Re: Fail to test new stack on Android device

gt; >> Hi all, >> >> I just tested an older stack on my Android device, everything is fine. >> Then I created a new stack for a little stack and always get this error >> when selecting "Test" in the LC dev menu. >> <https://www.dropbox.c

Re: Fail to test new stack on Android device

On August 11, 2022 5:31:36 AM Klaus major-k via use-livecode wrote: Hi all, I just tested an older stack on my Android device, everything is fine. Then I created a new stack for a little stack and always get this error when selecting "Test" in the LC dev menu. <https://www.

Re: Fail to test new stack on Android device

On Aug 11, 2022, at 6:39 AM, Klaus major-k via use-livecode >> wrote: >> Am 11.08.2022 um 12:30 schrieb Klaus major-k via use-livecode >> : >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I just tested an older stack on my Android device, everything is fine. >

Re: Fail to test new stack on Android device

or-k via use-livecode >> : >> >> Hi all, >> >> I just tested an older stack on my Android device, everything is fine. >> Then I created a new stack for a little stack and always get this error >> when selecting "Test" in the LC dev menu. >

Re: Fail to test new stack on Android device

> Am 11.08.2022 um 12:30 schrieb Klaus major-k via use-livecode > : > > Hi all, > > I just tested an older stack on my Android device, everything is fine. > Then I created a new stack for a little stack and always get this error > when selecting "Test&

Fail to test new stack on Android device

Hi all, I just tested an older stack on my Android device, everything is fine. Then I created a new stack for a little stack and always get this error when selecting "Test" in the LC dev menu. <https://www.dropbox.com/s/j89i1ewpxh5ixny/stream_install_failed.png?dl=0> Only scri

Re: All software installed, but no QR code scanner on Android device

-) and tested, she could create an APK which runs > fine on her Android device. > > Then we downloaded the neccessary package for the barcode scanner from here > https://dl.google.com/android/repository/google_m2repository_gms_v11_3_rc05_wear_2_0_5.zip > > Got the hint from here: <

Re: All software installed, but no QR code scanner on Android device

Hi Paul, > Am 21.10.2021 um 13:43 schrieb Paul Richards via use-livecode > : > > Hi Klaus, > > I thought the Barcode scanner widget was only available in Indy & Business > editions. Which may explain why it isn't showing up when built from Community > edition. ah, yes, did not see this

RE: All software installed, but no QR code scanner on Android device

: 21 October 2021 12:38 To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Klaus major-k Subject: All software installed, but no QR code scanner on Android device Hi friends, last week my customer and me (via TeamViewer) installed the latest Android Studio on my customers machine, which runs Windows 10 64 bit. We fin

All software installed, but no QR code scanner on Android device

Hi friends, last week my customer and me (via TeamViewer) installed the latest Android Studio on my customers machine, which runs Windows 10 64 bit. We finally managed this ;-) and tested, she could create an APK which runs fine on her Android device. Then we downloaded the neccessary package

All software installed, but no QR code scanner on Android device

Hi friends, last week my customer and me (via TeamViewer) installed the latest Android Studio on my customers machine, which runs Windows 10 64 bit. We finally managed this ;-) and tested, she could create an APK which runs fine on her Android device. Then we downloaded the neccessary package

Re: What Android device detail do you find useful and why?

On 9/8/17 8:46 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami via use-livecode wrote: MobileBuildInfo for Android (see below) Is anyone tracking this stuff? If so, what, from your analytics experience is most useful? And why? The most useful for me would be to get the hardware serial number for tracking

What Android device detail do you find useful and why?

