Hi,
> It still is spawning a Perl process per message. You can do away with
> that processing hog, if you use the add_header rule I mentioned before
> and have SA do it instead.
You may be right. I'll have to investigate doing this for this
specific user only. Thanks for the info.
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 14:45 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
> > That sounds overly complicated and like a lot of wasted cycles. Calling
> > a Perl script for each message? What you just described sounds a hell of
> > lot like this light-weight SA configuration:
>
> Yes, I should have mentioned that it
Hi,
> That sounds overly complicated and like a lot of wasted cycles. Calling
> a Perl script for each message? What you just described sounds a hell of
> lot like this light-weight SA configuration:
Yes, I should have mentioned that it is a copy of the mail that users
receive and only visible by
From: "Jason Bertoch"
Sent: Thursday, 2009/October/08 09:01
Shane Webster wrote:
Spamassassin Version 3.2.5
I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given the
subject would state [Potential Spam],
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, LuKreme wrote:
You can do this easily with procmail.
DOGPILE!
:)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 13:47 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
> We do something similar here using a procmail/formail script which
> calls a perl script to match on X-Spam-Status then rewrite the subject
> to include the bayes score prepended to the subject.
*boggle*
That sounds overly complicated and
On 8-Oct-2009, at 09:39, Shane Webster wrote:
I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the
value
of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given
the
subject would state [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 then it
is
[SPAM] if it was greater th
On tor 08 okt 2009 19:26:10 CEST, Shane Webster wrote
I actually would be doing that but the filter does not know how to
handle int(),
try using:
X-Spam-Level
header so
--
xpoint
Hi,
> I actually would be doing that but the filter does not know how to
> handle int(), so I would have to build a filter for all possible number
> combinations, but if I could just get SA to do the basic math for me and
> write a header or subject I can filter off of that.
We do something s
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Shane Webster wrote:
I actually would be doing that but the filter does not know how to
handle int(), so I would have to build a filter for all possible number
combinations,
You could check the asterisks in X-Spam-Level:
if match X-Spam-Level: **
subject -> [ULTRA
On Thursday 08 October 2009 19:26:10 Shane Webster wrote:
> I actually would be doing that but the filter does not know how to
> handle int(), so I would have to build a filter for all possible number
> combinations, but if I could just get SA to do the basic math for me and
> write a header or
I actually would be doing that but the filter does not know how to
handle int(), so I would have to build a filter for all possible number
combinations, but if I could just get SA to do the basic math for me and
write a header or subject I can filter off of that.
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 20:21 +0300
> Spamassassin Version 3.2.5
>
> I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject
> based on the value of the score. A example of this would
> be if a score of 4.0 was given the subject would state
> [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 then it is
> [SPAM] if it was greater then 10.0 it w
I will look into doing this, thank you.
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 19:02 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 12:01 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> > Shane Webster wrote:
> > > I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
> > > of the score. A example of t
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 12:01 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> Shane Webster wrote:
> > I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
> > of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given the
> > subject would state [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 t
To be honest it sounds like you want MailScanner.
Eddie Hallahan
Enterprise Management Consulting
www.emcuk.com
Enterprise Management Consulting is a company registered in England and Wales
with company number 3134544. VAT registration number is 681038440.
Shane Webster wrote:
> Spamassassin
Shane Webster wrote:
Spamassassin Version 3.2.5
I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given the
subject would state [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 then it is
[SPAM] if it was greater then
Spamassassin Version 3.2.5
I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject based on the value
of the score. A example of this would be if a score of 4.0 was given the
subject would state [Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 then it is
[SPAM] if it was greater then 10.0 it would be [SUPER
18 matches
Mail list logo
