle button. Nothing happens. That's the simplest possible copy-and-paste operation I can think of, and

[Bug 639933] Re: 10.04 - 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades - Couldn't configure pre-depend x11-common for x11-xkb-utils, probably a dependency cycle.

2010-12-02 Thread N7DR
It's now December. Is there any kind of estimate of when this is likely to be fixed? Surely there must be many people who never come here, and others like me who apply only official changes to their system, who are precluded from upgrading to lucid by this bug. -- You received this bug

[Bug 639933] Re: 10.04 - 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades - Couldn't configure pre-depend x11-common for x11-xkb-utils, probably a dependency cycle.

2010-10-18 Thread N7DR
Reply to #19: Sorry, I thought I would be automatically notified of any new comments (like kde-bugs) but it seems that commentators are not automatically subscribed here, so I only just saw your request. I just tried to upgrade again, and (of course) still hit the same bug. Attaching a

[Bug 639933] Re: 10.04 - 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades - Couldn't configure pre-depend x11-common for x11-xkb-utils, probably a dependency cycle.

2010-10-18 Thread N7DR
Attachment file /var/lib/dpkg/status. ** Attachment added: copy of /var/lib/dpkg/status https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/639933/+attachment/1700858/+files/attachment2.txt -- 10.04 - 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades - Couldn't configure pre-depend

[Bug 639933] Re: 10.04 - 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades - Couldn't configure pre-depend x11-common for x11-xkb-utils, probably a dependency cycle.

2010-10-13 Thread N7DR
I see that this is marked as Low importance. I can't imagine why. After four hours of downloading files to go from lucid to maverick today, following the official upgrade path as described at www.kubuntu.org, everything ground to a halt with this error. The lucid system, as recommended, was

[Bug 611485] [NEW] needs-packaging: sigil

2010-07-29 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Sigil is an epub editor offered under GPLv3 at: http://code.google.com/p/sigil/ calibre (which is already packaged) recommends using sigil to clean-up its epub conversion process. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags:

[Bug 542755] Re: pdfshuffler does not recognize all PDF files in directory

2010-07-15 Thread N7DR
That's exactly what I'm suggesting. If that isn't going to be implemented, then the wording of the dialogue should be changed. As a user, if I see a dialogue that tells me that it is offering to list PDF files then I expect it to... list the PDF files. I'm not sure that a few seconds of delay

[Bug 563079] Re: Eclpise freezes on startup

2010-06-30 Thread N7DR
I am getting this bug, starting this morning on 64-bit lucid. I did notice that xulrunner was updated in the updates today, and wonder if that's just a coincidence. In response to #13, how do I check that I'm using 64-bit Java (although it's hard to see how I could have that configured wrong;

[Bug 367495] Re: [intrepid]: no upgrade notification for jaunty received, manual attempt says nothing to upgrade

2010-03-23 Thread N7DR
I see that in karmic I don't ever get any kind of notification of updates: I have to manually start synaptic each day to see if any updates are available. So I have a bet with myself that when lucid comes out, I won't receive any kind of notification about that either. -- [intrepid]: no upgrade

[Bug 542755] [NEW] pdfshuffler does not recognize all PDF files in directory

2010-03-20 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pdfshuffler If one goes to import a PDF file, the dialogue lists only the files that happen to end in .pdf, regardless of whether: 1) those files really are PDF files 2) there are other PDF files in the directory that do not end in .pdf. The second bug

[Bug 542755] Re: pdfshuffler does not recognize all PDF files in directory

2010-03-20 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41422639/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41422640/XsessionErrors.txt -- pdfshuffler does not recognize all PDF files in directory

[Bug 537502] Re: gwibber crashes on startup

2010-03-18 Thread N7DR
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 427249 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427249 OK; although I note that that bug was fixed in November and I am running a fully up-to-date karmic and still see the crash. Presumably the fixed version simply hasn't been put into backports for some reason

[Bug 537502] Re: gwibber crashes on startup

2010-03-11 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: The error messages when gwibber is started http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40811000/gwibber.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40810319/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt

[Bug 537502] [NEW] gwibber crashes on startup

2010-03-11 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gwibber When I try to start gwibber, it crashes every time. I'm attaching the output from the console (for some reason, I can't simply cut-and paste the text into this report). ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 11 10:36:25 2010

[Bug 409044] Re: kcertpart displays incorrect subject and issuer information

2010-02-23 Thread N7DR
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 334191 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334191 Remember, this bug report is a duplicate of bug #334191. Comment here only if you think the duplicate status is wrong. Bug #334191 seems to be explicitly talking about operational failures in SSL certs.

