Re: VM HA enabled when on ceph

2019-06-27 Thread Andrija Panic
Jess, Simon shared hack for existing VMs. But you might want to make your Compute Offering HA enabled, then all VMs inherit that (new VMs obviously). Cheers On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 00:10, Simon Weller wrote: > Jess, > > Yes, that works. > > -Si > > > From:

Re: Cpu Overprovisioning factor

2019-06-26 Thread Andrija Panic
No (currently). Perhaps in next year or so, we *might* have some changes around that, but atm - no. Andrija On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 14:52, Fariborz Navidan wrote: > Hello All, > > Is there any way to force ACS to take into consideration the new cpu > overprovision factor without having to

Re: Very BIG mess with networking

2019-06-26 Thread Andrija Panic
t; works now!! > Thank you again!! > A big hug! :) > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:45 PM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > I would say, to make sure you have identical network/bond setup as before > > (irrelevant of which chils pifs are in the bond/network) - so from > >

Re: KVM: Homogenity of cluster

2019-06-25 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Michael, They need to be if as similar CPU as possible, in order to allow successful live migrations - other than that, you could technically combine Intel and AMD if you like. Networking bridges also needs to be setup in identical way (irrelevant of the possibility different NICs model and

Re: Very BIG mess with networking

2019-06-25 Thread Andrija Panic
wever, it get the right Network and continue to looking > for other network. > Do you think this is the issue also if CS continue with other tasks instead > stops founding more than one network Public? > Could I simply change network name in Xen Pool and update in CS? > > On Tue, Jun 2

Re: Very BIG mess with networking

2019-06-25 Thread Andrija Panic
If your new bond have changes name, have you changed also XenServer Traffic Label in CloudStack ? Active-active is known to be sometimes very problematic, switch back to active-passive until you solve your issues. Experiment later with active-active. On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 09:34 Michael Kesper

Re: Very BIG mess with networking

2019-06-24 Thread Andrija Panic
Quick one... Issues creating slave interface are reported by XenS. Active-active ia VERY problematic on XenS, revert to lacp or something.acs complains on more than one network with name Publci... Best... On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 01:15 Alessandro Caviglione wrote: > Hi guys, > I'm experiencing

Re: KVM HA fails under multiple management services

2019-06-24 Thread Andrija Panic
ey are > connected to is down. > You can find more information of this feature on this link: > https://www.shapeblue.com/software-based-agent-lb-for-cloudstack/ > > Please note this is a different feature than host HA, in which CloudStack > will try to recover hosts which are off via ipmi

Re: KVM HA fails under multiple management services

2019-06-23 Thread Andrija Panic
Li, based on the Global Setting description for those 2, I would say that is the expected behaviour. i.e. change Indirect.agent.lb.check.interval to some other value, since 0 means "don't check, don't reconnect" per what I read. Also, you might want to change from

Re: mgmt node on kvm host

2019-06-21 Thread Andrija Panic
ed redundancy and > ability to grow if we expand foot print) > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 3:09 PM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > In short, > > > > Never, EVER, do such thing (especially in production of any kind). > > > > Mgmt server (any auxiliary comp

Re: mgmt node on kvm host

2019-06-20 Thread Andrija Panic
In short, Never, EVER, do such thing (especially in production of any kind). Mgmt server (any auxiliary components like standalone DB server, billing software, monitoring software, load balancers etc - all things that are needed for production...) can be on KVM nodes, but a standalone KVM nodes,

Re: Create VM prompt SR backend failure

2019-06-19 Thread Andrija Panic
Li, please check the logs on XenServer, they should contain the error message explaining why volume creation failed. Best Andrija On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 17:24, li jerry wrote: > Hi, All > > I have a cloudstack + xenserver+iscsi cluster with five nodes: node01, > node02, node03, node04 and

Re: Unable to start VM

2019-06-17 Thread Andrija Panic
Unable to start VM on Host[-1-Routing] due to internal error: guest failed to start: cannot find init path '/sbin/init' relative to container root: No such file or directory You can google a bit - seems related to LXC stuff On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 16:23, Alejandro Ruiz Bermejo <

Re: Controlled shutdown post-partial-switch failure...

