Re: [Desktop13.04-Topic] GNOME plans review

developers. Shipping an outdated > GNOME means that we have a much less compelling story to tell these > developers. > > Jeremy > Whatever happens I think its important to maintain compatibility between Unity and Gnome-shell. It would be terrible to end up back where we were at 18months

Re: blueprint to organize GNOME 3.8 in Ubuntu

challenged here and would only be able to make (probably at a stretch) first or last session of the day. Jeremy is away currently, and unlikely to make the session, but will try if he can. Tim On 08/05/13 21:56, Iain Lane wrote: Hiya, On Tue, Apr 23, 2013

Re: GNOME 3.9 coming to PPA?

On 18/05/13 01:43, Adam Dingle wrote: Ubuntu has started lagging one release behind GNOME, which makes things a little tricky for people like me who want to build and run the latest versions (i.e. git master) of various GNOME apps. You should pro

Re: GNOME 3.9 coming to PPA?

On 18/05/13 18:47, Adam Dingle wrote: On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Tim wrote: On 18/05/13 01:43, Adam Dingle wrote: Ubuntu has started lagging one release behind GNOME

Re: GNOME 3.9 coming to PPA?

On 18/05/13 19:09, Adam Dingle wrote: On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Tim wrote: On 18/05/13 18:47, Adam Dingle wrote: On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Tim

Re: cp: cannot stat ‘/module-files.d/libpango1.0-0.modules’: No such file or directory

gnome-team ppa's only) The gnome3 PPA should be pretty stable, gnome3-staging on the other hand is definitely use at your own risk! Tim -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop

Call for testing - gnome-settings-daemon 3.8

kages from ppa:darkxst/gsd38 and let me know if you have any issues! Thanks Tim -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop

Re: Call for testing - gnome-settings-daemon 3.8

On 24/08/13 01:08, Nik Th wrote:     - Original Message - From: Tim Sent: 08/23/13 01:48 PM To: ubuntu-desktop

Re: Staying on GTK/GNOME 3.8 next cycle/for the LTS?

ibraries in Saucy did get updated to 3.10 versions, however there are packages we simply can't package on the PPA's such as glib, gvfs, cogl/clutter etc due the massive list of rdepends. Right now we have had to revert a huge number of patches just to get gnome-shell 3.10 running on Sa

Re: Staying on GTK/GNOME 3.8 next cycle/for the LTS?

On 02/10/13 19:21, Adam Dingle wrote: On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Le 01/10/2013 21:16, Adam Dingle a écrit : I've used Ubuntu every day for 7 years and am active in the GN

Re: Staying on GTK/GNOME 3.8 next cycle/for the LTS?

On 02/10/13 20:50, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le 02/10/2013 12:31, Tim a écrit : >> I am however concerned how this will all pan out if it does indeed end up >> being a 2 cycle delay. From which I can see it sliding further >> downhill as time progresses, until Ubuntu

Re: Some desktop updates for this cycle

r. We still need to look more > into details on how we can do that only out of gnome-shell sessions. > > > That's mostly it for this cycle I think, let us know if you have any question > or comment from Ubuntu GNOME perspective we would like to see - update cogl/clutter to atlea

Re: Some desktop updates for this cycle

On 06/11/13 18:31, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le 06/11/2013 07:46, Tim a écrit : >>> We are still looking at updating the patches to have a build of the new >>> version to test (that works is going to be useful, even if that's not >>> this cycle). Then we ex

Re: Epiphany 3.10 landed sans title bar

On 22/12/13 08:51, Iain Lane wrote: On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 08:26:24PM -0005, Adam Dingle wrote: I noticed that Epiphany 3.10.3 just landed in Trusty. It uses a GtkHeaderBar, so it has no title bar and looks pretty out of place on the Ubuntu desktop.

