On 3/14/19 5:50 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> I've been having a lot of problems with emails from comixology getting tagged
> as spam and then the message attachment is often, but not always, corrupt.
>
> Content analysis details: (6.8 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
>
On 14 Mar 2019, at 22:03, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2019, at 17:00, RW wrote:
>>
>> whitelist entries need to be globs that match an email address, not a
>> domain name.
>
> How sophisticated is SA's globbing?
>
> ^(\w+)([\-.'][\w]+)+@domain.tld$
For whitelist entries the match string is a
On 14 Mar 2019, at 17:00, RW wrote:
>
> whitelist entries need to be globs that match an email address, not a
> domain name.
How sophisticated is SA's globbing?
^(\w+)([\-.'][\w]+)+@domain.tld$
?
--
These are the thoughts that kept me out of the really good schools. --
George Carlin
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:50:01 -0600
@lbutlr wrote:
> I've been having a lot of problems with emails from comixology
> getting tagged as spam and then the message attachment is often, but
> not always, corrupt.
...
> I added whitelist_auth comixology.com to local.cf and still had
> issues, so I
That worked, many thanks..
Missing @ makes a difference ;)
-RIckH
-Original Message-
From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 11:44 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: whitelist_from in user_prefs is not being processed.
On Thu, 12 Mar
On 03/12/2015 07:23 PM, Rick Hantz (TirNanOg) wrote:
whitelist_from alfranken.com
bad syntax
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.txt
unwhitelist_from u...@example.com
Used to override a default whitelist_from entry, so for example a
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:23:33 -0700
Rick Hantz \(TirNanOg\) wrote:
However, none of the whitelist seems to get processed. Mail that
should have a high negative number doesn't and ends up in the spam
folder.
whitelist_from 23andme.com
...
whitelist_from *.aarp.com
try:
Am 12.03.2015 um 19:23 schrieb Rick Hantz (TirNanOg):
My mail is hosted on Lunarpages.com on my own domain.
I train SpamAssassin frequently.
However, I get hundreds of spam messages daily (500-700). This is an old
public account that I need to maintain, otherwise I’d delete it.
After a
On March 12, 2015 11:10:13 PM Rick Hantz \(TirNanOg\)
rick...@tirnanog.com wrote:
In my user_prefs file, I have: (see resulting header below)
whitelist_from mailto:*@sailthru.com
read perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
note whitelist_from allows forged senders, if possible use whitelist_auth
In my user_prefs file, I have: (see resulting header below)
whitelist_from mailto:*@sailthru.com
whitelist_from mailto:*@e.washingtonpost.com
Do I also need
whitelist_from mailto:*@*.sailthru.com ?
Appreciate all the help.
-RickH
Return-path: deliv...@mx.sailthru.com
Am 12.03.2015 um 23:06 schrieb Rick Hantz (TirNanOg):
In my user_prefs file, I have: (see resulting header below)
whitelist_from mailto:*@sailthru.com
whitelist_from mailto:*@e.washingtonpost.com
Do I also need
whitelist_from mailto:*@*.sailthru.com ?
Return-path:
nik600 skrev den 2013-10-18 17:24:
Can i do that?
sure:
whitelist_auth postmas...@example.org
whitelist_from allow forges, dont use it, its still candidate to be
removed from spamassassin
On 18.10.13 17:24, nik600 wrote:
is possible to specify a whitelist_from in local.cf limiting it for some
hosts?
yes, use whitelist_from_rcvd for that.
Note that applies to external mail, e.g. mail received from hosts not in
your internal_network.
i want to whitelist my postmas...@foo.tld to
nik600 wrote:
is possible to specify a whitelist_from in local.cf http://local.cf
limiting it for some hosts?
Example:
i want to whitelist my postmas...@foo.tld to avoid backscatter or
bouce_message classifications, but want to limit this whitelist only if
the sender is from my server,
1: spamassassin 21 -D --lint | less
2: perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF
could still be relevant problem if its added remotely and not localy,
but this is why i asked 1: on above, can you post it to pastebin and
give a link here ?
http://pastebin.com/xErBy0ej
2: is just informative
Philippe Ratté skrev den 2013-02-19 16:15:
1: spamassassin 21 -D --lint | less
2: perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF
could still be relevant problem if its added remotely and not
localy,
but this is why i asked 1: on above, can you post it to pastebin and
give a link here ?
Benny,
Feb 19 10:02:25.354 [19195] dbg: spf: cannot get Envelope-From, cannot
use SPF
is this why whitelist_from are the only one that works ?
first get it to work from local.cf, if this is working move the same
rule to sql is the right way to test
if envelope-from is non default,
Philippe Ratté skrev den 2013-02-19 23:49:
I'm using qmail, along with qmail-scanner-st, and I just added a
patch so that qmail adds the envelope-from to the headers
?
It works; this is what the first header now looks like:
Received: from mail-ve0-f193.google.com (209.85.128.193)
by
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Philippe Ratté wrote:
Benny,
Feb 19 10:02:25.354 [19195] dbg: spf: cannot get Envelope-From, cannot
use SPF
is this why whitelist_from are the only one that works ?
first get it to work from local.cf, if this is working move the same
rule to sql is the right way to test
David B Funk skrev den 2013-02-20 01:18:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Philippe Ratté wrote:
Benny,
Feb 19 10:02:25.354 [19195] dbg: spf: cannot get Envelope-From,
cannot
use SPF
is this why whitelist_from are the only one that works ?
first get it to work from local.cf, if this is working move
Philippe Ratté skrev den 2013-02-14 15:24:
The mail came from 65.54.190.123 and it passes SPF
dont use whitelist_from, with that setting anyone can use that email
as
sender to get whitelisted, this is okay if you do spf testing in mta
only, so spamassassin follow it as an ok, but not if you
Philippe Ratté skrev den 2013-02-13 23:05:
dbg: spf: def_spf_whitelist_from: already checked spf and didn't get
pass, skipping whitelist check
why does it not get pass when spf is okay ?
http://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/hotmail.com
| 3485 | %domain.ca | whitelist_from | u...@hotmail.com |
The mail came from 65.54.190.123 and it passes SPF
dont use whitelist_from, with that setting anyone can use that email as
sender to get whitelisted, this is okay if you do spf testing in mta
only, so spamassassin follow it as an ok, but not if you are not testing
spf in mta
What should I
thank you sir, i think this worked.
On 3/17/2010 3:26 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, John Hardin wrote:
header POGO_CUSTOMER Received =~
/\(\...@pinoyonthego\.net\@[\d\.]+\).*by mail\.pinoyonthego\.net/
Watch the line wrap on that...
hi sir,
yes i am using vchkpw to auth users. are you talking about using
whitelist_auth? i have tried using that coz i have spf defined on my
domain, but i am not sure if whitelist_auth is for that.
dig -t TXT pinoyonthego.net
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;pinoyonthego.net. IN TXT
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Ron wrote:
On 3/16/2010 12:51 AM, John Hardin wrote:
Are you authenticating your users in any way? There are ways to
whitelist users who have authenticated against your MTA. Please check
the list archives and the Wiki.
yes i am using vchkpw to auth users. are you
thank you sir,
please see attached file. test header set score to 15 just to be able to
send out, i have setup report_safe to but x-spam-report does not show
up on the header, i can't tell what's causing all the points to increase.
regards
Ron
On 3/16/2010 11:16 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Ron wrote:
please see attached file.
Is mail.pinoyonthego.net your MTA?
If so, try this:
header POGO_CUSTOMER Received =~ /\(\...@pinoyonthego\.net\@[\d\.]+\).*by
mail\.pinoyonthego\.net/
score POGO_CUSTOMER -1
Run in test for a while, if you only get hits on
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, John Hardin wrote:
header POGO_CUSTOMER Received =~ /\(\...@pinoyonthego\.net\@[\d\.]+\).*by
mail\.pinoyonthego\.net/
Watch the line wrap on that...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:43:03 +0800
Ron nha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Newbie here, i have a qmail server, and i installed
qmail-scanner+clav+spamassassin. I'm trying to allow all my users
using whitelist_from but filter spoofed e-mail address using
whitelist_from_rcvd.
