Hi ,
Here is the list of XCP-ng supported versions for ACS 4.19 :
XCP-ng 7.4.0, 7.6.0, 8.0.0, 8.1.0, 8.2.0 [1]
[1] http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.19.0.0/releasenotes/compat.html
-Jithin
From: Embedded
Date: Wednesday, 10 April 2024 at 6:44 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
> From: Suresh Anaparti
> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 3:07 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: XenServer Agent is not coming up after upgrading from 7.1 to
> 8.2
>
> Hi Vivek,
>
> This discussion thread might provide you some inputs:
> ht
.
# for host in $(xe host-list | grep ^uuid | awk '{print $NF}') ; do xe
host-param-clear uuid=$host param-name=tags; done;
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Harikrishna
From: Suresh Anaparti
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 3:07 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re
Hi Vivek,
This discussion thread might provide you some inputs:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/7q6yybm3qcms21qcd8945kvrygpr1v86
Also, check the docs here:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.16.1.0/installguide/hypervisor/xenserver.html#upgrading-xenserver-versions,
and see if you have
Hi Ammad,
Adding guest mapping alone might not work as the product name has been changed
by Citrix and Xenserver is now Citrix Hypervisor. This will create an issue
while trying to add the host or with some operations. To support this product
name change, updates have been made in CloudStack
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/releasenotes/compat.html
cheers
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 19:08, Luis Martinez
wrote:
> Hi
>
> ACS website is not loading for me, I am trying to find what versions of
> XenServer/XCP-NG are supported.
>
> Thank you
>
>
--
Andrija Panić
ag, 3. Februar 2018 01:10
> An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: XenServer Licensing Change - Switch Hypervisors?
>
> Hi all,
> I'm also trying to find a solution, our infrastructure is based on XS6.5
> that will not patched on meltdown and spectre so we're considerin
Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Sean Lair" <sl...@ippathways.com>
> > > To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Sunday, 7 January, 2018 18:20:11
> > > Subject: RE:
ways.com>
> > To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, 7 January, 2018 18:20:11
> > Subject: RE: XenServer Licensing Change - Switch Hypervisors?
>
> > Thanks for the reply Nux, yea we originally chose XenServer over KVM
> because KVM
- Original Message -
> From: "Sean Lair" <sl...@ippathways.com>
> To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, 7 January, 2018 18:20:11
> Subject: RE: XenServer Licensing Change - Switch Hypervisors?
> Thanks for the reply Nux, yea
are on XenServer 6.5 and with the new Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities
not being patched in 6.5... We may accelerate the move to KVM.
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 4:22 PM
To: users <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Xen
If you have expertise with XenServer and don't mind paying, then it's not a bad
direction to follow. It's a nice HV.
On the long term I think KVM will be a much better solution though.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From:
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:59 AM, Michael J McCafferty wrote:
> Dingo,
>
> This was a perfectly excellent question. I had this question myself
> and was considering asking it here. However, it is this sort of response that
> can discourage others from asking questions.
Dingo,
This was a perfectly excellent question. I had this question myself and
was considering asking it here. However, it is this sort of response that can
discourage others from asking questions. I do pay attention to this list, I had
this question, I googled, I spend a decent amount
pay attention might prove useful in the future
https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/introducing-xcp-ng/
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Sean Lair wrote:
> It looks like XenServer 7.3 will no longer have the following features in the
> Free Edition. Is anyone considering
Correction, Storage XenMotion.. Not XenMotion.
Regards,
Marty Godsey
Principal Engineer
nSource Solutions, LLC
-Original Message-
From: Marty Godsey [mailto:ma...@gonsource.com]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 12:36 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: XenServer 7.3
Hello guys,
m]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 11:53 AM
To: Marty Godsey <ma...@gonsource.com>; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer 7.1/7.2
Acordi g to the manual, only 7.0 is supported on 4.10, i had to downgrade
to XenServer 7.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android<https://overview.mai
, November 14, 2017 11:53 AM
To: Marty Godsey <ma...@gonsource.com>; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer 7.1/7.2
Acordi g to the manual, only 7.0 is supported on 4.10, i had to downgrade to
XenServer 7.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on
Android<https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.sr
Acordi g to the manual, only 7.0 is supported on 4.10, i had to downgrade to
XenServer 7.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Marty Godsey wrote:
Anyone tried XenServer 7.1/7.2 with ACS 4.10?