[Bug 367495] Re: [intrepid]: no upgrade notification for jaunty received, manual attempt says nothing to upgrade

2010-02-01 Thread N7DR
I can't remember with any certainty. If you'd asked soon after 9.10 came out, I'm sure I could have told you then, but now it's all a vague haze. -- [intrepid]: no upgrade notification for jaunty received, manual attempt says nothing to upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367495 You

[Bug 511676] [NEW] unixcw sends incorrect characters

2010-01-23 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unixcw The unixcw program sends incorrect characters at the default speed (12 wpm). Starting the program simply with the command cw (i.e., with no parameters), the program generates CW sounds, but the sounds do not match the characters typed on the

[Bug 511676] Re: unixcw sends incorrect characters

2010-01-23 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38310016/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38310017/XsessionErrors.txt -- unixcw sends incorrect characters https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511676 You received this

[Bug 511677] [NEW] at speeds higher than the deafult, unixcw just sends long tones

2010-01-23 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unixcw If one starts the cw program at speeds higher than the default (say, with cw -w 30), then no matter what character is typed, the program simply generates a longish tone, instead of dits and dahs. The duration of the tone varies slightly from

[Bug 511677] Re: at speeds higher than the deafult, unixcw just sends long tones

2010-01-23 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38310129/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38310130/XsessionErrors.txt -- at speeds higher than the deafult, unixcw just sends long tones

[Bug 511677] Re: at speeds higher than the deafult, unixcw just sends long tones

2010-01-23 Thread N7DR
It seems that this is probably a different manifestation of the same bug as #511676. Starting the program as cw -w 12 (the default speed) and typing T, one gets the sound, as reported in bug #511676, that is similar to an R. Starting cw at 20 wpm, the sound for any character is more like an N,

[Bug 488911] Re: needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)

2009-11-29 Thread N7DR
OK. Has the person who set that policy actually tried to develop C++ code on karmic? I'll have to go find a distro that supports developers, I guess :-( I don't have time to waste on silliness. I have to produce working code. -- needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)

[Bug 488911] Re: needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)

2009-11-29 Thread N7DR
For some rather odd value of the word fine, yes, they do. Not really relevant to trying to support large projects for server code though, which was the point of my original report. I'm still not sure why this policy has been applied to kdevelop when a quick review of the official repositories

[Bug 488911] [NEW] needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)

2009-11-26 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdevelop Canonical seems to have chosen to supply kdevelop4 without any option to install kdevelop3. This seems to be a grave mistake, for at least the following reasons: 1. kdevelop3 is a released stable product; kdevelop4 is in beta 2. There is no

[Bug 482921] Re: Attempt to access kdevelop handbook fails with error

2009-11-15 Thread N7DR
Then it seems to me that the bug is that there is a menu item that says there is documentation. That menu item should surely not exist. -- Attempt to access kdevelop handbook fails with error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482921 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 482921] [NEW] Attempt to access kdevelop handbook fails with error

2009-11-14 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdevelop Attempting to open the kdevelop handbook from the kdevelop Help menu produces the error: the file or folder help:/kdevelop/index.html does not exist It seems like some documentation package that should be installed along with kdevelop is

[Bug 482921] Re: Attempt to access kdevelop handbook fails with error

2009-11-14 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35706032/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35706033/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35706034/ProcStatus.txt -- Attempt to

[Bug 446131] Re: Eclipse doesn't open my C++ files

2009-11-14 Thread N7DR
Can someone provide detailed, step-by-step instructions as to how to get CDT installed properly in karmic? I tried and got this: Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not be found. Software being installed: Mylyn Bridge: C/C++ Development

[Bug 480291] [NEW] unable to access jaunty eclipse projects

2009-11-10 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eclipse I have a project that I was working on with eclipse under jaunty kubuntu. Now that I've upgraded to karmic, I can't find any way to access the project. The Open Project menu option is greyed out; the import feature doesn't seem to do anything

