at.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} 2011
"Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ..."
Xorg.conf(5)
___
users mailing list
users@li
t "su" would work. However, I figured it
> would be good to know why privileged kept getting overridden by "restricted"
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joel
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
&g
> etc? More importantly, if I want to use one of those unbound pv's for
> applications, can I?
>
> Regards,
> Marvin
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
>
sts.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} 2011
"Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ..."
Xorg.conf(5)
___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
e crc
> device, so I think I've met the pre-requisites. Whats the step that I'm
> missing?
>
> Regards,
> Marvin
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/use
0 (0%) 16m
> Allocated resources:
> (Total limits may be over 100 percent, i.e., overcommitted.)
> ResourceRequests Limits
> --
> cpu 1390m (92%) 300m (20%)
> memory
o are c5-xlarge machines. But here is maybe a relevant
> observation. As soon as I log into the cluster, I see this on my main
> dashboard.
>
> [image: image.png]
>
> Is there perhaps a problem with the CPU resource monitoring that is
> causing my problems?
>
> Regards
enjamin Guillon
> CNRS/IN2P3 Computing Center
> 21 Avenue Pierre de Coubertin, CS70202
> 69627 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listi
_
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} 2011
"Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ..."
Xorg.conf(5)
__
Look at the ConfigMaps in project openshift-node.
Change the mtu param in there first.
Restart the node (origin-node / atomic-openshift-node) service on all nodes.
If all goes well, you should be able to then reconfigure your network
interfaces.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 6:32 PM Tim Dudgeon wrote:
//docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.11/install/example_inventories.html#single-master-multi-node-ai
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Samuel M
>
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com <
> users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com> *On Behalf Of *Samuel Martín
> Moro
> *Sent:* Freitag, 31. Mai 2019 20:43
> *To:* bjoern.baertsc...@swisscom.com
> *Cc:* OpenShift Users List
> *Subject:* Re: Issue by in
The requested memory is the only sure thing you would get. If it differ
from your memory limit, you should know that this limit is optional and not
guaranteed.
Try setting your requested memory to 1gb
If you want openshit scheduler and/or oom to priorize that container,
consider setting your Pod
it seems people rather have an insecure quick fix than looking into the
> problem, I’ve been around issues and it happens around. Again I do believe
> many people will go with insecure even having valid certificates, but this
> doesn’t make much sense to me.
>
>
>
> Kind regard
es_nodeselector={'infra':'true'}
>
>
>
> I am out of ideas and I think my google is broken cause I can’t seem to
> find a suitable option that works… and each deploy_cluster takes over half
> an hour…
>
>
>
> Anyone can point me in the right path? Thank you!
>
>
>
To you too, have fun ;)
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019, 8:33 PM Ricardo Mendes wrote:
> Awe man, amazing, thanks!
>
> Totally had the wrong idea. Have a great weekend!
>
> Ricardo Mendes
> ------
> *From:* Samuel Martín Moro
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 1, 20
-compute'
> openshift_schedulable=True
> ```
>
> Should I point to infra instead?
>
> Kind regards,
> Ricardo Mendes
>
>
> --
> *From:* Samuel Martín Moro
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 1, 2019 19:03
> *To:* Ricardo Mendes
> *Cc:* Open
Hi
That sounds like an issue with your DNS records
Could you confirm *.apps points to the infra node(s)?
Regards.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019, 8:00 PM Ricardo Mendes wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a 3 server setup with 1 master 1 infra 1 node.
>
> I have finished the setup with deploy_cluster.yml
;
>
>
> https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/install_config/install/advanced_install.html#configuring-host-variables
>
>
>
> regards, Björn
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com <
> users-boun...@lists.openshift.r
<http://k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:130/n>
> ","stream":"stderr","time":"2019-05-24T12:19:13.74773138Z"}
> {"log":"I0524 14:19:13.745323 1 reflector.go:133] Starting reflector
> *v1.ReplicationController (0s) from
admin':
> '$apr1$Ky/ZY39n$Z8/t3xJsnxGANzypVTtmD0', 'developer':
> '$apr1$MdVAOTmy$8nB.ANU4OeciLjDeU68w/1'}
>
> # Option B - External NFS Host
> openshift_hosted_registry_storage_kind=nfs
> openshift_hosted_registry_storage_access_modes=['ReadWriteMany']
> openshift_hosted_
tasks:
> - name: set currently installed version
>^ here
>
> Any idea about that error ?
>
> --
> Hyde Stevenson
>
> Don't guess -- check your security regulations.
> ___
> users mailing
ole anymore.
>
>
> ???
>
> Every helpful hint is highly appreciated
> Harri
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinf
and try again, ...
Regards.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:26 PM Ahmed Ossama wrote:
> Hello Samuel,
>
> Assuming a production cluster; is running the upgrade_cluster sufficient?
>
> On 02/25/2019 11:40 AM, Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you explain what do
ntory in all my nodes, is there any ansible-playbook to run?
>
> Cheers,
> Iago.
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Samuel Martín Moro
{
": {
>
>},
>"code": 403
>}
>
> Does anyone know of a way to allow the "system:anonymous" user to post
> to that path?
>
> Thanks
>
> Sean
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.opensh
eb 4, 2019 at 9:47 PM Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Define "after the deployment is nearly finished". Did it succeed? Or where
> did it fail?
>
> Can you tell us more about your network?
> - what is the subnet your openshift instances are located into?
>
uld very
> thanksful because at the moment I have no idea why this don't work
> best regards
> Dan
>
>
> [1] https://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=CentOS_7=openshift311=1
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
&g
mailing list
> > users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> > http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/opensh
gt;>>>>> [3] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos
>>>>>> -release-ansible26-1-3.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2018-November/017033.html
>>>>>>
30 matches
Mail list logo