Regards,
Marty Godsey
Principal Engineer
Hi Martin,
Looks like you have hit a bug, you can patch it from this PR
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
On 22/02/17, 4:56 PM, "Martin Emrich" wrote:
>Hi!
>
>After shutting down a VM for resizing, it no longer starts. The GUI reports
Thanks, Dag - That was excellent!
Eric Pretorious
Portland, Oregon
On Jan 31, 2017 7:07 AM, "Dag Sonstebo" wrote:
Hi Eric,
My understanding as follows:
- XenServer with basic networking only works when using the “old” linux
switching backend, not OVS, due to the
Hi Eric,
My understanding as follows:
- XenServer with basic networking only works when using the “old” linux
switching backend, not OVS, due to the requirements to manage security groups.
- OVS plugin comes into play in advanced zones where you want to use SDN/L3
overlay networks to provide
Hi Skale,
This issue has been experienced on our side with ACS 4.7.2 and 4.9.0 when
using NFS based primary storage. This seams to be due by changes in
NFSSR.py by cloudstack and recent changes by XS65ESP1035.
This doesn't seams to have impact on the Secondary storage from what we saw
so far.
Mmmm platform row has these
parameters: viridian:true;acpi:1;apic:true;pae:true;nx:true
If I see in XenCenter, that instance has following boot options: graphical
utf8
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Hi Alexssandro,
>
> I think you will find
Hi Alexssandro,
I think you will find the string in the database table user_vm_details.
where the name=platform
select * from user_vm_details where name='platform' and vm_id=;
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Alessandro Caviglione <
c.alessan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've an ACS
LACP provide load-balancing based on hash of source+destination MAC
addresses. Also on the linux end (not sure about XS) you can configure
hash based on tcp port. Hash will be the same for one stream, it will
be the same for any pair of src+dst MAC addresses, so you'll never get
balanced
Hi Allessandro,
In our environment with servers of 4 NICs, we configured it as following:
- 1 bond for management traffic (NICs of 1Gbps)
- 1 bond for storage,public & guest traffic by using VLAN separation of course
(NICs of 10Gbps)
In your case I would configure it as following
- 1 bond for
Looking at the section 4.3.5.1. Active-Active Bonding from documentation of
the XenServer 6.5:
"Management or storage traffic. Only one of the links (NICs) in the
bond is active and the other NICs remain
unused unless traffic fails over to them. Configuring a management
interface or
LACP does not provide more throughput but does provide more bandwidth.
Basically if you have two 1G NICs in an LACP bond, you will not get a stream
faster than 1G.. However, since you are not load balancing, you can have MORE
1Gb streams.
So what your seeing is normal.
Also do a ovs-vsctl
-streaming the container
plugin?
Regards,
Marty Godsey
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Wagner [mailto:glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 9:12 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Xenserver 7 w/ ACS 4.8
Hi Marty,
As the 4.9 Rc2 has been cut and in testing, I
, 7 Victoria Street, Somerset West, Cape Town
7129South Africa
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Marty Godsey [mailto:ma...@gonsource.com]
Sent: Friday, 29 July 2016 2:49 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Xenserver 7 w/ ACS 4.8
I asked this same question yesterday
: Friday, July 29, 2016 6:00 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Xenserver 7 w/ ACS 4.8
Hi Glenn,
thank you! I expected that, but didn't want to waste time on provisioning an
intentionallly broken setup :)
Am Freitag, den 29.07.2016, 09:19 + schrieb Glenn Wagner:
> Hi Step
Hi Glenn,
thank you! I expected that, but didn't want to waste time on
provisioning an intentionallly broken setup :)
Am Freitag, den 29.07.2016, 09:19 + schrieb Glenn Wagner:
> Hi Stephan
>
> We have tested Xenserver 7 against master branch and due to the
> changes in XenServer 7 it
Hi Stephan
We have tested Xenserver 7 against master branch and due to the changes in
XenServer 7 it doesn't work
Regards
Glenn
glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
First Floor, Victoria Centre, 7 Victoria Street, Somerset West, Cape Town
7129South Africa
@shapeblue
s on my installation, without recompiling jar
>> files?
