[ovirt-users] Performance issue to retrieve VM's after upgrading engine from 4.2 to 4.3

This is a weird issue. Before upgrading it took 8-9 seconds to retrieve all VM's, 1230, using /ovirt-engine/api/vms URI. After the upgrade it now takes over 2 minutes. Query other items such as hosts, clusters, data centers etc is fast and the same speed as prior the upgrade from 4.2 to 4.3 I don

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

On 18/04/18 14:54, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Tony Brian Albers > wrote: > > You need a lot faster disks to keep up with all that random I/O. > > "Storage IO is average on 75 M/s Read Disk and 25 Write Disk. ( SSD >  >     Raid )" >

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Tony Brian Albers wrote: > You need a lot faster disks to keep up with all that random I/O. > > "Storage IO is average on 75 M/s Read Disk and 25 Write Disk. ( SSD > > Raid )" > > Ehm, are you running VM's on a DD box? Why on earth would you do that? > > /to

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

indows VM´s > > *From:*users-boun...@ovirt.org *On Behalf Of > *Thomas Fecke > *Sent:* Dienstag, 17. April 2018 16:18 > *To:* Roy Golan > *Cc:* users@ovirt.org > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue > > Guest: Win 10 and 2016 > > Disk: VirtISCSI – Thin provisio

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

: Roy Golan Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue Guest: Win 10 and 2016 Disk: VirtISCSI – Thin provision Domain: Single Data Domain – NFS 4 From: Roy Golan Sent: Dienstag, 17. April 2018 12:58 To: Thomas Fecke Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Performance

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

Guest: Win 10 and 2016 Disk: VirtISCSI – Thin provision Domain: Single Data Domain – NFS 4 From: Roy Golan Sent: Dienstag, 17. April 2018 12:58 To: Thomas Fecke Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 12:58 Thomas Fecke mailto:thomas.fe

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

*From:* Roy Golan > *Sent:* Dienstag, 17. April 2018 11:52 > *To:* Thomas Fecke > *Cc:* users@ovirt.org > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 12:45 Thomas Fecke wrote: > > Okay, > > > > it seems to be that

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

about 25Mbit/s external ( 400.000 k Internet ) I realy cant find that bottle neck From: Roy Golan Sent: Dienstag, 17. April 2018 11:52 To: Thomas Fecke Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 12:45 Thomas Fecke mailto:thomas.fe...@eset.de>>

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

half Of > *Thomas > Fecke > *Sent:* Dienstag, 17. April 2018 10:58 > *To:* users@ovirt.org > *Subject:* [ovirt-users] Performance Issue > > > > Hey Guys, > > > > We Deploy a lot of Templates. We got our Training Environment build in > Ovirt. > > > >

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

users-boun...@ovirt.org On Behalf Of Thomas Fecke Sent: Dienstag, 17. April 2018 10:58 To: users@ovirt.org Subject: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue Hey Guys, We Deploy a lot of Templates. We got our Training Environment build in Ovirt. Our Problem - when we Deploy the Same Template. The VM´s ge

[ovirt-users] Performance Issue

Hey Guys, We Deploy a lot of Templates. We got our Training Environment build in Ovirt. Our Problem - when we Deploy the Same Template. The VM´s getting slower every Time we deply a new VM from that Template. And I really don't know why. RAM locking good - CPU and Network looking good. But it

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

yment. Regards Donny D cloudspin.me From: Yue, Cong [mailto:cong_...@alliedtelesis.com] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:30 PM To: Donny Davis; users@ovirt.org Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs It is just the default configur

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

: Donny Davis [mailto:do...@cloudspin.me] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 11:24 AM To: Yue, Cong; users@ovirt.org Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs I see. So have you done any tuning for IO performance or are the configs straight out of the box

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

, 2015 11:40 AM To: Donny Davis; users@ovirt.org Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs I am using iometer (http://www.iometer.org/) to test the IOPS from one of the vm. As for IOPS is more trying to test the performance of block, rather than real

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

t: Thursday, January 15, 2015 10:57 AM To: users@ovirt.org<mailto:users@ovirt.org> Subject: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs Hi I have one question about whether GlusterFS is the suitable solution to be used as the block storage for VMs. The fai

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

eived. Do you have an operational gluster? Do what are you using right now? Donny D cloudspin.me From: users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] On Behalf Of Yue, Cong Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 10:57 AM To: users@ovirt.org Subject: [ovirt-users] Performance issu

[ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

Hi I have one question about whether GlusterFS is the suitable solution to be used as the block storage for VMs. The failure tolerant and scalability is good for GlusterFS, but in my test, it seems the iops is pretty bad. In some blog, it said, it is even with worse performance than normal NFS.