It seems that the issue is with the Node server that runs with Moonshine,
exporting to a tomcat server the correct calls are made and no duplicate
sessions occur.
Thank you all for your help.
On 2021/03/09 09:15:58, David Slotemaker de Bruine
wrote:
> Hi Safrizal,
>
> I only just found
Hi Safrizal,
I only just found your reply now as it got buried in the thread and I was off
trying to fic everything else.
Back on the server side of things now and want to implement your solution.
I have to use MX:RemoteObject as my existing backend is BlazeDS 4.0.1. I would
like to keep
vid Slotemaker de Bruine
> *Enviado el:* miércoles, 10 de febrero de 2021 17:36
> *Para:* users@royale.apache.org
> *Asunto:* Re: Remote Object Call Performance and Fault Event
>
>
>
> Hi Hiedra,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your response. Please do share the paging com
Hi Safrizal,
cool :)
Thanks for your response. I think js:RemoteObject could be an option if
you're starting a project from scratch. For people coming from a full
mx:RemoteObject implementation, wil be more difficult since I think there's
still some issues.
Great you have a solution to sessions,
do not use cookies, use stateless session.
if you still have to use cookies, you should check blazeDS
AppendToGatewayUrl message,
after command message PING / Operation 5, executed.
check message.headers, if name == 'AppendToGatewayUrl' and mustUnderstand ==
true,
save jsession value.
and use
s. (I could share with you a little PaginatorNav control that
>> I implemented. It is not finished and needs work but maybe it will help you
>> continue)
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyway, wait for another colleague to give us their opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hiedr
ontinue)
>
>
>
> Anyway, wait for another colleague to give us their opinion.
>
>
>
> Hiedra.
>
>
>
> *De:* David Slotemaker de Bruine
> *Enviado el:* miércoles, 10 de febrero de 2021 15:59
> *Para:* users@royale.apache.org
> *Asunto:* Re: Remote Object Call Per
otemaker de Bruine
> *Enviado el:* miércoles, 10 de febrero de 2021 15:27
> *Para:* users@royale.apache.org
> *Asunto:* Re: Remote Object Call Performance and Fault Event
>
>
>
> Hey Guys,
>
>
>
> Thank you both! That compile string works a treat, I can now send an
Hi David,
How many records do you have?
Hiedra
De: David Slotemaker de Bruine
Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de febrero de 2021 15:27
Para: users@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Remote Object Call Performance and Fault Event
Hey Guys,
Thank you both! That compile string works a treat, I can now send
David,
Great to hear that! Thanks for using Moonshine :)
śr., 10 lut 2021 o 15:27 David Slotemaker de Bruine <
dslotema...@vicensvives.com> napisał(a):
> Hey Guys,
>
> Thank you both! That compile string works a treat, I can now send and
> receive using the mx:Remote object instead of js:Remote
Hey Guys,
Thank you both! That compile string works a treat, I can now send and
receive using the mx:Remote object instead of js:Remote Object.
@Carlos I am still getting
"Detected duplicate HTTP-based FlexSessions, generally due to the remote
host disabling session cookies. Session cookies
I bit of an explanation why in Maven build we are using:
-compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyale-${royale.framework.version}-js.swc:defaults.css
Instead:
-compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyaleJS.swc:defaults.css
Each Maven swc which has been generated are having following
David,
I think this should be your compiler options:
-theme=${royalelib}/themes/JewelTheme/src/main/resources/defaults.css
-html-template=src/resources/jewel-index-template.html
-js-library-path+=${royalelib}/js/libs/MXRoyaleJS.swc
-compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyaleJS.swc:defaults.css
Sorry I missed your email I see your options. Give me a second I will
provide you correct stuff
śr., 10 lut 2021 o 13:43 Piotr Zarzycki
napisał(a):
> David,
>
> Show me screenshot with your compiler options. Carlos provided you correct
> stuff now you just need to place in a proper way.
>
>
David,
Show me screenshot with your compiler options. Carlos provided you correct
stuff now you just need to place in a proper way.
śr., 10 lut 2021 o 13:35 David Slotemaker de Bruine <
dslotema...@vicensvives.com> napisał(a):
> : command line Error: configuration variable
>
: command line Error: configuration variable
'compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files' value contains unknown token
'royale.framework.version'.
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 13:34, David Slotemaker de Bruine <
dslotema...@vicensvives.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> @Carlos I am using Moonshine to compile, I
Hi guys,
@Carlos I am using Moonshine to compile, I guess it uses maven under the
hood??
This is the string I am using:
-theme=${royalelib}/themes/JewelTheme/src/main/resources/defaults.css
-js-library-path=${royalelib}/js/libs/MXRoyaleJS.swc
Hi David,
so you have the old ApplicationResponsiveView and must be changed to
ResponsiveView right? That's the reason I was telling to start a project
from scratch, so having a j:Application file alone from the hello world
(for example) will start with a successful compilation. Then adding the
Hi Carlos,
Piotr helped me out fixing the template for a new project. For others finding
this post you have to change a tag in the MXML:
[1] https://github.com/prominic/Moonshine-IDE/issues/778
I still have issues with mx.rpc imports. I am only using the JS version of the
SDK nightly build
In order to download Nightly build of Royale trough Moonshine you should go
to menu Help -> Getting Started -> Download Third Party Software
In launched application choose from Drop down list 0.9.8 in Royale section
- click Download. - Once it's done you can choose for your project
downloaded
Please upload to some dropbox, onedrive or something like that and send me
to my email - do you see my email here ?
śr., 10 lut 2021 o 09:25 David Slotemaker de Bruine <
dslotema...@vicensvives.com> napisał(a):
> Hi Piotr,
>
> How can I send the project to you, I can't attached files to the
Hi Piotr,
How can I send the project to you, I can't attached files to the post? If I
change the SDK back to 9.7 -JS Moonshine no longer shows the:
The IDE highlights "J:initialView" with a red underline stating: "Cannot
parse a value of type org.apache.royal.core.IApplicationView"
error, nor
Carlos,
Above errors are nothing to do with Moonshine at all.
David,
Can you zip your project and send me off the list - I will look what is
your problems and guide you to resolve it. - If it's possible of course.
Thanks,
Piotr
wt., 9 lut 2021 o 17:25 Carlos Rovira napisał(a):
> Hi David,
>
Hi David,
sorry but I'm not an expert in Moonshine, to set up a project hope Piotr
could give you a hand. Since you're doing from scratch it should be fairly
straight forward.
El mar, 9 feb 2021 a las 16:07, David Slotemaker de Bruine (<
dslotema...@vicensvives.com>) escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
>
Hi Carlos,
I have installed the nightly of Moonshine (3.1.0) and it is point to the
nightly of Royal (9.8 - swf-js).
I created a new ApacheRoyal Project with platform set to JS.
I created the frameworks folder in:
C:\IDE\ApacheRoyalNightlyAll
which contains the royal-* folders, package.json
Hi, if I understand correctly, you just need to create a folder 11.7 and
copy the playerglobal.swc you have there. Although it is not that version,
I think Royale just wants to find it there. Even though you really use SWF,
I think that will work, but more over you just want to compile to JS.
You should use in my opinion Nightly build of Royale 0.9.8 - JS version -
Carlos should provide you compiler options which builds his project
In case if you have problems with Moonshine try Nightly build of it. It is
available on Moonshine's website by clicking small arrow near Download
button.
A Nightly build of moonshine or Royal? How do I go about setting that up
automatically like you mentioned before.
Cheers,
David
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 11:16, Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> I don't think you need that version. I think you should use JS version
> with some compiler options for your
I don't think you need that version. I think you should use JS version with
some compiler options for your project. I would leave Carlos clarification.
If you think that you will have problem with Moonshine try Nightly build of
it to see if it's the same.
wt., 9 lut 2021 o 11:00 David Slotemaker
No, I have download the SWF and JS Version as Carlos says I need the
mx:RemoteObject implementation to call BlazeDS Remote objects correctly.
All sorts of weird things are happening now with the IDE, I get build errors
and mark-up warnings on all my projects even if I go back to the standard JS
Just o be clear - you are using JS only version of SDK ? Did you download
it trough Moonshine SDK Installer ?
wt., 9 lut 2021 o 10:32 David Slotemaker de Bruine <
dslotema...@vicensvives.com> napisał(a):
> I am re copying the SDK, just in case a file is missing, because even
> creating a empty
I am re copying the SDK, just in case a file is missing, because even
creating a empty js app is giving me compile errors.
D
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 10:29, Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Carlos,
>
> Could you provide compiler options which you have in your project ? I
> think David is missing something
Carlos,
Could you provide compiler options which you have in your project ? I think
David is missing something in his. I don't follow fully this thread.
Thanks,
Piotr
wt., 9 lut 2021 o 10:11 David Slotemaker de Bruine <
dslotema...@vicensvives.com> napisał(a):
> Yes I have "JS" selected as
Yes I have "JS" selected as Run, I even selected SWF saved, and reselected
JS. No joy. I can clean the project but it doesn't fix the problem.
Do I need the playerglobal.swc? Where can I get the .swc and where do I put
it so I can compile?
David
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 09:57, Piotr Zarzycki
Hi David,
This is weird. Could you check in project Settings - section “Run” that you
have selected Platform - “JS”
Piotr
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 08:57, David Slotemaker de Bruine <
dslotema...@vicensvives.com> wrote:
> Hi Carlos, Thanks,
>
> I have download the SWF and JS verison of .98 and
Hi Carlos, Thanks,
I have download the SWF and JS verison of .98 and changed the paths in
Moonshine.
Moonshine is giving me "Definition cannot be found" source errors for the mx
imports and on building
I am getting:
This SDK does not contains playerglobal.swc in
Hi David,
don't use js:RemoteObject, use mx:RemoteObject from MXRoyale. The emulation
version is far more complete while the first one still requires more work
to be done. mx:RemoteObject can be considered 96% or so completed ;)
About the timing issue, please first use mx version and then we
Hey Guys,
I have managed to get a Remote Object Call working to our current BlazeDS
backend using Jewel UI and js:RemoteObject, Great work getting that done!
Some questions:
I have make the call twice, the first one always returns a Error message with
the fault string "Detected duplicate
38 matches
Mail list logo
