Dave - as with shell, do does a line - that is if you were to look at
the string you create with:
put alert (' myScore ');
it would span several lines. Imagine typing that into the script editor - it
would make no sense right? So you need to have the LiveCode as a single line
and not split
On 11/8/10 9:54 AM, David Brooks wrote:
do alert (' myScore '); in browser
Hmm.. I'm falling behind ... where is this documented?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
I was shocked, I thought for a moment that it was Steve Jobs who responded to
our concerns...
;-)
Le 4 mai 2010 à 16:30, Steve Jones a écrit :
Fairly new to RR here, but have used HyperCard and then SuperCard at the
amateur level for a while.
I see in RR that you put items in GROUPS to
On May 4, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
I see in RR that you put items in GROUPS to have them appear on every card in
a stack as opposed to SC where you put them in the BACKGROUND. I have a
GROUP of items on a single card in a stack. When the CREATE CARD command is
issued in a
Aha - that was it. Didn't even see that option. No very intuitive. You have
to create a GROUP and then assign it to be a BACKGROUND rather than just going
straight to a background to begin with. I guess there's more flexibility that
way.
Thanks!
Steve
On May 4, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Colin
Steve,
--
Comprehensive answer
--
go here:
http://www.runrev.com/developers/lessons-and-tutorials/tutorials/online-scripting-conferences/
scroll down to number 6 -- groups and backgrounds
download the stack
--
Specific answer
Steve Jones wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
I see in RR that you put items in GROUPS to have them appear
on every card in a stack as opposed to SC where you put them
in the BACKGROUND. I have a GROUP of items on a
On May 4, 2010, at 8:30 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
Fairly new to RR here, but have used HyperCard and then SuperCard at the
amateur level for a while.
I see in RR that you put items in GROUPS to have them appear on every card in
a stack as opposed to SC where you put them in the BACKGROUND.
Le 4 mai 2010 à 17:12, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
At the top of the Prefs window in the first section there are two radio
controls in a group labeled Property labels are: with the options being
Description of option and Name of RevTalk Property. Click the latter.
Thank you Richard, I don't
Steve, Welcome to RR.
I also came from the HC/SC background and was taken by the group behave
issue, at first it seemed an oversight to a much used convention. But since
I've been using RR I have found that I use backgrounds less and less. I think
this is one thing that truly differentiates RR
Yes, the primary difference between Hypercard and Revolution is that in HC
cards WERE your records. Similar data got added in fields on many cards with
the same background. With Revolution, you have access to use SQL databases,
so cards become more like forms that temporarily hold data for the
I haven't used SC/HC but I do use background groups a lot. I tend to always
have a bg group named interface on my projects that holds the common user
interface for the app, then using different cards, I just create the
modified parts, this way, instead of showing/hiding controls as the
interface
On 5/05/10 10:46 AM, Andre Garzia an...@andregarzia.com wrote:
I haven't used SC/HC but I do use background groups a lot. I tend to always
have a bg group named interface on my projects that holds the common user
interface for the app, then using different cards, I just create the
modified
Bob Sneidar wrote:
Yes, the primary difference between Hypercard and Revolution is that
in HC cards WERE your records.
And they can be in Rev too.
Similar data got added in fields on
many cards with the same background. With Revolution, you have
access to use SQL databases, so cards become
Hi Tim,
There's a FireFox plug-in to search the archives on GMane near the
bottom of this website http://economy-x-talk.com/developers.html.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter:
Speaking of Nable is that typo ever going to be corrected in the Help pane?
On Dec 11, 2009, at 11:55 PM, Jim Bufalini wrote:
Hi Tim,
Any searchable archives of this mailing list? Would like to check
there first before bothering everyone with basic questions.
On your Revolution menu, go
On 12/12/2009 20:50, Mark Swindell wrote:
Speaking of Nable is that typo ever going to be corrected in the Help pane?
On Dec 11, 2009, at 11:55 PM, Jim Bufalini wrote:
Hi Tim,
Any searchable archives of this mailing list? Would like to check
there first before bothering everyone
Hi Richmond,
Oddly enough the database update in RevStudio 4 (Mac) didn't work,
leaving me
with an unusable Search Engine. Same poo with Ubuntu (both RevStudio
and RevMedia)
Didn't have that problem with RevMedia 4 (Mac).