2019-06-17 Thread Andrija Panic
Been there, done that, a year ago (whole DC down == everything shutting down (storage things, S3 things, CloudStack things (all VMs and everything), etc, etc, etc) - very successfully but not funny...) On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 14:33, David Merrill wrote: > Hi All, > > I’m fielding an worrisome

Re: launch instance error

2019-06-16 Thread Andrija Panic
ingtemplateonUbuntu > > > When i try to launc the new instance i get again errors thi is the log > <https://pastebin.com/rdCYMYDZ>. As i see now the manager allocate CPU, > RAM > and Root disk in a storage pool but can't find a storage pool for Data > disk. > > I c

Re: launch instance error

2019-06-14 Thread Andrija Panic
After i have LXC working can later add KVM > > Wich approach would be more helpful to find where the trouble is. > > Regards, > Alejandro > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 2:59 PM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > I'm not sure how you moved the host to another Zone ? (Ple

Re: launch instance error

2019-06-14 Thread Andrija Panic
33e60f7bd | > > NetworkFilesystem | > > > 2049 | 1 | NULL | NULL | 3413114880 | > > 984374837248 | > > > 10.8.9.235 | NULL | /export/primary | 2019-06-06 20:05:26 | NULL > > > | NULL| Up | DefaultPrimary| ZONE| KVM > | > > > 0 | NULL | > > > | 3 | lxc | 3b062c9d-0333-41c4-9ba8-f71f75a81d1f | > > Shared

Re: launch instance error

2019-06-14 Thread Andrija Panic
-+-+--+---++---+-----+---++ > 1 row in set (0.00 sec) > > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:57 AM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > Execute this one (from logs) against your DB - does

Re: launch instance error

2019-06-14 Thread Andrija Panic
; createion (https://pastebin.com/Yd9as8uF) > > Thanks for the help > Alejandro > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 5:06 PM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > Well, this one still doesn't provide any usefull info. > > > > 1. Can you confirm if you have tags set on LXC Compute

Re: Hello

2019-06-14 Thread Andrija Panic
Long time no see Darrin - "Welcome to the jungle" ! On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 11:53, Sven Vogel wrote: > Welcome Darrin! > > > Am 13.06.2019 um 20:12 schrieb Suresh Kumar Anaparti < > sureshkumar.anapa...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi Darrin, Welcome to CloudStack! > > > > Regards, > > Suresh > > > > On

Re: Cloudstack orchestration feature

2019-06-14 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi there, everybody trying to sell you something will actually tell that their product is the best... Having that in mind (and since I'm not trying to sell you anything), there are a couple of things: 1. Dead easy to deploy (weeks) versus months/years for OpenStack (i.e. "turnkey" solution,

Re: [VOTE] 4.11.3.0 RC1

2019-06-12 Thread Andrija Panic
Gregor, can you confirm if you followed the steps exactly in regards to template flags and more importantly the actual name - I believe in the code, during upgrading, it will search for specific template name (i.e. systemvm-vmware-4.11.3) and update it's DB values so it becomes a "SYSTEM" instead

Re: launch instance error

2019-06-12 Thread Andrija Panic
, Alejandro Ruiz Bermejo < arbermejo0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi this is the full log for one instance cretion with the same error ( > https://pastebin.com/HHKnHi36) > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 5:10 PM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > Alejandro, > > > > Please

Re: Problem due to create network

2019-06-11 Thread Andrija Panic
oudStack can't do > that? We want just find and increase 300 seconds parameters from this > message "Timed out on acquiring lock account2 . Waited for 300seconds", > can you help us with it? > > пн, 10 июн. 2019 г. в 21:59, Andrija Panic : > > > In mgmt log you ha

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

2019-06-11 Thread Andrija Panic
migrate away all VMs to another host in that Basic zone - there is no way to move VMs to a new Zone... On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 23:26, Fariborz Navidan wrote: > You mean I should delete and re-add VMs? > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:43 AM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > You wan

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

2019-06-11 Thread Andrija Panic
c zone or the guest > network? > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:06 PM Fariborz Navidan > wrote: > > > what will happen to VMs running on the host during this procedure? > > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:56 PM Andrija Panic > > wrote: > > > >> In

