Hello
On 29 May 2015 04:30:46 Junling Zheng zhengjunl...@huawei.com wrote:
On 2015/5/29 10:08, Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 09:58:31AM +0800, Junling Zheng wrote:
On 2015/5/29 3:27, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 28 May 2015 at 04:00, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 04 settembre 2014 00:01:38 Waldemar Brodkorb w...@openadk.org ha scritto:
Hi Carmelo,
Hello,
Carmelo Amoroso wrote,
Hi,
I don't think clone on arm is missing RESET_PID if you use the
correct implementation from
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/clone.S.
Can you explain
Il 04 settembre 2014 22:32:01 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com ha scritto:
On 4 September 2014 19:32, Carmelo Amoroso carmel...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 04 settembre 2014 00:01:38 Waldemar Brodkorb w...@openadk.org ha
scritto:
Hi Carmelo,
Hello,
Carmelo Amoroso wrote
Hi,
I don't think clone on arm is missing RESET_PID if you use the correct
implementation from libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/clone.S.
Cheers
Carmelo
Inviato con AquaMail per Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
Il 02 settembre 2014 14:12:24 Wangyufen wangyu...@huawei.com ha
Hello,
we were using prelink on SH4 platform w/o problems (we implemented this
support @ST).
I will try as soon as some bandwidth how it's behaving on our platform
and let you know.
Regards,
Carmelo
On 7/31/2014 2:52 PM, Yann Sionneau wrote:
Hello,
I'm bumping this topic, no one is
Il 24 luglio 2014 23:05:34 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com ha scritto:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:20:51PM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Il 23 luglio 2014 13:42:38 Jody Bruchon j...@jodybruchon.com ha
Il 23 luglio 2014 13:42:38 Jody Bruchon j...@jodybruchon.com ha scritto:
On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: I would like to add my
support to Thomas' position.
Regardless of what happens with glibc and/or musl, an active community
supporting regular releases of uClibc is a good
Hello Alexey,
I guess you sent it to the wrong list.
You need to send to buildroot team.
Regards,
Carmelo
On 7/11/2014 6:31 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
Due to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id= it's impossible
to specify custom CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET, it is always gets overriden with
Il 20 aprile 2014 18:34:26 Yann E. MORIN yann.morin.1...@free.fr ha
scritto:
Hello!
Hello,
While building postgresql with uClibc, we have locales-related build
failures. Here is a small test-case (by Peter) that breaks on uClibc,
but works on glibc:
---8--- test.c ---8---
Hi Nicolas,
On 10/30/2013 7:10 PM, Nicolas Sauzede wrote:
Hi Rich,
Thanks for your answer.
In fact, my 'abort' example was just to demonstrate the weak issue
scenario.
We are indeed facing this issue with a lot of other symbols duplication
when
repurposing the uclibc as a semihosting lib c for
Hello
Il 14 ottobre 2013 18:43:34 Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com ha scritto:
I am new to building uclibc, but have experience building glibc and newlib,
and I have a question about the best way to build multiple versions of uclibc
from a script without any user interaction.
Currently, I run
Thanks Khem
Good idea ... Already registered ... Now we must respin review and release
process.
Carmelo
Inviato con AquaMail per Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
Il 24 settembre 2013 03:03:49 Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Hi All,
ozlabs has kindly added uclibc project mailing
Il 20 settembre 2013 08:41:25 Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx ha scritto:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Dear Khem Raj,
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
It'd be really nice if uClibc adopted a slightly more frequent
release schedule,
Hi
Il 20 settembre 2013 11:37:47 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com ha scritto:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Dear Khem Raj,
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:11:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
It'd
On 9/17/2013 8:38 AM, neutrino network wrote:
hi,
gcc 4.3.3
ncurses 5.7
I am trying to build(cross compiling for mips) ncurses using a uclibc toolchain
but it gives following error;
lib64\libc.a(nsswitch.o): (.data.rel+0x18):undefined reference to
'_nss_files_endaliasent'
are you sure you
already existing.