>>
>> Regards,
>> IT engineer
>> Farheap, Russia
>> Ivan Derbenev
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@accelerite.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2
this on?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Dave
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 24, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Dave Garbus <davegar...@spiceworks.com>
>>>>
gt;>>>>>
>>>>>> I updated the issue referenced in this email (
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9353) to include
>>>> CloudStack 4.8 as an affected version. If we could at least get someone
>>>>
rowse/CLOUDSTACK-9353) to include
> >> CloudStack 4.8 as an affected version. If we could at least get someone
> >> assigned to it, that’d be a good start.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> - Dave
> >>>>
> >>>
t;>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> - Dave
>>>>
>>>> On May 24, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Ivan Derbenev <
>> ivan.derbe...@tech-corps.com<mailto:ivan.derbe...@tech-corps.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way I ca
iles?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> IT engineer
> >> Farheap, Russia
> >> Ivan Derbenev
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@accelerite.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2
ivan.derbe...@tech-corps.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way I can fix this on my installation, without recompiling jar
>> files?
>>
>> Regards,
>> IT engineer
>> Farheap, Russia
>> Ivan Derbenev
>>
>> -Original Message-
>
, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: 丸子良太 / MARUKO,RYOTA [mailto:ryota.maruko...@hitachi-solutions.com]
Sent: 24 June 2016 01:21
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: XenServer nested on XenServer
Dear Tim, Remi
Thank you for your advices!!
I will try
ineer
> Farheap, Russia
> Ivan Derbenev
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@accelerite.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:06 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Xenserver 6.5 live migra
Dear Tim, Remi
Thank you for your advices!!
I will try XenServer in KVM(or ESXi).
Regards
>-Original Message-
>From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com]
>Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 1:50 AM
>To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: [!]Re: XenServer nest
> Is there a way I can fix this on my installation, without recompiling jar
> files?
>
> Regards,
> IT engineer
> Farheap, Russia
> Ivan Derbenev
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@accelerite.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 201
isor).
So take the time I think I will give up
Last question!!
Will I be able to construct "XenServer nested on KVM"???
Regards
>-Original Message-
>From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 10:39 PM
>To: users@cloudstack.apach
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: 丸子良太 / MARUKO,RYOTA [mailto:ryota.maruko...@hitachi-solution
-
From: 丸子良太 / MARUKO,RYOTA [mailto:ryota.maruko...@hitachi-solutions.com]
Sent: 15 June 2016 09:57
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: XenServer nested on XenServer
Dear Paul
My networking is as follows.
The zone is Advanced mode.
I made 3 XenServers as XenServer01-001/002/003
XenServer01 -NG??-> XenServer01-003 --> UserVM
~~
Regards
>-Original Message-
>From: 丸子良太 / MARUKO,RYOTA [mailto:ryota.maruko...@hitachi-solutions.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 5:42 PM
>To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: RE: XenServer nested o
gt;To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: XenServer nested on XenServer
>
>Hi Paul,
>
>I don’t get it but that’s probably me :-) Never mind.
>
>Regards,
>Remi
>
>On 13/06/16 16:00, "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
>>Re
>Sent: 13 June 2016 14:26
>To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: XenServer nested on XenServer
>
>I kinda like shameless self-plugs although I fail to see how this one answers
>the question asked?
>
>On 13/06/16 14:09, "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapebl
Message-
From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: 13 June 2016 14:26
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer nested on XenServer
I kinda like shameless self-plugs although I fail to see how this one answers
the question asked?
On 13/06/16 14:09, "Paul
Maruko-san,
Since nested XenServer isn't officially supported by Citrix, it's entirely
possible that some aspect of the nesting which CloudStack requires is
missing/broken.
As Paul indicated, knowing more about your configuration is crucial. First
and foremost, you'll need to be running on the
I kinda like shameless self-plugs although I fail to see how this one answers
the question asked?
On 13/06/16 14:09, "Paul Angus" wrote:
>Hi Maruko San
>
>We'd need to see the details of your networking.
>We've created Trillian github.com/shapeblue/Trillian - it's
Hi Maruko San
We'd need to see the details of your networking.
We've created Trillian github.com/shapeblue/Trillian - it's based on ESXi and
uses CloudStack to orchestrate everything.
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden,
Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:06 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Xenserver 6.5 live migration with local volumes
This is a product bug and needs to be fixed. There is some serialization issue
that needs fixing.
In the below code volumeToFi
Is there a way I can fix this on my installation, without recompiling jar files?
Regards,
IT engineer
Farheap, Russia
Ivan Derbenev
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@accelerite.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:06 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re
This is a product bug and needs to be fixed. There is some serialization issue
that needs fixing.
In the below code volumeToFiler is null as Map is not a serializable type. It
needs to be replaced with getVolumeToFilerAsList() and then the data needs to
be read appropriately.
final
I think I didn’t make it clear. Those 10 hosts are all Gen8 blades, that’s why
I want them to form a pool of their own. New Gen9 blades will go into a
different pool.
On 3/9/16, 10:14 AM, "Tim Mackey" wrote:
>In that case, Yiping, I would *definitely* recommend putting
In that case, Yiping, I would *definitely* recommend putting those servers
into at least two pools. The processors used in Gen8 and Gen9 servers can
not currently be joined into the same pool, and you actually need to be
very sensitive to the processor steppings. Dundee should fix that, but no
Hi, Tim:
Thanks for very detailed reply.
These are Gen8 HP blades and all my new servers will be Gen9. That’s why I’d
like to combine them into one maxed out cluster. I have only two guest VLAN’s
and roughly 400 VM instances for this 10 hosts cluster. So I think performance
wise I should
Yiping,
Here's the detailed answer
>From the XenServer perspective, there are a number of factors which go into
how various configuration limits are arrived at. Most of the time, they
aren't hard limits (for example I know of users with more than 16 hosts in
a pool). What the XenServer team
IIRC, its just a recommendation. I think it stemmed from performance
impact, due to numerous VLAN's present, in environments with lots of
tenants.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Yiping Zhang wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
> The CloudStack doc recommends that for XenServer, do not put
Sec storage is mounted on SSVM. It is mounted on host when required.
> On 14-Sep-2015, at 1:42 pm, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have primary SR mounted at slave server on my XenServer cluster to
> /var/run/sr-mount/UUID. Secondary storage is not mounted
Yes, Vadim Kimlaychuk Secondary storage not mounted any where
Regards,
Prapul sriram,
Cloud Architect,
PSI Cloud Solutions,
Psiclouds.com.
On Monday, 14 September 2015 1:42 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk
wrote:
Hello all,
I have primary SR mounted at slave server
starting XS agent manually
Either unmanage/manage cluster or perform a force reconnect to the host.
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: tony_caot...@163.com [mailto:tony_caot...@163.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 5:14 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re
Hello,
Almost one month gone, my problem is still here. I really really need
someone to help me.
new Settings ACS 4.4.4 XS 6.2
After reboot, errors here:
2015-08-12 16:18:54,557 INFO [c.c.a.t.Request]
(StatsCollector-3:ctx-b287085a) not building log message for '[{}]',
_cmds.length ==
After I disabled and enabled XS cluster primary. it works.
seems XS agent have started by ACS host. so what is the correct
behavior of starting XS agent manually ?
---
Cao Tong
On 08/12/2015 04:41 PM, tony_caot...@163.com wrote:
Hello,
Almost one month gone, my problem is
Well, sometimes people can’t answer a question because of lack of
relevant information, or simply because no one has encountered a similar
situation before.
Looking at your past messages on this thread, there were no mentions about
primary storage. Obviously, your primary storage configuration
Hi Yiping, Thanks for your reply first.
My NFS server deployed in ACS manager host, another host is a single
xenserver.
A KVM environment deployed in ACS manager host too.
there is three storages named, Kprimary, Xprimary, Secondary.
First, I add KVM cluster with zone-wide Kprimary, it
Hi, Finally I resolved this problem by my self.
* Primary Storage: A storage resource typically provided to a single
cluster for the actual running of instance disk images. (Zone-wide
primary storage is an option, though not typically used.)
This line above is from
I decided to gamble and go ahead and upgrade the hosts to XenServer 6.5
(plus patches). Everything appears to be back to normal. I'll find out
more as my users get back in over the next day or two.
Thank you Geoff H for your post here:
Hi Carlos,
What networking model are you using Basic / Advanced with security groups?
Glenn Wagner
Senior Consultant, South Africa
Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111
glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue
ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis
Basic, shared network (no security groups).
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Glenn Wagner glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Carlos,
What networking model are you using Basic / Advanced with security groups?
Glenn Wagner
Senior Consultant, South Africa
Phone: +27 21 527 0091 |
@prashant, following it the answer of you questions
1. Yes, primary storage is connected fine for my xenserver.
2. No, Xenserver's password is not changed.
3. yes, web UI is fine, and I can login.
4. before reboot, I unmanaged and disabled resources, and after reboot
I have enabled all of
Hi,
After reinstall, I got the problem again
So, I will describe once again.
WHAT my environment looks like:
I have a ACS server host and a xenserver host, After both reboot, I can
not create a VM on xenserver through ACS.
A KVM and A NFS are running together in ACS manager host.
the
Hey! help please...
some news.