Re: CloudStack 4.11.x - KVM hibernation support

2019-06-11 Thread Andrija Panic
Create a GitHub issue? On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:04, Razvan Rosca wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any chance to add KVM hibernation support in a (near) future CS > release? > > Thank you, > Razvan Rosca > > Skype: razvan.rosca > Tel: +40 731 059 660 > Linkedin:

Re: launch instance error

2019-06-11 Thread Andrija Panic
3ad768) > Updating resource Type = memory count for Account = 2 Operation = > decreasing Amount = 1024 > 2019-06-11 11:37:05,302 INFO [o.a.c.a.c.a.v.DeployVMCmdByAdmin] > (API-Job-Executor-24:ctx-34beda4d job-62 ctx-7fcf55ab) (logid:5b3ad768) > com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a > deployment for VM[Use

Re: VPC with Private Gateway leads to MASTER/MASTER

2019-06-11 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Richard, can I kindly as you to open a GitHub issue, describing the problem in detail, so someone can pick it up for the resolution - we could be able to fix this for the 4.13, but 4.11.3 we are a bit late since it's already in the voting process. Thanks, Andrija On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

2019-06-11 Thread Andrija Panic
. Pods, Clusters, Hosts, etc. from basic zone to > advanced one? > > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:19 AM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > In Basiz zone - no. VR is an entity existing only in Advanced Zone. > > I.e. Advanced zone can have many, isolated by VLAN, shared

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

2019-06-11 Thread Andrija Panic
ing to allow users have LB behind > their instances? > > Best Regards > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:37 PM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > Hi Fariborz, > > > > check here: go to Infrastcutre --> Zones, choose you Zone --> go to > > Physica

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

2019-06-10 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Fariborz, check here: go to Infrastcutre --> Zones, choose you Zone --> go to Physical networks, choose your Physical network carrying Guest traffic - and at the bottom od the page you will have "Network Service Providers". On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 17:40, Fariborz Navidan wrote: > Hello, > >

Re: Problem due to create network

2019-06-10 Thread Andrija Panic
Jun 2019 at 19:25, Dmitry Berezhnoy wrote: > Hi Andrija, > > https://yadi.sk/d/BNOQFeCN86szxw - agent.log > https://yadi.sk/d/5UdQ4RExJ-VfmA - management-server.log > It is fresh installation with using for some days. > > Dmitry > > пн, 10 июн. 2019 г. в 17:44, Andr

Re: launch instance error

2019-06-10 Thread Andrija Panic
Interesting lines being: FirstFitRoutingAllocator) (logid:0a0b5a30) FirstFitAllocator has 1 hosts to check for allocation: [Host[-4-Routing]] 2019-06-10 13:40:11,373 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.a.i.FirstFitAllocator] (API-Job-Executor-14:ctx-b92e08df job-41 ctx-3d41bde7 FirstFitRoutingAllocator)

Re: Problem due to create network

2019-06-10 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Dmitry, if not mistaken, this might have something to do with DB - can you please post whole log, on pastebin or similar ? Is this a fresh installation (test) or a running production for some time ? Andrija On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 14:55, Dmitry Berezhnoy wrote: > Hello, > > Just tried

Re: Unabele to boot CloudLinux on KVM after update

2019-06-10 Thread Andrija Panic
Fariborz, Usually indicates missing storage driver in initramfs (if you were on VMware, I would tell you to check if vmw_pvscsi.ko is present in initramfs). I've hard time believing that you might be missing initramfs completely (thought it might happen) but still would advise to re-check. If

Re: CPU compatibility issue

2019-06-06 Thread Andrija Panic
To be fair, this fix is not a "fix" - it just allows "subtracting" CPU flags for the vCPU from the base model presented, if the physical CPU doesn't support it. I spent some time yesterday googling - and it seems like a possible kernel/qemu bug which is presented on just some CPU models. Adam,

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate older hypervisors in 4.14

2019-06-05 Thread Andrija Panic
OVM ? On Wed, Jun 5, 2019, 19:56 Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > Bases on some conversation on a Github issue on moving to Python3 today, I > would like to propose a PR after 4.13 is cut on deprecation of following > hypervisors in the next major 4.14 release: > > - XenServer 6.2, 6.5 and older >

