On 7/24/18 07:35 , patrick.pus...@telekom.de wrote:
Hi all,
during resolving of several bundles with the felixResolver I get a
ResolutionException: org.apache.felix.resolver.reason.ReasonException: Fragment
was not selected for attachment: com.xx.yy version=1.7.0.201806111251
But the
The value's format is just a space-delimited list of URLs.
To install exploded bundles, the Felix framework supports a URL in the
form of:
reference:file:/path/to/exploded/bundle/directory
-> richard
On 8/30/17 22:11 , duxiutao wrote:
Hello felix guys:
I have read this from this link
.
-> richard
regards,
Karl
Best regards, Alex
Среда, 10 мая 2017, 16:55 +03:00 от "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>:
On 5/10/17 08:16 , Alex Sviridov wrote:
Hi all
I use Apache Felix 5.4.0 and I have two bundles: bundleA and bundleB. BundleB
depends on bundleA
On 5/10/17 08:16 , Alex Sviridov wrote:
Hi all
I use Apache Felix 5.4.0 and I have two bundles: bundleA and bundleB. BundleB
depends on bundleA.
I update bundleA and after that run the following code to do osgi refresh:
Bundle systemBundle = bcx . getBundle ( 0 );
FrameworkWiring
On 5/3/17 15:23 , Dan Hartman wrote:
Hi there,
I followed the tutorial here:
http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-ipojo/apache-felix-ipojo-gettingstarted/ipojo-hello-word-maven-based-tutorial.html
I can't find any felix-1.0.3 directory (nor one appropriately named
On 5/26/16 08:48 , Raymond Auge wrote:
I didn't because I wasn't sure it was even a real issue.
but I can if you like.
Always a good idea, since it is more likely to get seen. Thanks.
-> richard
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>
wrote:
Did
Did you open an issue in JIRA?
On 5/25/16 23:21 , Raymond Auge wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm not completely sure, but I think I have found a bug in the felix
resolver.
It's a little hard to reproduce, but I have done so in a test I've
submitted in this PR [1] to bnd (because I was trying to use
On 1/12/16 11:59 , Thomas Draier wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:45 PM Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>
wrote:
So, are you saying that when you get a resolved event for some arbitrary
bundle, you are running into issues because some of its dependencies are
not yet t
I think you may be reading more into the spec than what is there.
Technically, a resolve is atomic so all bundles are effectively resolved
at the same time, which means the events occur at the same time, but
since we can only deliver one at a time, then you receive them in some
arbitrary order
On 11/18/15 21:08 , David Leangen wrote:
Hi!
If I want to use the Felix Resolver, I need a ResolveContext. I noticed that
Felix has one, but it is private.
How could I get an instance of the Felix ResolveContext so that I may use the
Resolve service?
You don't. It is tied to the
what
they are doing, which is why 99% of the time I agree with Peter on this
subject that you should refresh.
-> richard
This assumes I have correctly understood the scenario as described by Maurice.
Neil
On 4 Nov 2015, at 13:31, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
On 1
kes in my original response. For clarification,
"installing to stale packages" should have been "wiring to stale
packages" and "this top" should have been "this topic".
Neil
On 5 Nov 2015, at 14:31, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wr
On 11/4/15 06:52 , i...@cuhka.com wrote:
I 'solved' it by restarting the device. I rather don't, as I like
solution where I can upgrade functionality without shutting down.
You don't need to shut down, you just need to refresh the framework. If
you update A and S, the old version of A is
On 10/30/15 15:19 , i...@cuhka.com wrote:
Yes, indeed I'm using THE osgi plugin, and I didn't do any
Bundle-Classpath editing, nor did bnd. Anyway, after 'ctrl-alt-del' of
my Felix it all seems to be ok. While I still don't grasp while it
occurs, what can make it hapen, I can continue.
If I
On 10/30/15 13:46 , i...@cuhka.com wrote:
After a flying start with OSGi'ing my application I'm running into
some amazements, or frustrations as I seem to spend more time managing
OSGi than actually creating stuff...
Anyway, my bundle resolves fine, but when it starts I get a
, then this would be a significant bug. If that is
the case, then it would be great to get more information. It would
definitely be surprising, but certainly not out of the realm of possibility.
-> richard
Best,
Milen
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org&
one with the
opinion that is should not have been moved into OSGi Core. Also, it is
another discussion (I am sure this was discussed internally before
releasing OSGi Core 5).
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>
wrote:
On 10/27/15 11:27 , Balázs Zsoldos wrote:
ave done that for me. It's all about
layers and perspective.
-> richard
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>
wrote:
On 10/27/15 11:27 , Balázs Zsoldos wrote:
@David:
I know about the *org.osgi.framework.system.**packages.extra* property,
but
t
nder
pattern since framework developers have done that for me. It's all about
layers and perspective.
-> richard
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>
wrote:
On 10/27/15 11:27 , Balázs Zsoldos wrote:
@David:
I know about the *org.
On 10/27/15 11:27 , Balázs Zsoldos wrote:
@David:
I know about the *org.osgi.framework.system.**packages.extra* property, but
that is about another use-case.
*org.osgi.framework.system.**packages.extra *can be used to extend the list
of system packages.
*org.osgi.framework.system.**packages*
On 10/27/15 11:27 , Balázs Zsoldos wrote:
@David:
I know about the *org.osgi.framework.system.**packages.extra* property, but
that is about another use-case.
*org.osgi.framework.system.**packages.extra *can be used to extend the list
of system packages.
*org.osgi.framework.system.**packages*
the framework packages.
You can certainly create an issue for this...
-> richard
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org>
wrote:
On 10/27/15 13:27 , Balázs Zsoldos wrote:
Also, we used to package some framework services separately (e.
don't have too much time to think about it.
Create an issue and potentially a patch and then start nagging people. :-)
-> richard
Christian
Am 27.10.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Richard S. Hall:
On 10/27/15 11:36 , Christian Schneider wrote:
A typical case I have is that I need to remove s
that
>> implements
>>> the extender pattern, as the bundle would not resolve.
>>
>>
>> As an application developer, you don’t need to import anything from
>> extender bundles.
>>
>> I would estimate that 90% of my bundles do not import anything
I think it is reasonable to allow someone to hide exports from the
system bundle, but that doesn't mean that this process couldn't be
improved. For example, we could introduce a new variable
${framework-exports} as an alias to what the framework exports, so then
in our default properties file
On 8/28/15 14:36 , Benson Margulies wrote:
Consider three bundles, A, B, and C. A has imports from B and C. All
three import Guava.
A and B import with a constraint of [18, 19), C takes [15, 16).
The container obediently wires A and B to one bundle, and C to the other.
Now, no Guava objects
On 8/28/15 15:05 , Benson Margulies wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 8/28/15 14:36 , Benson Margulies wrote:
Consider three bundles, A, B, and C. A has imports from B and C. All
three import Guava.
A and B import with a constraint of [18
On 8/21/15 14:24 , Hubert Felber wrote:
Windows
:-)
1. stop the bundle before deleting its bundle
neither stop nor uninstall the bundle helps. It must have to do with
the native code running -- is still locked.
Did you refresh after uninstalling ?
2. stop using windows, by far the best
, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org
wrote:
On 5/20/15 05:15 , Milen Dyankov wrote:
Thanks for your answer Richard!
I am aware if the FAQ however what it basically tells you is it depends
;)
Unfortunately, it does depend on your circumstances. There are very few
cases
On 5/20/15 05:15 , Milen Dyankov wrote:
Thanks for your answer Richard!
I am aware if the FAQ however what it basically tells you is it depends
;)
Unfortunately, it does depend on your circumstances. There are very few
cases in software engineering where you can say, always do it like
things downs just leads to other messiness (see
.NET and its strong versions).
As I said before, there is no free lunch. Developing software is
complicated and you have to work hard to keep it from getting messy.
- richard
Best,
Milen
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Richard S. Hall he
on their own
requirements. Some people might want their bundle to be self-contained
to make it easier to use or want to limit third-party dependencies, etc.
It just depends. :-)
- richard
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org
wrote:
On 5/20/15 11:37 , Milen Dyankov
On 5/17/15 12:57 , Milen Dyankov wrote:
Hi,
I recently stumbled upon something that makes me wonder about OSGI specs
APIs. As Metatype was the one API that made me start thinking about the
issue, I'll use it as an example but the question is about APIs in general.
So while attempting to
On 4/27/15 04:02 , Moss, Robin wrote:
Hello,
Sorry if this has been asked before but I've not had much lucking finding
information about it.
I'm trying to configure felix to use auto deploy to install,start a set of
plugins that are needed for auto.start bundles later on.
In my case I'm
On 3/17/15 04:34 , Anders Engström wrote:
Hi!
I'm deploying bundles at runtime in a Felix container and was expecting
the container to generate a FrameworkEvent (of type ERROR) if a call to
`Bundle#start()` fails with an exception.
In my case the call to `start` triggers a `BundleException`
On 1/12/15 11:42 , Benson Margulies wrote:
My idea that this has to do with system bundle versus not is wrong. I'm
still debugging.
Is it a single package you are talking about or is it a couple of
packages with uses constraints among them?
- richard
On 12/9/14 01:55 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi
Am 09.12.2014 um 03:02 schrieb Richard Hall he...@ungoverned.org:
On 12/8/14 20:47 , Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 12/8/14 18:07 , Benson Margulies wrote
all start levels up to the initial start level have completed activating.
- richard
On Dec 8, 2014 9:10 PM, Benson Margulies ben...@basistech.com
mailto:ben...@basistech.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Richard S. Hall
he...@ungoverned.org mailto:he...@ungoverned.org wrote
On 12/9/14 08:16 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 12/9/14 01:55 , Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi
Am 09.12.2014 um 03:02 schrieb Richard Hall he...@ungoverned.org:
On 12/8/14 20:47 , Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Richard S. Hall
he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 12/8/14 18
On 12/8/14 18:07 , Benson Margulies wrote:
FrameworkStartLevel#setStartLevel takes listeners, which looks really
useful. Can I call it instead of Framework#start?
They don't do the same thing, but certainly you can use either...
- richard
On 12/8/14 20:47 , Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 12/8/14 18:07 , Benson Margulies wrote:
FrameworkStartLevel#setStartLevel takes listeners, which looks really
useful. Can I call it instead of Framework#start?
They don't
On 11/17/14 10:27 , Benson Margulies wrote:
In several places,
http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-framework-launching-and-embedding.html
says:
This is achieved using the
org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra configuration
property previously presented.
It does not
On 10/6/14 06:13 , Andrew Scully wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking into domain security in OSGI. I've assembled a fairly complete
picture of what this would involve, but I have a question which I would
appreciate your thoughts on. It would also be useful to me to check that I
have correctly understood
On 9/1/14, 11:01 , Balázs Zsoldos wrote:
The system bundle exports in Felix are defined by the defaults.properties
file found inside the JAR, so it’s not necessary to use the Export-Package
header from the manifest.
I know. I saw it. The packages are also defined in the Export-Package
MANIFEST
On 6/12/14, 03:39 , Erik Jansman wrote:
Hello,
For a project I'm working on creating a VLC bundle in Felix. I'm
starting to wonder if trying to get VLC in a bundle is the right choice.
I'm running into what appears to be an import/export package problem.
VLC needs the
On 6/12/14, 05:01 , Benoît Thiébault wrote:
Hi again,
I checked what version of Felix did break it:
- Everything worked fine with Felix 4.0.3 that was released the 28th of
December 2012
- Version 4.2.0, released on the 11th of February 2013, broke it
Isn’t this modification responsible for
and the bundle are the same. Only Felix
version changes.
We have tried to look at other classes that were modified in Felix since 4.0.3
but could not find anything conclusive yet
Le 12 juin 2014 18:40, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org a écrit :
On 6/12/14, 05:01 , Benoît Thiébault wrote:
Hi
...
- richard
Kind regards,
Ben
Le 12 juin 2014 à 21:48, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org a écrit :
Perhaps you start the JVM up suspended with debug enabled and set a break point
up at R4LibraryClause.match() and see precisely why it is failing?
The code in there is pretty self explanatory
I assume you have a framework.start() in there that you are not showing us?
- richard
On 4/25/14, 10:42 , Keith Hughes wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a strange bug and suspect it may be due to bundle startup order in
Felix.So I am trying to log bundle startup order. I tried adding a bundle
listener
We're glad to have helped... ;-)
On 4/25/14, 11:41 , Keith Hughes wrote:
Found my problem. Very sorry.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Keith Hughes keith.mhug...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi folks,
I have a strange bug and suspect it may be due to bundle startup order in
Felix.So I am trying to
I'm guessing you'd want to use iPOJO API, which allows you to describe a
component dynamically:
http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-ipojo/apache-felix-ipojo-userguide/apache-felix-ipojo-api.html
- richard
On 3/26/14, 16:37 , alejandro.e...@miranda.com wrote:
Hello
This code looks to be based on a fairly old version of the framework...I
would guess version 3.x, which is prior to OSGi R4.3. You need to do
some updates to get this to work with the latest framework releases (now
version 4.4). Further, I think that OSGi R4.3 introduced some changes
that
. We use CQ 5.5 with Apache Felix 3.0.8.
Regards,
Dirk
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Richard S. Hall [mailto:he...@ungoverned.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 24. März 2014 19:01
An: users@felix.apache.org
Betreff: Re: OpenJPA Support in Apache Felix
This code looks to be based on a fairly old
, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 3/17/14, 09:07 , Stefan Egli wrote:
Hi Richard,
(see below)
On 3/17/14 1:34 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 3/14/14, 05:26 , Stefan Egli wrote:
Hi,
I just ran into the famous deadlock with Java 6 where the same class
is
being
On 3/19/14, 11:00 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 3/19/14, 10:47 , Stefan Egli wrote:
Hi,
I wrote a test which reproduces the deadlock on Java 6 (MacOS). It's
attached to FELIX-4462 ([0]). Unfortunately I only managed to get it
fail
when running from Eclipse, not via 'mvn clean test'. I had
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4462
On 3/17/14 4:22 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 3/17/14, 09:07 , Stefan Egli wrote:
Hi Richard,
(see below)
On 3/17/14 1:34 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 3/14/14, 05:26 , Stefan Egli wrote:
Hi,
I just ran
On 3/14/14, 05:26 , Stefan Egli wrote:
Hi,
I just ran into the famous deadlock with Java 6 where the same class is being
loaded from two different bundles (also see FELIX-3953). This happened on a
startup of a CQ instance.
I'll add more analysis details but my question is: what is the
On 3/17/14, 09:07 , Stefan Egli wrote:
Hi Richard,
(see below)
On 3/17/14 1:34 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 3/14/14, 05:26 , Stefan Egli wrote:
Hi,
I just ran into the famous deadlock with Java 6 where the same class is
being loaded from two different bundles (also
On 3/12/14, 10:30 , Henry, Cedric wrote:
Hello,
I have a system using Felix and one of the bundles contains an SMTP client
based on the JavaMail library.
That system is installed on different machines, and for some of them I have a
situation as the one mentioned in
On 3/5/14, 12:03 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Try the following:
addcommand ($.context loadClass java.lang.System)
Or:
g! addcommand system ((bundle 0) loadClass java.lang.System)
You need to give it a class loader for doing the loadClass...
- richard
2014-03-05 17:42 GMT+01:00 Daniel
The framework isn't a bundle, so you could try just the normal mvn
clean install...
On 2/14/14, 04:31 , Elros wrote:
Hi Felix users,
I need to compile the version of Apache Felix 3.1.1 on my Mac Air with JVM
1.7.0_51. When i try to do the command mvn -Dpackaging=bundle install the
process of
On 1/2/14, 10:07 , Daniel McGreal wrote:
Hi all,
Updating the system bundle has the effect of restarting the OSGi framework
(requires support from the launcher).
- http://wiki.osgi.org/wiki/System_Bundle
Does the Felix launcher support updating itself? I notice there's no bundle.jar
in
On 12/27/13, 11:25 , Ulrich wrote:
Am trying to get familiar with OSGi. Therefore have right now installed Felix
to my Eclipse Kepler installation following the description as is published
in http://felix.apache.org/site/integrating-felix-with-eclipse.html.
But unfortunatly when starting Felix
deals with class loader
locks, not the global lock (which is a Felix framework-specific thing).
- richard
On 18 Dec 2013, at 13:57, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi
Am 17.12.2013 um 14:25 schrieb Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org:
On 12/17/13, 04:36 , Tang Yong wrote:
Hi
On 12/17/13, 04:36 , Tang Yong wrote:
Hi All,
I met an issue as the following,
...
Caused by: org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to acquire global
lock for resolve.
at
org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.resolveBundleRevision(Felix.java:3832)
at
On 12/9/13, 02:37 , Snorre Lothar von Gohren Edwin wrote:
Hi
I have split up my bundles with an API bundle, and an implementation bundle.
Right now im trying to update the implementation bundle to be able to to
other things.
But for some reason, even if the new version displays in the list of
/refresh.
- richard
-Karl
From: Richard S. Hall [he...@ungoverned.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 3:25 PM
To: users@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: Stale BundleWiringImpl (ClassLoader) used for
sun.reflect.ConstructorAccessorImpl
On 11/23/13, 13
November 2013 15:28, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 11/20/13, 06:06 , David Bosschaert wrote:
It's been a while but I started implementing some of these. I added
patches to the following 3 bugs:
* FELIX-3868
* FELIX-4080
* FELIX-4083
Would be great if someone could review them
On 11/23/13, 13:29 , Karl Rieb wrote:
Hi,
We are using felix framwork 3.0.4 and are having problems when one of our
bundle upgrades. We noticed the same issue also occurs if we uninstall, then
later re-install the bundle.
The bundle has an embedded dependency (e.g. a non-OSGi jar) that
I think the API is largely the same...the main difference is the API was
moved out of the org.osgi.service.obr package and into the
org.apache.felix.bundlerepository package because OSGi wasn't/isn't
releasing a spec around this, so we couldn't really continue to use
their namespace.
-
On 11/20/13, 06:06 , David Bosschaert wrote:
It's been a while but I started implementing some of these. I added
patches to the following 3 bugs:
* FELIX-3868
* FELIX-4080
* FELIX-4083
Would be great if someone could review them and apply :)
Thanks! I'll try to look into them.
- richard
too much pain.
For now I would advise people against using a qualifier at all.
Eclipse seems to survive with qualifiers.
- richard
-Stijn
-Original Message-
From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:he...@ungoverned.org]
Sent: woensdag 6 november 2013 18:38
To: users@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re
Yes, it was basically decided that there wasn't much reason to spec
Gogo, since there wasn't any real prospect for getting multiple
implementations. So, as of now, it won't be spec'ed and thus the
implementation should not be using the spec package name space.
- richard
On 11/14/13 11:11 ,
much pain.
For now I would advise people against using a qualifier at all.
Eclipse seems to survive with qualifiers.
- richard
-Stijn
-Original Message-
From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:he...@ungoverned.org]
Sent: woensdag 6 november 2013 18:38
To: users@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re
On 11/5/13 11:45 , Elliot Huntington wrote:
The Felix documentation states:
felix.bootdelegation.implicit - Specifies whether the framework should try
to guess when to implicitly boot delegate to ease integration with external
code. The default value is true.
The documentation treats boot
On 10/31/13, 17:04 , Jason Tesser wrote:
I am looking for the download to
http://felix.apache.org/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-manifest-generator-mangen.html
Where can I find it?
I don't believe there ever was an official release, so you'd have to
build it yourself.
However, this
Try to exclude it in your Import-Package in your pom.xml (e.g.,
!oracle.xml.*).
- richard
On 10/25/13, 00:15 , Wade Girard wrote:
I have been experimenting with felix and learning OSGi for the last week. I
really like what it has to offer and believe that I can use it for an upcoming
On 10/17/13 00:31 , Peter Cheung wrote:
Dear AllI have a app, which is a debugger, it works with qemu and bochs.
I am planning to support more VM, so I want to independent the middle part to
OSGi. I am not sure i am doing it correctly:
1) I changed my app to start felix immediately after
It looks like you deploying a system bundle extension. What is in its
manifest?
- richard
On 10/8/13 02:26 , gavin.yao wrote:
Hi:
When upgrading to Felix Framework 4.2.1, I run into BundleException, however,
old version: 3.2.2 has not this problem.
Here's the full stack trace:
Could
On 10/3/13 10:24 , Rajan Parthasarathy wrote:
Hello,
I'm running into an Unresolved constraint in bundle error, and hoping to get
some insight into it. I'm using Felix system bundle 4.0.3.
The application uses an OBR, with a thread that periodically checks for
updates. Bundles are updated
Message-
From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:he...@ungoverned.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 1:10 PM
To: users@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with Unresolved constraint error
On 10/3/13 10:24 , Rajan Parthasarathy wrote:
Hello,
I'm running into an Unresolved constraint in bundle error
more tests (adding new bundles, etc.) but if you see anything
wonky with this approach, please let me know.
Yes, I believe that is the correct approach.
- richard
Thanks again for all the help,
Raj
-Original Message-
From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:he...@ungoverned.org]
Sent: Thursday
On 10/2/13 08:42 , Bengt Rodehav wrote:
I'm creating a dynamic processing component using iPOJO and Camel. The idea
is to dynamically specify (via config admin) a number of processor id's. In
runtime I want to find the matching processors (the processors are Camel
processors published as OSGi
On 9/25/13 05:25 , gavin.yao wrote:
Hi :
Which classloader load Fragment(Fragment-Host: system.bundle;
extension:=framework), boot classloader?? or system classloader??
I believe this would be the class loader that loaded the framework
classes, which is typically the application class
On 9/25/13 10:59 , Debeerst Benjamin wrote:
Hello all,
First of all I'd like to say how wonderful iPOJO works. Thanks for all
the hard work going into that project (and all the others at Apache
Felix). (Most of the time) there's good warnings or errors on why a
requirement could not be
On 9/24/13 16:06 , Fulvio Risso wrote:
I'm currently embedding Jetty in the felix framework, using the
examples provided on the felix website:
http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-framework-launching-and-embedding.html
and
On 9/23/13 03:19 , Roland wrote:
Roland wrote
[...]It would be nice if the wires also can be cached persistently in some
way.
I'm no Felix-expert and do not know the exact implementation, but I'm
assuming that Felix creats a hash table of wire-objects to resolve
dependencies at runtime.
simpler).
Richard S. Hall wrote
[...], it made little difference. [...]
It's a pity because of the result. But good that you tried it once.
Well, it could be that my approach was too naive. Needless to say, I was
surprised.
- richard
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-felix
Sounds like you need to see what the value of the ...system.packages
(and ...system.packages.extras) property is when you start in your test
container.
- richard
On 9/19/13 11:05 , Roland wrote:
Hello Felix experts...
Recently, I got the following error in my *test-container* (pax exam):
On 9/16/13 12:50 , Christopher BROWN wrote:
Hi,
I provide my own implementation of the Felix logger (I'm not referring the
OSGi log service here, I'm aware of the difference). I set it up using the
HashMap I provided to the Felix constructor (I'm using Felix in embedded
mode), using the two
Did you try installing all of your bundles into the framework and making
sure they really do resolve? You might get a better error message, if
there is an actual resolve error, if you try to resolve them in the
framework.
- richard
On 9/12/13 17:45 , Jamescott wrote:
Hello,
I have a maven
-jre sections). Is that correct?
Thanks,
Christopher
On 12 September 2013 18:14, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
On 9/12/13 11:56 , Christopher BROWN wrote:
Hello,
An application using Felix 3.2.2 on MacOS X has started failing with the
following exception:
org.osgi.framework
On 9/12/13 03:09 , Tang Yong wrote:
Hi Felix,
Good Afternoon(My local time)!
About the status of Felix Repository Subproject, I have two questions as
following and looking forward to obtaining some answsers:
1. Who are leading the subproject, Richard?
Not really, we don't really have
On 9/12/13 10:59 , Christian Schneider wrote:
That would be really helpful. Using CXF also requires to not export
some system packages.
Currently we have to completely redefine the system packages. So it
would be nice to be able to just specify which packages to add
(already works) and which
On 9/12/13 11:56 , Christopher BROWN wrote:
Hello,
An application using Felix 3.2.2 on MacOS X has started failing with the
following exception:
org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle
system.sdk-project [5]: Unable to resolve 5.0: missing requirement [5.0]
package;
I guess I don't recall, is this a framework issue or an OBR issue?
If it is a bug in the framework, did you open an issue for it?
- richard
On 9/10/13 11:08 , Roland wrote:
same issue as
On 9/6/13 04:45 , Roland wrote:
Hello Felix-experts,
I got a BundleException Cannot start bundle xyz because its start level is
3, which is greater than the framework's start level of 1. After the
exception was thrown I checked the Exception-type and I got 0 but I expected
START_TRANSIENT_ERROR
On 9/6/13 05:27 , Roland wrote:
Is it possible to start the framework and the cached bundles concurrently?
I'm not optimistic:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3034
- richard
--
View this message in context:
On 9/6/13 08:42 , Roland wrote:
Hello Felix-experts!
The org.apache.felix.utils.log.Logger can only be instanciated without using
the fallbacklogger (stdout,stderr) if a bundle exports the LogService
interface, isn't it? How can I set felix.log.logger at runtime after calling
the
On 9/6/13 08:59 , Roland wrote:
Does it mean that I should export the LogService-interface with
FRAMEWORK_SYSTEMPACKAGES_EXTRA? Otherwise it makes no sense to me.
Not sure what you mean, the framework doesn't use a logging service, it
uses an instance of org.apache.felix.framework.Logger.
-
1 - 100 of 1532 matches
Mail list logo