Too fried and crispy after that to bother firing up the XP box to
On 12/12/2009 22:05, Jim Bufalini wrote:
Hi Richmond,
Oddly enough the database update in RevStudio 4 (Mac) didn't work,
leaving me
with an unusable Search Engine. Same poo with Ubuntu (both RevStudio
and RevMedia)
Didn't have that problem with RevMedia 4 (Mac).
Too fried and crispy
Hi all,
Thanks for the various tips. The searching from the RevMedia help
menu did not work. It said something about building indexes,
failed and now it will search nothing. However I did find the
Nabble forum, and will now give Richard Gaskin's program a try...
Tim Selander
Tokyo, Japan
Hi Tim,
Any searchable archives of this mailing list? Would like to check
there first before bothering everyone with basic questions.
On your Revolution menu, go to Help - Revolution Search Engine and on the
second tab over from the left you can select Gmane, Mail Archive or Nable
and perform
Check NABBLE for the archives.
-
Stephen Barncard
San Francisco
http://houseofcubes.com/disco.irev
2009/12/11 Tim Selander selan...@tkf.att.ne.jp
Any searchable archives of this mailing list? Would like to check
there first before bothering everyone with basic
A while ago I recommended Ukelele to Richmond who wanted to change his Caps
Lock key into a Shift Lock key. I understand it did the job. Basically
Ukelele a GUI for modifying .keylayout files on OS X. If you have two Option
keys you should be able to turn one of them into Enter. Actually you can
On Oct 16, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
As far as I know, the only difference between UK, USA, MB and MBP
keyboards
are some graphics and their .keylayout files.
The Return key on my UK keyboard uses up the far right space of two
rows, it is sort of like an upsidedown L shape. That
Le 15 oct. 09 à 00:52, Andre Garzia a écrit :
mine is british... it even has that silly pound symbol that I will
never use
here in Brasil...
Bonjour,
Are you sure ? ;-)
One french saying is : Il ne faut pas dire : fontaine je ne boirai pas
de ton eau (something like : don't say :
use the FN key on the mac to make your return an enter... now, hold
CMD+FN+RETURN and soon we'll ressemble emacs in its cumbersome keychords...
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:10 PM, william humphrey
b...@bluewatermaritime.com wrote:
When you're using a mac-laptop the enter key is a combination
william humphrey wrote:
When you're using a mac-laptop the enter key is a combination enter key and
returnkey. So if you want to run a multi-line script you have to hold the
function key down on the mac laptop keyboard and hit the return key for it
to be an enter key. I spent ten minutes or so
On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:10 PM, william humphrey wrote:
So if you want to run a multi-line script you have to hold the
function key down on the mac laptop keyboard and hit the return key
for it
to be an enter key
For what it's worth, the MacBook Pro I have has an Enter key to the
right of
my macbook pro has a second option key as well... :-/
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Colin Holgate co...@verizon.net wrote:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:10 PM, william humphrey wrote:
So if you want to run a multi-line script you have to hold the
function key down on the mac laptop keyboard and
On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:10 PM, william humphrey wrote:
So if you want to run a multi-line script you have to hold the
function key down on the mac laptop keyboard and hit the return key
for it
to be an enter key
For what it's worth, the
Devin Asay wrote:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
For what it's worth, the MacBook Pro I have has an Enter key to the
right of the right-side command key, and that works as an Enter key
should. I see that MacBooks have a second Option key there instead.
As do the newest
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Between that and the full-glare reflective screen it's enough to keep
me from upgrading my MBP for a while.
The matte screen is available (as a $50 option !!) for both 15- and 17-
inch MBPs
-- Alex (who is trying hard to convince himself to buy one NOW)
On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
For what it's worth, the MacBook Pro I have has an Enter key to the
right of the right-side command key, and that works as an Enter key
should. I see that MacBooks have a second Option key there instead.
As do the newest MacBook Pros. :-( Have to
On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Jim Sims wrote:
There has been a difference in UK and USA keyboards for years.
My UK keyboard has an alt/option key to the right of the command key
SPACE BAR - CMD KEY - ALT/OPTION KEY
My USA keyboard has:
SPACE BAR - CMD KEY - ENTER KEY
It's not
mine is british... it even has that silly pound symbol that I will never use
here in Brasil...