[Bug 480291] Re: unable to access jaunty eclipse projects

2009-11-10 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35499330/XsessionErrors.txt -- unable to access jaunty eclipse projects https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 328324] Re: [needs-packaging] webmin

2009-11-09 Thread N7DR
karmic released; still no webmin :-( -- [needs-packaging] webmin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 252476] Re: [needs-packaging] OpenFire - Jabber XMPP Chat Server for real-time collaboration (RTC)

2009-11-09 Thread N7DR
karmic released... still no openfire :-( :-( -- [needs-packaging] OpenFire - Jabber XMPP Chat Server for real-time collaboration (RTC) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252476 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 305629] Re: [needs-packaging] gltail

2009-11-09 Thread N7DR
karmic released; still no gltail :-( -- [needs-packaging] gltail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 479724] [NEW] krecipies help says The file or folder help:/krecipes/index.html does not exist

2009-11-09 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdebase-runtime karmic: When clicking krecipes Help | Krecipes Handbook,the user simply gets a message saying: The file or folder help:/krecipes/index.html does not exist. So it looks like some documentation package isn't being installed correctly when

[Bug 479724] Re: krecipies help says The file or folder help:/krecipes/index.html does not exist

2009-11-09 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35451242/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35451243/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35451244/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 178038] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-11-01 Thread N7DR
Running amd64 jaunty just upgraded to karmic yesterday. I am now seeing this bug. -- npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 187191] Re: [needs-packaging] meshlab

2009-11-01 Thread N7DR
:-( -- [needs-packaging] meshlab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 172436] Re: gutsy: kontact will not include weather in summary

2009-10-16 Thread N7DR
What information? I answered your question nearly a year ago. You asked if it was reproducible in 8.10 and I said that it was even worse. What information did I not give you? -- gutsy: kontact will not include weather in summary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172436 You received this bug

[Bug 172436] Re: gutsy: kontact will not include weather in summary

2009-10-16 Thread N7DR
I'll try to remember to check karmic. Jaunty, like hardy, doesn't even have the option :-( -- gutsy: kontact will not include weather in summary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdetoys in

[Bug 415596] Re: gscan2pdf will not accept / character in saved filename

2009-10-15 Thread N7DR
Now the middle of October, and still waiting for a response explaining why this bug is still marked Invalid :-( It seems rather rude not to explain to the submitter why an action such as this has been taken. It essentially says to the submitter: You're an idiot and it's not worth our time to

[Bug 253286] Re: kdevelop project was broken when going to 8.10

2009-09-27 Thread N7DR
Is this fixed in karmic? I'm quite amazed that a problem like this wasn't assigned a high priority to get fixed. That it's still present in a fully up-to-date jaunty installation a year after the initial report is very discouraging. -- kdevelop project was broken when going to 8.10

[Bug 415596] Re: gscan2pdf will not accept / character in saved filename

2009-09-18 Thread N7DR
Still awaiting a clear explanation of the point you were trying to make regarding why this bug has been marked Invalid... :-( -- gscan2pdf will not accept / character in saved filename https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415596 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 151093] Re: [Kubuntu] [amd64] text in Openoffice.org can't be pasted correctly with the middle mouse button

2009-08-27 Thread N7DR
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 311251 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311251 How can this possibly be a duplicate of 311251??? 311251 explicitly is talking about klipper. We have known for nearly a year that this bug is present regardless of klipper's presence. I'm sorry, but I

[Bug 415596] Re: gscan2pdf will not accept / character in saved filename

2009-08-26 Thread N7DR
Perhaps I misunderstood what your point was... I thought you were saying that other file managers wouldn't accept a /, and that therefore this was not a bug. So when I produced a simple counter-example of an app using / in a filename, I thought that meant that this would be re-classified as a

[Bug 151093] Re: [Kubuntu] [amd64] text in Openoffice.org can't be pasted correctly with the middle mouse button

2009-08-25 Thread N7DR
FYI, my comment #11 is still true in jaunty. (Actually, I don't use klipper at all any more.) -- [Kubuntu] [amd64] text in Openoffice.org can't be pasted correctly with the middle mouse button https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 415596] Re: gscan2pdf will not accept / character in saved filename

2009-08-19 Thread N7DR
try doing so with any other application or file manager Sure... 1. Open Konqueror. 2. go to /tmp 3. Create New Text File 4. Call the file a/b 5. The file is created. You seem to be suggesting that this should have failed, but it doesn't. -- gscan2pdf will not accept / character in saved