Re: Epiphany 3.10 landed sans title bar

On 22/12/13 10:36, Tim wrote: On 22/12/13 08:51, Iain Lane wrote: On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 08:26:24PM -0005, Adam Dingle wrote: I noticed that Epiphany 3.10.3 just landed in Trusty. It uses a GtkHeaderBar, so it has no title bar and looks pretty out of place on the Ubuntu desktop. I thought

Re: Epiphany 3.10 landed sans title bar

On 23/12/13 09:53, Marco Trevisan wrote: > What about patching gtk itself so that GtkHeaderBar is rendered in a > different way here? A number of apps (epiphany, nautilus etc) in 3.10 weren't fully ported to GtkHeaderBar, ie they are adding their own close button etc. I don't think upstream will

Re: Epiphany 3.10 landed sans title bar

f you wanted. Will make a merge proposal soon. - Text labels in headerbars look bad (i.e. the channel name in Polari) Needs investigating. - Close button should be hidden for maximized windows Should be fixable by patching Gtk — looks like Tim is going to look at that. I am looking

Re: Epiphany 3.10 landed sans title bar

On 24/12/13 19:45, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Adam Dingle wrote: >> At that point, will unpatched apps that use GtkHeaderBar automatically have >> a dark (in Ambiance) titlebar containing the application name and >> close/minimize/maximize buttons? Or will they loo

[Call for testing] gnome-desktop 3.10

rol-center if the resolution is changed directly by Xrandr. Please test and let me know if you spot any bugs. ppa:darkxst/gnome-desktop Thanks Tim -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop

Re: [Call for testing] gnome-desktop 3.10

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey Laney,    Thanks for testing On 19/02/14 04:39, Iain Lane wrote: > Hiya, > > Thanks for the work here. > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 07:07:22PM +1100, Tim wrote:

Re: Shotwell issue in GNOME flavor(s) of Ubuntu

ecks to determine wether to use UOA or GOA. Unfortunately this wasnt included in the shotwell patches and of course shotwell doesn't even use GOA but the principle is the same. Tim Ubuntu GNOME > > If I have any of the above wrong, please let me know. > > This is a rather nas

Re: A small bug with power management in Ubuntu Desktop

On 02/06/14 03:23, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > I think that is still the case on 14.10 daily. I would suspect either upower > or systemd (it's blurry IIRC as systemd wants to handle suspend > stuff nowadays AFAIK). Suspend action is handled by unity-settings-daemon > > Thanks > ZK > > > On Sun, Jun

Re: GTK 3.12 coming to Utopic?

On 27/06/14 17:28, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le 26/06/2014 22:36, Adam Dingle a écrit : >> Right. On that note, I've noticed that all the GNOME desktop apps in >> Utopic (e.g. gedit, Nautilus, Epiphany) are still at version 3.10. Do >> you plan to upgrade these applications to their 3.12 version

Re: Client-side decorations and button layout

On 08/10/14 22:13, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently on Unity the apps using client-side decorations (aka > headerbars) have Close button on the right side, which is inconsistent > with all other apps. A good example of such app is gnome-weather. Aren't there bigger issues right now l

Re: Client-side decorations and button layout

On 08/10/14 22:35, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Tim wrote: >> On 08/10/14 22:13, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Currently on Unity the apps using client-side decorations (aka >>> headerbars) have Close bu

Re: GTK 3.14 coming to Vivid?

Hi Adam, Yes it is coming, seems there is only one remaining issue [1], that needs to be fixed before it can be uploaded, so it shouldn't be too far off. Most if not all 3.14 apps should also be coming to Vivid. Tim Ubuntu GNOME [1] http://pad.ubuntu.com/gtk-update-v On 07/12/14 00:01,

Re: [PATCH] Re: Recovering bogofilter in Evo... how can we do it?

