On 08/06/2014 10:01 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Hi Tom,
If we do not find the bugs in the fresh version, they won't be resolved until
the rename to Stable/Still. If less use Fresh, the quality of the next stable
will be lower Does this help?
No. Basically what you and Sophie are
On 08/05/2014 11:08 PM, David Love wrote:
Using LinuxMint v17.0 Qiana qith the MATE DE.
Have followed with interest the recent discussins on Base and have decided
to try and learn how to use it, using PostGreSQL as the backend. But -
and there is always one of those :-) - how many of the
On 08/03/2014 03:27 AM, Lera Goncharuk wrote:
В письме от 2 августа 2014 09:57:15 пользователь Kracked_P_P---webmaster
написал:
On 08/02/2014 06:25 AM, Lera Goncharuk wrote:
Hi,
The setup from PPA is deemed more important in Ubuntu user community
than
setup from *.deb files. A lot of
On 08/04/2014 01:21 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
Following on from previous threads, this is good news for LibreOffice:
Government documents will use what are known as open standards for
document formats. Word processor files will be saved with “.odt”
suffixes, rather than “.doc”.
On 07/31/2014 03:26 AM, Pedro wrote:
The problem is that it is difficult to find a word that explains that one
version is new (with new features/bugs/regressions) and the other one has
been patched so that new features are already stable.
If you call Stable to the patched branch (and calling
On 07/31/2014 03:35 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
...
Doubtless such discussion is more effective on the Discussion mailing
list. On this mailing list we just have to go along with whatever has
been decided, or to use our own words to make it clearer what is meant.
Actually it is pertinent to
While we're on 'nitpicking'...
OK I give... the download page/link is confusing enough with the
'Download' link going directly to
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ 'LibreOffice
Fresh', but now I see that 'LibreOffice Stable' has changed to
'LibreOffice Still'
? Your life must be a terrible experience and you
have better to do than lingering around here, so STFU.
Charles.
Pseudonyms aren't evil have been discussed ad nauseam previously...
(NoOp / Gary Lee)
Might I suggest reviewing:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
too bad
On 07/04/2014 12:37 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
There are a few reasons;
* Base needs an external back-end but most new users wont be aware of that
Interesting. I never knew that Base needs an external back-end...
Perhaps you can get the documentation folks to add that to the help
files and
On 07/04/2014 05:11 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 7/3/2014 10:56 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
I guess it depends whether you consider the ability to tab between
fields and fill in without a popup a regression. I consider the ability
to do so a 10 year leap forward. I am also able to paste
On 06/03/2014 06:58 AM, Sophie wrote:
Le 03/06/2014 15:54, Alex Thurgood a écrit :
Le 03/06/2014 15:39, Tanstaafl a écrit :
Anyone?
Seem to recall there's a bug report for this :
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78470
On 07/03/2014 06:43 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 6/10/2014 7:52 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 6/3/2014 9:58 AM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that Charles is talking about this bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75319
that behavior has been
On 07/03/2014 12:55 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Just for those people interested in using MariaDb perhaps to replace MySql
as a back-end for Base. As others have pointed out there are many possible
back-ends, such as Postgresql.
Interesting to see the MariaDb people include links to their
On 6/27/2014 8:21 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 6/25/2014 8:01 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2014 07:41 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
Each time that I've tested the non-distro version (which I normally run
instead of the distro version)
o I do not have any LO distro version installed (purged, including
config
On 6/25/2014 8:01 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2014 07:41 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
Each time that I've tested the non-distro version (which I normally run
instead of the distro version)
o I do not have any LO distro version installed (purged, including
config files
o I have purged any other
On 06/26/2014 04:51 AM, James Knott wrote:
On 06/25/2014 10:41 PM, NoOp wrote:
Recently I have been able to replicate crashes on linux LO versions
4.1.x- 4.2.x deb versions (32bit and 64bit) when attempting to open a
10MB Microsoft Publisher file.
I didn't know LO could open Publisher files
On 06/26/2014 10:46 AM, NoOp wrote:
...
Now I'm waiting for Brennan co to do one for Adobe Pagemaker 65
Framemaker as well :-)
Correction: waiting for Anurag Kanungo to do one for Adobe Pagemaker... :-)
http://fridrich.blogspot.com/
And as always - thanks Fridrich for these projects
Recently I have been able to replicate crashes on linux LO versions
4.1.x- 4.2.x deb versions (32bit and 64bit) when attempting to open a
10MB Microsoft Publisher file. However, when I switch to the distro LO
version 4.2.4 the .pub file(s) load up instantly. Unfortunately, the MS
Publisher file
On 06/25/2014 07:41 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
Each time that I've tested the non-distro version (which I normally run
instead of the distro version)
o I do not have any LO distro version installed (purged, including
config files
o I have purged any other previous LO
o I also have tested
On 06/18/2014 02:59 AM, Cley Faye wrote:
2014-06-18 2:37 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com:
Unfortunately, not directly. And there is (as far as I know) no simple
viewer that could be used for this purpose, ...
On the contrary, if the target platform is Windows (but not
Windows tomorrow and try it
there.
LibreOffice cannot be big and small at the same time :)
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger
Am 20.06.2014 um 08:23 schrieb NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net:
On 06/18/2014 02:59 AM, Cley Faye wrote:
2014-06-18 2:37 GMT+02:00 Brian Barker b.m.bar
On 06/20/2014 10:06 AM, Pikov Andropov wrote:
No, you're mistaken.
Using PP from Office 2007, I was able create a directory that contained
the following files:
AUTORUN.INF
THE_ORIGINAL_PPP_FILE.ppt
INTLDATE.DLL
microsoft.vc80.crt.manifest
msvcm80.dll
msvcp80.dll
MSVCR80.dll
OGL.DLL
On 06/18/2014 10:06 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Hi,
I do have PowerPoint as well, but do not know the option. You can export as
video, but this is suboptimal.
...
PPT Pack Go? That package is now called Package for CD:
On 5/9/2014 7:45 AM, Chris Net46 wrote:
Thanks Tom, I did install the whole program but this is not what you want
to do on a file server. Microsoft provide filter pack for open document
format but it doesn't work with recent version of odf files.
These might (or might not) be of interest/use:
On 05/04/2014 04:34 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi Tom :)
Good answers to Urmas there. Considerate, understanding and
light-hearted. Nicely done! :)
Did I miss something? Who/what is Urmas?
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
On 05/08/2014 07:28 PM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote:
@NoOp
Full threads in context are available on the Nabble service:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Users-f1639498.html
Thanks, I can read full threads. I had filtered Urmas some time back.
However, my question
On 05/02/2014 07:19 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
Stuart,
Update and status report - good news! -
1. I've installed Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1 Build ID:
46cfcd5a05aa1d13fecd73f5a25b64b8d8dd6781.
Did you by chance experience any dependency errors during your install?
See:
them usefully.
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:08 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 05/02/2014 07:19 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
Stuart,
Update and status report - good news! -
1. I've installed Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1 Build ID:
46cfcd5a05aa1d13fecd73f5a25b64b8d8dd6781.
Did you by chance
On 04/18/2014 10:00 AM, Sophie wrote:
...
To answer you specific question now:
Le 18/04/2014 17:37, alnuwer a écrit :
So I guess I have 3 choices:
Do nothing - I'm running version 4.2.2.1 (I have it set to auto update)
Go back to 4.1.5. Will I be giving up functionality?
Go to 4.2.3.3. But
On 11/18/2013 10:55 AM, john herron wrote:
Hello, everyone.
Can Apache OO be installed alongside LO (to run at different times)?
LO 3.5.7.2 [Build ID: 350m1(Build:2)] on Linux Mint 13.
Yes. But I *highly* recommend that you install AOOo 4.x in a parallel
folder instead of installing it via
On 11/18/2013 06:57 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
James didn't get quite far enough. It's a page or so further on. The
way page is set-up it does look as though you do HAVE TO make a
donation before the download will start. It's only the geeks that
will notice their own web-browser is the
On 11/05/2013 06:53 AM, Cliff Scott wrote:
** Reply to message from NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net on Mon, 04 Nov 2013
23:00:26 -0800
On 11/04/2013 12:38 PM, Cliff Scott wrote:
** Reply to message from Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com on Sat, 2 Nov
2013 15:29:02 -0500
...
'. I'm showing
On 11/05/2013 06:21 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
...
Did the Calibri Light fonts show up on your Win7 boot in LO 4.1.2.3?
Yes. And also in WinXP.
Which Linux distro are you using to see that that font set showed up in
the font list?
Doesn't matter - Ubuntu, Fedora, other. LO et al
On 11/05/2013 11:29 AM, NoOp wrote:
...
Another similar (I've not compared for EN spacing etc):
http://www.exljbris.com/fontinsans.htm
Note: it's important to compare/modify font spacing when substitute
fonts. They may look the same character-by-character, but character
spacing can make
On 11/05/2013 05:21 PM, c...@intergate.com wrote:
Quoting NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net:
...
Both AOOo AOO401m5(Build:9714) - Rev. 1524958 2013-09-20 11:54 - Linux
x86_64) and LO 4.1.3.2 act identical, at least on the linux versions.
Both use a substitute font for Calibri Light Bold/Bold Italic
On 11/04/2013 12:38 PM, Cliff Scott wrote:
** Reply to message from Cliff Scott c...@intergate.com on Sat, 2 Nov
2013 15:29:02 -0500
Reminder: This is on a Mac with OSx Lion (10.7.5).
Sorry for replying to my own message, but I finally rebooted and no help. I
removed the whole family of
On 10/07/2013 10:14 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I once read an amusing article If operating systems were airplanes. I
couldn't find the one i read but managed to pluck these bits from Zyra's mad
website.
snip
On 10/03/2013 09:14 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
has published an interesting article,
*French police move from Windows to Ubuntu Linux* (
http://www.zdnet.com/french-police-move-from-windows-to-ubuntu-linux-721479/)
, over at ZDNet. It deals explicitly with a
On 04/25/2013 12:52 PM, david wrote:
...
What I mean is a full screen view WITHOUT THE FULLSCREEN TOOLBAR (the
silly little thing that contains only a button to exit full screen
mode). That toolbar always appears in full screen mode and it's the ONLY
toolbar that appears in fullscreen mode.
On 01/27/2013 07:19 AM, C. H. D. wrote:
Hello! Regarding this bug report:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59270
C. H. D., I've replicated and added my comments to your bug report. It
seems that Rainer doesn't like my instructions on how to replicate. Good
luck... I think
On 01/26/2013 11:02 AM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
For some reasons I want to try the upcoming version 4.0. On the web
page, they say ”You are not recommended to use LibreOffice pre-release
builds for mission-critical purposes”. So obviously I need a stable
version as well, like the 3.5.7.2 that
On 01/20/2013 04:03 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 20/01/13 01:06, NoOp a écrit :
Hi NoOp,
I see; not trying to not shooting the messenger - thanks Alex ;-)
So will this be yet another 'improvement feature' like removing the text
boundaries[1] in Writer? Should we toss all of our pre
On 01/20/2013 09:13 AM, Luuk wrote:
On 19-01-2013 15:43, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
I just noticed a difference in the Tools Options LibreOffice
General options in the 3.6.4 versions.
With my 64-bit Debian install, there is a section for Print dialogs
and the option for that is Use
On 01/20/2013 08:27 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
On 01/19/2013 06:46 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 01/19/2013 06:43 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
I just noticed a difference in the Tools Options LibreOffice
General options in the 3.6.4 versions.
With my 64-bit Debian install
On 01/21/2013 05:26 PM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
Hello, Everyone
I hope that this is not too off topic, but I was wondering... Where are the
nightly builds for Linux?
The following three directories are now empty:
On 01/19/2013 04:12 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :) I think a few people need to contact the devs list and ask for
an LDAP connector to be either re-instated or created afresh.
Perhaps as an Extension? Is anyone already on the devs list? Regards
Perhaps you missed:
Subject: Thunderbird Address
On 01/15/2013 05:28 PM, C. H. D. wrote:
Hello!
Thanks for this idea. I report a bug related to LibreOffice.
Thanks for that. When you report a bug, it's always helpful to give the
link to the bug so that others can view/contribute.
The link to the bug report is:
On 01/16/2013 06:07 AM, Sandy Harris wrote:
I've been editing a file that is in Word .doc format using L-O 3.6 on
Xubuntu Linux, with all updates Xubuntu provides. File was created by
L-O on this system as ODF, later converted to Word format for some
sharing. Formatting is not remarkably
On 01/13/2013 05:35 AM, James Knott wrote:
Jay Lozier wrote:
Yes, all OS's are affected because Java is cross platform. I am not
sure if any of the previous version are affected or if only the
current release is affected.
The primary concern is Java applets run by your browser. The
On 01/12/2013 07:42 PM, George R. Crossman wrote:
I'm seeing warnings saying that one should disable embedded Java to
avoid hacking. Does this apply to linux users? If so, what is the procedure?
Yes. If you are using your distributions version of Oracle Java 7, then
they will (eventually)
On 01/13/2013 07:44 PM, Paul Schwartz wrote:
Does this update fix the Java plugin for Firefox?
Don't know. Ask them:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/get-community-support
...
Yes. If you are using your distributions version of Oracle Java 7, then
they will (eventually) issue a security
On 01/11/2013 08:04 PM, C. H. D. wrote:
Hello!
I think the version numbers have not been refreshed properly.
I cannot report the bugs in LibreOffice 4 Release Candidate 1 here:
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/
The error message I get is:
On 01/10/2013 05:21 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 08/01/2013, kahu jmei...@worldimpact.org wrote:
My company has provided .dotx files as a template for me to use, but I
cannot open it correctly rendered in LibreOffice 3.6.4 or LO-dev 4.0 Beta
2.
Here we go _again_: why didn't the company provide
On 01/08/2013 12:45 PM, gordom wrote:
...
In real life :-) there are lines starting with letters also. Only
these with Set: at the beginning should be left, rest is going to be
deleted.
Set: 01SA34509
0109SA
011017B
S01020207B
010902B
01090002
011007B
01090001
090110
Set:
On 01/09/2013 02:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
If you are going to have to do this on a 'regular basis' (pun intended),
install AltSearch[1] then use select Regular Expression and:
\p[:alnum:]+\p
That will select all except the 'Set:' lines. You can then replace with
blank.
Correction: you can
Fridric, your Visio filters in LO 4.0dev rock! Thanks thanks to all
that assisted!
I just fired up LO 4.0dev (linux)
Version 4.0.0.0.beta2 (Build ID: 4104d660979c57e1160b5135634f732918460a0
and opened up a Visio 4 file:
$ file TWhse2.vsd
TWhse2.vsd: Composite Document File V2 Document, Little
On 01/08/2013 03:57 PM, kahu wrote:
I would be happy to start a bug request for this--thanks for your work on
this with me.
Can you help me define exactly what the problem is, so I can explain what
needs to be addressed in the report?
On 01/07/2013 06:29 PM, kahu wrote:
I really would like to see a fix for this which would allow for other users
to open dotx files within our organization by simple steps--not just me,
but something I can recommend to anyone else. If it is a technical process
of extraction I think using
On 01/07/2013 03:19 PM, kahu wrote:
My company has provided .dotx files as a template for me to use, but I
cannot open it correctly rendered in LibreOffice 3.6.4 or LO-dev 4.0 Beta 2.
Essentially the header and footer are protected fields created in Word 2010
with graphics and text, and the
User has a clean install of LO 3.6.4.3 on Win7. Editing an Impress .ppt
file, LO crashes randomly on file saves. The netbook has 2GB of RAM
I've reduced the 'undo' to 25 vs 100, and that seems to stablized it a
little. But LO is still crashing (closes needs to be restarted -
document recovery
On 12/27/2012 01:06 AM, Anna Martynova wrote:
Please excuse me for long delay.
I've uploaded my test file to dropbox:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/80139861/test.odt
I can replicate with the MSPI driver using your file with both LO (3.5
and 3.6) and AOO (3.4). However, if I use the generic Adobe
On 12/22/2012 01:36 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
Greetings,
I am having problems with importing a powerpoint file, causing LO to
hang and crash, and wanted to try renaming the configuration file.
However, I can no longer find it. Previous versions had it in my home
directory, but it is no
On 12/21/2012 12:45 AM, Manfred J. Krause wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 2:43 AM, NoOp wrote:
No response on the discuss list, so I'll try here.
Why are the emailed bug reports also including HTML? [...]
Bugzilla (log in) → (User) Preferences → General Preferences →
Preferred
On 12/20/2012 10:25 PM, e-letter wrote:
On 19/12/2012, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote:
Readers,
Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple
...
And the link
On 12/21/2012 07:08 AM, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 21/12/2012 at 01:03, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Sorry, but I'm not seeing what you are. My screenshot:
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/6830/libreofficefootnotewrit.png
They are not aligned vertically. Last line of text on right page
On 12/20/2012 05:12 AM, Anna Martynova wrote:
Hello.
I noticed a strange thing in Windows version of Libre Office. When I print
to printer that is configured with driver MS Publisher Imagesetter,
sometimes print files are really huge. For testing purpose I used Print to
file option.
For
On 12/19/2012 08:16 AM, siren wrote:
in these months Libreoffice gained new useful features and team has
fixed many long-time-unsolved bugs
but there is a thing that, if we cannot strictly to define as a BUG, is,
at least, a defect regarding the right typography
I mean the behavior of
No response on the discuss list, so I'll try here.
Why are the emailed bug reports also including HTML?
Example:
From: bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
To: ...
Subject: [Bug 57873] mork (Thunderbird / Icedove / Seamonkey / ...) multi
address books multi profile support
Date: Thu, 13 Dec
On 12/20/2012 12:27 AM, siren wrote:
On 20/12/12 Dan Lewis wrote:
I thought I had seen something about this some time ago either on
this mailing list of the A00 mailing list. The topic was Register
true.
[...]
unfortunately, *register true* does not work in this case and can't help
to
On 12/19/2012 12:26 AM, e-letter wrote:
Readers,
Have done a bug report on both LO and AOO, about the 'changes' feature
of the word processor. (It's excellent that there are multiple
...
And the link to that bug report is... ?
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
On 12/18/2012 05:56 AM, Malcolm Moore wrote:
Is there a guide somewhere to making FDF forms with Writer ?
I know how to export a document to an FDF but how do I add
editable fields to the document. ( is this actually possible )
3.4 Writer Guide, Chapter 15:
On 12/16/2012 09:20 PM, webofht-libreoffice...@yahoo.com.hk wrote:
...
When selecting:
Format- Bullets and Numbering-
Options- Numbering- 壹貳參
The numbers are not consistent. Please
fix them:
壹貳參四五六七八九拾拾壹拾貳拾參拾四……
“參”should
be “叁”,
in particular. “四五六七八九”are
not consistent with
On 12/15/2012 05:49 PM, receiver wrote:
Yes, that was something that naturally came to mind so I did try it and
it does solve the problem of the zero valued date. However, my
objective is to develop a database file (i.e., .odb) that I can send to
a community of users who may lack the
On 12/16/2012 04:52 AM, ptoye wrote:
Thanks again NoOp. But I think we're at cross-purposes here. I don't need the
paper labels - they're easily and cheaply available here in England.
That is why I mentioned That said, the shipping + label sheets might
end up costing more than buying local
Note: please delimit replys other than yours so that we can tell who
wrote what.
On 12/15/2012 04:13 AM, ptoye wrote:
Thanks No-op and Don for the advice.
I wasn't 100% plain in stating the problem. All too easy when you know what
you're talking about!
Firstly, being English I need
On 12/14/2012 11:12 AM, ptoye wrote:
Trying to produce labels, but they don't fit the paper! I'm using the
built-in L7163 address label format.
It's a bit complicated as I don't have a printer attached - I have to make a
PDF document and print it on another machine. As Export to PDF just
While checking Peter's Trying to get labels to fit I found that my
version of LO (linux):
Version 3.6.4.3 (Build ID: 2ef5aff)
is missing all Avery A4 label templates only the US Letter size
templates are available. Granted my locale is English(US), but I would
think that all label templates would
On 12/14/2012 12:45 PM, NoOp wrote:
While checking Peter's Trying to get labels to fit I found that my
version of LO (linux):
Version 3.6.4.3 (Build ID: 2ef5aff)
is missing all Avery A4 label templates only the US Letter size
templates are available. Granted my locale is English(US), but I
On 12/14/2012 04:35 PM, Don Myers wrote:
Hi NoOp,
I have all sizes. I have the Linux 3.6.4.3 download from the Document
Foundation. I'm running Ubuntu 12.10.
Don
Thanks for checking (my version is the same - non-distro), the problem
is my user profile. Seem my [Disregard] Re: [3.6.4.3
On 12/14/2012 04:28 PM, Don Myers wrote:
Hi ptoye,
About 4 or 5 years ago when doing labels for our Christmas cards, I ran
across the table style forms mentioned by NoOp below. I will never go
back to the standard frame type forms standard in OO and LO. I've had
absolutely no alignment
On 12/12/2012 01:24 PM, Martin Kaspar wrote:
Dear Gentlemen,
after various trials i have allmost pulled my hair.
believe me or not. I have astonishing results: i found out a totally
different behaviour of LibreOffice
terrifying the behavior of LibreOffice depends on various
On 12/12/2012 07:08 AM, JC wrote:
I'm trying to register and connect to several address books in Thunderbird 17
through writer and base (versions 3.6.4.3). However when I tell writer or
base that I'm looking for a Thunderbird address book, the only available
address books are the default
On 12/12/2012 07:08 AM, JC wrote:
I'm trying to register and connect to several address books in Thunderbird 17
through writer and base (versions 3.6.4.3). However when I tell writer or
base that I'm looking for a Thunderbird address book, the only available
address books are the default
On 12/11/2012 02:02 AM, Pedro wrote:
...
Please think about this: Don't say/write everything that you think, but
think everything that you say/write
...
I *highly* recommend that you follow your own 'advise'.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
On 12/11/2012 03:11 AM, Stefan Weigel wrote:
Am 11.12.2012 06:42, schrieb NoOp:
Neither LO or AOO default
to turning a (c) into a © - (C) does.
My LibreOffice does this by default.
LibreOffice 3.5.4.2
Build-ID: 350m1(Build:2)
delivered with Ubuntu 12.04
...
I also have that version
, for
whatever reasons, the developers of the two office suites either can't or
won't combine their efforts.
You might want to look at the archives of the AOO dev list. The early
posts regarding this issue provide an interesting read.
Virgil
-Original Message-
From: NoOp
Sent
On 12/09/2012 12:13 PM, Marc Grober wrote:
With 3.6.3.2 and OSX 10.8.2 selecting two odt files from Finder and
directing Finder to open both with LO results in a graphic message that
file1file2 does not exist (suggesting it is concatenating the file
name?)
HOWEVER - using the LO menu to
On 12/10/2012 02:28 PM, VA wrote:
...
Not so with office suites. To get the most out of my office suites, I create
and edit templates, page, character and paragraph styles. I have to set the
autocorrect functions of each program to my liking to prevent a (c) from
turning into a ©. ...
...
On 12/09/2012 02:22 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2012/12/9 Lincoln Ramsay a1291...@gmail.com
I couldn't find a bug report link on LibreOffice.org so I'm sending it
here.
Steps to reproduce:
Navigate to a folder in the Finder that has more than 1 .odt file.
Select two .odt files.
Open them
On 11/29/2012 04:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/29/2012 08:45 AM, Chris Carlson wrote:
Okay, I must be brain-dead. I misread nabble as nobble.
Looking at nabble, it's way more than I need if anyone want's to look at
the document with which I'm having trouble. It can be downloaded from
http
On 11/28/2012 06:55 AM, VA wrote:
This is utterly maddening.
Based on Pedro's post, I ran a simple test. I created a document in Word
(.docx) and an identical document in LibO (.odt). I saved them both and then
extracted their contents using 7-zip Manager. I was amazed at how similar
the
On 11/15/2012 04:01 PM, Keith Bates wrote:
I am using Ubuntu 12.10 and LO 3.6.2.2
Every month or so our church has a music practice which basically
involves me reproducing sheet music and word sheets, then adding a
photocopying licence number to each piece of music.
Typically I might
On 11/20/2012 03:17 PM, Girvin R. Herr wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
You can imagine what viewing the document will be like with multiple EPS
images...
NoOp,
I'll second that! That was exactly my experience with many EPS images
in a Writer document I was working on.
I had anecdotal
On 11/19/2012 03:23 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
I need to provide a client with a Word version of a report written in
LaTeX. Exporting the text to LO format works just fine, but all the images
in the document are .pdf files generated by GRASS or R. I'm having
difficulty finding how to insert
On 11/18/2012 04:24 AM, Pedro wrote:
NoOp wrote
apache.incubator.ooo.user
and
documentfoundation.discuss
are probably better.
Actually I think this would fit better on the Discuss forum.
It's not an OpenOffice problem only if you bothered to read the article.
If you had only bothered
On 11/17/2012 11:04 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
Is this the proper forum to look for an informed discussion concerning what
seems to be the Frieburg Municipal Council's impending decision to abandon
OpenOffice and go back to Microsoft Office (
to U+0163.
I don't know enough about fonts to comment otherwise.
Gary
On 02/11/12 15:36, NoOp wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:23 PM, Jonathan Schultz wrote:
Libertine G and Biolinum G fonts have been bundled with LO since LO 3.3:
So I keep on reading. But apparently not in the Debian or Ubuntu
Copied from the Discuss list posting from today:
quote
CVE-2012-4233: Multiple file format denial of service vulnerabilities
Fixed in: LibreOffice 3.5.7/3.6.1
Thanks to High-Tech Bridge for reporting these flaws. Users are
recommended to upgrade to 3.5.7 or 3.6.1 to avoid these flaws
There are
On 11/02/2012 05:56 PM, VA wrote:
On the PDF file I generated with AOO, the Properties/Font returned:
LinuxLibertineG (Embedded Subset),
Type: TrueType,
Encoding: Built in
On the PDF file I generated with LibO, the Properties/Font returned:
LinuxLibertineG (Embedded Subset),
Type:
On 10/31/2012 06:57 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
On 10/30/2012 07:52 PM, avidscavenger wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
I am currently using LibreOffice 3.6.3 from the Debian experimental
repository. I just updated from version 3.5.4 from the Debian unstable
repository to see if it would
1 - 100 of 703 matches
Mail list logo
