Hey there,
We have a couple of user accounts (really, role aliases) that need a
different required_score from our global defaults. Since they're role
accounts, they don't have a homedir. We're using a milter that passes the
whole username (including domain name) along, anyway.
Is there a
Hey all,
The Day Job (and some of you may know what job that is) does enough PGP
related stuff that we've had encrypted messages get dropped on occasion,
and we'd like to whitelist this stuff.
It looks like Mail::Spamassassin::Plugin::OpenPGP is way way old and has
requirements that aren't
All,
Most of my users aren't command-line friendly. I'd like to basically have
my IMAP server default to handing out two imap mailboxes that get
auto-crontabbed to training bayes.
Ideally, I'd also like to make it so that things dropped in the learn_spam
folder are deleted, and stuff in
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013, Mark Martinec wrote:
On Sunday March 24 2013 05:57:49 Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
sa-update also uses a mirror file which lists all of the URLs where the
update can be downloaded from, optionally including weights for different
mirrors.
But there's no documentation
Hey there.
The SA wiki says:
sa-update also uses a mirror file which lists all of the URLs where the
update can be downloaded from, optionally including weights for different
mirrors.
But there's no documentation or examples given for weighting. Anyone
closer to the code know what this
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 2/22/2013 3:27 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:20:22 -0800
Marc Perkel supp...@junkemailfilter.com wrote:
We need a rule to catch this. It looks like more data than it is but
it's really little more than a single link. Like to
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Axb wrote:
On 03/08/2013 04:46 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there all,
It seems a pretty core function in SA is the ok_languages and ok_locales
function.
I'd like to be able to turn on LOGGING of detected locales before I set
which are ok (or specifically
Hey there all,
It seems a pretty core function in SA is the ok_languages and ok_locales
function.
I'd like to be able to turn on LOGGING of detected locales
before I set which are ok (or specifically, which are less ok)
I'm sure there's a knob for this somewhere, can anyone tell me where?
I was in the process of linting my SA config when I discovered that the
pyzor servers are handing back this response to all commands:
/usr/local/bin/pyzor --homedir /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/.pyzor
ping
public.pyzor.org:24441 (401, 'Unauthorized: User is not authorized to
request the
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
On 02/19/2013 03:47 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Spamcop has an undocumented feature that they allow you (if they trust
you) to quick report spam, where you send to a different mail address,
and it's reported instantly, without having to hit
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 2/18/2013 9:47 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
Spamcop has an undocumented feature that they allow you (if they trust you)
to quick report spam, where you send to a different mail address, and
it's reported instantly, without
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
On 02/19/2013 08:53 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
On 02/19/2013 03:47 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Spamcop has an undocumented feature that they allow you (if they trust
you) to quick
Hey there,
Spamcop has an undocumented feature that they allow you (if they trust
you) to quick report spam, where you send to a different mail address,
and it's reported instantly, without having to hit the web interface.
When you do this, you are still free to report spam in the usual way
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 9/25/2012 5:02 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I mentioned this on the mailing lists a few years ago.
I notice that there still doesn't seem to be a clean way to just make spamd
listen on all (v4 and v6) addresses by default, nor
All,
I mentioned this on the mailing lists a few years ago.
I notice that there still doesn't seem to be a clean way to just make
spamd listen on all (v4 and v6) addresses by default, nor is there a way
to listen on multiple addresses with multiple -A options.
This means that if you want to
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 9/25/2012 5:02 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I mentioned this on the mailing lists a few years ago.
I notice that there still doesn't seem to be a clean way to just make spamd
listen on all (v4 and v6) addresses by default, nor
All,
Has anyone come up with a ruleset yet to score against the new spamhaus
whitelists, and deduct points appropriately?
-Dan
--
Let me tell you something about regrowing your dead wife Lucy, Harry.
It's probably illegal, potentially dangerous, and definitely crazy.
-Harry nods-
Vincent
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Pat Traynor wrote:
I've been running Spamassassin on my linux server for some time, and I
use Pine to read my mail.
Hello, fellow fossil!
Aah, yonder fossils. I've found, by the way, that if you're not using
Alpine, you sure
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:41:53 -0700
Bill Landry b...@inetmsg.com wrote:
You could also test the envelope sender:
header SPAMHAUS_ENV eval:check_rbl_envfrom('SPAMHAUS_ENV',
'_vouch.dwl.spamhaus.org.')
But that's an abuse... you should not be
Hey there,
I just enabled pyzor as part of spamassassin (freebsd 6.4, pyzor built
from ports), and occasionally get this message in my logs:
Jul 9 05:40:59 quark spamd[11607]: spamd: connection from prime.gushi.org
[72.9.101.130] at port 51280
Jul 9 05:40:59 quark spamd[11607]: spamd:
Hey all,
In my spamc config file I have:
-d 72.9.101.140
-l
--connect-retries=10
--retry-sleep=30
However, procmail scripts that I was using to report, via spamc -C
report, were simply returning the message.
When I added -d 72.9.101.140, the message was properly reported.
The manpage
All,
It seems the only way to pass a preference from spamc to spamd is by
having a different user-id.
In my specific case, I'd like to report to spamcop using their quick UID
for some mails, but keep all my preferences otherwise the same (so I still
get the benefits of bayes, dcc, awl,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 18:09 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
It seems the only way to pass a preference from spamc to spamd is by
having a different user-id.
In my specific case, I'd like to report to spamcop using their quick UID
for some
Hey all,
From what I've gathered, there's both a recommended way to call
spamassassin/spamd from procmail with a message-size-limit, as well as an
overrideable builtin-default (-s option to spamc).
These both cause the usual spamassasin headers to be missing from
messages.
The greater
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 02:31 -0400, Dan Mahoney wrote:
The greater problem is, that if for some reason spamassasin doesn't run
(for example, a spamc timeout(*)) it produces exactly the same effect.
Is there a way to have spamassasin/dspamd not
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2010-06-28 11:33, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
Perhaps this is by design, but rt replies are, strictly speaking, not
bounce messages.
Message attached, let me know if it looks normal.
-Dan
from what I see it looks
Hey there,
Perhaps this is by design, but rt replies are, strictly speaking, not
bounce messages.
Message attached, let me know if it looks normal.
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 16:52 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Can spamc do this, or must it be forked to tee or something.
Ideally I'd like to both report and learn in a single step (such as in a
pipe from alpine). I note
I previously asked this question and was told the best answer might be to
wait for 3.3.
Was there ever support ratified for ipv6 including proper -A ipv6 access
lists, and proper ability to listen on both the ipv6 default and the v4
default at the same time, when specifying -i?
I'm not sure
Can spamc do this, or must it be forked to tee or something.
Ideally I'd like to both report and learn in a single step (such as in a
pipe from alpine). I note that spamassassin -r also has the option to
learn (by default!), but spamc doesn't for some reason. Or if it does,
the manpage
Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
Background: Sendmail with spamd running on a different box, spamc called
from global procmail file.
I'm doing some nightly log-combing to look for interesting patterns,
including against other network traffic (like erroneous DNS lookups, I
think I might
Hey there,
Background: Sendmail with spamd running on a different box, spamc called
from global procmail file.
I'm doing some nightly log-combing to look for interesting patterns,
including against other network traffic (like erroneous DNS lookups, I
think I might be on to something).
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Henrik K wrote:
Nothing of this makes sense. If you don't have a test server, too bad. If
you don't trust the score-changing values too bad. It all worked for me.
It's a great idea, but I'd like to see it mature some first, especially
with respect to its documentation,
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Apr 27, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
The problem exists now, there is PNG spam, and there will continue to be,
because it gets through. Right now the only way I find this blocked is if
spamcop blocks it.
Just as a point
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Gary Forrest wrote:
We are receiving the same image spam many times, random text within the
body.
FuzzyOCR. It seems Spammers are trying image spam again, after giving up on
it for a year or so.
Is there a version of FuzzyOCR
Hey all,
While there's a decent amount of spamassassin list traffic to imply
otherwise, is the SA project falling dormant?
the sare-rules claim they won't be updated due to lives, wives, and
hockey.
the fuzzyOCR project claims the only thing that works with 3.2 is the SVN
version, and on
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, SM wrote:
At 18:23 02-12-2008, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Are you using FreeBSD or NetBSD? If so, i understand you. Unfortunately, SA
developers do not care about IPv6 yet. So here SA program at first do
action with 127.0.0.1 than ::1, i guess ;;
This was tested on a BSD
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Also, sorry about the subject headers. I think I've fixed my procmail
recipe.
-Dan
--
I love you forever eternally.
-Connaian Expression
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, SM wrote:
At 23:01 30-11-2008, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
So then, you're saying the behavior for ipv4 and ipv6 is somehow different?
If you start spamd without specifying the IP addresses to listen on, spamd
will listen on the 127.0.0.1 IP address only
Since getting my hosts natively speaking ipv6, I've been seeing a lot of
initial timeouts connecting to spamc, because I believe it's apparently
trying ipv6 first.
spamc: connect to spamd on 2001:470:1f07:a7f::1 failed, retrying (#1 of
3): Connection refused
spamc: connect to spamd on
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, SM wrote:
At 21:45 30-11-2008, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Since getting my hosts natively speaking ipv6, I've been seeing a lot of
initial timeouts connecting to spamc, because I believe it's apparently
trying ipv6 first.
spamc: connect to spamd on 2001:470:1f07
Hello all,
A lot of the spam I'm seeing sneak past spamassassin has a blogger url in
it (this seems to be a new favorite for spammers).
I've got about 200 such spams that have managed to sneak past (no idea how
many of the 2 spams in my confirmed-kills folder also match).
So, that
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:39:29PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Can someone do a spam-versus-ham comparison for included links to
blogger.com (I don't have the corpus handy, nor do I know how to set up a
proper test.)
It's not really
--
Man, this is such a trip
-Dan Mahoney, October 25, 1997
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Matthias Leisi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Woick schrieb:
[Spamcop]
I understand the two step reporting process too, and I too find it
annoying and timeconsuming to ack my (manually reviewed) 50 spams per
day to them, so I ceased to do it.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, ram wrote:
Sorry I meant like spamcop .. I think I must proof-read my own mail
now before Ctrl-Enter :-)
The problem with SpamCop is: the two step reporting process makes things a
bear to do. I understand the logic behind it, but once or twice I've
taken a couple
Hey all,
In looking through my sendmail logs, I've found that some connecting mail
servers actually are correctly configured with a signed, valid cert from
one of the major CA's.
Is there a rule that can match this, on sendmail, based on the connecting
ip on your network edge?
This could
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:16:49PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
dnswl.org is either full of it, or not well maintained.
I've gotten at least 20 spams which I see are listed in dnswl.org as low
trust (which still merits -1.0).
Umm, did you
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Matthias Leisi wrote:
I forwarded over 200 of them earlier today (as an attachment -- total
email size was about one meg).
It would have been from this address.
-Dan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Mahoney, System Admin schrieb:
dnswl.org
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:48:49AM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Henrik Krohns wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:16:49PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
dnswl.org is either full of it, or not well maintained
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Matthias Leisi wrote:
I forwarded over 200 of them earlier today (as an attachment -- total
email size was about one meg).
OK, I now could have a look at them (well, a sample of them, not each of
the 200 individually).
All samples in that set have been forwarded through
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Matthias Leisi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Mahoney, System Admin schrieb:
Livejournal's purely a mail forwarding service (i.e. there's no way to
POP/IMAP that account)
As far as I know, there are mails originating from LJ itself (eg
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Alex Woick wrote:
Matthias Leisi schrieb am 17.10.2007 09:46:
Correct. But by setting (in your local.cf or equivalent)
| trusted_networks 204.9.177.18
you are telling SpamAssassin that this relay is not operated by a
spammer and that it should apply all black-/whitelist
dnswl.org is either full of it, or not well maintained.
I've gotten at least 20 spams which I see are listed in dnswl.org as low
trust (which still merits -1.0).
Could we maybe please add a feature to spamassassin -r (or some other hook
to the generic whitelisting code) which reports this to
In pseudocode...
IF (message is a recognizable bounce || message is from )...
AND (we can guess the domain being sent to (can't trust the to header,
but maybe the X-Envelope-To or some MTA token?)
AND the domain being sent TO supports SPF and/or DKIM...(i.e. implying a
misdirected bounce)
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Bret Miller wrote:
sa-update does NOT feed a local blocklist generated by *my*
particular
corpus of spam emails. Think of it as the RBL equivalent of
sitewide-bayes. Or think of it as a way of SA saying when
I get twelve
spams of score 10+ from ip 208.23.118.172...I
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, David B Funk wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Oct 9, 2007, at 4:22 PM, Chris Edwards wrote:
Your server then enforces encryption and SMTP-AUTH, and the SSL will
(hopefully) defeat any man-in-the-middle attacks by trans-proxies.
That's exactly the problem I
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Steven Kurylo wrote:
Or think of it as a way of SA saying when I get twelve spams of score 10+
from ip 208.23.118.172...I will feed the auto-expiring RBL, which
*SENDMAIL* works off of, thus keeping my *SPAMASSASSIN* load lower. Thus a
spam deluge via a dictionary attack
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Steven Kurylo wrote:
Parsing the SA logs would be easy, but the connecting IP isn't listed
there.
As I mentioned, I'm parsing exim's logs. It contains the spam score and the
IP address.
Oh, that's true enough. I was musing on parsing my own logfiles as
opposed to
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Rob McEwen wrote:
FWIW... that IP, 220.226.197.15, is currently listed on four spam
blacklists (RBLs):
1) uceprotect
2) no-more-funn
3) psbl
4) ivmSIP.com (mine)
On 07.10.07 05:55, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
My
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Rob McEwen wrote:
Therefore, I recommend that you re-think your choices here! Don't let your
quest for guaranteed long-term perfection keep you from making
**substantial** progress today!
Rob,
Then help rally the SA team to include those RBLs that you mentioned in
the
. The latter two are much more safe for outright
blocking... particularly ivmSIP.com, which a FP rate that is almost low as
the FP rate of SpamHaus's lists.
Rob McEwen
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Message at bottom.
I checked on this email. My system is right: it is an spf soft-fail
Message at bottom.
I checked on this email. My system is right: it is an spf soft-fail. At
this point, ninety nine percent of people who set up SPF are going to be
setting ~all and not understanding the difference between ~all and -all.
And this did constitute a fail (i.e. a forgery), but
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Mark Martinec wrote:
Rob,
When the domainkey policy record for the domain in question says the
domain signs some of its email.
Heheh.. Yeah, I guessed that much, but, we *don't* sign email. Not
DK(IM) or anything else.
Yes, this is normal. An absence of a policy record
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:59:31PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Is there some default mechanism loading these things (for example, I
notice loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM is only in v312.pre),
and is it safe to remove the old
Hello all,
I've got some stale v3xx.pre files around, and I notice that they load
plugins that are NOT loaded by v320.pre
Is there some default mechanism loading these things (for example, I
notice loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM is only in v312.pre),
and is it safe to remove
I notice the above page is immutable, for some reason.
I noticed, upon trying to use the instructions at
http://saupdates.openprotect.com/, that there IS no DNS record for 3.2.2
updates there, and I cannot edit the page to reflect this.
Nor is there an easy piece of contact information on
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:49:58PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I've got some stale v3xx.pre files around, and I notice that they load
plugins that are NOT loaded by v320.pre
Of course.
Is there some default mechanism loading
Any idea what could be causing the following?
DNS is against localhost, net::dns is 0.59
I'm seeing a ton of this in my ddebug log:
Jan 5 16:37:14 quark spamd[2031]: dns: timeout for
sorbs-lastexternal,sorbs after 11 seconds
Jan 5 16:37:14 quark spamd[2027]: dns: timeout for rfci_envfrom
Hey all,
The subject line says it all. I've got a lot of users complaining about
bounce spam, and while there's an 0.1 scoring Vbounce ruleset, I notice
that more often than not postmaster scores sometimes a whopping .5, and
at other times -17. Is there any way to simply say dont do this
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey all,
The subject line says it all. I've got a lot of users complaining
about bounce spam, and while there's an 0.1 scoring Vbounce ruleset,
I notice that more often than not postmaster scores sometimes a
whopping .5
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Any idea what could be causing the following?
DNS is against localhost, net::dns is 0.59
I'm seeing a ton of this in my ddebug log:
Jan 5 16:37:14 quark spamd[2031]: dns: timeout for
sorbs-lastexternal,sorbs after 11
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
ie: is the localhost DNS server working properly?
Yes, it is. I'm not seeing any major errors in /var/log/messages, and
I'm seeing some rules match on this. It would be quasi-helpful if the
error logged what lookup
One of my users just started getting slammed. This one user, out of 400+
is getting a dictionary attack that's overwhelming all my spamd process
slots.
Doing this on the spamd side would make simply stopping this really simple
-- even programmatically (i.e. automatically). Manually, even
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Thursday 14 December 2006 01:37, Marc Perkel wrote:
How do you deal with people forwarding email from another domain when
using SPF?
*If* you intend to reject mail based on hard SPF failures, then you *must*
allow for exceptions for forwarded
Hey all,
I'm looking for an easy way to override ALL scanning (NOT scoring) for a
specific user.
This is NOT the same as just setting required_score to 1000 -- basically
what I want instead is some special way that SA will say nope, not even
testing and short circuit.
This shouldn't be a
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:59:26AM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I'm looking for an easy way to override ALL scanning (NOT scoring) for a
specific user.
Don't send mails for that user to SA.
At the moment, that's a hack in the system
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Coffey, Neal wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I'm looking for an easy way to override ALL scanning (NOT scoring)
for a specific user.
This needs to be done in whatever you're using to call SpamAssassin
(postfix, exim, sendmail, etc).
This shouldn't
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:11:11PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
At the moment, that's a hack in the system-wide procmailrc that I don't
know how to do, since the only thing procmail knows about userspace is
dropprivs=yes, and there's
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
As an aside, part of this is why I had asked for (a while back) a way to
specify the domain portion of the -u argument, i.e. so it could be done
per-calling server (i.e. it is assumed that if shell server A and shell
server B, each with a distinct
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, George R. Kasica wrote:
I'm having the same issue with 3.1.7 under FreeBSD 5.4 -- all patches
applied to gocr/giftext.
-Dan
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:20:06 -0500, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey all,
Has anyone managed to successfully create an easy way to have a custom
query look up prefs based on the X-Envelope-To header -- preferably with
domain and username via custom query?
I just need a few pointers here.
-Dan
--
Oh, and we just recently got an invoice...
, alright. btw if *is* load-related,
an strace -f -ttt log will show that pretty clearly.
--j.
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
(copying Justin since this has to do with pre-forking)
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 3/10/2006 11:22 AM, Dan Mahoney
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Mar 30 21:52:14 quark spamd[45835]: __alarm__
Mar 30 21:52:14 quark spamd[45835]: __alarm__
Mar 30 21:52:14 quark spamd[45835
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 3/10/2006 11:22 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I of course have no idea what to make of this output. Pointers?
Each line is one file descriptor. So it doesn't appear that it's using an
insane number of them.
Next time spamd hangs
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
(copying Justin since this has to do with pre-forking)
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 3/10/2006 11:22 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Okay,
I'm still getting these issues. I've
this.
-Dan
On 3/10/2006 11:22 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I of course have no idea what to make of this output. Pointers?
Each line is one file descriptor. So it doesn't appear that it's using an
insane number of them.
Next time spamd hangs up, you might want to do this check
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Okay. SpamAssassin 3.1.1 -- same problems. Uninitialized values, bad
match strings, and the ever popular spamd uses all its children and the
spam keeps flowing.
http://www.gushi.org/maillogAGAIN.txt (warning, 20 megs)
The user
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 10/03/06 12:50 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
As I'm not a C programmer, I don't know what the relation is between a
kqueue and an FD -- but could it be related?
kqueues use FDs, so they are related.
If that original dccifd process
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 3/10/2006 11:22 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I of course have no idea what to make of this output. Pointers?
Each line is one file descriptor. So it doesn't appear that it's using an
insane number of them.
Next time spamd hangs
First, a note: I wrote this last night but forgot to send. Spamd gave me
a lockup YET AGAIN last night, that will be responded to separately.
Anyway, I was pretty happy at the number of things I had cleared out, and
issues I had resolved.
I'm using basically what amounts to a reinstall of
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 09/03/06 02:29 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Thusfar, here's the continuing list:
1) This old friend.
Mar 9 01:38:18 quark spamd[61724]: Use of uninitialized value in pattern
match (m//) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail
Hey all.
Had another hangup last night.
My full log is at http://www.gushi.org/maillog2.txt (but only for the next
24 or so...don't need to leave that out in the open).
Scroll down to about Mar 9 07:13:00 to see what happens.
I'm noting a few things. First, almost all of the locked up
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 09/03/06 03:09 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Off topic, a bit, but is this harmless?
Mar 9 19:18:52 quark spamd[32106]: netset: cannot include 216.89.180.7/32
as it has already been included
Mar 9 19:18:52 quark spamd[32106]: netset
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 09/03/06 07:03 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 09/03/06 03:09 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Off topic, a bit, but is this harmless?
Mar 9 19:18:52 quark spamd[32106]: netset
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 09/03/06 07:35 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 09/03/06 07:03 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 09/03/06 03:09 PM, Dan Mahoney, System
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 09/03/06 03:09 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey all.
Had another hangup last night.
My full log is at http://www.gushi.org/maillog2.txt (but only for the next
24 or so...don't need to leave that out in the open).
Scroll down
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 10/03/06 12:12 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 09/03/06 03:09 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey all.
Had another hangup last night.
My full log is at http://www.gushi.org
Hey all,
I recently tried to turn on SQL on my SA 3.1.0 installation.
Apparently user prefs are okay, but the lines that are supposed to turn on
the other two modules don't want to load.
I copied the config lines almost verbatim from an existing (working) SA
3.1 server, into local.cf:
Mar
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Matt Kettler wrote:
That fixed half of it.
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey all,
I recently tried to turn on SQL on my SA 3.1.0 installation.
Apparently user prefs are okay, but the lines that are supposed to
turn on the other two modules don't want to load.
I
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
