On 2013-08-01 7:31 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Urmas
Steam is a game platform, and here's some facts from their own info web
Please don't feed the trolls
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
Please don't send to me directly, I'm on the list.
Thanks
On 2013-08-01 7:44 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Hi Tanstaafl
Yes, a good choice, I forgot about UltraDefrag.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 01/08/2013 01:26 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Someone had asked about a free/FOSS defragger
And you did it again.
Best is to use an email client that actually supports Reply-To-List
(like Thunderbird).
On 2013-08-01 8:11 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Apologies Tanstaafl, I replied to all. I must have replied directly to
you as well as the list
Regards
Andrew Brown
Please don't feed the troll!
On 2013-08-01 7:57 AM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Urmas wrote:
It is much more better than an ODF, which documents nothing, and
depends on a reference implementation from a single vendor, Sun.
Year 1900 being a leap one is a universal convention
On 2013-08-01 10:36 AM, pasqual milvaques pons milvaques_...@gva.es wrote:
In my organization we have some applications built with oracle forms
which generate .doc and .xls documents, as we are migrating to
LibreOffice we are trying to remove the office suite from the pc's but
the users with
On 2013-07-31 3:20 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Not what I am referring to, I think you have misunderstood my content.
Agreed and I know the headers (or should I say mail body code)
I assure you I have a very good understanding of this, and 'mail body
code' is certainly *not*
On 2013-07-30 5:16 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
Remember to return your headers to normal otherwise every subsequent
email will be sent out with all headers exposed in the email, generally
loking like garbage.
Eh? All headers are *always* present in *all* emails *everyone*
On 2013-07-29 2:36 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
I can offer my input as to Windows 7. I am using Windows 7 Ultimate
64bit, all up to date with jre-7u21, both 32bit and 64bit installed
(this should not be an issue though as covered by many emails posts, LO
is reducing it's need for
On 2013-07-29 8:00 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-07-29 2:36 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
I can offer my input as to Windows 7. I am using Windows 7 Ultimate
64bit, all up to date with jre-7u21, both 32bit and 64bit installed
(this should not be an issue
On 2013-07-29 3:03 PM, sun shine phaedr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've recently installed 4.1 for a Deb system, and I am unable to open
password protected writer documents written in earlier versions of LibO.
I've double-checked the password, even typed it in plain text and copied
it over, and it
On 2013-07-29 3:12 PM, sun shine phaedr...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually - this seems to be a larger issue, at least on my machine: I
have attempted to create a document and then to save it with a password
and it throws back this error message:
Error saving the document Untitled1:
General Error.
So, since I'm on the 4.1 release version, this isn't the cause of my
problems?
Is no one else having this problem?
I'm on (32bit) XP Pro sp3 up to date, with JRE 7u25...
On 2013-07-26 6:09 PM, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Girvin R. Herr wrote:
On 2013-07-26 4:57 PM, Girvin R. Herr girvin.h...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
FWIW:
I do not know the correlation of versions between LO and AOO, but today
I got the following two security reports from the AOO users forum:
Not sure if this was even remotely close to my reported problem.
1. Upgrade
On 2013-07-26 3:15 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
So with that bit of tech-ed above out of the way, what this means is it
looks like you have only installed the 64bit version of JRE (Java
Runtime Edition). LO Base cannot see or use it, hence it showing up in
the settings but Base
Just wanted to check here before I go open a bug...
I just upgraded to 4.1, everything seemed fine, but I encountered a
.docx document this morning, and got the dreaded 'General I/O' error.
I then tried a bunch of different XML documents (.docx, .xslx, and
.pptx), and every one resulted in
On 2013-07-26 3:44 AM, Andrew Brown andre...@icon.co.za wrote:
When one right clicks on a cell and copies it, the pasting also collects
the cell format (it's borders and layout) along with the text/data,
If you DOUBLE-click the cell, and then highlight the contents, it does
NOT bring the
On 2013-07-26 7:54 AM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Tom Davies wrote:
My guess is that the default is 64bit or else other apps might need
the 64bit version. It's generally not a good idea to have more than 1
version of Java although even 1 might well be more than you need now.