Re: Can't start systemVM in a new advanced zone deployment

2019-06-05 Thread Andrija Panic
Yiping, if you are sure you can reproduce the issue, it would be good to raise a GitHub issue and provide as much detail as possible. Andrija On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 05:29, Yiping Zhang wrote: > Hi, Sergey: > > Thanks for the tip. After setting vmware.create.full.clone=false, I was > able to

Re: Cloudstack 4.11.2.0, Maven Error: testIsMockServerCanUpgradeConnectionToSsl (javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Received fatal alert: handshake_failure)

2019-06-03 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Eric, please check email thread on DEV ml, from Rohit, titled "Master breaking with jdk 1.8.0_201+" from 13th May I believe - perhaps you are hitting the same issues - i.e. try to keep your jdk lower version than this. "I've found the issue to be specific to newer JDK versions that disable

Re: Site to Site VPNs with Advanced Networks

2019-05-30 Thread Andrija Panic
Richard, as Dag said, it's a historical thing i.e. Once upon a time there was only Basic Zone, SG. Then "Advance Zone' was introduced, with multiple Shared Networks possible (imagine multiple Basic Zones effectively) Then Isolated networks were "invented" with some more networking features

Re: ldap permissions

2019-05-30 Thread Andrija Panic
Piotr, Can you please raise a bug/issue on the GitHub ? I believe I heard similar things from another user (but can't guarantee atm). Thx Andrija On Thu, May 30, 2019, 08:43 Thomas Joseph wrote: > Are both these accounts under the same domain id? > You could add an entry in the table

Re: Can't "find/use" VMware HV when using ShapeBlue's packages

2019-05-29 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Razvan, Is this Advaned Zone, Securituy Groups checkbox ticked ? Btw, /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /export/secondary -u http://packages.shapeblue.com.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/systemvmtemplate/4.11/systemvmtemplate-4.11.2-kvm.qcow2.bz2 -h

Re: 答复: RBD primary storage VM encounters Exclusive Lock after triggering HA

2019-05-28 Thread Andrija Panic
Thx Wido! On Tue, 28 May 2019 at 13:51, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 5/28/19 1:48 PM, li jerry wrote: > > Hi Wido > > > > > > > > I filled in the CLOUDSTACK is the following KEY > > > > > > > > [root@cn01-nodeb ~]# ceph auth get client.cloudstack > > > > exported keyring for

Re: Re: RBD primary storage VM encounters Exclusive Lock after triggering HA

2019-05-28 Thread Andrija Panic
And if we look into the release note of Minic, it states something like > 'This is the fifth bugfix release of the Mimic v13.2.x long term stable > release series. We recommend all Mimic users upgrade.' > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/mimic/#v13-2-4-mimic > > > :-) > > &

Re: Error running configureVirtualRouterElement api

2019-05-28 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Yiping, I believe you are specifying a wrong/unexisting ID. And here comes into play a new nice and shiny CloudMonkey, 6.0.0, writen in Go - with AUTOCOMPLETE - which will help you see actually what ID's you can specify :) It's always a good idea to verify API behaviour with CloudMonkey,

Re: RBD primary storage VM encounters Exclusive Lock after triggering HA

2019-05-28 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Li, You would like to take a look at the next PR from Wido - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2985 - this is 4.12 only. In other words, you are using Mimic, non-LTS release of Ceph - and I have a hard time believing that anyone is using this in production with CloudStack (since it's

Re: Instance creation troubles

2019-05-25 Thread Andrija Panic
Alejandro, from within the SSVM - try to ping google or someting, see if your SSVM can reach internet - since per your explanation, it seems everything else is fine. Except that I didn't quite understand the "my subnet for the public and private networks are the same". Andrija On Sat, 25 May

Re: DNS quit working when I updated to 4.11.2

2019-05-24 Thread Andrija Panic
n draw possibly some conclusions. Andrija On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 21:12, Eric Lee Green wrote: > On 5/24/19 10:16 AM, Andrija Panic wrote: > > Eric, > > > > your BIND9 servers is on a "Public" network (trying to talk to the Public > > IP of the VR dur