On 15/01/15 06:48, Paul Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 09:27 +, Iain Lane wrote: >> Which means, unless I'm mistaken (I only looked briefly), that someone >> so interested could submit a patch to Evolution, preferably upstream, >> to move the check from build to runtime. > I took a look

Re: Call for testing: GTK 3.15.4

On 07/02/15 04:22, Iain Lane wrote: > Desktop fans, > > We're thinking about having the released version of GTK3 in 15.04 be > 3.16, which is the current in-development version to be released towards > the end of March. Hi Laney, While I am in favour of this happening, currently things are not

Re: Call for testing: GTK 3.15.4

On 08/02/15 23:09, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:02:52 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >> * All non-CSD windows have a white border around the window (but not >> its top part). See the attached gnome-terminal screenshot for example. > Forgot the screenshot, it is here: >

Re: Drop Ubuntu Software Centre and Adopt GNOME Software

On 01/08/15 02:50, Iain Lane wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 08:13:39PM +0300, Amr Ibrahim wrote: >> Dear developers, >> >> USC is getting old. It is in Python 2, and probably will never be ported to >> Python 3. >> >> I suggest dropping USC in future Ubuntu releases and adopt GNOME Software. >

ubuntu-desktop membership

on many of these shared packages. My Application, with endorsements is below https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TimLunn/DesktopApplication Thanks Tim -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop

Re: Drop Ubuntu Software Centre and Adopt GNOME Software

On 12/08/15 07:56, Robert Ancell wrote: > For us to use GNOME Software we probably want to update to the latest version > [1]. That's currently blocked because it needs PackageKit 1.0 > [2]. And that's blocked until we get a Click update. If anyone knows more > migration issues please add infor

Re: Let's start discussing Ubuntu&GNOME work during today's meeting

Hey Seb, I can't make today's meeting but will endeavor to follow up on any emails. I assume jbicha will be there though. Looking forward to the more formal meeting, which hopefully can be at a slightly better time slot than the normal desktop meetings for me;) Tim PS my exodu

Re: lightdm or gdm?

On 20/04/17 00:32, Sebastien Bacher wrote: - gnome-shell uses gdm for its lockscreen so work is needed to make it work with lightdm That is not entirely right, the GUI for gdm is actually a cut-down gnome-shell session, this applies to both lock screen and greeter. gdm does however handle all

Re: Nautilus 3.24 and dropping type-ahead search, adding tracker

On 21/04/17 08:50, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Hey Jeremy, thanks for the reply, Le 20/04/2017 à 16:11, Jeremy Bicha a écrit : 3. Several GNOME apps depend on tracker. If you don't have them in the default install, many users will install at least one of them anyway. Bijiben, Boxes, Documents, Ga

Re: lightdm or gdm?

On 22/04/17 08:03, Jeremy Bicha wrote: Is their a process I can kill from a user session to break the lock? loginctl list-sessions # Find the session you are using. If the session is named '2', run loginctl unlock-session 2 that will only work if you are logged in as the user that owns the se

Re: Default App: GNOME Contacts

On 08/08/17 17:09, Khurshid Alam wrote: Hi, On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Robert Ancell wrote: gnome-contacts is an address book and is part of the core GNOME apps. It has all dependencies in main except for folks (which used to be in main). While this seems to work well in managing

Re: Need some assistance...

On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 22:12 -0500, Kevin Stagg wrote: > I have an old HP Pavillion ze5200 (512MB RAM - Pentium 4) with Windows > XP wasting space in my office. I set up a virtual server on my home > machine for the latest Ubuntu OS and am loving it. So I'm thinking I > want to reformat the HP, wipi

Re: Gthumb as default image viewer?

On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 10:12 +0100, Rick Spencer wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:04 -0400, Andrew SB wrote: > > I think you touch on the real issue here. It's not so much a problem > > with viewing photos, as we all have noted there are already two > > options, EOG when you are in a folder and F-

Re: Gthumb as default image viewer?

On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 00:00 +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > Le vendredi 03 juillet 2009 à 06:59 -0700, Tim Zakharov a écrit : > > I think it's worth mentioning again, but slightly off-topic, that we > > really need in F-Spot, to uncheck "Copy files to the Photos

Re: [Ayatana-dev] autolanding of unity and linked components branches ready and activated!

ones though, as the prereq stays even if it is merged. All that happens there is the merging of the prereq into trunk becomes a no-op for the diff generation. Tim -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop