?
I can only find rather old messages in this regard.
Thanks,
Sam
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3421252.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
The osgi standards are properties based, just like all old log4j config files.
Having it as config admin allows JMX bundles, etc etc to participate in the
logging setup.
An XML config file would in the current environment require something like
an MBean, a parser, possibly a config injector etc
Is there any ongoing effort for a Logback backend to Karaf?
I can only find rather old messages in this regard.
Thanks,
Sam
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3421252.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3421252.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
--
*Achim Nierbeck*
Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC
OPS4J Pax Web http
messages in this regard.
Thanks,
Sam
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3421252.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Guillaume Nodet
.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3421434.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
messages in this regard.
Thanks,
Sam
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3421252.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Guillaume Nodet
On Oct 14, 2011 3:47:54 am Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The main problem I see with logback is that there's no properties
based configuration for logback.
That's a real problem imho because we would not be able to leverage
the OSGi ConfigAdmin which is a key point in order to have a clean
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 17:21, ceki c...@qos.ch wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011 3:47:54 am Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The main problem I see with logback is that there's no properties
based configuration for logback.
That's a real problem imho because we would not be able to leverage
the OSGi
Hi Guillaume
I assume you missed my
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3421434.html
post , where I linked the published reasons for switching to logback as well
as stating our own.
Could you perhaps briefly explain why the backend logging configuration
I read your answer too quickly...
Answering my own question: for logging I suppose you wish to enforce
configuration admin service, so a seperate configuration file is not
welcome.
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging
On 14/10/2011 5:48 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Thank you for your quick response.
I do care a lot about logback being configure with properties to be able
to leverage ConfigAdmin. It should be *the* way to configure things in
OSGi. That way, you can distribute the configuration remotely or
.
To your other reply, you're right, I want to enforce ConfigAdmin.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 18:04, samspy sam.spyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guillaume
I assume you missed my
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3421434.html
post , where I linked the published
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 18:27, ceki c...@qos.ch wrote:
On 14/10/2011 5:48 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Thank you for your quick response.
I do care a lot about logback being configure with properties to be able
to leverage ConfigAdmin. It should be *the* way to configure things in
OSGi.
It might not fit too well with the felix/karaf idea of installing config admin
pid configs through .cfg property files, but config admin has no problem
dealing with a string property that is an entire xml document. So I'd go for a
handy way to initialize such config admin properties rather
Yeah, but you loose the ability to easily configure one logger level or
such. Fine grained configuration is much easier imho, but you're right, it
would work too.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 19:28, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
It might not fit too well with the felix/karaf idea of
On 14/10/2011 7:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
It might not fit too well with the felix/karaf idea of installing config
admin pid configs through .cfg property files, but config admin has no
problem dealing with a string property that is an entire xml document.
So I'd go for a handy way to
On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:43 AM, ceki wrote:
On 14/10/2011 7:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
It might not fit too well with the felix/karaf idea of installing config
admin pid configs through .cfg property files, but config admin has no
problem dealing with a string property that is an entire xml
I'm not sure finding the right bit of an xml configuration and editing it is
harder than finding the right property and editing it. dunno, seems like a
config admin interface issue.
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Yeah, but you loose the ability
On 14/10/2011 9:36 PM, David Jencks wrote:
What I'm proposing would not involve logback reading a file, but
rather config admin supplying the xml logback configuration to logback
as a single string.
Sure, that would work too.
--
Ceki
:
Excellent. I'll give it a try and report back with steps taken
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3177529.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Guillaume Nodet
:
Excellent. I'll give it a try and report back with steps taken
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3177529.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3177504.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
back to raw Felix.
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Running-Karaf-without-PAX-Logging-tp3177504p3177504.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Guillaume Nodet
Blog: http
24 matches
Mail list logo