CFLAGS-OMIT is a construct already used in several other places in uclibc
but only applicable at directory level. This patch just extend it to file.
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
Signed-off-by: Filippo Arcidiacono filippo.arcidiac...@st.com
Il 18 settembre 2013 06:49:44 Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com ha scritto:
Dear uClibc developers,
Hi Thomas
The last release of uClibc, 0.9.33.2, has been made well over a year
ago. However, there is fairly big number of improvements/fixes in the
master branch that
Il 08 agosto 2013 23:08:41 Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com hai scritto:
Hi guys,
I recently noticed I can't compile oprofile tool when using uClibc
instead of the glibc. The problem is uClibc doesn't have
AT_BASE_PLATFORM defined in the elf.h
Hum... Why should oprofile use this macro ?
It
as it is already there. Or we end up corrupting the linked
list and further dlsym lookups will hang.
Signed-off-by: Timo Teräs timo.te...@iki.fi
Acked-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
Cheers,
Carmelo
---
ldso/libdl/libdl.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5
: Carmelo Amoroso [mailto:carmel...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2013年6月5日星期三 12:26
收件人: Zhang Yu
抄送: uclibc@uclibc.org
主题: Re: arm_gcc-3.4.6_uClibc-0.9.28 -
arm_v7-a_gcc-4.5-linaro_uClibc-0.9.32. compile error
Il giorno 05/giu/2013 05:04, Zhang Yu zhang...@oki.com ha scritto:
uclibc
Patch from Filippo already available. Commit soon.
Thanks
Carmelo
Il giorno 26/mag/2013 19:05, Eugene Rudoy gene.de...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Dear all,
71c10c484e7dc113396cccb7e503befb759c6346 broke libubacktrace.so in that
way that it doesn't contain backtrace symbol anymore.
The attached
Il giorno 20/mag/2013 14:38, Filippo ARCIDIACONO
filippo.arcidiac...@st.com ha scritto:
On 5/19/2013 7:08 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 14 December 2012 05:40:05 Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
--- a/libc/misc/elf/dl-support.c
+++ b/libc/misc/elf/dl-support.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ void
Il giorno 19/mag/2013 07:08, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org ha
scritto:
On Friday 14 December 2012 05:40:05 Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
--- a/libc/misc/elf/dl-support.c
+++ b/libc/misc/elf/dl-support.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ void (*_dl_init_static_tls) (struct link_map *) =
A post commit dic will come sono. Apologies.
Carmelo
Il giorno 13/mag/2013 10:24, Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com ha
scritto:
commit:
http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=71c10c484e7dc113396cccb7e503befb759c6346
branch: http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=refs/heads/master
Il giorno 13/mag/2013 13:59, Carmelo Amoroso carmel...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
A post commit dic will come sono.
Top many typos ... Meant to sa
A post commit fix will come sono
Apologies.
Carmelo
Il giorno 13/mag/2013 10:24, Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
ha scritto:
commit:
http
Andy
I'll commit fixes forma backtrace with static applications tomorrow.
Thanks forma tour patience
Carmelo
Il giorno 08/mag/2013 21:24, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com ha
scritto:
Attempting to backtrace in a simple helloworld app. For the simple app,
we are just using the source of
Il giorno 08/mag/2013 22:33, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com ha
scritto:
-Original Message-
From: Carmelo Amoroso [mailto:carmel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 2:36 PM
To: ANDY KENNEDY
Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: Re: Troubleshooting statically built
Hello Filippo
Please post the patch so i'll push int.