Re: Apache-Cloudstack 4.11.2.0, Maven Error: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError (com/sun/jna/linux-aarch64/libjnidispatch.so not found)

2019-05-24 Thread Andrija Panic
Eric, if you are sucessful in your interesting project - please consider a blog post somewhere (and share here on ML) - it always helps the community. Cheers Andrija On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 03:11, Eric Pretorious wrote: > Thank you, Rohit: > > Commenting-out the portions of XML related to the

Re: DNS quit working when I updated to 4.11.2

2019-05-24 Thread Andrija Panic
Eric, your BIND9 servers is on a "Public" network (trying to talk to the Public IP of the VR during forwarding DNS requests) or a VM inside an Isolated network behind VR)? Andrija On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 02:15, Eric Lee Green wrote: > I had this working under 4.9. All I did was, on my main

Re: pci passthrough with extraconfig

2019-05-24 Thread Andrija Panic
function='0x2'/> > > > > > But now I have this: > > LibvirtException > org.libvirt.LibvirtException: Device :16:07.2 not found: could not > access /sys/bus/pci/devices/:16:07.2/config: No such file or directory > > Ehh... > Any help is welcome :) &

Re: pci passthrough with extraconfig

2019-05-23 Thread Andrija Panic
\n function='0x2'/>\n \n", > > Detach device virsh nodedev-dettach pci__16_00_2 on host and reboot VM > > And... not see this pci on VM :-( > > The subject is new to me, what am I doing wrong? Is this path correct? > How do you verify that this device is co

Re: Upgrade to Cloudstack 4.11.2 fails *AGAIN*

2019-05-22 Thread Andrija Panic
ption (modern 16 > core processors use about the same power as the 6 core processors I have > in my nodes). When I have the budget to upgrade the hardware, I will, > but what's there works, is reliable as a brick and not an issue, unlike > Red Hat breaking my infrastructure with incompatib

Re: Upgrade to Cloudstack 4.11.2 fails *AGAIN*

2019-05-22 Thread Andrija Panic
o be easy. There were security > > patches in the latest CentOS that I am required to have. It would > > actually be easier to just switch to Ubuntu at this point since we're > > talking a complete re-install anyhow. SIGH. Thank you, Red Hat Software. > > I hope IBM fixes t

Re: Upgrade to Cloudstack 4.11.2 fails *AGAIN*

2019-05-22 Thread Andrija Panic
yhow. SIGH. Thank you, Red Hat Software. > I hope IBM fixes them, but I have my doubts. > > On 5/22/2019 1:05 AM, Andrija Panic wrote: > > Hi Eric, all, > > > > I believe you might be hitting this one - issues on latest CentOS 7.6: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/

Re: Upgrade to Cloudstack 4.11.2 fails *AGAIN*

2019-05-22 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Eric, all, I believe you might be hitting this one - issues on latest CentOS 7.6: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/ due to changes in the OS itself... If you believe that is the case, please try with CentOS 7.4 (can confirm works fine) and/or CentOS 7.5. Best, Andrija On Wed,

Re: Changing the NIC and disk controller type permanently

2019-05-20 Thread Andrija Panic
e to this? > > > $ cmk create template details= ? > > > I have a vague recollection that cloudmonkey had an issue with nested data > structures specified as arguments. > > Is this still the case? > > > From: Andrija Panic

Re: Changing the NIC and disk controller type permanently

2019-05-17 Thread Andrija Panic
ble with > VMware's emulation, so we'd like to switch to VMXNET3 for all Windows VMs. > Setting the nicAdapter detail worked as expected, at least. > > > Any suggestions? > > > Regards, > > Gregor > > > From: Andrija Panic

Re: Changing the NIC and disk controller type permanently

2019-05-17 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Gregor, the code around managing VM details for existing VMs (CONTROLLER specifically) could be a bit better - but in short - there is NO way to change existing controller type from the current ones (for VMware specifically) using CloudStack (btw you "can" make the change in the GUI, while VM

Re: CS 4.12 logs

2019-05-16 Thread Andrija Panic
Main one: /var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 23:43, Alessandro Caviglione wrote: > Hi guys, > I've just upgraded from CS 4.9 to 4.12 but I cannot see any "running" logs. > In 4.9 I remember logs was in catalina.log file, but now I can't see any > logging