On 2013-07-26 8:18 AM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:03:43 -0400, Tanstaafl
tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-07-26 7:54 AM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Tom Davies wrote:
My guess is that the default is 64bit or else other apps might need
On 2013-07-18 10:52 PM, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com wrote:
What you can do, of course, is to set up another column or row in which
you put suitable values which can then control conditional formatting of
both the target cell and the referencing one. To change the background
of both,
On 2013-07-18 4:52 PM, Dave Liesse dslie...@liessefamily.net wrote:
I think what the OP is referring to is that in Excel you can do whatever
you want to a protected spreadsheet -- you just can't save the changes.
That is actually a completely different issue, but one that I have been
meaning
On 2013-07-19 9:11 AM, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com wrote:
At 06:44 19/07/2013 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-07-18 10:52 PM, Brian Barker wrote:
What you can do, of course, is to set up another column or row in
which you put suitable values which can then control conditional
Is it possible to have a cell on one worksheet that references a cell on
another worksheet to also reflect the FORMAT of the referenced cell? Ie,
if the referenced cell has a red background, the cell referencing it
should also have a red background?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Hello,
Microsoft Excel has the ability to allow users to apply formatting
changes to protected cells when a sheet is protected.
Is there any possible way to do this in Calc?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
On 2013-07-15 2:25 PM, Steve sjohnson332...@gmail.com wrote:
The default date acceptance pattern seems to have been M/D/Y/;M/D but that
didn't work, so I changed it to //, since I want the day, month,
day of the week, and year to display and that doesn't work either. It comes
up
when any
cell is modified/saved?
To: Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
2013/7/9 Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org:
Is it possible to define a range of cells to auto sort themselves, such that
anytime one of them is modified, the sort is reapplied?
This is some Sales Numbers for some Sales
Thanks Errol,
Trying to work out how it works as we speak... :)
On 2013-07-11 10:58 AM, Errol Goetsch er...@xe4.org wrote:
Hi all
You can get to a auto-sorted table in 4 steps without macros by using
vlookup, hlookup, count, max and min.
Ive sent Charles a working example for 20 salespeople
Hi all,
I'm wondering if it is possible to set a background color style on a
group of cells such that only cells that have been edited within the
last x [days][hours] will be a certain defined color, and all others
will not have a BG color applied?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Is it possible to define a range of cells to auto sort themselves, such
that anytime one of them is modified, the sort is reapplied?
This is some Sales Numbers for some Sales Reps, and the boss wants them
to always be sorted based on the total column anytime any numbers in
the sheet are
Hi all,
I have a problem I'm hoping someone can help me with.
I have a workbook with multiple sheets, some of which reference data
from other sheets in the workbook.
I have one 'Main' sheet, that lists our Sales Reps, and has each ones
monthly numbers, by column, ie:
1 Name Jan Feb
On 2013-06-07 11:38 AM, Luuk luu...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems to be a bug.
The reference to you first sheet (Main.A2) should be to the same cell,
even after sorting your data in this first sheet.
It does, so no bug... but that is the problem.
I'll try a simpler and more specific example...
a problem with sign tabloid.
Kind regards
Regina
Tanstaafl schrieb:
On 2013-05-30 10:43 AM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
If I change the paper size to Tabloid Print dialog does show it in
landscape mode, but the paper size is showing as Letter, NOT tabloid.
You have changed
Hi all,
Ok, I'm at my wits end.
We have a Canon Imagerunner iR-ADV C5030/5035 UFR II.
It has 4 paper trays: 2 for Letter (different orientations), one for
Legal, and one for Tabloid.
Microsoft office works fine under the following circumstances, but
Libreoffice is driving me crazy.
I
On 2013-05-30 9:33 AM, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com wrote:
I'm guessing here, but Microsoft Office has only one place to define
page and paper size, I think, whereas LibreOffice has two: you define
page size in Format | Page... but paper size at File | Printer
Settings... (or
On 2013-05-30 10:43 AM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
If I change the paper size to Tabloid Print dialog does show it in
landscape mode, but the paper size is showing as Letter, NOT tabloid.
You have changed to Tabloid in Format Page _and_ in printing dialog
Properties ...
On 2013-04-16 8:22 AM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
lordmax tdf wrote:
what is iPot?
Please tell us.
Maybe Apple is getting into cooking utensils. ;-)
Or getting ready for when hemp ie legalized in all 50 states *and* at
the Federal level...
--
For unsubscribe instructions
On 2013-04-15 7:53 AM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Dr. R. O Stapf wrote:
My dream is still Thunderbird with calendar, notes, tasks, contacts
which can be synched with iPot and all running on XP machine
I have no idea what iPot is, but with Thunderbird, Lightning and an
add-on
On 2013-03-31 10:48 PM, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
Unfortunately, I do not have a version of Win8, and have been asked how
to set file associations for MSO files to use LibreOffice instead. The
person who asked me would rather double-click on the files she wants to
open through windows
On 2013-03-17 2:59 PM, Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com wrote:
Tanstaafl
Sorry, but there is no bug.
Tink
Sorry, but you are wrong.
The Program has no way of knowing whether you want to move to another place
on the same sheet, or whether you want to move to another sheet.
Seriously
On 2013-03-14 4:17 PM, Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com wrote:
For the benefit of others, there is no bug.
For the benefit of others, there is most certainly a bug. Tink, stop
saying otherwise.
You need to include a position on the sheet, say: Target 2014,A1
This will take you to cell A1
On 2013-03-18 10:27 AM, Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com wrote:
Tanstaafl
If I enter 2014.A1 as the Hyperlink target, a click on it takes me to sheet
2014 cell A1
If I enter 2012.C12 the link takes me to Sheet 2012 Cell C12
So where is the Bug?
sigh
The first and foremost bug
On 2013-03-18 12:55 PM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote:
So there is definitely an issue with the Target in Document GUI picker
allowing an incomplete hyper link. Or equally an inconsistent
parser/handling logic for incomplete hyperlink targets--would think that
absent a complete
On 2013-03-18 12:17 PM, Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com wrote:
I understand perfectly what you are saying.
I just do not understand why you cannot enter the cell location as well as
the sheet number.
When I do it, it just works.
I didn't say I couldn't do it, and I didn't say it didn't work
On 2013-03-16 8:47 AM, Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com wrote:
Steve
There is no bug.
Yes, there is.
When you add the hyperlink using the GUI (Insert Hyperlink Document
Target OtherSheet), where OtherSheet name is only a number, it adds
a hyperlink that doesn't take you to that
, 2011, 2012, 2013...), and this makes it very
very difficult to navigate these workbooks...
Thanks,
Charles
On 2013-03-13 9:24 AM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi everyone,
Would appreciate if some of you could confirm this bug for me.
I'm on Windows XP sp3
Hi everyone,
Would appreciate if some of you could confirm this bug for me.
I'm on Windows XP sp3, with LibreOffice 4.0.1 release...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62289
Bug report:
A hyperlink defined on one worksheet that is linked to another sheet/tab
in the same workbook
I just noticed this, and I think it has been around for a while now.
I also just tested by creating a brand new .xlsx file with Excel 2007,
with just some simple text in it, so it has nothing to do with being an
encrypted/password protected file, or anything like that.
Every time I try to
2:11 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Version?
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I just noticed this, and I think it has been around for a while now.
I also just tested by creating a brand new .xlsx file with Excel 2007,
with just some
On 2013-02-25 8:35 AM, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Stephan P. wrote:
Honestly, how does this happen? If nobody is working on Impress to even
check these absolutely basic things, be honest enough about it and drop it
from LO. But constantly, with every release, breaking
On 2013-02-21 12:41 PM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
Economics had nothing to do with it.
Opinions are...
Reagan was a stick in the mud conservative who didn't want change.
Economics would have meant moving to it, to keep up with the rest of
the world.
Economics meant it
On 2013-02-21 1:54 PM, James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote:
The longer the wait, the greater the long term cost of remaining with an
obsolete system. Regardless, my opinion of Reagan stands. He
demonstrated similar behavior on other issues too. He was an old geezer
who liked things the
Hi Wes,
Dependence on Java for certain things is a long standing issue. The devs
are working to reduce and eventually eliminate this dependency, but it
takes time.
One suggestion would be for you to get him set up with a free LogMeIn
account (www.logmein.com), then you could provide remote
Hello,
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
UI code to AOO...
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to give a facelift for LO? I don't want (hate!) the
ribbon in MSO, but would love to see the UI with a decent
On 2013-02-19 11:44 AM, sun shine phaedr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
UI code to AOO...
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to give a facelift
On 2013-02-19 12:30 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
On 02/19/2013 11:33 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to give a facelift for LO? I don't want (hate!) the
ribbon in MSO, but would love to see the UI
On 2013-02-14 1:23 AM, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com wrote:
At 20:14 13/02/2013 -0500, Pete Bonly wrote:
Does calc have some kind of method to subdivide individual cells?
Yes - but you have to think of the problem the other way about.
You can select a number of cells and then
On 2013-02-14 9:19 AM, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com wrote:
At 08:50 14/02/2013 -0500, Nobody Noname wrote:
... but it is much more complicated than if there was the possibility
to just subdivide a single cell into multiples...
OK: suppose you divide cell Xn into four cells- two
On 2013-02-10 10:27 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
I do not like all that typing.
What I do is use the default file manager and double click the archived
file and unarchive it. Then I take the folder that is created and
rename it to Lib or LibO. That way you do not need to type all of the
On 2013-02-12 3:11 PM, John R. Sowden jsow...@americansentry.net wrote:
I will follow your advice, although I think that this process needs
review. I feel that it is disrespectful to the people that are creating
this great program to say that since My Idea (emphasis added) is not
there, then it
On 2013-02-12 2:52 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
On 02/12/2013 11:10 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-02-10 10:27 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
I do not like all that typing.
What I do is use the default file manager and double click the archived
file
On 2013-01-28 6:05 PM, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote:
IMPRESS doesn't accept videos;
??? Sure it does...
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting
On 2012-11-26 9:13 AM, Ken-GSS ken_ha...@globalsouthservices.com wrote:
Anyone have any ideas how to fix this?
Just click 'Reply'??
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
On 2012-11-19 1:40 AM, rost52 bugquestcon...@online.de wrote:
This can be achieved with many bugs less and full compatibility. MSO
doesn' come up with a new format every week, thus our devs have a very
good chance to adjust LibO to full compatibility.
Sounds easy, doesn't it? Until you realize
On 2012-11-19 6:54 AM, M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/19 Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org
snip
I don't see this happening any more. Microsoft is on a roll now, coming
out with new versions *far* more often than they used to (which means they
can 'improve' the file formats
Why not open a bug/feature request to add support for doing this via styles?
Since you've already worked out the hard part, upload your default
template complete with these predefined Styles to give the devs a
starting point?
On 2012-11-19 10:50 AM, VA cuyfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have
On 2012-11-19 12:43 PM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
You can get the OOXML standard from
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm
Are you actually suggesting that this is either complete or accurate?
You can get the binary file format
On 2012-11-01 4:21 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Trying to triage these printing bugs and I'd much prefer not printing and
instead just printing to file...unfortunately I don't have this option any
more and I'm not sure when or why it went away.
Bodhi Linux
LibO: 3.6.1.2
On 2012-11-02 10:00 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/02/2012 03:52 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-11-01 4:21 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Trying to triage these printing bugs and I'd much prefer not printing
and
instead just printing to file
On 2012-09-27 10:14 AM, Gordon Burgess-Parker gbpli...@gmail.com wrote:
If you click on the Sunbird link it also says Lightning - I'm using it
here in Lightning 1.7
Ah, ok, thanks...
Hmmm... we are using Thunderbird ESR here at the office, and it is stuck
at Lightning 1.2.3... I wonder what
thousands (or millions) of users having to do this
manually.
From: Tanstaafl [mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org]
Sent: Thu 9/6/2012 10:21 AM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] RE: Libreoffice and Java
Thanks Stuart...
So, if you (like I always do) first uninstall JRE
On 8/28/2012 9:57 AM, Bob McDonald bob.mcdon...@pcn-inc.com wrote:
JRE 1.7 32 bit edition works if (and only if) JRE 1.6 is installed
first and is pointed to in the options. (you can even uninstall JRE
1.6 afterward...)
Are you absolutely certain that a fresh/clean install of Windows 7
Thanks Stuart...
So, if you (like I always do) first uninstall JRE 1.6, then install 1.7
(32bit of course), will it still be broken?
On 8/28/2012 12:10 PM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote:
Bob McDonald wrote
JRE 1.7 32 bit edition works if (and only if) JRE 1.6 is installed
On 8/31/2012 3:15 PM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
I have found a limited solution. export the PPT as PDF,
Were you trying to export a .ppt file?
Whenever working in Libreoffice, you should always use the native file
formats... only save to the Microsoft Office format if you need
On 8/30/2012 2:33 PM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
The security problems are Java problems and are not OS or app related
and can affect any computer running the unpatched Java version(s). My
understanding is the transmission is likely via rogue or corrupted
websites that use Java rather
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:24 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P wrote:
With this mix of system being used for various tasks, I would have a
mess if I tried to read emails on more than one system, even if I
could get a sync system to work properly between the various Windows
and Ubuntu systems.
This is
On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr girvin.h...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
I hope this gets to the right place. I used Reply All in
Thunderbird. The header looks correct, but people are going to get
duplicate messages.
Why not 'Reply to List' (I use the keyboard shortcut, CTRL-SHIFT-L)?
On 2012-08-13 4:01 PM, Girvin R. Herr girvin.h...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Yesterday, your changes broke my email filter which puts libreoffice
user group messages in a specific folder. But then I changed the filter
from looking at Reply-To: to To: and thought that would suffice.
Now, this morning I
On 2012-08-08 4:19 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I will say though... I consider 1GB to be the *bare minumum* on an XP
box but it will still be sluggish. I couldn't use it with 512MB, it
would drive me to drink.
For XP, I always recommend 2GB, and for 7 (won't
On 2012-08-09 8:14 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
The costs for upgrading to newer version of MSO still has some people I
know using MSO 2003, in business and home. Then there are those who
send out complex MSO 2010 .docx documents to people that cannot view
them,
On 2012-08-10 8:52 AM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, maximizing the RAM on any computer will improve its
performance and it is relatively cheap and easy to do. It does not
matter which OS or CPU.
My point though is that there is generally a sweet spot, determined by
On 2012-08-10 2:54 PM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a point of diminishing returns where more memory will not
noticeably improve performance depending on usage with increasing
memory. But the demands on the computer tend to increase with time as
people use more graphically
On 2012-08-08 11:04 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I am using Control Panel to remove it before I install 3.5.5.
Well it has taken over 1/2 hour to remove it, and still has time to go.
This is on a Sempron 3500+ CPU, 512 MB ram, running XP.
This very slow removal
Please don't top-post in a bottom/inline posted thread...
On 2012-08-01 9:09 AM, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-07-31 10:33 PM, anne-ology wrote:
are you perchance clicking on 'save' rather than 'save as'?
I don't know why
On 2012-08-01 2:19 PM, Spencer Graves spencer.gra...@prodsyse.com wrote:
I've had BSODs and similar events with Windows 7, Vista, XP, Windows 98,
... . I don't know, but I suspect that some of these may be hardware
not software. Spencer
These are almost *always one of two things:
1. Bad
On 2012-07-31 10:33 PM, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote:
are you perchance clicking on 'save' rather than 'save as'?
I don't know why the 'save' is there;-)
Obviously it is so that you can easily save changes to a file that has
already been saved/named, without having to save it to an
On 2012-06-19 9:20 PM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/19/2012 08:58 PM, Brian Charlton wrote:
Note that the message I am getting refers to LO 3.5 Quickstarter,
but it is not installed at that stage. After removind LO 3.4, I
still got the same message and failure.
I am at a loss.
On 2012-05-24 10:27 AM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
Many organizations, companies, and government agencies in the US
only support MSO formats because that is the default format of their
applications. Thus, US users must have MSO format support or LO is not a
viable option.
But there
On 2012-05-23 12:48 PM, Karen DInse kdi...@rrwrd.dst.il.us wrote:
We are using Windows XP, SP3. Applications and user's files are stored on
the network. I'm able to install LO 3.4.2 to the network, and I'm able to
distribute the applications to various users.
How are you doing this? Is this
On 2012-05-17 9:48 AM, Pertti Rönnberg p...@elisanet.fi wrote:
It is a little astonishing and worrying to read that LibreO is a 32-bit
application under any Windows-OS but I have seen no info about LibreO
being only 32-bits - not 64 bits nor 32/64 bits.
I have been told that a 64-bit machine
On 2012-05-13 12:50 PM, Brian Barker b.m.bar...@btinternet.com wrote:
I think you miss the point here: the instruction is both to download
(the viewer) and install the Compatibility Pack.
The Compatibility Pack is indeed intended for systems with Microsoft
Office XP (2002) or 2003 and it
On 2012-04-30 7:56 PM, Ant a...@zimage.com wrote:
Ah OK. Weird. I will still have to try v3.4.x Does the LO's crashes keep
any records/logs somewhere?
Fyi, we use 3.4.x and 3.5.x on many XP Pro sp3 machines in our office
with zero crashing issues, EXCEPT for occasional problem documents in
On 2012-04-30 7:56 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I had to install LO twice in a row, WITH NO uninstall in between. I do
not know why that happened, but it happened to me twice. BUT, the last
time I installed 3.4.4, or was it 3.4.5, on XP/pro I did not have any
On 2012-04-19 11:17 AM, Mark Stanton m...@vowleyfarm.co.uk wrote:
Replying without quoting *anything* to maintain context is just as dumb
as if not dumber than blindly quoting everything...
Sorry, having a proper email client that links replies correctly, I forget
that not everybody has that.
On 2012-04-20 3:56 AM, Mark Stanton m...@vowleyfarm.co.uk wrote:
Wish I could.
Nary the knowledge or the time.
Frustration abounds.
I was afraid you were going to say that :-(
Mark Stanton
One small step for mankind...
PS Nice talking to someone with a proper reader ;)
Wtf? He quoted your
On 2012-04-19 2:56 AM, Mark Stanton m...@vowleyfarm.co.uk wrote:
'S a good idea. Go for it.
who are you talking to, and *what* is a good idea?
Replying without quoting *anything* to maintain context is just as dumb
as if not dumber than blindly quoting everything...
--
For unsubscribe
Actually, Tom, it is probably so that different positions can be saved
for different users who may be editing the same file (no way to tell
different users apart if they haven't personalized it)...
On 2012-04-19 7:21 AM, Ron House rho...@smartchat.net.au wrote:
Thanks Tom and Jerry, it works
On 2012-04-17 8:01 AM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
Well, it is always good to promote ODF, but if you work in a business
environment, you cannot get away from MSO's file formats. I create the
documents in LO and save my copy in ODF, but I still have to send
editable
On 2012-04-17 6:56 PM, e-letter inp...@gmail.com wrote:
You could send in odf, which m$ is supposed to support. Growth in the
quantity of odf documents, together with people complaining to m$
(instead of complaining to LO!), the long term effect is to force m$
to improve compatibility with odf,
On 2012-03-30 9:26 AM, Sylvain Bromberber sbrom...@mit.edu wrote:
Is there an explanation of what MariaDB is that can be understood more
generally than in the reference given in this message, or is MariaDB of
interest only to programmers? It sounds as if it is a data base that
could be useful to
I didn't see anything in the release notes for Java7 support...
So, is 7 officially supported yet? If not, is there a bug open for
tracking its progress?
Thanks,
Charles
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
On 2012-03-05 4:26 PM, MiguelAngel mari...@miguelangel.mobi wrote:
Page break only work with:
Menu/Format/Page/Sheet - Scaling mode, Reduce/enlarge printout
selected.
I don't like it, but is how it works.
It is a bug or regression - or just a bad decision if it was changed
intentionally -
301 - 400 of 511 matches
Mail list logo