Whitelist rules
Hi Sir,
Please see inline. Thank You
On 3/16/2010 12:05 AM, RW wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:43:03 +0800
Ronnha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Newbie here, i have a qmail server, and i installed
qmail-scanner+clav+spamassassin. I'm trying to allow all my users
using whitelist_from but filter
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Ron wrote:
whitelist_from *...@imagetransforms.com
Do not do this.
The From: address is trivially easy to spoof. You should not trust it to
this degree.
whitelist_from should only be used in unusual situations, when you know
exactly why one of the other whitelist
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Ron wrote:
i think the only way to not scan outgoing mails in qmail is to add the
users IP address to /etc/tcp.smtp, unfortunately my users are on dynamic
IP that i cannot add it one by one.
Are you authenticating your users in any way? There are ways to whitelist
users
Le 26/07/2009 04:00, McDonald, Dan a écrit :
From: Robert [mailto:list...@abbacomm.net]
There are no doubt lots of ways, but how about:
egrep 'whitelist_from[^_]' local.cf | awk '{FS=@; print $2
TXT;}' | xargs dig | grep v=spf1
what is this supposed to do?
select all of your
Hi,
I'm looking an email that appears to be one of the users from the
whitelist, but instead was from:
From probesqt...@segunitb1.freeserve.co.uk Mon Jul 27 19:49:19 2009
Why can't a comparison be made between the From: info and the actual
sender? Is this because of virtual domains and/or
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking an email that appears to be one of the users from the
whitelist, but instead was from:
From probesqt...@segunitb1.freeserve.co.uk Mon Jul 27 19:49:19 2009
Why can't a comparison be made between the From: info and the actual
sender? Is this because
On 25.07.09 01:25, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Actually there should be one or two more whitelists, so one can e.g., score
-100 one's friends
-10 one's schools
-1 one's country
we still have def_whitelist_* with score of -15.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;
There are no doubt lots of ways, but how about:
egrep 'whitelist_from[^_]' local.cf | awk '{FS=@; print $2
TXT;}' | xargs dig | grep v=spf1
John.
john,
what is this supposed to do?
- rh
From: Robert [mailto:list...@abbacomm.net]
There are no doubt lots of ways, but how about:
egrep 'whitelist_from[^_]' local.cf | awk '{FS=@; print $2
TXT;}' | xargs dig | grep v=spf1
what is this supposed to do?
select all of your whitelist_from entries, parse out the domain part, dig the
Le 24/07/2009 04:09, MySQL Student a écrit :
I don't doubt that if we removed a substantial amount of them that SA
would do what's right, but there doesn't seem to be any scientific way
to do that successfully.
Can't you just look at the scores that the whitelisted messages are
getting and
Le 24/07/2009 04:09, MySQL Student a écrit :
I don't doubt that if we removed a substantial amount of them that SA
would do what's right, but there doesn't seem to be any scientific way
to do that successfully.
Can't you just look at the scores that the whitelisted messages are
getting
Actually there should be one or two more whitelists, so one can e.g., score
-100 one's friends
-10 one's schools
-1 one's country
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
Actually there should be one or two more whitelists, so one can e.g., score
-100 one's friends
-10 one's schools
-1 one's country
I have long wanted to be able to
whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
I have long wanted to be able to
whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it enough
to write the code.
How does this not work?
header WL_FROM_FOO From =~ /\bf...@bar/i
score WL_FROM_FOO -3.00
John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org writes:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
I have long wanted to be able to
whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it
enough to write the code.
How does this not work?
header WL_FROM_FOO From
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org writes:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
I have long wanted to be able to
whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it
enough to write the code.
How does this
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
I have long wanted to be able to
whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it
enough to write the code.
First of all -- I don't
On Fri, July 24, 2009 20:10, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:
I have long wanted to be able to
whitelist_from f...@bar -3.0
to have per-entry scores. Obviously though I haven't wanted it enough
to write the code.
How does this not work?
header WL_FROM_FOO
Le 22/07/2009 17:48, MySQL Student a écrit :
So, forever I have been using whitelist_from and have probably a
thousand entries.
Firstly, before you convert all these to whitelist_from_rcvd, perhaps
you ought to ask yourself whether you really need 1000 entries on your
whitelist. Does mail
Hi,
Firstly, before you convert all these to whitelist_from_rcvd, perhaps you
ought to ask yourself whether you really need 1000 entries on your
whitelist.
I'm surprised you were the first to make that very comment, so thanks.
Does mail from these addresses actually get miscategorised as
MySQL Student wrote:
Hi all,
Some time ago someone had mentioned to never use whitelist_from but
instead use whitelist_from_rcvd. Where is whitelist_from_rcvd
documented? It doesn't appear in the SA docs in the same place that
whitelist_from is listed.
So, forever I have been using
It is documented on the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man page just like
whitelist_from.
Ugh, thanks.
whitelist_from_rcvd a...@lists.sourceforge.net sourceforge.net
Use this to supplement the whitelist_from addresses with a check against the
Received headers. The first parameter is the
address
It is documented on the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man
page just like whitelist_from.
Ugh, thanks.
whitelist_from_rcvd a...@lists.sourceforge.net
sourceforge.net
Use this to supplement the whitelist_from addresses with
a check against the Received headers. The first
parameter is the
/var/log/maillog output:
May 13 10:53:46 cerberus MailScanner[3309]: Message n4DFrTip004779 from
63.93.193.30 (a...@easymatch.com) to saintjoe.edu http://saintjoe.edu/ is
spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=68.739, required 4, AWL -33.17,
BAYES_50 0.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, HTML_30_40
Well maybe you should figure out what is going on with these two: RE_PASSWORD
100.00, RE_PASSWORDV 100.00
since your choice of -100 (it is not a magic pass value, just another factor
in the arithmetic) for your manual whitelist only counteracts one of them ...
or run your manual whitelist score
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 11:16 -0500, Michael Lyon wrote:
We're using spamassassin 3.1.7 on a slack-10 box, invoked via cron.
I suggest upgrading. That's quite ancient...
I'm having problems getting a domain whitelisted. Previously, adding
domains to be whitelisted simply meant adding a
Please always keep threads on-list by replying to list. I am not the
only one, who can help you.
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 11:57 -0500, Michael Lyon wrote:
But...how do I remove an autowhitelist entry for just one user? I
have a rule that was duplicated and causing me problems (It was to
prevent
On 29.10.08 17:18, Nelson Serafica wrote:
I'm using spamassassin 3.2.5. Now, I must a whitelist_from containing *@
foo.com in my local.cf.
However, there are still 1 email that has been tagged as spam.
Only one? show the headers or upload it somewhere..
In my understanding, if a domain
On Wed, October 29, 2008 10:18, Nelson Serafica wrote:
Is this the right way to whitelist? As I check, when using 3.2.5, this is
the right way of whitelisting a domain.
the more i hear about whitelist_from the more i want to make a bug on it,
whitelist_from should imho newer have being
Nelson Serafica wrote:
I'm using spamassassin 3.2.5. http://3.2.5. Now, I must a
whitelist_from containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://foo.com in my local.cf
http://local.cf.
However, there are still 1 email that has been tagged as spam. In my
understanding, if a domain was in whitelist_from,
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, October 29, 2008 10:18, Nelson Serafica wrote:
Is this the right way to whitelist? As I check, when using 3.2.5, this is
the right way of whitelisting a domain.
the more i hear about whitelist_from the more i want to make a bug on it,
whitelist_from
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:24:25AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
There are some messages you can't whitelist in SA using any other method.
(ie: when the sender's server doesn't have reverse DNS).
You can use trusted_networks + ALL_TRUSTED to whitelist. Given of course
that there aren't any
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:24:25 -0400
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, October 29, 2008 10:18, Nelson Serafica wrote:
Is this the right way to whitelist? As I check, when using 3.2.5, this is
the right way of whitelisting a
Jeff Mincy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Agreed. whitelist_from sucks. However, it's there as a method of
last-resort. There are some messages you can't whitelist in SA using any
other method. (ie: when the sender's server doesn't have reverse DNS).
Since whitelist_from is
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Matt Kettler wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
the more i hear about whitelist_from the more i want to make a bug on it,
whitelist_from should imho newer have being implemented
Agreed. whitelist_from sucks. However, it's there as a method of
last-resort. There are some
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 07:52 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
I'm going to suggest again that, given how much pain it causes noobs,
perhaps the use of whitelist_from should generate a lint _warning_ that it
should only be used if no other whitelist method will work...
The thing with noobs and
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 07:52 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
I'm going to suggest again that, given how much pain it causes noobs,
perhaps the use of whitelist_from should generate a lint _warning_ that it
should only be used if no other whitelist
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:15 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
The thing with noobs and whitelist_from (according to my experience on
this list) appears to be a lack of reading. I got the impression most of
them just blindly whitelist_from their own
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 07:52 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
I'm going to suggest again that, given how much pain it causes noobs,
perhaps the use of whitelist_from should generate a lint _warning_ that it
should only be used if no other whitelist method will work...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Karsten
mathiasadsl wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying hard to make my whitelist_from work.
I want to whitelist my own domain (i know... it can be dangerous but it's
for testing purpose).
This is an example of unormaly tagged email:
unormaly ?
If you're trying to say your example isn't being whitelisted... It
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 10:27 -0700, mathiasadsl wrote:
I'm trying hard to make my whitelist_from work.
I want to whitelist my own domain (i know... it can be dangerous but it's
for testing purpose).
Yes, for production you should use whitelist_from_rcvd instead, if there
is a need for
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 11:12 +0200, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I would like to do some whitelisting for an external mailing list. I
found
whitelist_from and whitelist_auth but they automatically score -100.
Is
there a way to use whitelist_* or something similiar with a custom score?
amavisd-new
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 11:12 +0200, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I would like to do some whitelisting for an external mailing list. I found
whitelist_from and whitelist_auth but they automatically score -100. Is
there a way to use whitelist_* or something similiar with a custom score?
On 02.07.08 11:12, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I would like to do some whitelisting for an external mailing list. I found
whitelist_from and whitelist_auth but they automatically score -100. Is
there a way to use whitelist_* or something similiar with a custom score?
you can use def_whitelist_*
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
Would it be possible to make some changes and having whitelist_from
to NOT consider the From header ???
Sure, but you'll have to rewrite some of the code to do it, or make your
own plugin.
. ie: no, there's no default support for this kind of thing, you'd
Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/19/2007 4:51 PM
You would have to get the calling software to pass as the username
either (i) something like @example.com; or (ii) a non-existent account
at the domain.
Get it to do that and you'll see the results you want. SA will be happy
with it...
Matthew Yette [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/20/2007 8:24 AM
Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/19/2007 4:51 PM
You would have to get the calling software to pass as the username
either (i) something like @example.com; or (ii) a non-existent account
at the domain.
Get it to do that and you'll
Matthew Yette [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/19/2007 2:13 PM
I am using SA 3.2.0 using SQL backend userprefs. There is a sending address
that is whitelisted for an entire domain, as well as specific users on that
domain. However, on the messages that come in from this whitelisted address for
multiple
After further testing, it most definitely has to do with a message hacing
multiple recipients (I've tried changing around my custom SQL query to no
avail). qmail-queue.log log entry w/ debug on:
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:10:20 EDT:16677: g_e_h: return-path is [EMAIL PROTECTED],
recips is [EMAIL
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 at 15:14 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
After further testing, it most definitely has to do with a message hacing
multiple recipients (I've tried changing around my custom SQL query to no
avail). qmail-queue.log log entry w/ debug on:
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:10:20
I don't know that SA has a way for running messages through for each
individual recipient. I don't believe you can specify multiple username
paramenters using spamc and/or spamassassin.
Here we use Postfix and I instruct Postfix to send the message through SA
for each recipient. It works like
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 at 15:44 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
I don't know that SA has a way for running messages through for each
individual recipient. I don't believe you can specify multiple username
paramenters using spamc and/or spamassassin.
Here we use Postfix and I instruct
Matthew Yette wrote:
I don't know that SA has a way for running messages through for each
individual recipient. I don't believe you can specify multiple username
paramenters using spamc and/or spamassassin.
Here we use Postfix and I instruct Postfix to send the message through SA
for each
At 13:43 19-07-2007, Duane Hill wrote:
As I stated before, I can tell Postfix to feed the message through
one recipient at a time and can use:
/usr/local/bin/spamc -u ${recipient}
to tell spamc what user it will run as. Then, the SQL query works
like it should. I have multiple global,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 at 15:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
At 13:43 19-07-2007, Duane Hill wrote:
As I stated before, I can tell Postfix to feed the message through one
recipient at a time and can use:
/usr/local/bin/spamc -u ${recipient}
to tell spamc what user it will run as.
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Tue, April 17, 2007 01:57, Duane Hill wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
to me a bit hardcore to read, but it have all ip that is known forwards mails
to me as trusted_networks even if its still not my servers, and have maked the
complete
On Thu, April 19, 2007 21:20, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Given the number of ISP's that don't have rDNS configured,
i reject them, atleast spf can help them
whitelist_from_rcvd should probably be extended to support
IP/CIDR addresses as well...
why not spf ?
Let's not overload the
On Tue, April 17, 2007 01:57, Duane Hill wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
to me a bit hardcore to read, but it have all ip that is known forwards mails
to me as trusted_networks even if its still not my servers, and have maked the
complete rfc1918 in trusted_networks and
On Tue, April 17, 2007 01:26, Kelson wrote:
That won't do what you think. trusted_networks is for IPs that you
trust to provide honest header information, not IPs that you trust not
to send spam.
correct, all my known forwarders pass spam when user want to have it forwarded
--
This message
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, April 14, 2007 10:31, Wael Shahin wrote:
whitelist_from 172.16.0.0/16
trusted_networks 172.16.0.0/16
whitelist_from is for email not for ip :-)
That won't do what you think. trusted_networks is for IPs that you
trust to provide honest header information,
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Kelson wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sat, April 14, 2007 10:31, Wael Shahin wrote:
whitelist_from 172.16.0.0/16
trusted_networks 172.16.0.0/16
whitelist_from is for email not for ip :-)
That won't do what you think. trusted_networks is for IPs that you trust to
On Sat, April 14, 2007 10:31, Wael Shahin wrote:
whitelist_from 172.16.0.0/16
trusted_networks 172.16.0.0/16
whitelist_from is for email not for ip :-)
--
This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails.
Opps,
looks like i totally messed up
thaks Benny
- Original Message -
From: Benny Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: whitelist_from ip_range
On Sat, April 14, 2007 10:31, Wael Shahin wrote:
whitelist_from
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: whitelist_from and whitelist_from_rcvd not working
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 05:55:24PM +0100, mouss wrote:
Mark Adams wrote:
Hi All,
Spamassassin 3.1.4-1
Currently
brother.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: whitelist_from and whitelist_from_rcvd not working
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 05:55:24PM +0100, mouss wrote:
Mark
Mark Adams wrote:
Hi All,
Spamassassin 3.1.4-1
Currently have entries like the following in the local.cf file
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But mail is still picked up as spam for the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have also tried the following;
Rainer Sokoll wrote:
Hi,
sendmail 8.13.7, Dan Nelson's spamss-milter 0.3.1, SA 3.1.5.
whitelist_from is ignored entirely, no matter if I put it into local.cf
or some other .cf. If I run SA in test mode (-t), SA honors
whitelist_from.
By digging into milter's source, I see this snipplet from
BTW, some versions of spamass-milter have had problems with recent versions
of SA. I don't know if that has been fixed or not, since I don't use it.
It it hasn't been fixed (at least in the version you have) it may be part of
your problem.
Loren
Soomail from myspace has been getting tagged as spam...been trying
to halt that on a domain basis. Here's what I've tried (and seen
online):
.*myspace.com
@myspace.com
*myspace.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone tell me which is the correct format? Thanks!
whitelist_from [EMAIL
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 07:03 -0600, James Lay wrote:
Hey all!
Soomail from myspace has been getting tagged as spam...been trying
to halt that on a domain basis. Here's what I've tried (and seen
online):
.*myspace.com
@myspace.com
*myspace.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone tell
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