Re: Add KVM host

2019-05-15 Thread Andrija Panic
Alejandro, can you please paste the whole management log and also agent log files (pastebin or similar, not here). Best, Andrija On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 21:09, Alejandro Ruiz Bermejo < arbermejo0...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > I'm setting up CloudStack 4.12. I've already deployed the management >

Re: issue with system vm template not downloading

2019-05-10 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Richard, Can you also, beside logs, try/confirm the following: - are you running a Basic zone ? - since systemVM tempate should be pre-seeded with a script, perhaps you are having issues with the SSVM itself and/or downloading default CentOS template? If so please execute from inside SSVM the

RE: AW: CS 4.9.2: System VMs not starting

2019-05-10 Thread Andrija Panic
, etc.) - so might be some DB inconsistency as well. Andrija Regards, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Mueller, Udo Sent: 08 May 2019 16:53 To: users

RE: Online courses?

2019-05-08 Thread Andrija Panic
ng if it's still accurate/updated. Thank you, Razvan Rosca Skype: razvan.rosca Tel: +40 731 059 660 Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/razvanrosca/ Facebook: https://fb.com/razvanrosca.com On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 10:34 AM Andrija Panic wrote: > Hi Razvan, > > As Suresh said, document

RE: Online courses?

2019-05-08 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Razvan, As Suresh said, documentation is good place to start, you should pick up a lot of info from there. Otherwise you can either spend your money on a course produced by a company that do mass-production of courses, or you can spend your money on specialized courses from ShapeBlue -

RE: AW: CS 4.9.2: System VMs not starting

2019-05-07 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Udo, Perhaps not relevant, but check host 65, error message being: 2019-05-07 07:09:19,718 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-15:null) (logid:) Seq 65-6444932541743890440: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 101543520292, via: 65, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,

RE: CS 4.9.2: System VMs not starting

2019-05-06 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Udo, Can you share more details about your setup? Still on version 4.9.2 ? By PCS you mean Pacemaker ? If so please describe your setup in more details - what is being clustered (shared resources, etc.) and why are you using it. How many CloudStack management servers? If possible, please

Re: Restricting IP usage & Upgrading CloudStack & Live storage migration

2019-05-03 Thread Andrija Panic
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bf209405e7d60b6a5abf87677d368c429359d98a , for KVM and ROOT volumes only (didn't test it myself). On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 17:41, Razvan Rosca wrote: > Hey, > > Yeah, NFS is specified so I doubdt local storage will work, unfortunately. > > Razvan Rosca

Re: Automating creation of ACLs

2019-05-03 Thread Andrija Panic
wrote: > Hi Andrija, > > I wasn't aware the API supports creating ACLs with multiple networks / IP > addresses. > > Andrei > > - Original Message - > > From: "Andrija Panic" > > To: "users" > > Sent: Friday, 3 May, 2019 16:11:3

Re: Automating creation of ACLs

2019-05-03 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Andrei, perhaps I got something wrong, but why don't you use API to create needed ACL rules ? Andrija On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 17:04, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have come across a need to create an ACLs that includes around 100 > different IP addresses and network

RE: Cannot create instance with FQDN

2019-04-25 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Fariborz, Instance FQDN is generate from the VM name when you deploy it (becomes hostname) and the network domain set on the network to which a VM is joined. So: In case of Shared or Isolated Network, you have an option to set "network domain" when creating the network. In case of VPC, you

RE: ACS management server running out of loop back devices

2019-04-24 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Yiping, Based on https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.11.2.0/scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh , I would say to see what keeps these loop devices mounted - i.e. if you can unmount them manually. Based on code from above, unmount is run, but it might fail in your environment due to

Re: Cloudstack-agent gets the local IP address exception

2019-04-23 Thread Andrija Panic
a very short time. > > > > > > ________ > 发件人: Andrija Panic > 发送时间: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 10:22:47 PM > 收件人: dev > 抄送: users@cloudstack.apache.org > 主题: Re: Cloudstack-agent gets the local IP address exception > > Hi Jerry, > > not a good idea, if you don't mind me