[Bug 415596] [NEW] gscan2pdf will not accept / character in saved filename

2009-08-18 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gscan2pdf Running Kubuntu 64-bit jaunty, gscan2pdf 0.9.27 If one puts a / in the filename when trying to save a scan, then one receives a complaint about a nonexistent directory. ** Affects: gscan2pdf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 411193] [NEW] wish: moving/copying photos in digikam should automatically rename the underlying file if necessary

2009-08-09 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: digikam 64-bit Kubuntu jaunty; digikam 0.10.0. It is far too hard to organize one's pictures in digikam if one uses multiple cameras. The root of the problem lies in the fact that each camera will independently name its image files. So if one imports

[Bug 409044] [NEW] kcertpart displays incorrect subject and issuer information

2009-08-04 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Whenever I display a cert in konqueror using the kcertpart, it displays completely erroneous information for the subject and issuer. It always says that both the subject and the issuer are for a (fictional, I assume) Canadian company, as shown on the attached screenshot. **

[Bug 409044] Re: kcertpart displays incorrect subject and issuer information

2009-08-04 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: screenshot showing the problem http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29907445/cert-1.png -- kcertpart displays incorrect subject and issuer information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409044 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 345672] Re: Okular epub support missing

2009-07-31 Thread N7DR
It seems like something like the extra package you suggest would be a great idea. Right now, it's very confusing to the end-user not to be able to view particular formats in okular when people on other distros can do so. Also, at least for this particular format, it's hard to believe that more

[Bug 345672] Re: Okular epub support missing

2009-06-02 Thread N7DR
I am unclear about the resolution of this. Has it been resolved: 1) simply by no longer advertising epub support? or 2) actually including epub support? If the former, I guess I'll file another bug, specifically requesting epub support, but I don't want to do that if this bug has been resolved

[Bug 375746] [NEW] [jaunty]: wish: consider backporting more recent version of calibre; current version is rather out of date

2009-05-12 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: calibre The calibre package for jaunty installs version 0.4.143, but the current version at http://calibre.kovidgoyal.net/download_linux is 0.5.11, which has a considerable number of changes from the jaunty version. 0.5.11 is in karmic. ** Affects:

[Bug 151093] Re: [Kubuntu] [amd64] text in Openoffice.org can't be pasted correctly with the middle mouse button

2009-05-05 Thread N7DR
Set back to New (per comment on 090228). This problem still exists in the official jaunty release. ** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- [Kubuntu] [amd64] text in Openoffice.org can't be pasted correctly with the middle mouse button

[Bug 367495] Re: [intrepid]: no upgrade notification for jaunty received, manual attempt says nothing to upgrade

2009-04-29 Thread N7DR
Yes, I am aware of the workaround. However, I figure that for every person who knows enough to do that, or to come here to file a bug report, there are probably hundreds or thousands of ordinary users who are seeing the same bug and don't know what to do about it, so I think it is still important

[Bug 367495] Re: [intrepid]: no upgrade notification for jaunty received, manual attempt says nothing to upgrade

2009-04-28 Thread N7DR
Naïvely thinking out loud here (which is probably not welcome, but I'm not happy at not being able to upgrade and I want to try to move this along)... It seems to me that some condition is tested to determine whether the upgrade notification is displayed. For some reason that condition appears to

[Bug 177805] Re: Scribus does not work with accented characters when writing into a text box

2009-04-27 Thread N7DR
FWIW, this problem does not seem to exist with 64 bit Kubuntu intrepid using the scribus-ng package. When I enter accented characters, they appear as expected. -- Scribus does not work with accented characters when writing into a text box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177805 You received this

[Bug 367495] Re: [intrepid]: no upgrade notification for jaunty received, manual attempt says nothing to upgrade

2009-04-27 Thread N7DR
Additional info that may or may not be relevant: The day of the jaunty release was the first time that I had used this computer in a couple of months. It did download something like 100+MB of updates (to intrepid) that had accumulated since I last used it. -- [intrepid]: no upgrade notification

[Bug 367495] Re: [intrepid]: no upgrade notification for jaunty received, manual attempt says nothing to upgrade