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Jim Sims s...@ezpzapps.com wrote:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
For what it's worth, the MacBook Pro I have has an Enter key to the
right of
Hi John,
Were it not the weekend, I'd pass on this and let someone with first
hand experience and sqlite databases, but
You may do just about anything via an on openStack or even a on
preOpenStack handler that would be run as soon as or even before your
stack is opened. This allows
John Hunter wrote:
I'm looking at Rev and RB and was wondering if there are any samples /
demo stacks that show how to use sqlite databse without using buttons
to create or connect to.
It would be really helpful to see how to create / connect to sqlite
databases using code as opposed to
Well, as well as all the other useful things that everybody is proposing
how about a sort of Top of the Pops of errors?
My personal favourite crops up all the time:
flase, fales, flsae . . . but, very rarely 'false'
Now . . . variables . . .
The message box is an amazing feature. You can use it in a debugging
session to work with the state of your code at the breakpoint.
Bernard
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Stephen Cox step...@networkxfla.com wrote:
Lol. Of course. I knew it would be easy. Thanks.
For the life of me I could
There is a gotcha to be aware of here.
Checking if a previously unused variable is empty returns false. That
has caught me out a few times. I wonder why the answer is false. I
think the engine interprets the variable as a string instead, in the
same way that 'answer hello' without quotes around
Wait. I don't get this. You saying that checking if an unused variable is
empty returns false? Does revolution put some data in a variable when
created?
On 5/9/09 2:44 AM, Martin Blackman martinblack...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a gotcha to be aware of here.
Checking if a previously unused
Jacque-
Friday, May 8, 2009, 11:25:47 AM, you wrote:
how the engine works. I personally do not use explicit variables, I
never declare them specifically, and I have never had any problem.
...the first step in recovery is recognizing you have a problem... g
--
-Mark Wieder
Mark Wieder wrote:
Jacque-
Friday, May 8, 2009, 11:25:47 AM, you wrote:
how the engine works. I personally do not use explicit variables, I
never declare them specifically, and I have never had any problem.
...the first step in recovery is recognizing you have a problem... g
Bah. Don't
Stephen Cox wrote:
Wait. I don't get this. You saying that checking if an unused variable is
empty returns false? Does revolution put some data in a variable when
created?
Sort of, but only in specific cases, which is mostly a side-effect of
how friendly Rev's interpreter is and how it deals
By the way, off topic a bit:
Wouldn't I am be the same as I am? ((notice the space after
I in the second example)).
On 5/9/09 12:57 PM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.com wrote:
Stephen Cox wrote:
Wait. I don't get this. You saying that checking if an unused variable is
empty
Certainly should be the same. Isn't it? It is for me with 3.5.
Joe Wilkins
On May 9, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Stephen Cox wrote:
By the way, off topic a bit:
Wouldn't I am be the same as I am? ((notice the space
after
I in the second example)).
Stephen Cox wrote:
By the way, off topic a bit:
Wouldn't I am be the same as I am? ((notice the space after
I in the second example)).
Yup.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
Stephen-
Saturday, May 9, 2009, 11:15:01 AM, you wrote:
Wouldn't I am be the same as I am? ((notice the space after
I in the second example)).
also the same as I am
...and just for good measure...
I space am
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
Richmond-
Saturday, May 9, 2009, 1:14:47 PM, you wrote:
So; what is 'strict compilation', and why should we be
interested?
Strict compilation was formerly referred to as explictVars.
Setting the checkbox *forces* you to declare all your variables or be
faced with compile errors. The advantage
Writing as someone who, generally, learns from his errors, and
trying to work out why they are error, this sounds as if it would
not be a great advantage to me.
Probably much more useful for somebody trying to belt out
something with a very quick SDLC or turn-around.
Mark Wieder wrote:
Actually I'm not so sure it even matters, considering this isn't a typed
language.
I was just surprised when I ran my first try at code and had errors at
runtime. Almost every compiler I've used checked variables. Why I asked in
the first place.
On 5/9/09 5:24 PM, Richmond Mathewson
Richmond-
Saturday, May 9, 2009, 2:24:47 PM, you wrote:
Writing as someone who, generally, learns from his errors, and
trying to work out why they are error, this sounds as if it would
not be a great advantage to me.
Not to worry - there's plenty of errors to go around...
