On 2012-03-20 23:09, mayak-cq wrote:
snip
well -- secret be told -- it is being worked on and i am partially
funding the development
i'll let francois give the details.
snip
this is really great news! Thanks a lot for supporting this
development!
Is synchronization of multiple address
On 2012-03-20 23:40, Donny Brooks wrote:
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 04:09 PM CDT, mayak-cq
ma...@australsat.com wrote:
well -- secret be told -- it is being worked on and i am
partially
funding the development
i'll let francois give the details.
this is really great news! Thanks a
Am Tuesday 20 March 2012 22:09:30 schrieb mayak-cq:
snip
well -- secret be told -- it is being worked on and i am partially
funding the development
i'll let francois give the details.
snip
this is really great news! Thanks a lot for supporting this development!
Is
Am Tuesday 20 March 2012 06:47:31 schrieb mayak-cq:
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 19:12 -0400, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 19/03/12 17:19, chymian wrote:
I believe, there a lot of people waiting desperatley for the
implementation of z-push.
so, it would be nice, if we can get some news on
snip
well -- secret be told -- it is being worked on and i am partially
funding the development
i'll let francois give the details.
snip
this is really great news! Thanks a lot for supporting this development!
Is synchronization of multiple address books going to be possible via
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 04:09 PM CDT, mayak-cq ma...@australsat.com wrote:
well -- secret be told -- it is being worked on and i am partially
funding the development
ill let francois give the details.
this is really great news! Thanks a lot for supporting this
On 19/03/12 17:19, chymian wrote:
I believe, there a lot of people waiting desperatley for the implementation of
z-push.
so, it would be nice, if we can get some news on that development for the
1.5.x/2.0 sogo-backend for z-push?
when will be a beta/release available?
AFAIK, no one is
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 19:12 -0400, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 19/03/12 17:19, chymian wrote:
I believe, there a lot of people waiting desperatley for the implementation
of z-push.
so, it would be nice, if we can get some news on that development for the
1.5.x/2.0 sogo-backend for
On Feb 19, 2012, at 21:39 , Lacroix Francois wrote:
How are still interest in a Caldav/Carddav support for Z-Push?
Yup, definitely.
I would be able to do it for 800€.
I would need to take holiday to be fully concentrate on it.
That sounds reasonable to me.
I have only an iPhone to do test
At Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:11:43 +0100,
Corrado Fiore wrote:
1) Just to make sure we're all on the same page, what would be the final
product of your effort? A Z-push backend to be installed onto the latest
stable release of Z-push?
2) Would you release your code with a GPL license?
That's a
Dear All,
I second this proposal of developing a SOGo-version of Z-Push. I'd contribute
with another 400 Euros. Time to start a fundraising for this?
Best,
Corrado Fiore
__
On Feb 7, 2012, at 15:54 , mayak-cq wrote:
i'm willing to finance 400 euros ... just need
On 7-2-2012 8:26, André Schild wrote:
I could also spend time on that project.
Another sources for active sync informations can be found here
- http://wiki.horde.org/ActiveSync
It's based on a 1.x version of z-push but then heavily
refactored/reworked.
-
Am 07.02.2012 09:31, schrieb Jim:
On 7-2-2012 8:26, André Schild wrote:
I could also spend time on that project.
Another sources for active sync informations can be found here
- http://wiki.horde.org/ActiveSync
It's based on a 1.x version of z-push but then heavily
refactored/reworked.
-
At Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:31:58 +0100,
Jim wrote:
On 7-2-2012 8:26, André Schild wrote:
I could also spend time on that project.
Another sources for active sync informations can be found here
- http://wiki.horde.org/ActiveSync
It's based on a 1.x version of z-push but then
At Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:26:23 +0100,
André Schild wrote:
https://github.com/dekkers/s-push/tree/caldav
Have you taken the 1.5.x branch or the upcomming 2.0 branch ?
Perhaps it would be good to directly go to the 2.x code.
This is the 1.5.x branch, but the backend API is (almost) the same,
from
i'm willing to finance 400 euros ... just need an invoice of some sort.
cheers
m
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Am 07.02.2012 02:39, schrieb Jeroen Dekkers:
At Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:16:08 -0500,
Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 18/01/12 01:39, André Schild wrote:
There already exists a sogo backend for Z-Push, a few posts ago is a
link for download.
I will try to make it better available, so we can work on
On 19/01/12 10:37, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 19/01/12 10:35, Bartłomiej Kluska wrote:
maybe the question isn't very intelligent but why not implementing
the SyncML functionality directly into SOGo (without Funambol or even
Z-Push).
Is Funambol server giving anything more than the SyncML
Nella citazione in data mer 25 gen 2012 14:53:24 CET, Ludovic Marcotte
ha scritto:
That API could also be used for other apps that want to consume data
from SOGo in JSON. Everybody loves JSON and it's the solution to all
problems!
Hi Ludovic,
We have some project in nodejs+javascript and
But you still have the big monster Funambol-Server with all its problems
and heavy resource requirements which also must be maintained by the
admins besides SOGo, Samba4, ...
And in my opinion Funambol is to buggy and makes to many problems.
ActiveSync on top of a buggy system doesn't make it
Am 25.01.2012 14:53, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
One other option here, which I just reminded, would be to use the
Funambol JSON Connector (https://json-connector.forge.funambol.org/).
Hm - this one to connect SOGo and Funambol to each other instead of
using the database?
Could be done over a
I would also prefer using a standalone ActiveSync Solution like Z-Push
oder the Tine´s One.
I dont like 50 different daemons for 50 different use cases...and
funambol eats resources...dont like that :-/
On 1/25/12 3:58 PM, Martin Lehmann wrote:
But you still have the big monster
Am 25.01.2012 15:58, schrieb Martin Lehmann:
I have also seen this ActiveSync implementation. Maybe it's better
than Z-Push?
http://www.tine20.org/downloads/2011-05-6/tine20-activesync_2011-05-6.tar.bz2
Had a quick look over the code - it heavyly depends on tine data
structures and classes -
Am 25.01.2012 15:58, schrieb Martin Lehmann:
And in my opinion Funambol is to buggy and makes to many problems.
You're right, but maybe many bugs are from the direct database
connection? FU looks for the events in the database of SOGo, so the
interface between FU and SOGo are the tables.
I
Am 25.01.2012 14:53, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
On 19/01/12 10:37, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 19/01/12 10:35, Bartłomiej Kluska wrote:
maybe the question isn't very intelligent but why not implementing
the SyncML functionality directly into SOGo (without Funambol or
even Z-Push).
Is Funambol
Am 25.01.2012 16:20, schrieb Martin Rabl:
Am 25.01.2012 15:58, schrieb Martin Lehmann:
I have also seen this ActiveSync implementation. Maybe it's better
than Z-Push?
http://www.tine20.org/downloads/2011-05-6/tine20-activesync_2011-05-6.tar.bz2
Had a quick look over the code - it heavyly
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:37 +0100, André Schild wrote:
Am 25.01.2012 16:20, schrieb Martin Rabl:
Am 25.01.2012 15:58, schrieb Martin Lehmann:
I have also seen this ActiveSync implementation. Maybe it's
better
than Z-Push?
Am 25.01.2012 18:07, schrieb mayak-cq:
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:37 +0100, André Schild wrote:
Am 25.01.2012 16:20, schrieb Martin Rabl:
Am 25.01.2012 15:58, schrieb Martin Lehmann:
I have also seen this ActiveSync implementation. Maybe it's better
than Z-Push?
Am 25.01.12 18:07, schrieb mayak-cq:
as far as architecture goes, would a mysql backend scale better than *dav?
No. Using the *dav interface there are some nice features provided by
SOGo - sorted, change flags, calculated recurrences and so on.
When you get the data directly from the database,
On 1/18/2012 12:42 PM, Heiner Markert wrote:
Am Wednesday 18 January 2012 07:39:20 schrieb André Schild:
There already exists a sogo backend for Z-Push, a few posts ago is a
link for download.
I will try to make it better available, so we can work on improving it.
Hello André,
unfortunately I
On 18/01/12 01:39, André Schild wrote:
I don't see why we should drop SyncML support, it's working after all
and a OPEN standard...
The Problem with Activesync stuff is always the potential license
question, what if MS will start claim license violations by Z-Push
(Justified or not does not
On 1/18/2012 1:16 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 18/01/12 01:39, André Schild wrote:
I don't see why we should drop SyncML support, it's working after all
and a OPEN standard...
The Problem with Activesync stuff is always the potential license
question, what if MS will start claim license
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:16:08PM -0500, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
I would still very much like to open a discussion about this - ie.,
Funambol (SyncML) backend vs. Z-Push (ActiveSync) backend.
I'm struggeling with seeing why one would push Funambol/SyncML. It
requires 3. party agent on all
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:14:38PM +0100, André Schild wrote:
the licensing agreement doesn't make me a happy, happy, joy man.
Is z-push that much different of a threat than the Open^H^H^H^Hchange-
replacement you seem to be doing in v2.0 ?
OpenChange has nothing to do with ActiveSync.
Am 18.01.2012 05:45, schrieb Francisco Adote AKUESON.:
Hi sogo users and contributors,
As you know,
1. *The Funambol SOGo Connector allows any SyncML enabled devices
to fully synchronize contacts, events and tasks with SOGo. The
connector is fast and reliable. It features :*
35 matches
Mail list logo