Carmelo
Il giorno 29/apr/2013 10:04, Filippo ARCIDIACONO
filippo.arcidiac...@st.com ha scritto:
On 4/26/2013 4:51 PM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
From: Filippo ARCIDIACONO
[mailto:filippo.arcidiacono@**st.comfilippo.arcidiac...@st.com
]
On
On 26/04/2013 5.30, ANDY KENNEDY wrote:
I'm attempting to link static an app that contains backtrace. I
set LDFLAGS to -lubacktrace -ldl and I get a viable file which
does run. The app crashes. During the call to backtrace, I get
an error:
libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for backtrace to
On 15/03/2013 17.15, Ramesh Rangavittal wrote:
From: Sergei Poselenov [sposele...@emcraft.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 1:50 AM
To: Ramesh Rangavittal
Cc: uclibc@uclibc.org
Subject: Re: Questions on .config [uClibc for ARM Cortex A9]
Hello
On 28/02/2013 19.52, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Hi All,
Hi,
Does uClibc have a hardening guide? If so, would someone be able to
point me to it?
I have not been able to locate one, but I might be missing some key
terms. For example,
https://www.google.com/#q=hardening+guide+site:uclibc.org
-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
---
ldso/ldso/ldso.c|2 +-
libc/misc/elf/dl-support.c |4
libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c | 22 --
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
[SNIP]
Please consider
On 10/12/2012 18.27, Rich Felker wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:43:54PM +0530, Madhu koriginja wrote:
Hi All,
I am facing compilation issue with the iozone compilation failure with
uclibc library.
I am using the uclibc 0.9.32 version, gcc 4.5 linaro toolchain.
The same code is compiling
On 10/12/2012 14.41, kkmmkk wrote:
elfutils needs getext to properly build. It looks like you are using
OpenWrt, so I would rather direct you to the openwrt development
mailing-list, because this has nothing to do with uClibc per se.
But I am able to compile with glibc library
On 11/12/2012 16.32, Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
If the syscall returns with an error the stack pointer and r4 register
are not restored because the instruction 'ldmnefd sp!, {r4}' is executed
after branching to '__error' label.
This bug has been spotted out by running './utstest clone 5' from
On 01/11/2012 16.26, Natanael Copa wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Natanael Copa natanael.c...@gmail.com wrote:
building vlc will end up with a segfaulting ./vlc-cache-gen on x86_64.
...
Core was generated by
`/home/ncopa/aports/main/vlc/src/vlc-2.0.3/bin/.libs/lt-vlc-cache-gen
On 26/11/2012 20.45, Rich Felker wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:45:18PM +0100, Filippo ARCIDIACONO wrote:
Folks,
we have seen some issues recently in uClibc related to the way the
aux vect is managed inside __uClibc_main.
Running a set-[user,group]-ID ELF binaries with some 'unsecure'
On 02/11/2012 10.04, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 26/09/2012 16.54, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
when building a buildroot based system for the target qemu-mips64-malta I
get following output
generated:
wbx@neon:~/adk/buildroot $ ./output/host/usr/bin/mips64-linux-readelf
On 02/11/2012 14.54, 风涯 wrote:
first an example
libmya.c
[code]
#includestdio.h
void PrintA()
{
printf(A\n);
}
__attribute__ ((weak))
void myfunc()
{
printf(myfunc in libmya\n);
}
[/code]
libmyb.c
[code]
#includestdio.h
void PrintB()
{
printf(B\n);
On 20/09/2012 8.36, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Florian,
I just updated two systems to uClibc 0.9.33.2/NPTL (ARMv5 and MIPS32r1),
and I now see dlsym() returning NULL for a symbol where it should not.
Does it mean that with an older version is worked ? if so, which one ?
it could
On 21/08/2012 2.11, Joaquim Pedro França Simão wrote:
Hello, I am trying to create a system using BuildRoot, but the system
generated can not run binaries compiled on himself, gives a segfault.
It generates a core dump, I managed to capture some of the code that
theoretically would be the
dead-lock.
In order to make it cancel-safe, it needs to rely upon the
pthread_cleanup push pop protocol, as it is already done for
the pthread_mutex counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Filippo Arcidiacono filippo.arcidiac...@st.com
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
---
libc/stdio
On 28/08/2012 18.57, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 28/08/2012 9.07, mail...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[Please keep me on CC:, I'm not subscribed]
I'm working with current uClibc and had problems with POSIX timers.
I use
On 28/08/2012 9.07, mail...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
[Please keep me on CC:, I'm not subscribed]
I'm working with current uClibc and had problems with POSIX timers.
I use the timer with SIGEV_THREAD to create one thread each timer event. It
seems there is a race condition between the
On 19/08/2012 1.51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 05:29:29 Timon ter Braak wrote:
I am trying to build a gccgo (go language) cross compiler targetting an
ARM system. Go uses the context control routines for coorperative
multithreading. uClibc however does not implement them, so
On 26/07/2012 20.41, Scott Moore wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to compile uClibc 0.9.33.2 with NPTL support, but I keep
encountering build failures (possibly related to ldso). I have
successfully built uClibc in with no thread support or with
linuxthreads.old. I appreciate any help you can offer.
On 12/06/2012 16.19, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 12 June 2012 14:23, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
uClibc++ current does not build using an ARM EABI toolchain with the
following build failure:
eh_alloc.cpp
In file included from ../include/basic_definitions:21:0,
On 10 April 2012 01:46, Anthony G. Basile bas...@opensource.dyc.edu wrote:
Hi everyone,
I hit this warning yesterday after a fresh pull from the repo on a big
endian 32-bit mips compiling with gentoo's mips-gentoo-linux-uclibc-4.6.2.
It was repeat many times.
Hi,
4.6.2 has started enabling
On 1 April 2012 08:55, PHilip RUshik prus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:07 PM, PHilip RUshik prus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:44 PM, PHilip RUshik prus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Filippo ARCIDIACONO
filippo.arcidiac...@st.com
On 14/03/2012 15.56, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
__libc_once is not available / needed when multithreading support
is not enabled, so authnone_create() calls authnone_create_once()
directly.
When LT.{old,new} is used instead of NPTL, it needs to explicitly
include bits/libc-lock.h to get
On 25/03/2012 7.38, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 16 March 2012 07:06:47 Rob Landley wrote:
The standard:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/stpcpy.html
uClibc's include/string.h:
#ifdef __USE_GNU ... /* Copy SRC to DEST, returning the address
of the
On 27/02/2012 18.44, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote:
Carmelo,
Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading
context' breaks linuxthreads build,
LT as in LT.old
__libc_once is not available / needed when multithreading support
is not enabled, so authnone_create() calls authnone_create_once()
directly.
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
---
libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote:
Carmelo,
Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading
context' breaks linuxthreads build,
LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter.
What arch
On 14/03/2012 15.26, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
__libc_once is not available / needed when multithreading support
is not enabled, so authnone_create() calls authnone_create_once()
directly.
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
---
libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c |6 ++
1
On 14/03/2012 15.32, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 14/03/2012 15.26, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
__libc_once is not available / needed when multithreading support
is not enabled, so authnone_create() calls authnone_create_once()
directly.
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
__libc_once is not available / needed when multithreading support
is not enabled, so authnone_create() calls authnone_create_once()
directly.
When LT.{old,new} is used instead of NPTL, it needs to explicitly
include bits/libc-lock.h to get __libc_once to be visible.
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso
On 23/02/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:36:11AM +0800, Tony Wu wrote:
Carmelo,
Commit c697912b3a9 'inet:rpc: fix authnone_marshal in multithreading
context' breaks linuxthreads build,
LT as in LT.old or LT.new? Seems it doesn't matter.
What arch
Please commit
Cheers
Carmelo
Inviato da iPod
Il giorno 04/feb/2012, alle ore 05:42, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com ha scritto:
This is needed for stat'ing loop devices 255
since otherwise kernel returns EOVERFLOW becasue
it needs st_rdev/st_dev to be larger than 16bits but
in kernel it uses
On 03/02/2012 13.58, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 02 February 2012 19:12:00 Khem Raj wrote:
--- a/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/stat.c +++
b/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/stat.c
int stat(const char *file_name, struct stat *buf) { int result;
+#ifdef __NR_stat64 +struct kernel_stat64
On 02/02/2012 23.04, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Peter Mazinger p...@gmx.net wrote:
they are already rebased on master here https://github.com/kraj/uClibc
so i will start from there and if you can help in issues as we find
that will be useful
i want to avoid breakages
This is a port of glibc's fix by Zack Weinberg as reported
in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=142312,
and discussed in http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2002-04/msg00069.html
and following.