2009-04-27 Thread N7DR
I am out of ideas as to how to convince the system that intrepid is online upgradeable to jaunty. Someone had suggested reinstalling update-notifier-kde. I tried that but it made no difference (which makes sense, since I think it's just doing its job: reporting correctly that as far as the system

[Bug 367495] [NEW] [intrepid]: no upgrade notification for jaunty received, manual attempt says nothing to upgrade

2009-04-26 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Running 32-bit Kubuntu 8.10; extremely vanilla; no unofficial packages or repositories. No notification that a new version (9.04) has appeared. Following the instructions at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/JauntyUpgrades/Kubuntu, running update-notifier-kde -u simply

[Bug 367495] Re: [intrepid]: no upgrade notification for jaunty received, manual attempt says nothing to upgrade

2009-04-26 Thread N7DR
n...@n7dr-laptop:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 Codename: intrepid n...@n7dr-laptop:~$ -- [intrepid]: no upgrade notification for jaunty received, manual attempt says nothing to upgrade https

[Bug 307617] Re: No shortcut was placed on the menu after installing krecipes using apt-get install.

2009-04-21 Thread N7DR
It's more than OK with me. It's fantastic that someone's going to look into fixing the crash. Thank you very much. And I hope that finals go well. -- No shortcut was placed on the menu after installing krecipes using apt-get install. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307617 You received this bug

[Bug 307617] Re: No shortcut was placed on the menu after installing krecipes using apt-get install.

2009-04-21 Thread N7DR
Marlin: you might want to add that comment to bug 278415 as well (that's the report about the crash). Basically, it sounds like this package is in exactly the same (unusable) state it was in in intrepid :-( -- No shortcut was placed on the menu after installing krecipes using apt-get install.

[Bug 300323] Re: look and behaviour of scrollbars in Thunderbird are messed up

2009-04-20 Thread N7DR
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 211578 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211578 Not only does the duplicate status seem suspect, but the duplicate is now marked as INVALID. That sort-of suggests to me that this bug has entered some kind of black hole where it's not going to be

[Bug 180184] Re: keyserver.ubuntu.com does not seem to synchronize with other important keyservers (MIT in particular)

2009-04-09 Thread N7DR
This bug persists. Just a few days ago, there was an e-mail on the official Kubuntu-users reflector (message gra4j5$iv...@ger.gmane.org) telling someone to get key 9423A34CCA967634 from keyserver.ubuntu.com. A search on pgp.mit.edu indicates that that key has not been propagated to the

[Bug 357128] [NEW] add openfire package

2009-04-07 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: The openfire collaboration server (http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/openfire/index.jsp) is GPL, and reports on slashdot (http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/06/2243202) are that it is an excellent jabber server. It seems like a package should be included with

[Bug 174298] Re: font system mishandles Latin Modern fonts

2009-03-25 Thread N7DR
It'll be my turn to make the same comment for karmic. LM is a simply wonderful font family. I've published several books using it. I'm surprised that no one else seems to care that it can't be used in OOo. -- font system mishandles Latin Modern fonts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174298 You

[Bug 332750] Re: unable to install kdeplasma-addons (unmet dependency)

2009-02-23 Thread N7DR
Is this invalid because it's a problem with backports rather than an official repository??? Please, someone just tell me the reason so I don't have to guess. (And if that is the reason, then I'll know in future not to include backports on a production machine.) -- unable to install

[Bug 332750] Re: unable to install kdeplasma-addons (unmet dependency)

2009-02-22 Thread N7DR
Please, why is this marked INVALID? The error I receive following the update is exactly as I quoted; synaptic won't let me install kdeplasma-addons, without which lots of plasmoids are unavailable. What about that is invalid? -- unable to install kdeplasma-addons (unmet dependency)

[Bug 303522] Re: there should be a way to install all debug libraries easily

2009-02-22 Thread N7DR
Yes, I know how to do it. My principal point, though, is that in general one doesn't bother installing debug symbols for a particular application until after one's had a crash -- which is too late. The ideal time to make the decision to install debug libraries would be during system installation.

[Bug 332564] [NEW] package kdebase-runtime-dbg 4:4.1.4-0ubuntu1~intrepid1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libkdeinit4_kwalletd.so', which is also in package kdel

2009-02-21 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdebase-runtime Running regular (daily) update I just received the error in the summary. It says that extra information will be appended automatically to this report. ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage:

  1   2   3   >