...I'd be happy to
Stephen,
Without even checking, since it's the way it would be done in HC, just
use:
if tUsername is empty then
if tUsername exists then ...
You were already there. Didn't you check these out in the messagebox?
Joe Wilkins
On May 7, 2009, at 11:25 PM, Stephen Cox wrote:
Really two
Hi Stephen,
Search the docs for empty. It will show you things like
put empty into x
set the cProp to empty
So, you will also want to read up on put and set.
There is also a function variableNames, which will probably be very
useful to you. Why do you want to check for the existence of a
Lol. Of course. I knew it would be easy. Thanks.
For the life of me I could not find an example in the docs; the user guild
or online.
The messagebox? I hardly use it. Gets in the way mostly. I've been using it
to look at global variables. I know you can run commands. But if you don't
know the
Stephen, I should have checked. Check exists in the dictionary for
the rev syntax. Not quite as straightforward or easy as with HC.
Sorry,
Joe Wilkins
On May 7, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Stephen,
Without even checking, since it's the way it would be done in HC,
just use:
I did search for empty in the Online Dictionary. But all I got were
property keywords. I also read the docs on put and answer and saw nothing
about empty.
Anyway know now, thanks.
As for checking for existence of variables.. Just a habit I formed over
years writing dbase and c. Always check the
Ahhh! Exists was there. I was looking at it from the wrong end. Thanks.
God I feel like I have to unlearn all my coding habits and thinking.
On 5/8/09 2:47 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins pepe...@cox.net wrote:
Stephen, I should have checked. Check exists in the dictionary for
the rev syntax. Not
Hi Stephen,
How do I check if a variable is empty? Sort of like;
If !empty(tUsername)
// process here
Endif
Empty() is a Foxpro function that pops if what you are checking is
empty. I
can¹t seem to find it¹s equivalent in revolution. Am I approaching this
the
wrong way? And can I
Stephen Cox wrote:
Next question; checking the existence of a variable? Now I know I can turn
on Strict Compilation (and I have) but I¹d rather have the assurance of
checking to see if a variable exist? Is this a non-issue in Revolution?
It is a non-issue. Rev does not require you to declare
Very badly documented:
on mouseEnter
set the lockCursor to true
set the cursor to hand
end mouseEnter
on mouseLeave
set the cursor to arrow
set the lockCursor to false
end mouseLeave
Stephen Cox wrote:
I¹m gonna preface [the subject] all my questions with ³Newbie² so those who
have no
Hi Stephen,
You need to lock the cursor right before or after setting it.
Otherwise, the cursor will be reset as soon as the handler finishes
running.
on mouseEnter
lock cursor
set the cursor to hand
end mouseEnter
on mouseLeave
set the cursor to arrow
unlock cursor
end
Stephen,
As the most useful tip I can think of for someone NOT familiar with
HC, learn to use the messageBox, which you may display by clicking on
the third icon from the left in the Rev Toolbar. It allows you to test
bits of code without having to do a lot of development. Importantly,
Stephen,
One of the frustrating aspects about both HC and Rev is that the same
things may be accomplished in a number of different ways. And
assignments are particularly so, since you have to do things like:
put 20 into tVar instead of what you might expect tVar = 20
Which is one of the
Kill is Quit Without Saving. Not very good unless you have a hung
process.
I agree the Applescript method is best.
Bob Sneidar
IT Manager
Logos Management
Calvary Chapel CM
On Jan 8, 2009, at 6:58 PM, Timothy Miller wrote:
Oops! Kill Process does make the application quit.
Is this command
You need to preface it with a forward slash ie. /applications/some
folder/...
Bob Sneidar
IT Manager
Logos Management
Calvary Chapel CM
On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Timothy Miller wrote:
Hi,
Not so many elementary questions on the list these days. Well, I've
got an infinite supply. It might
BTW this is not a revolution issue but an OS one. This is how the OS
refers to the root of the startup volume. The first slash means The
startup drive. For other volumes you would access the mount point
folder which is Volumes i.e. /Volumes/My Other Drive/Some Folder/...
To access the home
Quick tip that should work on all platforms:
In the message box type
answer file choose the one you like; put it
The result will appear as the correct Rev syntax that refers to the file
Do this for folders.
answer folder choose the one you like; put it
Hope this helps
Jim Ault
Las Vegas
Thanks everyone! It works now.
