Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

d my > > iRedMail/amavis server. This method has shown to keep my Bayes scores > > very accurate. > > > > Hope someone finds this information helpful. > > > > Dave > > > > > > On 01/20/2017 01:02 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > >> O

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

ion helpful. > > Dave > > > On 01/20/2017 01:02 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: >> On 20-01-17 19:46, David Jones wrote: >>>> From: Kevin Golding >>>> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 11:59 AM >>>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >>>> Subje

Re: Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

ubject: Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17 On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:26:01 -, Bill Keenan wrote: What is the fix needed so /usr/bin/sa-update starts getting updates? I too have not received an update from updates.spamassassin.org <http://updates.spamassassin.org/> since 1-

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

>> I think the "barrier to entry" is too difficult for most.  I would >> have to setup a new MX on a domain without MTA checks (DNS and RBL) I set this up and it was much easier than I had thought.  The wiki documentation was helpful but very confusing at first.  Start with:

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Sat, 21 Jan 2017, Kevin Golding wrote: On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:08:39 -, Jari Fredriksson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Hardin kirjoitti 20.1.2017 22:38: > Collecting spam after RBL filtering is much less helpful to masscheck. > Ideally your

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Sat, 21 Jan 2017, Kevin Golding wrote: On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:35:12 -, David Jones wrote: I think the "barrier to entry" is too difficult for most. I would have to setup a new MX on a domain without MTA checks (DNS and RBL) then create a honeypot email address to

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Golding kirjoitti 21.1.2017 21:22: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:08:39 -, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> John Hardin kirjoitti 20.1.2017 22:38: >> >>> Collecting spam after

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:08:39 -, Jari Fredriksson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Hardin kirjoitti 20.1.2017 22:38: Collecting spam after RBL filtering is much less helpful to masscheck. Ideally your spam corpus is from a totally unfiltered feed.

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Hardin kirjoitti 20.1.2017 22:38: > Collecting spam after RBL filtering is much less helpful to masscheck. > Ideally your spam corpus is from a totally unfiltered feed. > > However, even if it is filtered and small, it helps, *especially* if >

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

>On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:35:12 + >David Jones wrote: >> I think the "barrier to entry" is too difficult for most.  I would >> have to setup a new MX on a domain without MTA checks (DNS and RBL) >I hope it doesn't actually say that anywhere. IMO the corpora should be >dominated by the spam

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:35:12 + David Jones wrote: > I think the "barrier to entry" is too difficult for most. I would > have to setup a new MX on a domain without MTA checks (DNS and RBL) I hope it doesn't actually say that anywhere. IMO the corpora should be dominated by the spam that's

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:35:12 -, David Jones wrote: I think the "barrier to entry" is too difficult for most. I would have to setup a new MX on a domain without MTA checks (DNS and RBL) then create a honeypot email address to attract spam if I didn't have established

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On 01/21/2017 05:35 PM, David Jones wrote: On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 19:02:09 -, Tom Hendrikx wrote: As John has said, diversity makes the rules more accurate for more people. Also many hands make light work. With more people involved there's not such a requirement to

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

>On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 19:02:09 -, Tom Hendrikx wrote: >As John has said, diversity makes the rules more accurate for more people. >Also many hands make light work. With more people involved there's not >such a requirement to contribute thousands of messages per person. I

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 19:02:09 -, Tom Hendrikx wrote: I think I can say the same about my platform, but since this issue keeps popping up I just applied for an account just to find out if my contribution could help. I can't speculate so I'm just gonna try if it helps :)

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Bill Keenan wrote: I am interested/willing to be part of mass check. However, I use spam assassin via amavisd-new. On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, David Jones wrote: I would like to help with the nightly masscheck but I don't have the resources to manually check ham and spam.

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On 20-01-17 19:46, David Jones wrote: >> From: Kevin Golding <k...@caomhin.org> >> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 11:59 AM >> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Subject: Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17 > >> On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:26:01 -, Bill K

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

>From: Kevin Golding <k...@caomhin.org> >Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 11:59 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17   >On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:26:01 -, Bill Keenan  ><developerli...@wjkeenan.org> wrote: >> W

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

Kevin, I am interested/willing to be part of mass check. However, I use spam assassin via amavisd-new. The wiki references http://www.spamtips.org/p/install-procedure.html , which is not my form of installation. BillK > On Jan 20, 2017, at

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:26:01 -, Bill Keenan wrote: What is the fix needed so /usr/bin/sa-update starts getting updates? I too have not received an update from updates.spamassassin.org since 1-Jan-17. Besides

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

What is the fix needed so /usr/bin/sa-update starts getting updates? I too have not received an update from updates.spamassassin.org since 1-Jan-17. Besides updates.spamassassin.org , what other rule sets are commonly used?

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017, at 12:51, Axb wrote: > On 01/17/2017 09:14 PM, Dave Warren wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017, at 20:02, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > >> On 1/15/2017 9:21 PM, Chris wrote: > >>> The last update of rules I've seen is 1/1/17. The attached cron output > >>> seems to show no problems

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On 01/17/2017 09:14 PM, Dave Warren wrote: On Sun, Jan 15, 2017, at 20:02, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 1/15/2017 9:21 PM, Chris wrote: The last update of rules I've seen is 1/1/17. The attached cron output seems to show no problems though. Doesn't seem right no updates for two weeks but I guess

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017, at 20:02, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 1/15/2017 9:21 PM, Chris wrote: > > The last update of rules I've seen is 1/1/17. The attached cron output > > seems to show no problems though. Doesn't seem right no updates for two > > weeks but I guess it's possible. > > It's been

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On Sun, 2017-01-15 at 23:02 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 1/15/2017 9:21 PM, Chris wrote: > > > > The last update of rules I've seen is 1/1/17. The attached cron > > output > > seems to show no problems though. Doesn't seem right no updates for > > two > > weeks but I guess it's possible. >

Re: No rule updates since 1/1/17

On 1/15/2017 9:21 PM, Chris wrote: The last update of rules I've seen is 1/1/17. The attached cron output seems to show no problems though. Doesn't seem right no updates for two weeks but I guess it's possible. It's been noted and I think i have the root issue tracked down. Some of the