Re: Cloudstack-agent gets the local IP address exception

2019-04-23 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Jerry, not a good idea, if you don't mind me saying that. Are you using 4.11 release ? If so you should use the internal LB logic that is now part of Agent on KVM side - please check this one: https://www.shapeblue.com/software-based-agent-lb-for-cloudstack/ Let me know if this works for

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove support for el6 packaging in 4.13/4.14

2019-04-19 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Vladimir, is it possible that you upgrade management and hypervisors hosts for the next major release - we are not talking removing packaging support for current LTS release/updates but for the next MAJOR release. Upgrading management hosts is as simple as introducing additional ones and

Re: FC STORAGE

2019-04-18 Thread Andrija Panic
http://downloadns.citrix.com.edgesuite.net/11988/XenServer-7.1.0-s1-install-cd.iso On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 09:12, Dominik Czerepiński wrote: > Hello Adrian Sender, > XenServer 7.1LTSR have non-free license? Because citrix want to pay for > this version. Only 7.6 I found free version. > >

Re: CloudStack and SDN

2019-04-17 Thread Andrija Panic
Simplest one that actually works (call it SDN if you like) - VXLAN. A few others with various implementation states and all hypervisor dependent: Nicira NVP / Vmware NSX Midonet Various tunneling protocols On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 09:46, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com> wrote: > > > Noted Nuage's

Re: Fast access to specific templates vs. secondary storage

2019-04-16 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Peter, initial template copy process from Secondary to Primary storage pool should be decently fast, since you are doing sequential IO read from Secondary NFS and doing sequential IO write to Primary Storage - that should be very fast in general. No way around this process at the moment.

Re: Problem with ACS 4.11.2 and vCenter server

2019-04-16 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Florent, please upload to pastebin or such - attachments are stripped on ML. Andrija On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 11:14, Florent Paillot wrote: > Thanks for the answers, > > Paul : I know that the vCenter 6.7 is not officialy supported but my > colleague reported that it worked with 4.9.3 . >

Re: Windows on KVM - Windows profile with PV drivers vs Other PV?

2019-04-16 Thread Andrija Panic
yep https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2870 On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 11:06, Nux! wrote: > Shouldn't I see something like hyperv or hv in the virsh xml dump for the > VM if enlightenments were enabled? > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > >

Re: CloudStack 4.11.2 SS problem

2019-04-15 Thread Andrija Panic
oved, but template is in place? > > The records for certain templates are absent in template_store_ref, while > others are just fine... it looks like a very serious bug for regular users, > who don't manage templates and ISO programmatically. > > пн, 15 апр. 2019 г., 12:21 Andrija Pan

Re: CloudStack 4.11.2 SS problem

2019-04-15 Thread Andrija Panic
: > Andrija, > > yes, I have the case with missing records in 'template_store_ref'. What I > don't get is how it could happen... > > пн, 15 апр. 2019 г. в 11:24, Andrija Panic : > > > Hi Ivan, > > > > is it possible that your DB got somehow corrup

Re: CloudStack 4.11.2 SS problem

2019-04-15 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Ivan, is it possible that your DB got somehow corrupted or that you are missing records in template_store_ref etc - this might be the reason why SSVM is trying to download templates again - if you check the logs for non-problematic templates, you will see something like "template already on

RE: committer with merge rights on cloudstack-www

2019-04-11 Thread Andrija Panic
Is the following (what I did actually) enough ? 1. Go to ASF ID, and add your github username(s): https://id.apache.org 2. Go to Github settings and enable 2FA (two-factor authentication, I use google authenticator) 3. Go to gitbox setup page: https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/

Re: Windows on KVM - Windows profile with PV drivers vs Other PV?

2019-04-10 Thread Andrija Panic
No problem - just don't run (busy) Windows Server 2008 R2 or older without Hyper-V Enlightenments - Simon found that bringing a bit of performance benefits were important (and of course it is), but for me (in my previous job role), I found more important things being the stability brought for

Re: Loop snapshots are not automatically deleted

2019-04-09 Thread Andrija Panic
to understand what goes wrong. Best, Andrija On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 02:12, li jerry wrote: > Hi, Andrija > After the snapshot is manually created and deleted, the snapshot > on ceph has been deleted normally. > > > Jerry > > -邮件原件----- > 发件人: Andrija Panic &g

Re: Windows on KVM - Windows profile with PV drivers vs Other PV?

