Check this out:
http://ilearnzone.com/wicket.html
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> eclipse issue is easily fixed if you search the archives
>
> -igor
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Neil Bartlett
> wrote:
> > Thx Bruno. I've tried it under pure Maven. I recreated the q
eclipse issue is easily fixed if you search the archives
-igor
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Neil Bartlett wrote:
> Thx Bruno. I've tried it under pure Maven. I recreated the quickstart
> but did a mvn jetty:run in the project directory and all works fine.
> Seems to be an issue with my Eclips
We're integrating a third party web-based authentication service that
requires that we redirect from Wicket and then handle a redirect back from
the service.
The API requires passing in the raw HTTPServletRequest and
HTTPServletResponse.
Our page hierarchy looks like this:
BasePage
Aut
Thx Bruno. I've tried it under pure Maven. I recreated the quickstart
but did a mvn jetty:run in the project directory and all works fine.
Seems to be an issue with my Eclipse set-up.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruno Ledesma"
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:40
For the first exception that you posted, i would say that you're missing
HomePage.html. Maybe the filename is a little bit different from the class
name. But in the end you have commented that you already checked this. You
could try a mvn clean install just to make sure the jetty plugin is with
sy
Hi, i have a page that has 2 areas, a formArea anda a viewArea
1) In the formArea, there is a Ajaxtabbedpanel with 2 tabs, each of
them has a form with a search button, they are for diferent seaches.
2) In the viewArea, the results of each search must appear in turn
I was wondering which is the c
I thought I'd give Wicket a whirl on a new project. Till now I've
predominantly used Spring, but I'm doing a small project so I thought
I'd see what wicket could do.
I'm getting an exception on the quickstart maven project.
The exception is
org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupNotFoundException: Marku
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> Those designs aren't what make me like CSS - most of them are
> necessarily-filled with hacks to make them work, especially across
> browsers.
>
Sure. My comment was a joking plea to Johan to reconsider CSS :)
> css is really crap
And
As an aside, I think the art-form takes a great stride forward every time we
arrive at a framework that, by its very use, improves general design and
implementation.
For example, I think the concepts around Spring are a huge step forward.
Most young developers don't understand what *dependencies*
But, the compiler only knows what you're allowed to do by the type of
the variable. You do not need to declare your variables with the
wildcards.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Cristi Manole wrote:
> declaration is not the problem. from what i remember from generics (I might
> be wrong), you're
Those designs aren't what make me like CSS - most of them are
necessarily-filled with hacks to make them work, especially across
browsers.
Again I think it all comes down to familiarity. I still like the
separation of markup for presentation and java for code - which is
what draws me to Wicket an
Admittedly - it may not be standard, easy or necessarily intuitive ... but
CSS ain't all bad is it? :)
http://www.mezzoblue.com/zengarden/alldesigns/
-Luther
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
> css is really crap (until i really can use box-sizing: border-box
> everywhe
declaration is not the problem. from what i remember from generics (I might
be wrong), you're not allowed to instantiate "generically". you have to tell
the compiler exactly what type you want. at runtime it has no idea about
generics.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:41 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> Just
Just because the constructor is declared that way (with the ?) doesn't mean
you have to declare your variables that way.
On Jun 12, 2009 4:43 PM, "Martin Makundi" <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> new DropDownChoice ?
Maybe ...
**
Martin
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Martin
> new DropDownChoice ?
Maybe ...
**
Martin
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Martin
> Makundi wrote:
>> I have casting problem:
>>
>> dropDown = new DropDownChoice(, new
>> ChoiceRenderer(...));
>>
>> dropDown.getChoiceRenderer().getDisplayValue(dropDown.getModelObject());
>> <-- DOES NOT
What you describe i already replied
Thats the hybrid approache if pages can be stateless then wicket can
generate already urls that can generate the page again if expired and
the call the event
On 12/06/2009, Martin Sachs wrote:
> I wonder why this is so a big problem. On bookmarkable Webpages (e
I wonder why this is so a big problem. On bookmarkable Webpages (e.g.
Productpages) the user dont need to login and the session can destroyed
via timeout. Each Ajax-Request throw would throw a PageExpiredException.
This is the worst thing in wicket, IMHO.
My tryout was the following in a quickstar
Yes if you dont want to have page expires you could try to use
bookmarkable pages all the way and use the hybrid coding to get mixed
book/session pages.
Or store something in the db record the last page for every user...
On 12/06/2009, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
> the path is stored in the session,
Or implement a "remember me" feature in the request cycle.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jeremy
Thomerson wrote:
> Just lengthen the session timeout - how to do this depends on your
> servlet container.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www
Just lengthen the session timeout - how to do this depends on your
servlet container.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Christopher L
Merrill wrote:
> Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>>
>> the path is stored in the session, so as long as your app server
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
the path is stored in the session, so as long as your app server
reloads existing sessions on restart, it should (iirc). however, in
your dev environment, the app server probably blows away sessions
hr, i just re-read and realized that you said this is for the
PageEx
You're right i got confused, probably was thinking on something else when i
replied.
=)
Thanks
Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
>
> it wouldn't need to grow - it could be a single column in the users
> table - next to userid.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
>
>
the path is stored in the session, so as long as your app server
reloads existing sessions on restart, it should (iirc). however, in
your dev environment, the app server probably blows away sessions
hr, i just re-read and realized that you said this is for the
PageExpired which is typical
Wow, I hope it's really that easy!?!
Should this work through an appserver restart? E.g. if I
1) login to the app
2) restart the app server
3) click a page link in the browser
Should this work? It didn't for me. Based on my limited understanding of
how wicket works and stepping into the code,
in your login form submit, call continueToOriginalDestination()
onSubmit() {
if (false == continueToOriginalDestination()) {
setReturnPage(SomeOtherPage.class);
}
}
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Christopher L
Merrill wrote:
> I've changed o
I've changed out PageExpiredErrorPage to be the login page for our app.
Does wicket have any support built-in to help return the user to where
they were after re-authenticating?
From my modest understanding of Wicket, it would need to be a bookmarkable
page, which will be ok for a good percentage
Be careful not to confuse sessions with opening new windows. I got bit by this
recently.
For example; an application is a link from a portal. This portal opens a new
window (i.e. target="_blank") that launches your wicket or servlet app. A new
session is created upon first log in. The user t
it wouldn't need to grow - it could be a single column in the users
table - next to userid.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Juan Carlos Garcia
M. wrote:
>
> Also attach some HttpSessionListener to your web application in order to
> remove old
Also attach some HttpSessionListener to your web application in order to
remove old sessions from the database whenever they get destroyed and
prevent that table for growing without control.
Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
>
> Store the session ID in your DB whenever someone signs in. Then if
> some
Store the session ID in your DB whenever someone signs in. Then if
someone signs in, and the session ID is not the same, you can either
block them from signing in, or you can have something in the request
cycle that checks on every request to make sure that this session ID
is still allowed to be s
I need suggestions on implementing single user login , like My system has a
user with a usernamejdavid and my application should not allow two
different sessions for the same username jdavid , can one session peep
into all other session
to see if the any has a usernaem jdavid, I am basically
wicked :) Thanks alot, saved my day!
On Jun 12, 2009, at 17:33 , Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Yes - don't use a simple attribute modifier. Use an
"AttributeModifier" that takes a model. Return the URL in the model.
pseudo code:
container.add(new AttributeModifier("value", true, new
AbstractReadO
dont remember offhand, look in the source.
-igor
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Steve
Swinsburg wrote:
> Thats the one I was after. A question though, what units are the
> measurements displayed in? time/totaltime in milliseconds, session size in
> bytes?
>
> thanks,
> Steve
>
> On 12 Jun 2009,
Thats the one I was after. A question though, what units are the
measurements displayed in? time/totaltime in milliseconds, session
size in bytes?
thanks,
Steve
On 12 Jun 2009, at 16:54, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
getRequestLoggerSettings().setRequestLoggerEnabled(true);
-igor
On Fri, Jun 12,
new DropDownChoice ?
-igor
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Martin
Makundi wrote:
> I have casting problem:
>
> dropDown = new DropDownChoice(, new
> ChoiceRenderer(...));
>
> dropDown.getChoiceRenderer().getDisplayValue(dropDown.getModelObject());
> <-- DOES NOT COMPILE
>
> Is this a wicket
getRequestLoggerSettings().setRequestLoggerEnabled(true);
-igor
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Steve
Swinsburg wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I vaguely remember seeing a component or setting that times how long it
> takes to completely render a page then outputs the result in a Label, can
> someone poi
This vote is closed. We will be releasing 1.4-rc5.
13 yes votes, 3 of which are binding.
1 sort of no vote, non-binding - Bernard didn't really say no, but
raised an objection
I'll work on completing the release later today. Announcements will follow.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettrain
css is really crap (until i really can use box-sizing: border-box everywhere
that will be a great relieve)
who ever thought about that content-box should be shot and not through the
head
but shot at various places so that he will die a very painfull and slow
death.
its completely counter intuitiv
Yes - don't use a simple attribute modifier. Use an
"AttributeModifier" that takes a model. Return the URL in the model.
pseudo code:
container.add(new AttributeModifier("value", true, new
AbstractReadOnlyModel()) {
public CharSequence getObject() {
return getRequestCycle().urlFor(dlink,
Yeah - but the other parts of the app I know that I can proficiently
make - the business logic, tasks, etc... The only part that I don't
have experience in is the desktop GUI - which is why I ask for help on
that specific piece.
And I have received a lot of helpful pointers! Thanks to everyone!
I used to hate HTML / CSS and had designers to do the layout. In the
past couple years, I've had to do all my own layouts from photoshop
images of what it should look like, and have become fairly proficient
with HTML / CSS. To the point where I actually sort of like it. Not
as much as coding the
>
Put some wicket:id on that, then add a WebComponent for it that you add
an AttributeModifier to, which sets the "value" attribute.
> When I try to do the obvious, replace the {{URL_HERE}} part
> with it complains
> about non-valid XML and such.
There are basically two groups
I think I found the answer to this - it has nothing to do with wicket at
all. But, in case anyone wonders:
http://www.techtalkz.com/internet-explorer/56120-ie7-drop-down-menus-crash-browser.html
The users haven't tried the proposed solution yet, but at least it seems
like it's not a wicket pro
I have some time ago. It doesn't get much priority from Spring Source
so don't expect miracles. The main author is mostly tied up on Spring
Webflow.
Unrelated: I forgot to mention that you should absolutely use Glazed
Lists when you're doing a Swing project.
Regards,
Erik.
Jeremy Thomer
Major Péter wrote:
I didn't actually used it, but this could be helpful for you:
http://www.jformdesigner.com/
I have used JFormDesigner extensively, it is an excellent product.
Simle, yet it has all layout features you need. Costs are not high.
Works with open source JFormLayout layout manag
Ok, so that 'almost' wraps this up. HypbridUrlCodingStrategy works perfectly
for the Ajax-added data.
My last problem is related to the form fields. In
AjaxFallbackButton.onSubmit ... I clean out the input that holds the value
I've just added to the database and redisplayed in a list to the user.
I have casting problem:
dropDown = new DropDownChoice(, new
ChoiceRenderer(...));
dropDown.getChoiceRenderer().getDisplayValue(dropDown.getModelObject());
<-- DOES NOT COMPILE
Is this a wicket bug or bug in me?
**
Martin
-
Hello, Everybody
There is very simple code: form with input line and submit button (to get
words for searching):
public void onSubmit() {
PageParameters parameters = new PageParameters();
parameters.put( "searchLine", "words to search" );
se
Hi!
A couple of my users have reported that their IE7 crashes when they
fiddle around with a dropdown in my app. The browser just shuts down
completely when they make a choice in the drowpdownchoice box. It is
ajax enabled.
I have the exact same version of IE7, and I cannot repeat the proble
Here is the URL of the ListView:
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/list/ListView.html
- NM
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Jen Van Orman wrote:
> Igor,
>
> Thank you; this makes sense now, it was a matter of getting straightened
> out
> on
>
> mount the page with hybridurlcodingstrategy and your problems will go away.
>
Flawless Victory!
Thanks everybody,
-Luther
Hi!
Here is a heavier Jamon example, but you can see how it is done:
* http://blog.xebia.com/2008/02/02/monitor-wicket-page-request-using-jamon/
**
Martin
2009/6/12 Steve Swinsburg :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I vaguely remember seeing a component or setting that times how long it
> takes to completely re
I agree. However, finding the right GUI component library can make
things look very nice a lot quicker than you can do it on your own.
You still have to handle events properly (threading issues) and
architect stuff the right way, but having a nice library of "widgets"
is a great start.
On Fri, Ju
Hi all,
I vaguely remember seeing a component or setting that times how long
it takes to completely render a page then outputs the result in a
Label, can someone point me in the right direction?
Or is it as simple as just setting the start time in my BasePage, then
checking again at the
Thanks, I looked at the source and did the following:
public JalViewPanel(String id, DefaultMutableTreeNode treeNode) {
super(id);
activeNode = treeNode;
dlink = new DownloadLink("downloadMsf",
currentJalviewAlignment) {
@O
Yes, this is indeed very funny. People think, that making a good (desktop)
user interface is just about making the right choice of the used
architecture or GUI builder. That's plain wrong. You also can't
automatically make good looking and behaving web applications, just because
you know how html a
GWT is nice until you have too many objects on screen, then
performance drops to horrible.
What I like about doing HTML is that a lot of the layout problems have
been solved. Crude, yes, but solved.
Here is some hundreds of JavaFX examples, http://jfxstudio.wordpress.com
One is mine :-)
/Per
O
Ha this is funny,
I hear things like swing is horrible to design, from users that use
wicket so html apps. I guess those dont design the webapps themselfs,
because if i have to choose i would choose swing or swt over html/css
any day.. I really hate css
For swing apps just have a good ui builder l
58 matches
Mail list logo