I think the cause is that the ACS host can't communicate with XenServer
host.
ACS continues outputing logs like this
2015-07-22 20:42:13,555 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentAttache]
(AgentManager-Handler-7:null) Seq 5-8174877748607582212: Forwarding Seq
Thanks all,
I have already reinstall my hosts for preparing a new clear environment
to restart my research.
---
Cao Tong
On 07/20/2015 09:24 PM, Prashant s wrote:
some questions :
can you please tell ...
1. is your NFS storage or your primary Storage Repository in connected
mode
No, no one's IP was changed.
1. In xenserver I can not login systemvms using the internal IP like
'169.254.1.112', There shoud be a bridge network for this right? it is
gone.
2. I try to delete xenserver host from CS on web, it also failed with
lots of logs like following, then memory is
some questions :
can you please tell ...
1. is your NFS storage or your primary Storage Repository in connected
mode with no red cross mark on them in xencenter.
2. did you change any passwords on the xenservers ?
3. is the cloudstack web ui up , can you login to the cloudstack web page.
4.
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer upgrade in CloudStack environment
Hi Remi,
I am interested in the doc update as well. Please include how to enable poolHA
as part of the upgrade process. I am assuming one must first upgrade to a
version of ACS that supports it.
thanks,
Carlos
On Tue, Jun 23
.
-Original Message-
From: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs [mailto:mart...@vertigs.lv]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:40 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer upgrade in CloudStack environment
Hello,
No, I didn't. Didn't know about such upgrade procedure. I will follow
this article
Message-
From: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs [mailto:mart...@vertigs.lv]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:40 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer upgrade in CloudStack environment
Hello,
No, I didn't. Didn't know about such upgrade procedure. I will follow this
article next
Hi Martins,
Have you unmanaged your xen cluster from cloudstack UI before xen upgrade?
This is a mandatory step that disconnects all xen servers in the cluster
from while upgrade is going on.
You can go through
Hello,
No, I didn't. Didn't know about such upgrade procedure. I will follow
this article next time.
Thanks a lot!
On 2015.06.12. 10:21, Praveen B wrote:
Hi Martins,
Have you unmanaged your xen cluster from cloudstack UI before xen upgrade?
This is a mandatory step that disconnects all xen
Hi,
I did the same as Martin at CS 4.5.1 and it went OK. Does this depend
on CS version?
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs [mailto:mart...@vertigs.lv]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:40 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer upgrade
]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 April 2015 0:11
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
Geoff,
I just went through the changelog for ipset, and its a pretty safe bet
that's where the problems are. In XenServer 6.2, ipset is version 4.5 while
XenServer 6.5 uses
to use nethash or iphash based on the ipset version? In
Rohit's change I see that for both XS 6.2 and 6.5 nethash is used.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 April 2015 0:11
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5
Message-
From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 April 2015 0:11
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
Geoff,
I just went through the changelog for ipset, and its a pretty safe bet that's
where the problems are. In XenServer 6.2
, April 09, 2015 6:36 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5
Even though the identifications steps don't match, disabling intremap in
XS
6.5 seems to have solved the issue for us:
http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX136517
2015-04-08 22:15 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Zięba t.a.zi
important to consider. Luckiliy you
don't need to change motherboard and have workaround.
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Jan-Arve Nygård [mailto:jan.arve.nyg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 6:36 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5
Even though
:11
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
Geoff,
I just went through the changelog for ipset, and its a pretty safe bet that's
where the problems are. In XenServer 6.2, ipset is version 4.5 while
XenServer 6.5 uses ipset version 6.11. With version 5
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 20 April 2015 17:52
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
Many thank Somesh
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540
Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
What is the output of cat /etc/sysctl.conf? Update it as per
http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/latest/hypervisor/xenserver.html.
If there was an upgrade from XS 6.2 to XS 6.5, then changes to sysctl.conf is
not persisted.
On 21-Apr
[mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 20 April 2015 17:52
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
Many thank Somesh
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 20 April 2015 17:52
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
Many thank Somesh
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M
| M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 20 April 2015 17:52
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
Many thank Somesh
Regards
Geoff
: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 20 April 2015 17:52
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
Many thank Somesh
I am running that in my lab and haven't encountered any issues. But note I may
not be covering a whole lot of use cases.
Any specific issues that you are facing?
Somesh
CloudPlatform Escalations
Citrix Systems, Inc.
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent:
Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com]
Sent: 20 April 2015 15:38
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: XenServer 6.5 - Security Groups
I am running
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo