Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

Le 10/08/2017 à 16:33, RW a écrit : > On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:12:11 +0200 > Felix Defrance wrote: > > >> In the first lines on log, you could see opendkim results are success. >> >> Aug 9 10:25:42 vmail opendkim[21923]: 0D81A778B1D: DKIM verification >> successful >> Aug 9 10:25:43 vmail

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

On 10.08.17 10:06, techlist06 wrote: Update: Still NOT working, but I'm giving it hell trying to figure out why :) - Matus: re:" autolearn=unavailable apparently due to not accessible bayes database [due to permissions]". I hope you are right. That would make sense to me. See below

Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

Felix Defrance skrev den 2017-08-10 17:09: Ok but in many other cases, spamassassin not failed at this point and validate the signing.. why it fail sometimes, and not all time ? verify when it fails what size the failed mail have, if that its truncated with amavisd, then extend

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

On 08/10/2017 10:06 AM, techlist06 wrote: Update: Still NOT working, but I'm giving it hell trying to figure out why :) First a couple of answers to other's questions: - John, others, not an ISP, high is relative I'm sure but the volume is much higher than I can duplicate and review every

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

>why this? >When you run from amavisd, you only need permission for amavis user, not for >anyone. To be sure that is not the problem. I can tighten it up once working. I understand thisis what one woudl normally use if they had a multi-user enviroment. But it can't hurt the problem for

Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

Le 10/08/2017 à 14:46, Benny Pedersen a écrit : > RW skrev den 2017-08-10 02:06: > >> If amavis only passes part of the email to SA, it isn't going to pass >> DKIM. > > i think there is more underlaying problems there, amavisd have its own > dkim verify and signer, even if spamassassin does not

Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:12:11 +0100, Felix Defrance wrote: In the first lines on log, you could see opendkim results are success. Aug 9 10:25:42 vmail opendkim[21923]: 0D81A778B1D: DKIM verification successful Aug 9 10:25:43 vmail opendmarc[7879]: 0D81A778B1D:

RE: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

Update: Still NOT working, but I'm giving it hell trying to figure out why :) First a couple of answers to other's questions: - John, others, not an ISP, high is relative I'm sure but the volume is much higher than I can duplicate and review every flagged message. Right now running at about

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

FYI, here's the verbose headers for that same one that flowed above: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 23.904 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=23.904 tag=- tag2=5 kill=6.4 tests=[BAYES_999=0.2, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=3.2, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.293,

RE: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

Here's a verbose log of amavis/spamassassin processing another high score that just came through. I don't see a peep about auto-learn. But it was unavailable too. (posting via nabble, apologies if it wraps) Aug 10 11:03:39 mail2 amavis[377]: (00377-01) LMTP :10024

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

Here is a debug log for one that just flowed. I don't see anything about why auto-learn was unavailable. But it shows it's talking to the db anyway I think. Is there a way to set auto_learn_force to yes? The log format makes one thing it's a global setting but all I can find it looks like a

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

If any particular message has a * 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100% * [score: 1.] Is it safe to assume that spam or one close to it has been learned and so it would not be a candidate for auto-learn? Maybe I'm not being patient enough. -- View this

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

OK, so I don't think auto-learn works on spam. What about HAM? I've raised the floor to auto-learn HAM to 1. Before anyone gives me any grief, it's just for testing. I'll rebuild the bayes db from a corpus when I get it working. So SPAM takes the 3-way patch, 3 from the header, 3 from the

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

OK, so I don't think auto-learn works on spam. What about HAM? I've raised the floor to auto-learn HAM to 1. Before anyone gives me any grief, it's just for testing. I'll rebuild the bayes db from a corpus when I get it working. So SPAM takes the 3-way patch, 3 from the header, 3 from the

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

Imho You need 100 ham and 100 spam to auto learning working. Do manual learning 08.08.2017 8:20 PM "Scott Techlist" napisał(a): > Centos7 > Postfix 3.2.2 > Amavisd-new 2.11.0 > Spamassassin 3.4.0 > Site-wide configuration > > This is a new box and I've configured some

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

> Imho You need 100 ham and 100 spam to auto learning working. Do manual learning See earlier post today. I've got it loaded up, right?: [root@tn2 mail]# su amavis -c 'sa-learn --dump magic' 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0349

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

Scouring the differences between this and my old server I see this: Old server: -rw--- 1 amavis amavis 83472 Aug 10 15:51 bayes_journal -rw--- 1 amavis amavis 1986 Aug 10 15:51 bayes.mutex -rw--- 1 amavis amavis 328491008 Aug 10 15:51 bayes_seen -rw--- 1 amavis

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

Trying to check for any locking issues I ran sa-update in debug moed su amavis -c 'sa-learn -D --spam --showdots --mbox /home/mail/onespam' Appears to be creating and dropping lock files. Nothing left over after running.. Aug 10 16:48:39.109 [7524] dbg: bayes: expiry starting Aug 10

Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

Le 09/08/2017 à 18:53, David Jones a écrit : > On 08/09/2017 10:19 AM, Felix Defrance wrote: >> Do you have any idea why the body has been altered sometimes ? I >> don't have any log about amavis alterate body message. >> > > This happens when any server in the path modify some of the headers or

Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:12:11 +0200 Felix Defrance wrote: > In the first lines on log, you could see opendkim results are success. > > Aug 9 10:25:42 vmail opendkim[21923]: 0D81A778B1D: DKIM verification > successful > Aug 9 10:25:43 vmail opendmarc[7879]: 0D81A778B1D: groupeastek.fr > none >

RE: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

>surely, it makes no sense blow up the database with already 100% >classified samples - you even don't do that uncnditional with a >hand-trained database (at least not forever, at the begin it makes sense >to get additional tokens) I think you misunderstood my question. I meant that as I look at

RE: Bayes auto-learn - not happening

>surely, it makes no sense blow up the database with already 100% >classified samples - you even don't do that uncnditional with a >hand-trained database (at least not forever, at the begin it makes sense >to get additional tokens) I think you misunderstood my question. I meant that as I look at

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening, tentative success....

Well, here's a development... About the only difference in my old, functioning box and this new "clean" install was the location of the bayes files. Old box: /var/spool/amavisd/.spamassassin/ New box: /etc/mail/bayes The other details that caught my attention were that on the old box, the

Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening - tentative success

Aug 10, 2017; 10:15pm Scottonline Scott Re: Bayes auto-learn - not happening, tentative success Well, here's a development... About the only difference in my old, functioning box and this new "clean" install was the location of the bayes files. Old box: /var/spool/amavisd/.spamassassin/

Re: SA dbg: dkim: FAILED DKIM .. does not match author domain

RW skrev den 2017-08-10 02:06: If amavis only passes part of the email to SA, it isn't going to pass DKIM. i think there is more underlaying problems there, amavisd have its own dkim verify and signer, even if spamassassin does not see the fullmail, amavisd can verify and sign it still, so