Is it okay to use the Open Process command instead? (It seems to
work.)
Can I also use a Rev command to quit an application?
I messed around with closeProcess but couldn't get it to work.
with:
answer there is a process /Applications/Firefox.app
I get True
Hi Tim,
You can use applescript (from within Rev) to do this...
put tell application quotefirefox-binquote to quit into tScript
do tScript as applescript
HTH,
Terry...
On 9/1/09 1:40 PM, Timothy Miller gand...@doctortimothymiller.com wrote:
Thanks everyone! It works now.
Is it okay to
Oops! Kill Process does make the application quit.
Is this command safe on Mac OS? The documentation is somewhat
ambiguous on this point.
Thanks again.
Tim
On Jan 8, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Timothy Miller wrote:
Thanks everyone! It works now.
Is it okay to use the Open Process command
I think you're better off asking it to quit first with an applescript then
if that fails you can always kill it.
I'm pretty sure Ken (sonsothunder.com) has some tips that you might find
useful for this sort of stuff.
Terry...
On 9/1/09 1:58 PM, Timothy Miller gand...@doctortimothymiller.com
It works! THANKS!
Jim
On Sep 15, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Klaus Major wrote:
Hi J9m,
Hello all,
I appreciated the recent thread where you all welcomed basic
questions. I am just starting with Revolution, coming from a
FileMaker background.
I have a table field into which I put the results
Hi J9m,
Hello all,
I appreciated the recent thread where you all welcomed basic
questions. I am just starting with Revolution, coming from a
FileMaker background.
I have a table field into which I put the results from a MySQL
query, triggered by a rawkey event in a search field. It
Thanks for that - It seems strange to me too.
Cheers
Si.
Simon Harper
2.44 Kilburn Building
University of Manchester (UK)
Pri: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alt: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 28 Mar 2007, at 18:14, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
On 28 Mar 2007, at 17:22, Simon HARPER wrote:
Thanks for that,
Hi there, and I do agree that, as a coder of 15 years, I would
normally go on gut instinct. However, being used to c/c++, Java and
Perl the Revolution Transcript syntax and expressions are not
'natural' for me, as I'm trained to think in the more mathematical
syntax of these grammars and
On Mar 29, 2007, at 5:27 AM, Simon HARPER wrote:
Hi there, and I do agree that, as a coder of 15 years, I would
normally go on gut instinct. However, being used to c/c++, Java and
Perl the Revolution Transcript syntax and expressions are not
'natural' for me, as I'm trained to think in the
On 3/29/07 8:12 AM, Devin Asay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe others can share similar Aha! insights about the nature of
the Rev scripting language.
Coming from the old Hypercard world, after 3 years I am still getting used
to the fact that Rev can work through 100 lines of code in 2 blinks
Aha! So RR is just like HyperCard - except for custom properties and
a few other querky things - as I knew all along. Thanks for the
confirmation. No sarcasm intended. I'm serious!
Joe Wilkins
On Mar 29, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Devin Asay wrote:
On Mar 29, 2007, at 5:27 AM, Simon HARPER wrote:
Jim, it's the computers. Even HC is fast! (smile)
Joe Wilkins
On Mar 29, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Jim Ault wrote:
On 3/29/07 8:12 AM, Devin Asay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe others can share similar Aha! insights about the nature of
the Rev scripting language.
Coming from the old Hypercard
H Simon,
I can really sympathize with you! I was in the same boat around three
years ago. The documentation is not very good, especially if you are
used to working in C/C++ where the white books are available.
The thing that really confused me and got me pulling my hair out is
the
On 3/29/07 8:36 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim, it's the computers. Even HC is fast! (smile)
Joe Wilkins
Actually, the Rinaldi XCMDs and XCFNs are compiled to give HCard speed
boosts, and Rinaldi has noted that Rev is so fast you don't need most of
them for Rev. His web
Nice to know, since I'm sure I'll be getting into the image
management issue before too long.
Thanks,
Joe Wilkins
On Mar 29, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Jim Ault wrote:
On 3/29/07 8:36 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim, it's the computers. Even HC is fast! (smile)
Joe Wilkins
Devin Asay wrote:
Here are some of the aha! moments
that helped me figure out Xtalk scripting.
Excellent post Devin,
IMO It should be distributed with all new and demo license keys
One minor picky point
Internally, all line delimiters are ASCII 10 (LF), but Rev automatically
translates
Martin Baxter wrote:
Last I checked (admittedly quite a while ago) this was not true on
Linux, just on Mac and Win. perhaps this has changed?
Anybody currently working on Linux know if RR can nowadays properly open
mac or win text files and translate line-endings without scripted
assistance?
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Martin Baxter wrote:
Last I checked (admittedly quite a while ago) this was not true on
Linux, just on Mac and Win. perhaps this has changed?
Anybody currently working on Linux know if RR can nowadays properly
open mac or win text files and translate line-endings without
Martin Baxter wrote:
I determined, by testing, that on Linux (and I would assume - other
Unixes as well) there appears to be an assumption that any text files
you import already have LF line endings, so no conversion is done. On
Mac and Windows the native line endings (for either platform)
On 3/28/07, Simon HARPER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the online dictionary, it seems to be different on the mac
- the tutorials suggest you can use a drill down approach looking for
say messages or commands and then locating the one you want
(serendipitous browse) however on my mac I
On 3/28/07 12:49 AM, Simon HARPER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on mouseUp
put the hilitedlines of field listCats into tLineList
split tLineList by comma
sort items of tLineList descending of each
repeat for each element tLineNumber in tLineList
delete line tLineNumber of field
Thanks for this, and it's much appreciated.
Regarding the online dictionary, it seems to be different on the mac
- the tutorials suggest you can use a drill down approach looking for
say messages or commands and then locating the one you want
(serendipitous browse) however on my mac I seem
Welcome, Simon.
On Mar 28, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Simon HARPER wrote:
Thanks for this, and it's much appreciated.
Regarding the online dictionary, it seems to be different on the
mac - the tutorials suggest you can use a drill down approach
looking for say messages or commands and then
Thanks for that, I'll keep on doing it this way but I think that
better documentation would really help user uptake.
Cheers
Si.
Simon Harper
2.44 Kilburn Building
University of Manchester (UK)
Pri: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alt: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 28 Mar 2007, at 15:57, Devin Asay wrote:
On 28 Mar 2007, at 17:22, Simon HARPER wrote:
Thanks for that, I'll keep on doing it this way but I think that
better documentation would really help user uptake.
Due to reasons unknown to me, RunRev doesn't think that this is an
urgent thing to change. I and other users disagree with their
I wrote:
Recipe: Create a field. Switch to Contents in the inspector, change
the text there, try switching to table.
I can´t remember if I filed a BZ on that one. I vaguely recall it, but
might be wrong.
It was bug 3180
http://support.runrev.com/bugdatabase/show_bug.cgi?id=3180
All the
: Sunday, 18 December, 2005 09:44
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Re: Newbie Question (table in inspector)
I wrote:
Recipe: Create a field. Switch to Contents in the
inspector, change
the text there, try switching to table.
I can´t remember if I filed a BZ on that one. I
On Dec 14, 2005, at 4:24 PM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
Devin,
My system seems to hang when I open the inspector to the tables
popup. If I command period it releases and displays the table info
correctly.
OSX 10.4 Rev 2.6.1
Has that happened to you at all?
Tom
No, I've not seen that
Confirmed Tom.
Recipe: Create a field. Switch to Contents in the inspector, change
the text there, try switching to table.
I can´t remember if I filed a BZ on that one. I vaguely recall it, but
might be wrong.
Latest Rev, Os X.2.8
All the best,
Malte
My system seems to hang when I open
Joe,
'set the showLines of fld myField to true'
Best,
Mark
On 14 Dec 2005, at 20:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Please tell me how to create a field with the lines showing.
Joe,
Orlando, FL
___
use-revolution mailing list
Joe,
By lines showing do you mean the horizontal lines, like you see on
notebook paper? If so, just open the property inspector for the
field, choose Table from the popup list, then check Text
baselines, which shows the, well, baselines for the text. This is
the same as setting the
Devin,
My system seems to hang when I open the inspector to the tables
popup. If I command period it releases and displays the table info
correctly.
OSX 10.4 Rev 2.6.1
Has that happened to you at all?
Tom
On Dec 14, 2005, at 3:35 PM, Devin Asay wrote:
Joe,
By lines showing do you
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