Assuming we send data back to the mothership for analytic, then: If we want to know all about the device running our app. I asked myself: how much and how far can we go? -- the platform # gets us the bare minimum, OS -- the screenrect # that's useful especially for the myriad of Androids

Re: Android device speed

2, 2017 6:14:06 PM Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode < >>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I just put my app on a galaxy tab E as a test. >>>>> >>>>> It

Re: Android device speed

t;> >>>> I just put my app on a galaxy tab E as a test. >>>> >>>> It is painfully slow, but not just in the LC portion of the app. The map, >>>> delivered through a browser widget, is also slow. >>>> >>>> So, I used the regular

Re: Android device speed

gt; Hello everyone, >>> >>> I just put my app on a galaxy tab E as a test. >>> >>> It is painfully slow, but not just in the LC portion of the app. The map, >>> delivered through a browser widget, is also slow. >>> >>> So, I used the

Re: Android device speed

tab E as a test. >> >> It is painfully slow, but not just in the LC portion of the app. The map, >> delivered through a browser widget, is also slow. >> >> So, I used the regular browser (chrome) at the webglearth website. That >> was slow too, although not as bad.

Re: Android device speed

Hi Hermann, That page is a great resource! Some of their measurements might be a good proxy for GPU power, like the max viewport size and a couple others. It would be preferable to fully internalize the system check. I will look through the page source to see what JS commands they use to

Re: Android device speed

> Jonathan wrote: > It sounds like I need to find a way to detect the processing speed > of the device. Did you alread try to use webgl? See the source of https://browserleaks.com/webgl ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com

Re: Android device speed

painfully slow, but not just in the LC portion of the app. The map, >> delivered through a browser widget, is also slow. >> >> So, I used the regular browser (chrome) at the webglearth website. That was >> slow too, although not as bad. I think the main difference w

Re: Android device speed

ow too, although not as bad. I think the main difference was that the map div at their website is small, so it takes less processing power. I had thought I selected a midlevel Android device that can handle moderate amounts of computation. In y'alls' experience, are android devices just slow? Do the

Android device speed

. I think the main difference was that the map div at their website is small, so it takes less processing power. I had thought I selected a midlevel Android device that can handle moderate amounts of computation. In y'alls' experience, are android devices just slow? Do they have inferior

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

Mark Wieder wrote: > On 05/01/2017 04:52 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: > >> How many Android devices have an x86 processor? >> >> My hunch is that there are more C++ apps on Android than there are x86 >> devices they can't run on, but I have no data on that. >> > > I believe all the

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

On 05/01/2017 04:52 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: How many Android devices have an x86 processor? My hunch is that there are more C++ apps on Android than there are x86 devices they can't run on, but I have no data on that. I believe all the Chromebooks have Intel chips. This

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

Jan Schenkel wrote: > So LiveCode is a bit of an outsider, as the apps it produces spend > little time in the Dalvik/ART virtual machine. All scripts run in the > native portion, and events are funneled from the VM into native code > to be handled there. This leaves me wondering which

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

On Sat, 4/29/17, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: > > [snip] > > I had thought one of the reasons Android uses the Dalvik and ART > VMs is because they're VMs, separating the APIs from processor architectures. > > If so, then the LC engine for Android is

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 4/29/17 1:25 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: >>> If that is so why can LiveCode make standalones that run on ARM >>> Android? >> >> But can you run an Android APK made with LiveCode on an ARM Linux OS? > > Seems to me, Richmond's question is the same as "Why

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

On 4/29/17 1:25 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: If that is so why can LiveCode make standalones that run on ARM Android? But can you run an Android APK made with LiveCode on an ARM Linux OS? Seems to me, Richmond's question is the same as "Why can't we run a Mac app on Windows?

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

Richmond Mathewson wrote: > On 4/29/17 6:13 pm, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: >> So while we can build for a very wide range of Linux distros, >> Android is Linux-based (as in, it uses the kernel and a handful >> of other packages) but is not a Linux distro per se. >> >> I don't believe

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

-livecode wrote: >>> Isn't Android a type of Linux? >>> >>> Arguably a Linux standalone should work better on x86 Android devices >>> . . . >>> >>> So; here's LiveCode's next headache: >>> >>> How to build a Linux standalone whi

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

>>> >>> Arguably a Linux standalone should work better on x86 Android devices >>> . . . >>> >>> So; here's LiveCode's next headache: >>> >>> How to build a Linux standalone which can be installed on an x86 Android >>> device. &g

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

devices . . . So; here's LiveCode's next headache: How to build a Linux standalone which can be installed on an x86 Android device. Mobile limitations are fairly severe, and most of the IDE tools wouldn't work. That's not what I meant: I meant the ability to hive off standalones that would

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

On 4/28/17 3:03 PM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode wrote: Isn't Android a type of Linux? Arguably a Linux standalone should work better on x86 Android devices . . . So; here's LiveCode's next headache: How to build a Linux standalone which can be installed on an x86 Android device

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

Isn't Android a type of Linux? Arguably a Linux standalone should work better on x86 Android devices . . . So; here's LiveCode's next headache: How to build a Linux standalone which can be installed on an x86 Android device. Richmond. On 4/26/17 10:26 pm, Colin Holgate via use-livecode

RE: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

-livecode Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 2:45 PM To: use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Cc: jonathandly...@gmail.com Subject: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device? I see that it won't run on an x86 emulator - will it work on on actual x86 device? Sent from my iPhone

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

Does it run arm-emulation automatically or do we need to warn it? The parts I use that are processor-intensive are running in the browser widget, which I assume runs on both architectures. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2017, at 3:37 PM, jonathandly...@gmail.com wrote: > > Lol - thank you -

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

Lol - thank you - that is what I meant. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2017, at 3:12 PM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode > wrote: > > I don't think LiveCode (the development environment) will work on > Android of any sort: but it should develop standalones

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

x86 Android devices can run ARM code in emulation. The performance would be better if you could publish to x86, but the app should work. > On Apr 26, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Mike Bonner via use-livecode > wrote: > > I don't think you can build for x86 android but

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

I don't think you can build for x86 android but i'm not positive. On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > I don't think LiveCode (the development environment) will work on > Android of any sort: but it should develop

Re: Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

I don't think LiveCode (the development environment) will work on Android of any sort: but it should develop standalones that work on Android. Richmond. On 4/26/17 9:45 pm, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode wrote: I see that it won't run on an x86 emulator - will it work on on actual x86

Will LiveCode run an x86 android device?

I see that it won't run on an x86 emulator - will it work on on actual x86 device? Sent from my iPhone ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription

Re: Android device not recognized

On 9/12/16 6:38 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: So I tried on a Samsung S4. On that device, the "installing" dialog appears and nothing else happens. I waited two or three minutes, then had to force-quit LC because there is no way to cancel the dialog. And on restarting, it did install. No idea what

Re: Android device not recognized

On 9/12/16 5:17 PM, panagiotis merakos wrote: If the device name is shown but it is dimmed, could it be the case that you have not selected to build for Android? Yes, sorry, that was it. We're sharing the stack back and forth and I should have realized the setting had been changed. But now

Re: Android device not recognized

> On 13 Sep 2016, at 8:17 AM, panagiotis merakos wrote: > > If the device name is shown but it is dimmed, could it be the case that you > have not selected to build for Android? The other option would be if the mode of your stack is not 1 or it’s not the topStack. Cheers

Re: Android device not recognized

If the device name is shown but it is dimmed, could it be the case that you have not selected to build for Android? On 12 Sep 2016 22:15, "J. Landman Gay" wrote: > Was there a change in RC2 in recognizing Android test devices? I've tried > three different ones and LC

Android device not recognized

Was there a change in RC2 in recognizing Android test devices? I've tried three different ones and LC won't allow any of them. Terminal ("adb devices") sees them, and they are in the LC Test Target menu, but the device name is dimmed and can't be selected. I've relaunched LC several times,

Re: Android Device Offline

here which should resolve the issue. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5584976/android-device-chooser-my-device-seems-offline When this has happened in the past for me, an adb kill-server and adb start-server usually sorts things out. Kind Regards, Neil LiveCode Technical Support Lead n

Re: Android Device Offline

Hi Rod, There's a few things you can try here which should resolve the issue. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5584976/android-device-chooser-my-device-seems-offline When this has happened in the past for me, an adb kill-server and adb start-server usually sorts things out. Kind Regards

Re: Android Device Offline

Reality, Games and In-car Systems www.rodmc.com twitter: rodlux On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Neil Roger n...@livecode.com wrote: Hi Rod, There's a few things you can try here which should resolve the issue. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5584976/android-device-chooser-my-device-seems

Android Device Offline

Dear All, I am trying to get Livecode to install an app on an Andoird (Moto G) phone. While LC sees the the device as a target test device each time it comes to try and install the app I receive a device offline* error. The device has been configured for debugging and developing etc so seems to

Re: OT: Contixo android device

...@hyperactivesw.com wrote: On 5/14/2015 7:14 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: Hey all, I was given an android device. A Contixo kids tablet. The owner things there is a hardware issue (white screen, touch works, sounds work, but can't see anything.) I suspect a horked update has caused issues. Since I can't get

Re: OT: Contixo android device

an android device. A Contixo kids tablet. The owner things there is a hardware issue (white screen, touch works, sounds work, but can't see anything.) I suspect a horked update has caused issues. Since I can't get to any settings (on purpose) does anyone know of a way to use ADB to force

Re: OT: Contixo android device

On 5/14/2015 7:14 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: Hey all, I was given an android device. A Contixo kids tablet. The owner things there is a hardware issue (white screen, touch works, sounds work, but can't see anything.) I suspect a horked update has caused issues. Since I can't get to any settings

OT: Contixo android device

Hey all, I was given an android device. A Contixo kids tablet. The owner things there is a hardware issue (white screen, touch works, sounds work, but can't see anything.) I suspect a horked update has caused issues. Since I can't get to any settings (on purpose) does anyone know of a way

Re: Android Device

or is a very common size or features that most people want or use? Doesn't necessarily have to be the cheapest but be good for testing code and have common features I guess. Any suggestions on an Android device? sims ___ use-livecode

Android Device

or is a very common size or features that most people want or use? Doesn't necessarily have to be the cheapest but be good for testing code and have common features I guess. Any suggestions on an Android device? sims

Re: Android Device

but be good for testing code and have common features I guess. Any suggestions on an Android device? sims ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your

Re: Android Device

. Might there be one that is used more or is a very common size or features that most people want or use? Doesn't necessarily have to be the cheapest but be good for testing code and have common features I guess. Any suggestions on an Android device? sims

Re: Android Device

there be one that is used more or is a very common size or features that most people want or use? Doesn't necessarily have to be the cheapest but be good for testing code and have common features I guess. Any suggestions on an Android device? sims

Android Device

Am thinking about playing with LiveCode and Android. Might there be one that is used more or is a very common size or features that most people want or use? Doesn't necessarily have to be the cheapest but be good for testing code and have common features I guess. Any suggestions on an Android

Re: Android Device

want or use? Doesn't necessarily have to be the cheapest but be good for testing code and have common features I guess. Any suggestions on an Android device? sims ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url

Android device problem

Hello All, LC and my Android phone: no problem connecting and testing. LC and my Android tablet: the Devpt Test target menu is grayed, and clicking on Test gives Unknown deployment platform. I realize this is a very vague question, since there's many factors at play -- all of which I think

Re: Android device problem

Some devices have to be specifically set up in the android sdk. For example, the kindle fire... http://mobile.tutsplus.com/tutorials/android/getting-started-with-kindle-fire-development/ (there is an official amazon page for setting up the kindle fire but I couldn't find it. The link above is

Re: Android device problem

On 6/19/12 5:37 AM, Nicolas Cueto wrote: Hello All, LC and my Android phone: no problem connecting and testing. LC and my Android tablet: the Devpt Test target menu is grayed, and clicking on Test gives Unknown deployment platform. I get that error if I have specified an OS version in

Re: Android device problem

Figured it out. After updating to Win7, I had forgotten to also re-install the tablet-specific USB driver. Thanks. -- Nicolas Cueto ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage