Dimdim wrote:
> True, but isn't that always the case with Hi-Fi? One hi-end oscillator
> can easily set you back ~400.Only if you buy it. As a matter of interest you
> referred above to their
being measurements which prove something. Are their measurements of the
outputs of a dac (using its
Dimdim wrote:
> If that were the case, Ian's FIFO reclocker or Kali or Acko's reclocker
> would have no reason to exist. You'd just put in a better clock.
>
Come this way sir with your chequebook.
adamdea's Profile:
JackOfAll wrote:
> No, it's still accepting an I2S input, and on-paper it's slave to Pi, by
> which the Pi is sending BCLK and LRCK to DAC as well as DATA. But
> the Sabre board local OSC and on-chip ASRC, is re-clocking it
> internally, on the Sabre chip. (And if you buy into the Sabre
>
JackOfAll wrote:
> In general terms, IMHO, the Sabre design using on-chip ASRC with a
> semi-decent single freq local OSC, will benefit less from Kali (or
> re-clocking in general) than a PCM5xxx series design where the DAC PLL
> is dependent on the MASH'd Pi BCLK. However, if you use the MCLK
JackOfAll wrote:
> Maybe Greg or Scott, or someone who has used the HB DAC+ Pro in master
> mode without Kali, and compared to same DAC+ Pro in slave, but with
> Kali, can post their impressions.
>
> Since Allo called me a liar, I'm not inclined to want to say anything
> positive about any of
JackOfAll wrote:
> Nail on the head. Both of the two "master" HAT boards that are
> commonly available are "flawed". (And no, I'm not going to expand on
> that! ;))
Perhaps someone will be able to publish some measurements demonstrating
the superiority of the kali + slave solution for
badboygolf16v wrote:
> I'm starting this thread as a request for information from JackOfAll. I
> thought it might be useful to have this information on a separate thread
> that others could easily find. I suspect there may be a reasonable
> amount of interest in the KALI Reclocker.
>
> Allo
edwardthern wrote:
> First off I would like the thank the PiCorePlayer team for all their
> hard work for this excellent player!!!
>
> I am wondering if the team would entertain the idea of optimizing PiCore
> for audio.
>
> For example the audio threads as outlined in ALSA's Low Latency howto
It's very kind of you to share your experience. I'm using a cubox-i at
the moment but planning on having a go with a pi2 I bought recently
adamdea's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=37603
View
Phil Leigh wrote:
Have I piCorePlayer working on 3.5mm jack.
I next a Hifiberry digi+...
1) Durio
2) IQaudio
3) Hifiberry DAC
What's next?
Regarda
Phil
I have nothing useful to contribute about pi dacs, but am delighted to
see you back on the forum and have not forgotten the help
JohnSwenson wrote:
I have tried to take some of this on myself but I just do not have the
time now. Due to some personal issues and two jobs I simply do not have
the time this will take to move forward.
If anyone (or group) is interested in taking this on I will be glad to
provide the
colin_e wrote:
On my Debian Jessie box changing the entry in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/squeezecenter.list to point to the unstable
branch got me LMS 7.8.1 which installed and ran first time, which is
great. Thanks to everyone on this thread. Questions-
- No mention of the 7.9.x
bullitbd wrote:
...just for the record, rebooting from debian or doesn't work either
(other than pressing the reset key)... it appears to be wand related -
unless you don't have personally that issue?
Have you tried using the serverpowercontrol plugin to reboot LMS
JackOfAll wrote:
OK, every point you make above was considered. The bottom line, this
product has to hit a price point. It depends on using an off-the-shelf
Pi board to do it. The compute module and a custom carrier board was
looked into. It would have resulted in the retail price having to
Triode wrote:
I've had to update this script to match the latest changes to the arch
distribution for this platform.
Please use the latest install script if you have this platform.
(Hummingboard i1 is currently my favorite low cost platform)
Adrian
I just thought I'd let you know
dsdreamer wrote:
The following script must be run in the same directory as was used for
the CPAN build script above. It depends on having a ./slimserver-vendor
directory with a successfully built
arm-linux-gnueabihf-thread-multi-64int shared object file set.
Code:
aubuti wrote:
From the Squeezelite thread it looks as if your approach to getting the
newer LIBC went fine. Or am I reading that wrong? I'll still consider
myself lucky that you blazed the trail first ;-)
Yes it did work, thanks. Mind you I am trying to repeat the exercise
using Debian on a
aubuti wrote:
Thanks. I did the Squeeze -- Wheezy upgrade over the weekend, which I
neglected to mention also involved changing out the hard drive (I wanted
to install a larger drive and re-purpose the one I had been using).
LMS installation was very smooth. I still need to re-install
aubuti wrote:
Ah, yes, thanks. squeezelite is another one still on the to-do list. I
was running squeezelite under Debian Squeeze (via the Local Player
plugin) and want to set it up under Wheezy. I'll check out that newer
LIBC. With Squeeze I needed to tweak permissions to access audio
PasTim wrote:
Apologies for asking stupid questions, but do you have an audio device
that is working under debian? If it does work, and if squeezeboxserver
belongs to the audio group, I don't know why there is no list of devices
on the local player settings page. There should be.
Has
bpa wrote:
Does squeezelite run ok from a shell prompt ? Umm I don't really know what I
am doing here.
I have tried opening a terminal window (and a root terminal window) and
typing (variously) squeezelite, squeezelite -l start squeezelite
each of which gets me the response command not
bpa wrote:
1. Look at WebUI Settings/Information and note the full 1st Plugins
folder location path (probably starts with /home and ends with
Cache/InstalledPlugins/Plugins )
2. In the terminal window do the following commands in red - don't miss
the . on the squeezelite command and in the
ok I can see that wheezy uses GLIBC 2.13.,
I gather from this that changing is not all that straightforward.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10863613/how-to-upgrade-glibc-from-version-2-13-to-2-15-on-debian
I can fid in the unstable debian repository (via synapic) GLIBC 2.19,
but not
bpa wrote:
This means the build of squeezelite is not compatible with your version
of Linux.
What distro and version have you installed ?
There is also a chance that the LMS support applications may also not
work.
sorry I missed your post. I am running Debian Wheezy Release 7.6
(wheezy)
PasTim wrote:
Do the following (I use ubuntu but I it's based on debian so I think it
uses the same commands).
Code:
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libc6
When I get problems like this, googling the text often
i tried installing 2.19 and running squeezelite from shell, but it still
says
root@adamd:/var/lib/squeezeboxserver/cache/InstalledPlugins/Plugins/LocalPlayer/Bin#
./squeezelite-x86-64 -l
./squeezelite-x86-64: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version
`GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
THANKS VERY MUCH FOR ALL YOUR HELP- SQUEEZELITE IS NOW RUNNING.
In the end I managed to update by enabling the unstable repository in
synatpic and then following Tim's suggestion and updating LIBC from the
shell using Apt.
Squeezeite is now running.
I'm really grateful for your help Guys.
PasTim wrote:
Well done.
Since your problem was compatibility with Wheezy,It's quite possible
(even probable) that adding the 'audio' group to user squeezeboxserver
has no effect at all :-)
I think that definitely helped with getting my music files recognised.
I have managed to get wma working with the play windows media file
(thanks bpa).
And the triode spotify plugin is working beautifully too. Thanks a
million to Adrian too for this as well of course as for Squeezelite.
PasTim wrote:
Having installed the local player plugin, it should just run without any
special scripts. What shows up in the LMS Settings, under Advanced,
Local Player? Do you see a list of devices? If not, there could be
user access issues.
Sorry i thought I had replied to this earlier
PasTim wrote:
Try adding the 'audio' group to user squeezeboxserver, as follows:
Code:
sudo gpasswd -a squeezeboxserver audio
and check:
Code:
groups squeezeboxserver
sadly no dice. I have set local player to debugging in the logging menu
(and set to save) and to debug in the localplayer menu.
all I get in the server log is
14-09-03 17:59:00.9720] Slim::Web::HTTP::addPageFunction (2575)
Backtrace:
frame 0: Slim::Utils::Log::logBacktrace
PasTim wrote:
Have you looked in /var/log/squeezeboxserver/localplayer.log ?
On the local player settings do you now have a list of audio devices?
I'm afraid I don't get a list of devices. If the log you refer to is the
one you access from the advanced local player screen then it just
Triode wrote:
All those errors are coming from another plugin - SrvrPowerCtrl
I guess so- but squeezelite is reported as not running in the local
player settings. Have I got the logging set up wrong?
adamdea's Profile:
I apologise for my cluelessness. I have decided to enter into the world
of linux and thought I would have a go running lms under debian wheezy
with arch desktop on an old intel desktop 64 bit.
I have managed to install LMS which appears to be running fine and
appears in the browser. That said I
35 matches
Mail list logo
