of when going from 3.0.4 to 3.2.5? And how
important is this? Until now there is not a real problem with the
filtering.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
and there was a slight problem with
permissions, but it looks like a successful upgrade. I only changed
/dev/null to a real mailbox, because of the 2010 problem. When something
like this happens again I now can recover those e-mails.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com
/.SpamDir.${dirStr}/cur/
echo
done
date
sa-learn --dump magic
date
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl writes:
I did the upgrade. It took some time and there was a slight problem with
permissions, but it looks like a successful upgrade. I only changed
/dev/null to a real mailbox, because of the 2010 problem. When something
like this happens again I now can
LuKreme krem...@kreme.com writes:
I think he (she?)
He. Cecilia and Cecile are female, but Cecil is male. Think about Cecil
B. DeMill.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
sync
atime
0.000 0 1263044805 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 05529600 0 non-token data: last expire atime
delta
0.000 0 1868 0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software
that the spamd must run with the --allow-tell option for
this to work.
But when I run spamc -L I get a return code 0 back. I am working with:
SpamAssassin Client version 3.2.5
Also is it possible to do not have output? At hte moment I get:
(Message was already un/learned)
--
Cecil Westerhof
Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl writes:
The documentation says:
-L learn type, --learntype=type
Send message to spamd for learning. The learn type can be
either spam, ham or forget. The exitcode for spamc will be set
to 5 if the message was learned, or 6
do not need to work with 'set +e' and 'set -e'
and I can catch the output to decide what has happened.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
errors
if there are.)
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
the size limit is? And I still
need the check, because when the size limit changes (or the wrong one is
used) you will get the error.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
in bytes, as a positive integer greater
than 0. For example, -s 50.
I'd suggest doing a size test and explicitly telling spamc to use the
same size limit.
That is the safest. ;-) Only problem could be maintainability.
The default value of 500 KB is a good one?
--
Cecil Westerhof
folder. In my situation not
very important, but I like to do things in the 'correct' way. When
someone is going to use my script on a server where there is a lot to
learn and regularly, then the current script would be a lot better as
the old script.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
with distro
Perl, and upgrade distro, if Perl gets old.
I will make sure this will be done.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl writes:
In CPAN, you might want to try at least
install Bundle::CPAN
I'll do this. Will properly take some time, because it is quit an old
system.
and if that does not install YAML and LWPm then
install YAML
install LWP
Where already
Most of my problems where solved by installing db-dev abd running
'install Bundle::CPAN'. But some problems remain.
Cecil Westerhof ce...@decebal.nl writes:
Also with the script I use to run sa-update I created a log file. When I
do:
grep 'not installed\|warning' sa-update.log
I get
I use the option -D to get the debug information from the sa commands.
Most is not interesting, so I filter it with:
grep 'not installed\|warning'
Does this get everything, or should I expand the regex?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi writes:
On 2.4.2010 14:02, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
My problem with Net::Ident did not go away.
I might try force install Net::Ident and then prepare to format my HD :(
It looks like it does not pose a problem. Is it an important module, or
can I live without
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi writes:
On 2.4.2010 14:31, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi writes:
On 2.4.2010 14:02, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
My problem with Net::Ident did not go away.
I might try force install Net::Ident and then prepare to format my HD
Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si writes:
On Friday 02 April 2010 15:31:39 Cecil Westerhof wrote:
According to that Apache wikipage
Net::Ident is required by SA.
Net::Ident is NOT required by SA, it is entirely optional
(unless you want to use --auth-ident option to spamd).
And you'd
is happening here?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
;;
esac
echo
grep ${GREP_REGEX} ${LOG_FILE}
Off course I have in my inittab:
spam:2345:respawn:/usr/bin/spamd --allow-tell
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net writes:
On 4/4/2010 12:35 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
When running sa-update with -D I see when there are updates the folowing
lines:
Apr 4 18:26:15.954 [12630] dbg: config: warning: score set for
non-existent rule SHORTCIRCUIT
Apr 4 18:26
.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
with
dynamic-looking rDNS
I am an user, not a spam expert. What does this mean and what could I
tell the sender to have there email not ending in my spam folder?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Op zaterdag 9 jun 2012 14:01 CEST schreef RW:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:52:58 +0200
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
A few of the mails on this group came in my spam folder because of:
2.9 SPOOF_COM2OTH URI: URI contains .com in middle
2.0 SPOOF_COM2COM URI: URI contains .com in middle and end
Op zaterdag 9 jun 2012 14:24 CEST schreef hamann w.:
BTW: the OP is in a quite lucky situation: he knows that the system
uses SA
I installed it myself. ;-}
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Op zaterdag 9 jun 2012 14:15 CEST schreef Benny Pedersen:
Den 2012-06-09 11:55, Cecil Westerhof skrev:
The following tree messages I see a lot in false positives:
1.2 HS_INDEX_PARAM URI: Link contains a common tracker
pattern.
1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 BODY: HTML: images with 2400-2800
Op zaterdag 9 jun 2012 13:23 CEST schreef Michael Scheidell:
On 6/9/12 5:55 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
The following tree messages I see a lot in false positives:
1.2 HS_INDEX_PARAM URI: Link contains a common tracker pattern.
1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 BODY: HTML: images with 2400-2800 bytes
Op zaterdag 9 jun 2012 19:22 CEST schreef Cecil Westerhof:
HS_INDEX_PARAM: tell them not to use web bugs in their marketing
emails
Could you be more specific. If I tell them this they will not know
what to do.
I did not understand the real meaning of web bugs. Now I do. ;-}
--
Cecil
for
non-existent rule RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3
So it looks to me that rules that are not used anymore are deleted,
but there scoring not.
Should the scorings not be deleted also?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
user_prefs.template
When I look into mailspike I see:
# MailSpike is included in SpamAssassin 3.4+
if (version = 3.004000)
But when I look at http://spamassassin.apache.org/ the the latest
version is:
3.3.2
That is also the version I am running.
Is something else missing?
--
Cecil
Op woensdag 26 dec 2012 23:12 CET schreef Kevin A. McGrail:
On 12/26/2012 3:54 PM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
Op woensdag 26 dec 2012 21:22 CET schreef Kevin A. McGrail:
These errors relate to the fact that those rules are encapsulated
with a version check that is likely above your version
Op Wednesday 1 Jan 2014 05:19 CET schreef Michael Seepe:
Happy new Year to you all and may all your wishes come true :-)
To you and the rest:
May you not get what you wish,
but what you need.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com
solved my
problem. What could be the reason of mu problem? And is my change the
correct one?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
On Tuesday 4 Jul 2017 10:33 CEST, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.07.2017 um 10:07 schrieb Cecil Westerhof:
>> When looking in my logs, I saw: spamd[1172]: error creating a DNS
>> resolver socket: Address family for hostname not supported at
>> /usr/share/per spamd[11
When executing:
spamc -L spam http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
On Sunday 28 May 2017 14:50 CEST, Joe Quinn wrote:
> On 5/28/2017 2:11 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> When executing:
>> spamc -L spam >
>> I get an EX_IOERR error. But no description why I get it. Is there
>> a way to find out what triggers the error?
>>
&g
lse
echo Geen mails gevonden
fi
And typeStr is of-course spam in this case.
It is almost solved. Sometimes it even gets into spam, but I am just
curious. And maybe it can help to make SpamAssassin better.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
"Bill Cole" writes:
> On 21 Oct 2018, at 21:14, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> When executing spamc I do not get output and the exit status is 74
>> (EX_IOERR: IO error).
>
> This would be the result of spamc not being able to communicate with
> spamd.
>
&g
] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 1
Update finished, no fresh updates were available
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Bowie Bailey writes:
> On 10/22/2018 11:08 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>
>> I should have looked into the logs. :'-(
>>
>> When I run it again I see in the logging:
>> Oct 22 16:47:15 munus.decebal.nl spamd[17102]: spamd: connection from
>> localhost [
stituted --allow-tell for $OPTIONS and restarted the service. Now
>> it works again. But why the service file has been changed …
>
> That would be an issue for whoever packages SA for your system. There is
> no systemd service file distributed in the SA release.
It is a Deb
ce file is overwritten.
I do not see a reason to override it. But I am going to ask why it is
there three times.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
DBL
blocklist
[URIs: techwrestle.com]
Should not one of those two be removed, because it is now penalised
two times.
It was spam, so that is not the problem, it only looks wrong to me.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn
Reindl Harald writes:
> Am 28.03.20 um 08:09 schrieb Cecil Westerhof:
>> When looking at email that was marked as spam, I saw the following:
>> 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
>> blocklist
>>
nd whitewashing, black eye, black Friday, black market, …?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
nder terms.
To be honest, I think the gender terms have a better case to be
changed as blacklist and whitelist.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
. This can be changed
without dire consequences.
Black Lives Matter.
White Lives Don't Matter.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8460059/Cambridge-University-backs-academic-tweeted-White-Lives-Dont-Matter.html
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
sue want to avoid adding more noise to a list
> that's about SpamAssassin. Maybe a lot of people recognized this
> wasn't a "motion" or a request for comment at all, but rather notice
> of a change to code. Or, as you yourself mention, maybe a lot of
> people are just politely igno
on
>> something to mark it as YOURS. Isn't that rather selfish?
>> {^_^}
>
> The intent is to be fully backwards-compatible, so it's (hopefully)
> *not* going to be that bad.
The word hopefully makes me feel very secure.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
.
Yes, reasonable descriptive. While the original is very clear. So in
my opinion a very stupid move.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Mark London writes:
> Spamassassin is not alone.
And that is how dictatorships and injustices are created: blindly
following, because a lot of others do.
Hitler, Mussolini and Franco where the worst.
Luckily we also had the saviours, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Sen
e
of is just looking into the mirror did not appear.
What I find strange, because in my -of-course biased opinion- where a
lot less shocking as published versions on both sides of the spectrum.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
f blatant inaccuracies are spit out I sometimes
respond.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
"Kevin A. McGrail" writes:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 5:28 PM Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> Why did my replies disappear then? I am not banned, because then the
> one you responded on would not have appeared either.
>
> Not enough information for me to know but I c
"Kevin A. McGrail" writes:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 5:28 PM Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> Why did my replies disappear then? I am not banned, because then the
> one you responded on would not have appeared either.
>
> Not enough information for me to know but I c
Bill Cole writes:
> On 2023-11-01 at 07:50:38 UTC-0400 (Wed, 01 Nov 2023 12:50:38 +0100)
> Cecil Westerhof
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> Since some time I see that when I want to update the spamassassin
>> filters I get error 74 for every email that I use to train th
Since some time I see that when I want to update the spamassassin
filters I get error 74 for every email that I use to train the
filters. What could be happening here?
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
t; gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
>> '/etc/spamassassin/sa-update-keys'
>> The directory itself has drwx--, what seems OK to me.
>> Or is it about /etc/spamassassin? This has drwxr-xr-x.
>
> OWNERSHIP is *not* permissions
I was a bit confused when sea
ing other way?
I really do not know for sure. I thought default packages, but it is
to long ago.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Sidney Markowitz writes:
> Cecil Westerhof wrote on 2/11/23 4:02 am:
>> And when I run that from the command line I get:
>> gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
>> '/etc/spamassassin/sa-update-keys'
>
> That is referring to the owner of the directory
A
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>
>>>> What platform are you running on? (OS, distro, perl version, etc.)
>>>
>>>Debian 12.
>>>sa-update version 4.0.0 / svn1900642
>>> running on Perl version 5.36.0
>>
&g
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/spamc.html says:
-L learn type
Send message to spamd for learning. The learn type can be
either spam, ham or forget. The exitcode for spamc will be set
to 5 if the message was learned, or 6 if it was already
"George A. Theall via users" writes:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:28:38AM +0100, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/spamc.html says:
>>-L learn type
>>Send message to spamd for learning. The learn type can be
>&
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:28:38AM +0100, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>>>https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/spamc.html says:
>>>>-L learn type
>>>>Send message to spamd for learning. The l
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> The update is done by sa-update. I use only a script around it, but
> the script calls sa-update.
>
> From now on this script is not run as root anymore, but as
> debian-spamd.
>
> I also tried to do this with the service, but that gave a l
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>>> Debian 12 contains SpamAssassion 4.0.0-6.
>
>>Cecil Westerhof writes:
>>> Strange. When running 'apt update' I get:
>>> All packages are up to date.
>
> On 05.11.23 13:54, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>It is i
giova...@paclan.it writes:
> On 11/7/23 18:38, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:28:38AM +0100, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>>>>>> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/spamc.html sa
h a few about
2020.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
72 matches
Mail list logo