2019-04-09 Thread Andrija Panic
What he said ^^^ :) On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, 16:34 Simon Weller wrote: > Lucian, > > Windows PV also enables the KVM HyperV Enlightenment features for Windows > guests on 4.12. > > >

Re: Loop snapshots are not automatically deleted

2019-04-08 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi, can you please test with a new volume, make a few snapshots manually, and then delete one by one, observing if snapshots is deleted from Ceph ? Long days ago, this ^^^ was an issue, with serious consequences on performance - hope it's not back... Andrija On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 14:21, li

RE: Packer and Cloudstack

2019-04-05 Thread Andrija Panic
We have internal repo for this - builds for centos 6,7 ubuntu 14,16,18 and can be easily tuned to support different SCSI and NIC controllers for other hypervisors (atm build targets building vmware templates). Were thinking making this public at some point in time... andrija.pa...@shapeblue.com 

RE: Shutdown VM

2019-04-05 Thread Andrija Panic
No. CloudStack is not aware that you did shutdown VM from inside OS - CloudStack will consider a VM crashed, and will start it again. Best Andrija andrija.pa...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue -Original Message- From:

RE: pci passthrough

2019-04-05 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Piotr, Have a look at a video from last London User Group that explains (beside other new things) passing extra configuration flags for KVM VM, which might give you an idea how you can achieve PCI passthrough:

Re: VM's network adapter speed

2019-04-03 Thread Andrija Panic
As Simon said ^^^ I was getting 13Gbps on 10Gbps NIC in KVM, long time ago... On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 15:28, Simon Weller wrote: > Fariborz, > > Are you using the virtio-net para-virtualized drivers? The virtio-net > driver makes the OS aware that the drive is not physical and won't limit > you

Re: How to re-create virtual router

2019-03-29 Thread Andrija Panic
> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 5:12 PM Fariborz Navidan < > mdvlinqu...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > 4.11.2 with KVM. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 5:08 PM Andrija Panic < > andrija.p

Re: How to re-create virtual router

2019-03-29 Thread Andrija Panic
cloudstack version, hypervisor (version) ? On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 13:34, Fariborz Navidan wrote: > I did marked router vm instance to Stopped and set remoed to NULL. In > infrastructure overview it shows 1 virtual router but clicking on View, > shows no data. Then I restarted the network with

Re: How to re-create virtual router

2019-03-29 Thread Andrija Panic
9 at 12:09, Fariborz Navidan wrote: > My zone is a basic one. Unfortunately.,It does not work for me It think > router exists for the network but it does not! > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:18 PM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > what ACS version, what kind of network/zone ? >

Re: How to re-create virtual router

2019-03-29 Thread Andrija Panic
what ACS version, what kind of network/zone ? In 4.11.2, Advanced Zone, Isolated network (KVM), I have deleted router, then started a VM, which triggered a creation of new VM. Again, destroyed VR, restarted network withOUT the "clean up" option, and again new VR was created. On Fri, 29 Mar 2019

Re: Apply modified service offering

2019-03-29 Thread Andrija Panic
y tried the "change > serviceofferingforvirtualmachine" command but it always complain s about > invalid cpu cores. > > Thanks > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 1:55 AM Fariborz Navidan > wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 1:24 AM Andrija Panic > > wrote: >

Re: Apply modified service offering

2019-03-28 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi, you don't have to re-apply (nor there is such thing) same offering to a VM (you could change to other offering and back to original one - but that doesn't change a thing) - when VM is booted, some parameters are read from it's offering and applied acordingly (while some parameters might be

Re: CloudStack affinity group and vSphere DRS

2019-03-28 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Yiping, unless I'm mistaken, CloudStack should have nothing to do with DRS - it only initially chooses the host to which to deploy a VM to, but later VMware DRS can kick in and move it on it's own. Cheers, Andrija On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 21:10, Yiping Zhang wrote: > Hi, All: > > I started

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >