Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) The 3.5.0 was blatantly not ready for business use and was not stable, as we saw from the number of problems people had on the lists, problems that were often solved by going back to 3.4.x.  It was absurd to claim that 3.5.0 or 3.5.1 or 3.5.2 were stable.  The 3.5.3 seemed to generate

Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 3.5 and Win 7 UAC

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Ahhh, that is the cunning thing about renaming instead of just deleting your old profile!  Either way forces LO to reset back to factory defaults by generating a whole new copy of the default settings.  Renaming has the advantage that you can copy back some of the settings from your old

Re: [libreoffice-users] Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Smart move!  If more of us tried very early releases, preferably when still at alpha or beta testing stages then we could each quickly check that the 'obvious' (but different for each of us) things we use.  For those rare flukes where something might not work the way you expect then

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 02/06/12 23:29, webmaster-Kracked_P_P a écrit : Hi, Would 3.5.4 be considered ready to give to a large local business or local government office? Are there any show stoppers that are still there that needs to be fixed before you would give it to your boss in a business or other

[libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 02/06/12 16:52, webmaster-Kracked_P_P a écrit : Hi, I just noticed that EVERY extension that I had installed were not carried over to 3.5.4, even though during the install process the status wording looked like it was going to. So, it that an error for 3.4.6 to 3.5.4 or was that a part

[libreoffice-users] Re: Invalid descriptor Index 07009 when using a query parameter?

2012-06-03 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 01/06/12 17:18, leeand00 a écrit : Hi, Is there a place I can submit the bug? I would try here : http://bugs.mysql.com/ Alex -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/

[libreoffice-users] Re: Invalid descriptor Index 07009 when using a query parameter?

2012-06-03 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 01/06/12 16:31, leeand00 a écrit : Hi, Is the LO-MySQL specific connector the same as the MySQL ODBC driver? Or would it be something I could use in place of it? They are different, and you can use it in place of the ODBC driver. However, I note that you mention parameter substitution - I

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) I thought it was possible to copy user-profiles between different machines?  Even between ones running different OSes?  Is it not possible to copypaste the Extensions folder from the old folder position to the new one?  Something like the equivalent of cp /Users/user

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) I thought it was possible to copy user-profiles between different machines?  Even between ones running different OSes?  Is it not possible to copypaste the Extensions folder from the old folder position to the new one?  Something like the equivalent of cp /Users/user

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 02.06.2012 21:18, Jude DaShiell wrote: No. Not ready for Government academic or business users. What's worse, the accessibility problems inferior jre with windows registry patch merged didn't start in libreoffice at all. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46114#c7 [Resolved, not

[libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 03/06/12 11:03, Tom Davies a écrit : Hi Tom, Hi :) I thought it was possible to copy user-profiles between different machines? Even between ones running different OSes? Is it not possible to copypaste the Extensions folder from the old folder position to the new one? Something like

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Mirosław Zalewski
On 03/06/2012 at 01:58, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote: The real problem is that ODF 1.2 is not supported by MS and I am not sure if MSO XP supports any ODF formats. But Andreas is not talking about DOC vs ODF. He is talking about DOC vs DOCX. I agree with him - DOC was around earlier,

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Mirosław Zalewski
On 02/06/2012 at 23:29, webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: The real big thing is how ready is this line to be used for business users. During the 3.3.x and 3.4.x line crossover, you keep getting told that this version is ready and that version is not. I think you are

[libreoffice-users] Re: Bug on change foreground color on Calc (LibO 3.5.4.2 on Mac)

2012-06-03 Thread Tinkerer
I am using LibO 3.5.4.2 on a Mac 10.7.4 and there does not appear to be any problems with colour in Calc, fonts or background. Can you give us an example? Tink. -- View this message in context:

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Bug on change foreground color on Calc (LibO 3.5.4.2 on Mac)

2012-06-03 Thread Januar V. Simarmata (G!)
I'll send the screet-shoot when I have the Mac in front of me. Btw, I'm using Mac 10.6.8. Would it be the reason? On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com wrote: I am using LibO 3.5.4.2 on a Mac 10.7.4 and there does not appear to be any problems with colour in Calc,

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Bug on change foreground color on Calc (LibO 3.5.4.2 on Mac)

2012-06-03 Thread Januar V. Simarmata (G!)
Btw, just to make sure. Have you tried the foreground color? Background color is good for me too. On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Januar V. Simarmata (G!) janua...@gmail.com wrote: I'll send the screet-shoot when I have the Mac in front of me. Btw, I'm using Mac 10.6.8. Would it be the

[libreoffice-users] Master Document numbering irregularities

2012-06-03 Thread Rogier F. van Vlissingen
LO 3.5.4.2 on Win7 In a Master Document of some 300 pages -- a book of some 15 chapters -- I am seeing repeated jumps in page numbering in the middle of some chapters, and by the end it adds up to a discrepancy of 10 pages, for utterly and completely unclear reasons. E.g. the page numbering will

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) I pushed this question to the marketing list (again) and got this standard official TDF line 3.5.x is stable, although there are some regressions which impact on some users. Of course, this is not implying that 3.5.x is perfect, and we will never have a perfect software as bugs and

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Fonts: Not all installed fonts are listen at font selection drop list

2012-06-03 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P
As the original poster, including the misspelled title, the problem was not the drop down menu on the toolbar, but the menu with highlighting and right-clicking to choose the font for that section. That is where only the first 50, 75, or whatever, fonts show up and the rest are not shown at

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P
Tom as the OP of this thread, my real issue was while it was upgrading the status text indicated to me that is was going to transfer my user profile info and such. It did not do the proper job if it decided to transfer only the user name and other such data, and not all of the extensions

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P
On 06/03/2012 05:40 AM, Mirosław Zalewski wrote: On 02/06/2012 at 23:29, webmaster-Kracked_P_Pwebmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: The real big thing is how ready is this line to be used for business users. During the 3.3.x and 3.4.x line crossover, you keep getting told that this version is

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Fonts: Not all installed fonts are listen at font selection drop list

2012-06-03 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
I am confused. I am the original poster... and the one who made the spelling thank you for draw my attention to this, sorry about that. As far as I am concerned with fixed Gentoo ebuild that installs the *.afm the type1 culmus fonts are shown in the drop down and working. On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) The 3.5.x branch definitely does use a different folder for the users settings.  For soem reason i got confused and gave the old and the new paths for Macs but the Windows pathname change is similar.  For pre-Vista versions of Windows it used to be C:\Documents and Settings\user

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Fonts: Not all installed fonts are listen at font selection drop list

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Probably one of you guys did a Reply to and then re-wrote the subject-line to ask a new question.  Either that or someone is doing too much typing and possibly ill or hazy and getting confused about which thread they were writing too when they wrote that first line.  Since Tim is quite

[libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 03.06.2012 11:28, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Le 03/06/12 11:03, Tom Davies a écrit : Hi Tom, Hi :) I thought it was possible to copy user-profiles between different machines? Even between ones running different OSes? Is it not possible to copypaste the Extensions folder from the old

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Jay Lozier
On 06/03/2012 05:29 AM, Miros?aw Zalewski wrote: On 03/06/2012 at 01:58, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote: The real problem is that ODF 1.2 is not supported by MS and I am not sure if MSO XP supports any ODF formats. But Andreas is not talking about DOC vs ODF. He is talking about DOC vs

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Ouch!  I'm glad we have managed to avoid saying it sucks!  (oops) I was really hoping the sensible way would work.  Ideally i had imagined copying the old user-profile all around the place and then installing the newer LO so that 'a few' (hopefully not too many) settings might get changed

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P
What I hated was the status text seemed to tell me that the profile [all of it] was being transfered over. I thought that part of your profile was the extensions you added. I know if I delete the .libreoffice file in Ubuntu you loose the link to your added extensions. DID 3.5.x replace

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Felmon Davis
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Jay Lozier wrote: My choice of MS formats is done for*political* reasons not technical. Some people I interact with need to feel comfortable that I can read a MSOX format file and the best way to convey this is to send them MSOX format files. Thus they do not need to worry

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread James Knott
Felmon Davis wrote: I am curious: what happens if one just changes the file extension from .doc to .docx? You divide by zero and a black hole appears. ;-) -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems?

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Felmon Davis
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Brian Barker wrote: At 18:14 03/06/2012 +, Felmon Davis wrote: I am curious: what happens if one just changes the file extension from .doc to .docx? Roughly the same as if you call your cat Rover. Brian Barker sorry I cut the thread but the OP was concerned about

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread Jonathon Waterman
webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote: What I hated was the status text seemed to tell me that the profile [all of it] was being transfered over. I thought that part of your profile was the extensions you added. I know if I delete the .libreoffice file in Ubuntu you loose

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Ken Springer
On 6/2/12 5:23 PM, Jay Lozier wrote: Unfortunately for MSO users its use the ribbon only, no option to use a different interface. No so, Jay. I'm no longer a Windows or MSO user, although I have them except for Office 2010. But I found these on the web: To hide the ribbon in 2007 and

Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 3.5 and Win 7 UAC

2012-06-03 Thread Felmon Davis
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Tom Davies wrote: I do need to start getting more organised about it tho.  you've said this several times in the last couple of messages. perhaps you need to get organized enough to organize yourself? I'm like that too! don't know where/how to start. F. -- Felmon

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 03.06.2012 20:14, Felmon Davis wrote: I am curious: what happens if one just changes the file extension from .doc to .docx? F. Brilliant idea! This way you get much better results while the WinWord user will not notice any difference at all. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail

[libreoffice-users] Impress: Default color for text is white

2012-06-03 Thread Agustin Lobo
When I insert a text box, the default color for text is white, which is quite inconvenient. How can i change this default? Could not find it in options. Using LibreOffice LibreOffice 3.5.3.2 Build ID: 350m1(Build:2) Ubuntu 11:10 Thanks Agus -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:

[libreoffice-users] Re: Bug on change foreground color on Calc (LibO 3.5.4.2 on Mac)

2012-06-03 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 03.06.2012 11:32, Januar V. Simarmata (G!) wrote: Hi, I'm using LibO 3.5.4.2 on Mac, specifically trying it on Calc. I'm trying to change foreground color and it doesn't show as expected. With same version, It works fine on Windows. I'm not sure if it's already known, and also haven't have

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Jay Lozier
On 06/03/2012 03:03 PM, Felmon Davis wrote: On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Brian Barker wrote: At 18:14 03/06/2012 +, Felmon Davis wrote: I am curious: what happens if one just changes the file extension from .doc to .docx? Roughly the same as if you call your cat Rover. Brian Barker sorry I

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 03.06.2012 22:18, Jay Lozier wrote: My idea is to show that whatever MS does with file formats that you are not required to use MSO at all. And this is falsified each and every day as you can read on this list, in the press, anywhere on the internet. -- For unsubscribe instructions

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Jay Lozier
On 06/03/2012 03:30 PM, Ken Springer wrote: On 6/2/12 5:23 PM, Jay Lozier wrote: Unfortunately for MSO users its use the ribbon only, no option to use a different interface. No so, Jay. I'm no longer a Windows or MSO user, although I have them except for Office 2010. But I found these on

Re: [libreoffice-users] Impress: Default color for text is white

2012-06-03 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Agus, Agustin Lobo schrieb: When I insert a text box, the default color for text is white, which is quite inconvenient. How can i change this default? Could not find it in options. Using LibreOffice LibreOffice 3.5.3.2 Build ID: 350m1(Build:2) Ubuntu 11:10 Normally the default color is

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: install of 3.5.4 over 3.4.6 removed all my extensions

2012-06-03 Thread Steve Edmonds
Not Business ready then? On 2012-06-04 02:12, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: Tom as the OP of this thread, my real issue was while it was upgrading the status text indicated to me that is was going to transfer my user profile info and such. It did not do the proper job if it decided to

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P
On 06/03/2012 03:03 PM, Felmon Davis wrote: On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Brian Barker wrote: At 18:14 03/06/2012 +, Felmon Davis wrote: I am curious: what happens if one just changes the file extension from .doc to .docx? Roughly the same as if you call your cat Rover. Brian Barker sorry I

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Felmon Davis
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: On 06/03/2012 03:03 PM, Felmon Davis wrote: On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Brian Barker wrote: At 18:14 03/06/2012 +, Felmon Davis wrote: I am curious: what happens if one just changes the file extension from .doc to .docx? Roughly the same as if

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread V Stuart Foote
Jude DaShiell wrote No. Not ready for Government academic or business users. What's worse, the accessibility problems inferior jre with windows registry patch merged didn't start in libreoffice at all. Those same problems exist in openoffice 3.45 which I think is its current version.

[libreoffice-users] Re: inferior jre error message

2012-06-03 Thread V Stuart Foote
Jude, Sorry, didn't catch this the first time through your posting. Please double check your entrance sequence to use Accessibility Tools in Libre Office: The sequence you list would put you in the Appearance panel, not the Accessibility panel--need to enter a second a altt -- Tools alto --

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P
On 06/03/2012 05:17 PM, Felmon Davis wrote: On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: On 06/03/2012 03:03 PM, Felmon Davis wrote: On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Brian Barker wrote: At 18:14 03/06/2012 +, Felmon Davis wrote: I am curious: what happens if one just changes the file extension

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: inferior jre error message

2012-06-03 Thread Jude DaShiell
On the nvda-project site under openoffice you'll find a registry patch which I downloaded and merged since nvda won't have openoffice or libreoffice speaking without that registry patch. Also, I'm running windows 7 on a 32-bit machine. I'd have to get another machine with more memory and

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: inferior jre error message

2012-06-03 Thread webmaster-Kracked_P_P
do you have any opinion what is the practical lowest system speed and resources that are needed to take a Windows computer and add this type of access? Operating Systems: all 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 (including Server

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Ken Springer
On 6/3/12 2:25 PM, Jay Lozier wrote: On 06/03/2012 03:30 PM, Ken Springer wrote: On 6/2/12 5:23 PM, Jay Lozier wrote: Unfortunately for MSO users its use the ribbon only, no option to use a different interface. No so, Jay. I'm no longer a Windows or MSO user, although I have them except for

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Ken Springer
On 6/2/12 8:46 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote: There seems to be differenting opinions on how business ready 3.5.3 was So now that LO 3.5.4 is out, I ask the users, is it ready to be deployed to my/our business users? We really need to know. The last official word on the 3.5.x line was

Microsoft .TLA and .TLAx Extensions (was RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?)

2012-06-03 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
The speculative responses to this suggestion are very amusing. I tried it. After all, computing is an empirical science [;). Here is what happened when I renamed a .xls to .xlsx: Excel [2010] cannot open the file 'longname.xlsx' because the file format or file extension is not valid.

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Brian Barker
At 19:03 03/06/2012 +, Felmon Davis wrote: On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Brian Barker wrote: At 18:14 03/06/2012 +, Felmon Davis wrote: I am curious: what happens if one just changes the file extension from .doc to .docx? Roughly the same as if you call your cat Rover. sorry I cut the thread

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Brian Barker
At 22:04 03/06/2012 +0200, Andreas Säger wrote: Am 03.06.2012 20:14, Felmon Davis wrote: I am curious: what happens if one just changes the file extension from .doc to .docx? Brilliant idea! This way you get much better results while the WinWord user will not notice any difference at all.

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) Can we agree to disagree? Jay's answer is imperfect but it gets LO out there.  People see it working and see that they can read documents from him although he has to do a lot of work sometimes to tidy-up documents they give him.  Andreas' and e-letter's answer is to tell people that to

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) You have to use Save As ...  Just renaming the file-extension probably wont work as they are 2 very different formats.  Regards from Tom :)  --- On Sun, 3/6/12, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de wrote: From: Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.de Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4

[libreoffice-users] Re: inferior jre error message

2012-06-03 Thread V Stuart Foote
Jude, Please uninstall your Java Runtime and Java Access Bridge--and run the JWin utility to install a JRE then correctly configure Java Access Bridge. It doesn't do anything that can't be done by hand, but the manual set up is error prone. Please get JAB configured correctly and then let us know

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: inferior jre error message

2012-06-03 Thread Jude DaShiell
Before I joined this email list, I had done all of that. In fact, when I uninstalled jre-1.7, I also removed jre-1.6 because libreoffice chose jre-1.6 rather than jre-1.7 when the two jre's were on the machine at the same time. Those were suggestions I got from the nvda-support list

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 04.06.2012 00:59, Tom Davies wrote: Andreas' and e-letter's answer is to tell people that to use LO they must stop communicating with anyone that uses MS Office, so that is all their customers and clients, their colleagues, their boss and people that work for them, their family and

[libreoffice-users] Re: inferior jre error message

2012-06-03 Thread V Stuart Foote
Jude, I understood you the first time. But please uninstall your JRE's and then use the JWin installer to preform the JRE and JAB 2.0.2 reinstall. It really does perform a correct installation of the JAB--you need to ensure that is done correctly before you will be able to work with LibreOffice

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?

2012-06-03 Thread Andreas Säger
Am 04.06.2012 00:50, Brian Barker wrote: You are implying that a file with a .docx extension but actually in .doc format will be happily opened by Microsoft Word - that Word will simply interpret the contents and ignore the inappropriate extension, that is. Sadly for your theory, that appears

Microsoft .TLA and .TLAx Extensions (was RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?)

2012-06-03 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
There are security issues around allowing MSO binaries being disguised as OOXML and then silently accepted anyhow. The decision, stupid or not, is clearly by design. To see the importance of this, note that you cannot rename a *.docm (macro-enabled) as a *.docx (no macros here, ever) and get

Re: Microsoft .TLA and .TLAx Extensions (was RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is 3.5.4 ready for business users?)

2012-06-03 Thread Jay Lozier
On 06/03/2012 06:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: The speculative responses to this suggestion are very amusing. I tried it. After all, computing is an empirical science [;). Here is what happened when I renamed a .xls to .xlsx: Excel [2010] cannot open the file 'longname.xlsx'

[libreoffice-users] Re: Impress spontaneously changes formatting

2012-06-03 Thread rdb
The tabs are relative to the text box, as far as I can see. I am not really sure where I can find the adjust text size to space available, but I'm pretty certain I didn't select it. In the 'Text' tab of the 'Text...' right-click option, Fit height to text is selected and not Fit to frame. --

[libreoffice-users] Impress: No slide numbers

2012-06-03 Thread Agustin Lobo
Hi all, In Impress, I do View/Header and Footer and select Slide number, I  can see the little rectangle in the right-bottom corner, then Apply to all, but... the slide number does not come up in the slides. I have also tried with Master, there the right-bottom field is greyed. Using LibreOffice

[libreoffice-users] libreoffice 3.5 inaccessible

2012-06-03 Thread Jude DaShiell
I had removed jre from the computer and restarted the computer to update configuration. I had run j_win and been told I need a jre on the machine so was sent to the website where I downloaded jre. I ran j_win again as instructed and was told a jre environment wasn't found again and offered

Re: [libreoffice-users] Impress: Default color for text is white

2012-06-03 Thread Agustin Lobo
Regina, many thanks for your help. Just found that this problem happens only if a recycle a given ppt, not if I start a new presentation from scratch. Nevertheless, as this recycling is actually important, I provide a short example here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3180464/test.ppt Note that the

[SOLVED?]Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: How to import printed form into writer in Linux?

2012-06-03 Thread Thomas Taylor
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 22:42:41 -0700 Thomas Taylor li...@comcast.net wrote about Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: How to import printed form into writer in Linux?: On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:41:41 +0200 Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote about [libreoffice-users] Re: How to import printed