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
---
libc/inet/rpc/auth_none.c
On 23/01/2012 11.43, stl wrote:
Hello,
if I want to statically cross-compiled a file, what should I do
to avoid symbol alias names?
Thanks for your answers.
what kind of problem/scenario you are trying to address ?
what do you mean with avoiding alias ?
carmelo
On 28/01/2012 21.28, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
commit:
http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=83ce0cc4d5e93549f0a9447a9bd6b051f5f1b62f
branch: http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=refs/heads/master
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com
Thanks Bernhard,
I
On 26/01/2012 17.08, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 16/12/2011 18.36, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/12/11 15:57, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
I was able to fix
On 27/01/2012 12.13, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 26/01/2012 17.08, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 16/12/2011 18.36, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/12/11 15:57
On 27/01/2012 15.55, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 02:17:25PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Well,
what I'd expect to have for sigaction is:
libc.{so,a}
--- __libc_sigaction (global)
--- sigaction (weak alias of __libc_sigaction)
--- __GI_sigaction (hidden
On 27/01/2012 14.17, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 27/01/2012 12.13, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 26/01/2012 17.08, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 16/12/2011 18.36, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 05:59:16PM +0100
On 27/01/2012 16.54, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Jan 27, 2012 4:47 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
So, to summarise I'd expect
libc.{so,a}
--- __libc_sigaction (global)
--- __GI_sigaction (hidden alias for internal use)
--- sigaction
a. A wrapper
On 24/01/2012 3.17, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 23 January 2012 13:26:44 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
I'm wondering if we do still need to have in uclibc a version of
kernel_types.h, any idea ?
the alternative is ... ? relying on linux/types.h ?
linux/posix_types.h for example
if we don't
On 24/01/2012 7.56, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Jan 24, 2012 2:04 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On (23/01/12 19:59), Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Indeed, the common, mips and xtensa version of pread_write.c do not
refer any of types defined in kernel_types.h, so not needed
Folks,
I'm wondering if we do still need to have in uclibc a version of
kernel_types.h, any idea ?
thanks,
carmelo
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
Indeed, the common, mips and xtensa version of pread_write.c do not
refer any of types defined in kernel_types.h, so not needed
to include this header.
(Build untested on mips, xtensa)
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
CC: Chris Zankel ch...@zankel.net
CC: Khem Raj raj.k
On 21/01/12 20:42, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 21/01/2012 15.08, Khem Raj wrote:
Arm has a different mechanism of getting
_Unwind_GetIP. Therefore we profile arch
specific backtrace file.
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k
On 21/01/2012 9.28, Khem Raj wrote:
On (20/01/12 10:36), Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 20/01/2012 7.55, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 19/01/2012 15.28, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Fill properly the sym_ref fields when invoking
to get full
+ * symbols printed.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2009, 2010 STMicroelectronics Ltd.
+ *
+ * Author(s): Giuseppe Cavallaro peppe.cavall...@st.com
+ * - Initial implementation for glibc
+ *
+ * Author(s): Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
+ * - Reworked for uClibc
+ * - use
On 20/01/2012 7.55, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 19/01/2012 15.28, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Fill properly the sym_ref fields when invoking _dl_find_hash to lookup
symbols
this did not make the segfault go away. Although
On 19/01/2012 0.10, Khem Raj wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Filippo ARCIDIACONO
filippo.arcidiac...@st.com wrote:
With your fix was ok?
I did not try mips with my fix but I will try soon
In our sh4 target pango-querymodules runs without any problem.
yes it runs fine on ppc,
Fill properly the sym_ref fields when invoking _dl_find_hash to lookup
symbols
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
---
ldso/ldso/mips/elfinterp.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ldso/ldso/mips/elfinterp.c b/ldso/ldso/mips/elfinterp.c
On 19/01/2012 15.28, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Fill properly the sym_ref fields when invoking _dl_find_hash to lookup
symbols
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
---
ldso/ldso/mips/elfinterp.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 17/01/2012 2.59, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 15/01/2012
On 17/01/2012 9.41, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 17/01/2012 2.59, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
filippo.arcidiac...@st.com
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
---
ldso/libdl/libdl.c | 33 +
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ldso/libdl/libdl.c b/ldso/libdl/libdl.c
index bc3ef8a..da3c405 100644
--- a/ldso/libdl/libdl.c
On 17/01/2012 19.24, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 17 January 2012 12:23:43 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Defer removal of the local scope of a dl-opened library after all
the destructors (of itself and related dependencies) are
actually get unloaded, otherwise any function registered via
atexit
On 18/01/2012 7.58, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com
wrote:
Defer removal of the local scope of a dl-opened library after
all the destructors (of itself and related dependencies) are actually
get unloaded, otherwise any function
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13
On 16/01/2012 10.36, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 9.09, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/01/2012 8.53, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO
carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj raj.k
On 15/01/2012 1.31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 14 January 2012 10:10:19 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Test clean can be invoked with -j to exploits parallelism.
why don't you use `make -j` then ? i don't think -j munging
belongs in any Makefile here.
I do already use, but this one
On 15/01/2012 1.33, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 14 January 2012 19:31:16 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 14 January 2012 10:10:19 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Test clean can be invoked with -j to exploits parallelism.
why don't you use `make -j` then ? i don't think -j munging
belongs
On 15/01/2012 19.37, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 15 January 2012 13:23:54 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 15 January 2012 13:11:58 Mike Frysinger wrote:
As suggested by Bernhard, there is no point in evaluating the
compiler's flag availability when cleaning, so skip things in
that case.
On 15/01/2012 7.22, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
From: Salvatore CRO salvatore@st.com
Test clean can be invoked with -j to exploits parallelism.
Verbosity mechanism aligned to main libc one.
Signed-off-by: Salvatore Cro salvatore@st.com
Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
---
Makefile.in|2 +-
test/Rules.mak
On 11/01/2012 8.44, Khem Raj wrote:
khem ? any news ?
no unfortunately, had no time to delve further. once I have turned a
merge into patch which was causing the regression, let me go down that
path.
let
hi Carmelo
Hi khem
Attached patch is causing the trouble. and I have
ok
#
On 16/12/2011 18.36, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
On 16/12/11 15:57, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
I was able to fix the issue like this:
--- uClibc-0.9.33/libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/sigaction.c.orig
2011-12-03 18:55
On 04/01/2012 23.36, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 03 January 2012 11:34:40 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 01/01/2012 0.10, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 22 December 2011 13:19:22 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 22/12/2011 15.30, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
For backtrace to work is enough to use
On 03/01/2012 20.23, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012 7:11 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO carmelo.amor...@st.com wrote:
Build raise and abort function with dwarf2 info by using
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables to make backtrace() working across a
call to abort.
A scenario where it could
-by: Carmelo Amoroso carmelo.amor...@st.com
---
libc/sysdeps/linux/arm/Makefile.arch |3 +--
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/arm/Makefile.arch |1 -
libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/arm/aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1.c |1 -
.../sysv/linux/arm/nptl-aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1.c |1 -
libubacktrace
On 29/11/2011 17.05, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
Hi,
static linking on ARM with NPTL causes duplicate symbol
errors for __aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0. I think it is
both gcc and uClibc issue.
See also
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4117
gcc version 4.6.2 20111004 (prerelease)
On 05/01/12 14:42, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:13:49PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:58:24AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
On 01/12/2011 6.29, Khem Raj wrote:
On (29/11/11 17:05), Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
static linking on ARM
1 - 100 of 762 matches
Mail list logo
